dannyboy wrote
Quote:
no, its about thinking how good can stevo be, I think he could be an A grader
at the moment though he still isn't doing the things he needs to do consistently. I actually couldn't give a toss how many kicks he gets. In these games today its easy to get kicks. What today's game demands though is absolute commitment at each contest, whether it be chasing, tackling, marking, spoiling etc.
I don't care if a player gets beaten unless he gets beaten because he is not fully committed. I am also not interested in having a good side. I want to win a flag (or more) and to do that each player must be prepared to do the 1%. I do not think it will work if you have about 12 who do and then some who do not have to.
So again, not because I am angry with him, but because I want Stevo to take the next step, I would consider dropping him if I thought that kick up the backside might be just what he needed to work out the areas of his game that have grown slack.
Its not about hacks or scapegoats or who is better, it is about what each player needs. I wonder, does Stevo need to be dropped to understand he cannot accept (of himself) those efforts.
Quote:
- now I hope the staff are constantly in his ear telling him to push harder in these areas, so if he doesn't what as a club should we do?
a) accept he will never improve and not worry about it
or
b) demand that improvement.
if b) and I hope this is so
then would dropping help him achieve this?
If yes - then regardless of 'credits' drop him this year, now, and build for next year. If stevo could take the step up in those areas consistently flower we'd have an awesome midfield.
as it is now though, if a side can, they will drag him back and then go through his man.
Against the better sides, his man will hurt us.
I'm not sure if you know this DB, but I'm a Stevo fan; keogh knows it.
Nevetheless, I don't have a problem with your argument; it makes sense to me. I do not find anything radical or ridiculous in your suggestion. It should do him more good than bad given he has another 2 years after 2008.
There's nothing like pressure coming from the twos, and what better way to prove there's pressure on players than be replaced from someone playing in the twos the week before.
It's time to send the message of development (not tanking) and remind the senior listed players that there's kids after their spots who will take them regardless of the security a contract brings in terms of income.
Stevo was very ordinary this week, and last week too; he wasn't alone. I think Carrazzo would have been bettr in the middle than Stevo at getting the ball, and Browne and Armfield would have been better than Carrazzo in defense.