Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 6:15 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 9:21 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Geelong make $600,000 per game they play at Kardina Park. I assume we are not getting that at the Dome.

Whatever Geelong did they did it much better than us and good on them for it. They did have AFL and government assistance but to setup their operations where they can earn that much is excellent and is why Cook is respected and classed as the best in the business.
Agree. We could of had it all. Modern boutique stadium, excellent training facilities/gym for players and the public, a community asset including cafes, bars etc for a variety of user groups and serviced by public transport.(Jewell station,trams and buses + ample parking and possible new train stn). A split of games between all 3 Melb venues would please all and give the AFL more flexibility re scheduling.
Instead we find a typical situation of bruised egos, retribution, minority groups holding too much power and a lack of vision.(AFL,local government and previous administrations)
A couple of mates and i go down to Geelong for 1 game each year and love it. The atmosphere is great and their supporters know how lucky they are to be playing at their home ground and whatsmore they are making a big profit for their club. The whole town is energized.
We should of had the same thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:10 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10612
People are starting to see the light ... unfortunately, it's too late. :evil:
The silence of some is deafening. :roll:


Last edited by SurreyBlue on Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Surrey... why dont you explain what that post actually means... im really interested....

You have a habit of making posts that dont actually mean anything...

For the sake of this exercise can you explain what it meant... Exactly???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:23 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10612
Welcome to the thread Synbad. Anything to add?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:37 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
Revisionists, start your engines.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:42 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10612
Deano Supremo wrote:
Revisionists, start your engines.


Some are "visionaries" and "best for CFC" types while others are just in it "for themselves" and "live for the moment" types. :wink:
Over and out from me because I hate saying "I was right ... again".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:44 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
Of course you were right.

Staying at PP was simply a matter of choosing to do so.

There were absolutely no outside factors to consider.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:54 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
We didn't have the right people leading the club to stay at PP.

BUT, if Swan and Dick were handling it then I am sure we could have set PP up to be profitable like KP.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:12 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:16 pm
Posts: 295
Quote:
Carlton yesterday ruled out Princes Park as an alternate venue, with the Heatley and Harris Stands being ripped down for the club's new elite training facility.




http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/sport/afl/story/0,26576,24115692-19742,00.html

looks as if PP is not going to be on the cards with our revamps happening


I wonder if we acted a bit quick on our facility upgrades


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:43 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
We'll really see how profitable Kardinia Park is when they are near the bottom of the ladder again.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:44 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
Just read that article and it shows that PP is finished and dusted as an AFL playing venue. It does seem that the AFL are bluffing the Dome.

If the AFL is not bluffing then this scenario could be likely:
We could play Fremantle at KP and earn $600,000.

The AFL are better off re-developing Punt Road and turning that into a 25 thousand seat stadium. It is close to train stations and parking.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:54 am 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18673
Location: threeohfivethree
So we rebuild PP as a 25,000 seat stadium.

That's terrific next time the Dockers take on Melbourne but how the @#$%&! does that help us as a home ground?

Do we really want to see a future where 50,000 Carlton members have to fight to get into a ground with 25,000 seats?

Obviously not.

So if we're not going to play there are we simply using it as a real estate investment to lease out to other clubs?

In which case do we really want other clubs screwing up the best training surface in the country?

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:56 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 795
Location: Funky Town
GWS wrote:
So we rebuild PP as a 25,000 seat stadium.

That's terrific next time the Dockers take on Melbourne but how the flower does that help us as a home ground?

Do we really want to see a future where 50,000 Carlton members have to fight to get into a ground with 25,000 seats?

Obviously not.

So if we're not going to play there are we simply using it as a real estate investment to lease out to other clubs?

In which case do we really want other clubs screwing up the best training surface in the country?


+1

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
WOH-ooooh...................

you just....BLEW my mind Gee Dubya.................!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:17 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18673
Location: threeohfivethree
Perhaps we could move back to our REAL home ground at Royal Park and start wearing chamois tipped jumpers too...

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:22 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
GWS wrote:
So we rebuild PP as a 25,000 seat stadium.

That's terrific next time the Dockers take on Melbourne but how the flower does that help us as a home ground?

Do we really want to see a future where 50,000 Carlton members have to fight to get into a ground with 25,000 seats?

Obviously not.

So if we're not going to play there are we simply using it as a real estate investment to lease out to other clubs?

In which case do we really want other clubs screwing up the best training surface in the country?
Thats a little short sighted GWS. We would more than likely be scheduled to play against the interstate clubs there so 50,000 members aren`t all going to attend plus it would give a fortress effect.
What`s so wrong with gaining rent from other clubs? Makes sense to have other revenue sources.
As for the condition of the ground,there is a VFL game played there nearly every week,Melb Storm train on it and opposition clubs use it for pre season training and practice matches.
The more use it gets the better,its a fantastic venue.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:26 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18673
Location: threeohfivethree
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
GWS wrote:
So we rebuild PP as a 25,000 seat stadium.

That's terrific next time the Dockers take on Melbourne but how the flower does that help us as a home ground?

Do we really want to see a future where 50,000 Carlton members have to fight to get into a ground with 25,000 seats?

Obviously not.

So if we're not going to play there are we simply using it as a real estate investment to lease out to other clubs?

In which case do we really want other clubs screwing up the best training surface in the country?
Thats a little short sighted GWS. We would more than likely be scheduled to play against the interstate clubs there so 50,000 members aren`t all going to attend plus it would give a fortress effect.
What`s so wrong with gaining rent from other clubs? Makes sense to have other revenue sources.
As for the condition of the ground,there is a VFL game played there nearly every week,Melb Storm train on it and opposition clubs use it for pre season training and practice matches.
The more use it gets the better,its a fantastic venue.


What's the smallest crowd we've had so far this year?

What's that figure going to be when we're in the top four?










Fair dinkum... :lol:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:00 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
GWS wrote:
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
GWS wrote:
So we rebuild PP as a 25,000 seat stadium.

That's terrific next time the Dockers take on Melbourne but how the flower does that help us as a home ground?

Do we really want to see a future where 50,000 Carlton members have to fight to get into a ground with 25,000 seats?

Obviously not.

So if we're not going to play there are we simply using it as a real estate investment to lease out to other clubs?

In which case do we really want other clubs screwing up the best training surface in the country?
Thats a little short sighted GWS. We would more than likely be scheduled to play against the interstate clubs there so 50,000 members aren`t all going to attend plus it would give a fortress effect.
What`s so wrong with gaining rent from other clubs? Makes sense to have other revenue sources.
As for the condition of the ground,there is a VFL game played there nearly every week,Melb Storm train on it and opposition clubs use it for pre season training and practice matches.
The more use it gets the better,its a fantastic venue.


What's the smallest crowd we've had so far this year?

What's that figure going to be when we're in the top four?










Fair dinkum... :lol:


GWS you must consider that when we play at the G or Dome that there are a lot people who don't add to the gate receipts. These people are medallion club holders, AFL members and MCC members and all the corporates. Just because we get a good crowd doesn't mean they are all Carlton supporters. There are people attending these games that don't give a rats toss bag (Thanks Blightey) about Carlton but just go and watch because they are members of another club outside of the Carlton Football Club.

Would you rather 25,000 Carlton supporters at PP and Carlton receives $600,000

OR

Would you rather 25,000 Carlton supporters + 15,000 MCC, Medallion, Corporates at the G or Dome and receive $100,000.

Look, I think PP is finished as an AFL venue and the above article has quoted Carlton saying as such. This issue is we are not getting a good deal at the Dome and it is great that the AFL are on our side on this one.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:12 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18673
Location: threeohfivethree
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Look, I think PP is finished as an AFL venue and the above article has quoted Carlton saying as such. This issue is we are not getting a good deal at the Dome and it is great that the AFL are on our side on this one.


And that's what it should be about. Debating what we might or might not earn at PP is a total waste of time. We should be looking at being a club that attracts 100,000 to every bloody game we play.

"Boutique" is a nice way of saying you don't have any supporters. I don't want our club to ever be a "boutique" club.

This is the most successful football club in the land and has 10% of AFL supporters identifying with it. A club with that sort of profile should be looking to maximise its exposure at all times. I said in the membership thread that the benefits of playing in front of large crowds on a regular basis was totally underestimated by those trying to keep us at PP a few years back. The reason I'm a Carlton supporter is because I was taken to a packed house at VFL park by my neighbours as a kid and watched Jezza stand on heads. Totally blew my father's sad little Demon event into another universe.

By all means get us a great deal at the G but we're a MAJOR club and we should be looking at being a MAJOR drawcard. You don't do that at a "boutique" stadium.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
Yeahhhh.............

boutique's where you buy dresses..................!

i don't want a dress.................do you want a dress
Gee Dubya...........?







nahhhh.............didn't think so........!


kindest regards tommi















anyone ELSE want a dress.................?

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 78 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 17th Premiership, Google [Bot], GWS and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group