Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 11:42 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
We might have been able to convince a side who had a poor year and already thought they had the number one pick as a father-son to give up their first round pick.

Selwood. :cry:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 8:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
dannyboy wrote:
cj69 wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
keogh wrote:
Well J they do


And that is because some people dont want to face the obvious or are just plain dumb


Watch Geelong now



Name me one passenger in their side


Thats right none


Can you teach an old dog new tricks

nup



Your answer to the question DB

Drop him


There might have been a few slackers in the Geelong team of a few years ago that are still very much on the list - S Johnson, C Mooney.


I agree DUC and what turned those two around was a strong club imposing penalties and restrictions that made them realise do it the teams way or get out. I am not sure we have reached that level of internal discipline just yet.

It is an area I think Ratten has to improve on in year 2. At the moment he is trying to be everybody's friend.


which is why the question 8) I think its important we set out what we want and then develop the ways of achieving that. I do not want to waste the talent we have.


Probably the MOST important item we need to address. How we develop our kids is vital. They need to learn a culture of discipline, no short cuts and team work (one in all in). It is interesting to watch how Murph, Gibbs, Kruezer, Grigg, Browne, Anderson, Walker all get along so well. Gives me confidence for the future. For me this is another reason Stevens should be used of the bench in an attacking role.

There is no point arguing over him being dropped it won't happen. He wont be traded and has 2 years in him max. So, use him the best way we can as a support to the kids and to take pressure off them when required. Using him as a key & vital member of the side has to many negatives.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:10 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
yeah I kind've thought that and then wondered about dropping him to see if we could get more - I know it will never happen, its the discussion I like, not the fantasy I might actually be right 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2008 10:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:24 pm
Posts: 1362
I think that bit has been a real bonus that Stevens is actually out on the park

he could have easily been finished as a footballer

2008 was about returning and gaining confidence


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:11 am 
Offline
*previously banned user*
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 12:01 am
Posts: 41
dadadadada wrote:
I think that bit has been a real bonus that Stevens is actually out on the park

he could have easily been finished as a footballer

2008 was about returning and gaining confidence


...and getting some respect back.

NO MORE TEAMS JUST TURNING UP AND WE HANDING OVER 4 POINTS LIKE WEAK FLOPPY FLOWERS.

Opponents this year will feel the power of generations of BLUES - the past will re-surface and EVERYBODY in the football knows this.

We have teams that are on the slide and they may get over the line this year (like the swans did last week) BUT they know that the Blues have awoken.

AND the blues wont piss their oppurtunity for a flag up againstthe walll like the saints will, like collingowood have done.

We will strike - and the opposition wont know what hit them.

doesnt matter if we win 8 games or make the finals this year.

THE GIANT HAS AWOKEN - WHO WILL STOP US GOING FORWARD NOW?

_________________
Blood must be spilt on the fields of pain and henceforth OUR cup will runneth over


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:45 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
Hellenic Genius wrote:
dadadadada wrote:
I think that bit has been a real bonus that Stevens is actually out on the park

he could have easily been finished as a footballer

2008 was about returning and gaining confidence


...and getting some respect back.

NO MORE TEAMS JUST TURNING UP AND WE HANDING OVER 4 POINTS LIKE WEAK FLOPPY FLOWERS.

Opponents this year will feel the power of generations of BLUES - the past will re-surface and EVERYBODY in the football knows this.

We have teams that are on the slide and they may get over the line this year (like the swans did last week) BUT they know that the Blues have awoken.

AND the blues wont piss their oppurtunity for a flag up againstthe walll like the saints will, like collingowood have done.

We will strike - and the opposition wont know what hit them.

doesnt matter if we win 8 games or make the finals this year.

THE GIANT HAS AWOKEN - WHO WILL STOP US GOING FORWARD NOW?


Sounds good to me. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:23 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:32 am
Posts: 1077
Location: east coast
Well said Hellenic Genius . Other clubs now know that the Carlton of old is on the way back and that puts the fear of #3?*!(@ or whoever into them . It's great to see and be part of . Look forward to 2009 when we go that step further . Flower 'em all .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 7:33 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
We must be better than I thought.

Here we have a player who is top 20 in the AFL for clearances.
Top 30 in the AFL for kicks and total disposals.
Top 30 in the AFL for first possessions and top 10 in the AFL for inside 50s.
He's also top 50 for contested possessions (even though apparently he doesnt work hard :? ) and amazingly so, top 50 for tackles.
Yet we can afford to drop him!

Geelong (who apparently have no passengers have 4 players with more tackles)
Does that mean they'll be dropping 18 players this week?

I think we're letting frustration get in the way of reality here. :wink:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 8:15 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
so BV you're happy with him then?

I accept its all about perception and as we win more perceptions will change - so stevo's as finished a product as an afl footballer can be?

Was that chase just one poor moment amongst a stellar year of hard chases, strong tackles, excellent defensive marks etc.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 10:13 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18035
dannyboy wrote:
so BV you're happy with him then?

I accept its all about perception and as we win more perceptions will change - so stevo's as finished a product as an afl footballer can be?

Was that chase just one poor moment amongst a stellar year of hard chases, strong tackles, excellent defensive marks etc.


I'm reasonably happy Danny.
Sure there are areas of Stevos game I'd like improved but that is the case with every player.
Stevo is a front runner but I dont see that as a negative. Good teams require players who run hard and create an option ahead of the play. These players are as important to your structure as your grunt players. They give you balance and a completeness (is that a word? :lol: )
And credit where its due, the stats tell you he wins the contested ball and works hard to tackle as well.

The more our team improves, the more value Stevo's finishing will become. Some people may not like it but the ability to bust your arse to create an option ahead of the ball is as dificult as running defensively.

I'd drop 10 players before I'd consider dropping Stevens. He offers a skill that very few players on our list are capable of.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 1:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
yeah but those 10 players may not be around in the finals over the next 2/3 years - stevo will be and that's what i was thinking about.

I see this year as finished - so what can be accomplished?

The easy part is giving some kids a go - hence austin in and harts, probably Hammer soon and 1 or 2 others.

But the other thing to focus on is our best players - hwat can we do to develop them? (if we can)

so it wasn't about stevo should be dropped before players x,y,z

rather

stevo is one of the players that will be part of our finals attack next year - can we improve him, will dropping him help?

I admit I am worried about our lack of hard defensive runners, have felt for a while that this is often left up to too few, too often. But it is a perception based on the last few years and often perceptions change slowly compared to reality.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:26 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
It will be another test of Ratten's strength of character that next season he must make Stevens understand that to be of value he has to be at his fittest by Round One. No excuses.

Maybe it is worth him having the last 4 weeks off as his break and start pre season early under a special program with Cordy. Then he wont need to do extra sessions every year to catch up. He must earn his position like everyone else if we are to progress.

For what its worth I would like to see how the kids go without him. It is amazing what can happen when they are given an opportunity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:00 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6431
So the stats say he is a gun midfielder


Then why was he in the back pocket on a midget for the whole of the last quarter when the game was in the balance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 4:03 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 651
keogh wrote:
So the stats say he is a gun midfielder


Then why was he in the back pocket on a midget for the whole of the last quarter when the game was in the balance


Probably needed a rest :wink:

_________________
"You will always miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- Michael Jordan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:42 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 12:47 am
Posts: 2466
Location: Lost In Time
TianaCon wrote:
keogh wrote:
SoL the stats say he is a gun midfielder


Then why was he in the back pocket on a midget for the whole of the last quarter when the game was in the balance


Probably needed a rest :wink:


LOL....that's funny TC, but what's your real answer??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 5:57 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 651
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
TianaCon wrote:
keogh wrote:
SoL the stats say he is a gun midfielder


Then why was he in the back pocket on a midget for the whole of the last quarter when the game was in the balance


Probably needed a rest :wink:


LOL....that's funny TC, but what's your real answer??


My real answer HB is I'm not sure. Maybe he was stuffed & needed a rest, maybe thats the job he was given, maybe he was lost & had no idea where he was. Not sure HB. :) :wink:

_________________
"You will always miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- Michael Jordan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:01 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
I hardly think Stevens himself actually wanted to be in the back-pocket. People make it sound like it was his decision to play there. He obviously went with his man in Luke Ablett. Perhaps it was just poor coaching by Ratten to leave him there or at least (seemingly) not attempt to move him away?

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:19 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6431
TianaCon wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
TianaCon wrote:
keogh wrote:
SoL the stats say he is a gun midfielder


Then why was he in the back pocket on a midget for the whole of the last quarter when the game was in the balance


Probably needed a rest :wink:


LOL....that's funny TC, but what's your real answer??


My real answer HB is I'm not sure. Maybe he was stuffed & needed a rest, maybe thats the job he was given, maybe he was lost & had no idea where he was. Not sure HB. :) :wink:





Your hard one to figure out Con


Bit like JFK was only killed by Oswald :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:26 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 11:47 am
Posts: 651
keogh wrote:
TianaCon wrote:
HELLAS BLUE wrote:
TianaCon wrote:
keogh wrote:
SoL the stats say he is a gun midfielder


Then why was he in the back pocket on a midget for the whole of the last quarter when the game was in the balance


Probably needed a rest :wink:


LOL....that's funny TC, but what's your real answer??


My real answer HB is I'm not sure. Maybe he was stuffed & needed a rest, maybe thats the job he was given, maybe he was lost & had no idea where he was. Not sure HB. :) :wink:





Your hard one to figure out Con


Bit like JFK was only killed by Oswald :-D


:lol: :lol: :wink: That's not bad.

Seriously tho Keogh. I was rather hoping you could tell us what Stevo was doing there in that last qtr & the significance of it, seeing as you brought it up, IYO.

_________________
"You will always miss 100% of the shots you don't take"- Michael Jordan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 23, 2008 6:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6431
Well He hardly touched the ball the first 3 quarters and once again had succumbed to a hard tag.

Perhaps Ratten thought of the freo game where Stevens outpointed a midget who recently retired that being Bell.

Moore would looked Bell in the eye


You see Stevens is hopeless overhead. At least agree with that one Con :-D So he has to play on guys 6cm shorter.

I would have thought that Rattens idea was to play Stevens down back to deliver the ball with purpose and run as well

The ball hardly got to him in the end


We really need a defensive player like Gilbee with good kicking skills

Trouble is Stevens has liitle in this area(defensive skills)


Hope this satisfies your need Con


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 166 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CarltonComeback, diesel_85, Mickstar, mkarp1 and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group