Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 12:06 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:14 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19526
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Cazzesman wrote:
Last week our second half disposal was very good and won us the game. This week our woeful disposal cost us the game. That's the facts of the matter, not whether Ratts was out-coached or not. The Crows flooding didn't prevent us from having ample shots on goal to win the game.Regards Cazzesman


Is it that last week there was less pressure on the midfielders so they had the time and space to hit targets, but this week when pressure was applied through the middle we turned it over? Hopefully with exposure to that sort of pressure the players know that their disposal under pressure needs to improve.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:16 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
Good points from all sides in this thread, been a good read.

I'll just say that the pressure from Adelaide and basketball tactic pretty much force us to make mistakes, that is something beyond Rattens control. We will improve when we mature.

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:21 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Holy shit don't tell me Neil Craig the Einstein of the coaching fraternity out coached a bloke in his first year . How on earth can this happen its is so hard to comprehend


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:24 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
After Cain kicking 7 with the Bullants and being "unstoppable".....we've now got two Full Forwards!.......who knew?........... :-D

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Basketball.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:44 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Mickstar wrote:
Everyone in footy circles know how to beat the Blues.You just use an old basketball tactic.That is,apply a half court press.In other words,you flood the midfield rather than the backline.


Yeah, whatever makes you feel better.
Only one little problem with your theory, facts don't back it up.
We are the sixth highest team for shots on goal, so therefor we don't seem to have too much trouble getting past the so called basket ball tactic that you use to rubbish our coach, so best to find a new one to can Ratts with.

BTW had we kicked 6 goals 3 instead of the other way around against the crow, would you still be stating that Ratts can't coach???


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:49 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 4:08 pm
Posts: 505
Location: Melbourne
Cazzesman wrote:
Ratts mention in his sportal interview about 72 clangers or ineffective disposals. I think it can be safely said that it wouldn't matter who the Coach was on the day. If a team gives up the ball that many times there's not much a coach can do during the game.

Last week our second half disposal was very good and won us the game. This week our woeful disposal cost us the game. That's the facts of the matter, not whether Ratts was out-coached or not. The Crows flooding didn't prevent us from having ample shots on goal to win the game.

If we had won the game this thread wouldn't exist.

Regards Cazzesman


Exactly. It doesn't matter what the game plan is: until we can hit our targets consistently, we're gonna keep losing winnable games.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
This thread is unreal.

We absolutely butchered the pill all day long and got smashed in the clearances for good measure. Yes, this loss had Ratts' paws all over it.

The lads know how to get around the Fev flood - see the 2nd Richmond game. The difference between this loss and that win was the pressure, application and know-how of the opposition, and the fact that our senior players were largely well down.

But anyway...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 3:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
The Hoff wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Ratts mention in his sportal interview about 72 clangers or ineffective disposals. I think it can be safely said that it wouldn't matter who the Coach was on the day. If a team gives up the ball that many times there's not much a coach can do during the game.

Last week our second half disposal was very good and won us the game. This week our woeful disposal cost us the game. That's the facts of the matter, not whether Ratts was out-coached or not. The Crows flooding didn't prevent us from having ample shots on goal to win the game.

If we had won the game this thread wouldn't exist.

Regards Cazzesman


Exactly. It doesn't matter what the game plan is: until we can hit our targets consistently, we're gonna keep losing winnable games.


I would of thought that is the time when a Center Half Forward contesting and causing a spill is crucial. Wouldn't have been good to see Waite, Cloke or Kruezer or Hartlett in the 3rd Qtr. I just want to see a little bit more dynamic coaching. It just appears too predictable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:27 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:42 pm
Posts: 2833
Michael Jezz wrote:
The Hoff wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Ratts mention in his sportal interview about 72 clangers or ineffective disposals. I think it can be safely said that it wouldn't matter who the Coach was on the day. If a team gives up the ball that many times there's not much a coach can do during the game.

Last week our second half disposal was very good and won us the game. This week our woeful disposal cost us the game. That's the facts of the matter, not whether Ratts was out-coached or not. The Crows flooding didn't prevent us from having ample shots on goal to win the game.

If we had won the game this thread wouldn't exist.

Regards Cazzesman


Exactly. It doesn't matter what the game plan is: until we can hit our targets consistently, we're gonna keep losing winnable games.


I would of thought that is the time when a Center Half Forward contesting and causing a spill is crucial. Wouldn't have been good to see Waite, Cloke or Kruezer or Hartlett in the 3rd Qtr. I just want to see a little bit more dynamic coaching. It just appears too predictable


That was the problem, we couldn't get our hands on it in the 3rd and when we did we turned it over in the middle of the ground.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
A lot of people seem to be overstating the role of coaches on game day. Our players struggled against the Crows strategies because their decision making skills are poor. That is the result of years of neglect well before Ratten took the reins.

Our players are learning offensive kick out structures, defensive kickout strategies, centre bounce strategies (offensive and defensive), throw in strategies (offensive and defensive). There may well be 6 or 8 different structures for each.
That stuff takes years to learn, not half a season! You are dealing with an enormous cross section of the community in a football team. Some players will be responsive and knowledgeable. Others will be dumb as dogshit and have zero memory retention skills. Players need to learn where everyone positions them self in each structure for it to be effective. You may be playing midfield in the first quarter and half back in the next. Each player must instinctively know everyone role in every set up or it gets picked apart.
It takes years to become proficient and well drilled.

I also agree with Mickstars thoughts. For years team have been throwing up different strategies to defeat Carlton. Our players were always good when our opponents went head to head with us. As soon as they starting flooding us, setting up presses or giving us something different, we turned to shit. Our players didn't have the capacity to think their way through situations in games and they didn't have the ability to make decisions for themselves. On Saturday they were presented with a 15 man zone and they had little idea how to counter it.
It is a skill that must be developed and it was ignored for 5 years. We had a philosophy of "do what you're told" instead of "do what you think".

Ratts is on the right track and most of his drills are "game sense" based but he's coming from a long way behind.
It will take years to get back to ground zero.
Those expecting an overnight miracle are kidding themselves.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Nevertheless.....we only got done by 8 points by a good well drilled team playing on their own patch.....and....but for bad kicking for goal in the last quarter; we should've won.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:50 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
I would have thought Scotland standing on the mark at the 50 metre line and letting his man play on twice to kick goals would take about a minute to fix.
On Saturday irrespective of what has happened in the past we should have beaten Adelaide. Whether you like it or not the buck stops with the coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
Very true Warby.
Our players have enormous potential. Its just going to take a bit of time before we become world beaters.
I dont understand how people can be disappointed with our improvement this year. :?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
woof wrote:
On Saturday irrespective of what has happened in the past we should have beaten Adelaide. Whether you like it or not the buck stops with the coach.


Nah, the people who make the decisions and have a realistic grasp of the situation would understand better.
Ratts has plenty of credits in the bank.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:54 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
Warby wrote:
Nevertheless.....we only got done by 8 points by a good well drilled team playing on their own patch.....and....but for bad kicking for goal in the last quarter; we should've won.


If only we had, we wouldn't have to listen to Mondays experts. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Headplant.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7409
Headplant wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Headplant wrote:
Mickstar, if getting players young or old to do exactly what you want is that simple, we should have won zero games based upon your premise.

I think YOU are missing the point.
............You are absolutally correct Headplant.I am missing your point,Keep trying buddy coz i havent a clue what you are on about.Slow down,take a deep breath,and go about it one step at a time.



Sorry Mickstar, I'll try not to use such big words next time.

:roll:


Having left school at 14 i aint real educated i will agree H.Been fending for myself eversince..............funny thing though H,even an uneducated oaf like myself doesnt have trouble responding to an easybeat like yourself.A heavyweight you aint pal.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Blue Vain wrote:
woof wrote:
On Saturday irrespective of what has happened in the past we should have beaten Adelaide. Whether you like it or not the buck stops with the coach.


Nah, the people who make the decisions and have a realistic grasp of the situation would understand better.
Ratts has plenty of credits in the bank.


He has 4 games and 1 more year of credit. No finals next year and I don't need to tell you what the people with the realistic grasp of the situation will do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Ratts - most improved?
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2008 1:24 pm
Posts: 20
Hey, I'm a BIG Ratten fan - more than happy to have him at the helm BUT ... I agree with the original poster - I thought we were outcoached on Saturday. Craig is a meticulous planner with a well-drilled team who, more often than not, will win those 50-50 games. No disgrace for Ratts there. Michael's point is a good one - "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Basketball.
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:08 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7409
Steve_C7 wrote:
Mickstar wrote:
Everyone in footy circles know how to beat the Blues.You just use an old basketball tactic.That is,apply a half court press.In other words,you flood the midfield rather than the backline.


Yeah, whatever makes you feel better.
Only one little problem with your theory, facts don't back it up.
We are the sixth highest team for shots on goal, so therefor we don't seem to have too much trouble getting past the so called basket ball tactic that you use to rubbish our coach, so best to find a new one to can Ratts with.

BTW had we kicked 6 goals 3 instead of the other way around against the crow, would you still be stating that Ratts can't coach???


Not rubbishing the coach Steve.Read my past posts and you will see that i rarely rubbish the coach and that goes for Dennis as well.Ratts is a promising young coach no doubt.But he has had a few boo boos along the way.And the tactic i refer to is used against us regularly.Sometimes it works,and sometimes it doesnt.We will always struggle against the Crows,Swans,and now the Hawks because these three sides use the tactics more so than others.Its not about plan A,but plan B,C etc......ya gotta be prepared,and so far i see no evidence of this,hence my frustration.
PS................stating i that i get a kick out of slagging the coach is nothing more than a snide,sarcastic cheap shot which is completelly off the mark.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
woof wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
woof wrote:
On Saturday irrespective of what has happened in the past we should have beaten Adelaide. Whether you like it or not the buck stops with the coach.


Nah, the people who make the decisions and have a realistic grasp of the situation would understand better.
Ratts has plenty of credits in the bank.


He has 4 games and 1 more year of credit. No finals next year and I don't need to tell you what the people with the realistic grasp of the situation will do.


Sounds a bit drastic mate.....we've already doubled our last Season win count.....we all would've been happy with 8 wins plus preseason.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 143 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Laguna, Mannequin, MPH78 and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group