Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 5:56 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:39 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Molly wrote:
Synbad said:
Quote:
You want me to get stuck into thngs all the time?????


well yeah I do. Because you see, I look at your footer and I see that it says everything is going well at Carlton, and I read your posts after a win, and it seems like you believe everything is going well at Carlton, and then we lose and Getafix Synbad comes out and it is like the sky is about to fall in on our heads.

See... I don't reckon your development argument necessarily holds up when we win. And given we've won approximately 50% of games this year, then your theory works one week in every two. So what does that mean on the weeks when the theory doesn't hold? Probably that Ratts coached well and that the side is developing.

So next time we get a win... what I want is a post pointing out exactly where our development looked hindered and laboured during the course of that win. I'll read it with interest.


You dont learn anything from "next tine we win".. you actually learn more when we lose....!!!

Yes?
No?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:48 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
Synbad said:
Quote:
You dont learn anything from "next tine we win".. you actually learn more when we lose....!!!

Yes?
No?


Stuffed if I know Synners, but I certainly have learned a few things from you about the team when we win or lose though.

When we win I learn that we will make the finals and that all is going well.

When we lose I learn that the sky is falling in and that Judd and Fev are all we have.

Stirring insights. Flaky stuff. At least Melvey is 100% consistent that we are screwed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:48 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Synbad wrote:
Molly wrote:
Synbad said:
Quote:
You want me to get stuck into thngs all the time?????


well yeah I do. Because you see, I look at your footer and I see that it says everything is going well at Carlton, and I read your posts after a win, and it seems like you believe everything is going well at Carlton, and then we lose and Getafix Synbad comes out and it is like the sky is about to fall in on our heads.

See... I don't reckon your development argument necessarily holds up when we win. And given we've won approximately 50% of games this year, then your theory works one week in every two. So what does that mean on the weeks when the theory doesn't hold? Probably that Ratts coached well and that the side is developing.

So next time we get a win... what I want is a post pointing out exactly where our development looked hindered and laboured during the course of that win. I'll read it with interest.


Off he park things couldnt be going any better.....


Except that Ralph Carr is still on the board


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:49 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
Don't forget Simon Wilson Rhys! Please don't forget Simon Wilson :-D :-D :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Molly wrote:
Synbad said:
Quote:
You dont learn anything from "next tine we win".. you actually learn more when we lose....!!!

Yes?
No?


Stuffed if I know Synners, but I certainly have learned a few things from you about the team when we win or lose though.

When we win I learn that we will make the finals and that all is going well.

When we lose I learn that the sky is falling in and that Judd and Fev are all we have.

Stirring insights. Flaky stuff. At least Melvey is 100% consistent that we are screwed.



if u dont learn u will get burnt if you put your hands in fire youll keep doing it right???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Molly wrote:
Don't forget Simon Wilson Rhys! Please don't forget Simon Wilson :-D :-D :-D


What a hanger on that guy is!!
I'd love to know what he has contributed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 3:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Its a good debate and Im happy the issues are out on the table
The point about 'time' is a good one. Im sick of the attitude that we are a work in progress. FFS lets stop making excuses and start to WIN games of football that we should win
That was the most disheartening part about the Essendon* result.


The way I see it:

R1 Richmond - expected to win YES, won NO -1
R2 St Kilda - expected to win NO, won NO -
R3 Essendon* - expected to win YES, won NO -1
R4 Collingwood - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R5 Melbourne - expected to win YES, won YES -
R6 Adelaide - expected to win NO, won NO -
R7 West Coast - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R8 Lions - expected to win YES, won NO -1
R9 Fremantle - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R10 Geelong - expected to win NO, won NO -
R11 Port - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R12 Collingwood - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R13 Essendon* - expected to win YES, won NO -1

Losses when expected to win = 4
Wins when expected to lose = 5
Results as expected = 4

Anticipated win/loss ratio to round 13 = 5 wins 8 losses
Actual win/loss ratio to round 13 = 6 wins 7 losses

Net result = 1 more win than expected at this point in time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
verbs wrote:
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Its a good debate and Im happy the issues are out on the table
The point about 'time' is a good one. Im sick of the attitude that we are a work in progress. FFS lets stop making excuses and start to WIN games of football that we should win
That was the most disheartening part about the Essendon* result.


The way I see it:

R1 Richmond - expected to win YES, won NO -1
R2 St Kilda - expected to win NO, won NO -
R3 Essendon* - expected to win YES, won NO -1
R4 Collingwood - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R5 Melbourne - expected to win YES, won YES -
R6 Adelaide - expected to win NO, won NO -
R7 West Coast - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R8 Lions - expected to win YES, won NO -1
R9 Fremantle - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R10 Geelong - expected to win NO, won NO -
R11 Port - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R12 Collingwood - expected to win NO, won YES +1
R13 Essendon* - expected to win YES, won NO -1

Losses when expected to win = 4
Wins when expected to lose = 5
Results as expected = 4

Anticipated win/loss ratio to round 13 = 5 wins 8 losses
Actual win/loss ratio to round 13 = 6 wins 7 losses

Net result = 1 more win than expected at this point in time.


its all about the reality of NOW...

for example StKilda 2nd favourites to win the flag....... -1

The game is fluid and dynamic.... things change.. you need to seize on opportunities....

We havent... in my opinion...

in my opinion there are alot of teams struggling.... (refer to ladder).. and we should be pushing harder ... on the current form of the AFL ladder...
Were more talented than most of the teams in our vicinity....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:11 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 408
The point you made above Synbad is something i have been harping on about for a while now.
I coach an U11 football side and i can tell you that we drill blocking and sheperding and helping your team mates out whenever you can from this age.
Now why does it seem that a bunch of 18-30 year old guys seem to not know that this is something that needs to be implemented in every game in order to win?
How can there be excuses like 'they're still learning'? These are fundamental skills taught from a young age.
They should be natural. The fact that we aren't doing it at all is a really worrying sign.

One last point that Synbad made aswell, the kicking into space. Fevola is not going to mark the ball when it is popped up for him one on one. (except the few instances when he grabs it with one hand and it sticks) If you go to the games you can see it better than on television, There is usually alot of space infront of Fev and he tells the ball carier or who ever marked it to just kick it in front of him into that space and he'll run onto it. Instead we either wait to long and this space is filled (usually by our players!) or we just pop it up. It's such a basic skill! AGAIN!

I have no doubt that our players are good enough. But are they smart enough? And if not are we constantly getting in there ear about the basics. Because you cant do the fancy stuff until you learn the very simplist of skills!
MB

_________________
Loooook OUT!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:15 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Mighty Blues wrote:
The point you made above Synbad is something i have been harping on about for a while now.
I coach an U11 football side and i can tell you that we drill blocking and sheperding and helping your team mates out whenever you can from this age.
Now why does it seem that a bunch of 18-30 year old guys seem to not know that this is something that needs to be implemented in every game in order to win?
How can there be excuses like 'they're still learning'? These are fundamental skills taught from a young age.
They should be natural. The fact that we aren't doing it at all is a really worrying sign.


MB based on what you said above, we obviously need to lay responsibility for lack of blocking and shepherding at the U11 coaches of our players. 8)

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
With blocking and shepherding...

If Judd is our biggest asset.. im sure he would appreciate abit of a chop out as well!!!!

He will be a battered man aged 26 at this rate....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:23 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:31 pm
Posts: 408
Good one DUC!
Exactly Synbad. You'd think that with Judd in our team, the premier onballer in the competition, that we'd go out of our way to block and shepherd. OUT OF OUR WAY! Forget getting the football, PROTECT JUDD! that should be the instructions to some of our players.
What's the point of having the best player in the comp when we refuse to help him out. And you're right, he will not be playing for much longer if he continues to get the ball and get dumped to the ground 30 times a game!

_________________
Loooook OUT!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
We've got him for six years. Might as well get as much out of him as we can, as no-one expects him to stick around after that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
SYNBAD - CLAP CLAP CLAP
SYNBAD - CLAP CLAP CLAP

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
kingkerna wrote:
SYNBAD - CLAP CLAP CLAP
SYNBAD - CLAP CLAP CLAP


your favourite colour must be green........ :lol:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:48 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
DownUnderChick wrote:
But if Harts is playing the lead up role to the wing, we are again stuck with the kick it to Fev dilemma.

Fish leads up and then kicks to one of either Fev or Harts.


..in this instance i reckon it's far better for harts to lead up, and use his penetrating kicking ability to lead pass to fev out on an open, searching lead from goal square to 50m, or fish falling back into the space to mark/crumb at top of goal square.. ..see, problem with fish being lead up player is his short kicking, with him out on a wing, he can only pass to the 50m arc, where you'd have fev and harts competing too close together..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:58 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
But if Harts is playing the lead up role to the wing, we are again stuck with the kick it to Fev dilemma.

Fish leads up and then kicks to one of either Fev or Harts.


..in this instance i reckon it's far better for harts to lead up, and use his penetrating kicking ability to lead pass to fev out on an open, searching lead from goal square to 50m, or fish falling back into the space to mark/crumb at top of goal square.. ..see, problem with fish being lead up player is his short kicking, with him out on a wing, he can only pass to the 50m arc, where you'd have fev and harts competing too close together..


Both Harts and Fev have a booming kick so that 50m shots at goal, shouldn't trouble them as much as Fish.

Fish, if he doesn't take a grab, tends to not have too much second efforts and the ball quickly moves out of our F50 [if Fev is not in tackling mode].

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:03 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..it's pretty much how wce got the best out of judd,, ,,and not just in the middle, fev could benefit from a few well placed blocks, very much in the mold of how the swans go about it..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
DownUnderChick wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
DownUnderChick wrote:
But if Harts is playing the lead up role to the wing, we are again stuck with the kick it to Fev dilemma.

Fish leads up and then kicks to one of either Fev or Harts.


..in this instance i reckon it's far better for harts to lead up, and use his penetrating kicking ability to lead pass to fev out on an open, searching lead from goal square to 50m, or fish falling back into the space to mark/crumb at top of goal square.. ..see, problem with fish being lead up player is his short kicking, with him out on a wing, he can only pass to the 50m arc, where you'd have fev and harts competing too close together..


Both Harts and Fev have a booming kick so that 50m shots at goal, shouldn't trouble them as much as Fish.

Fish, if he doesn't take a grab, tends to not have too much second efforts and the ball quickly moves out of our F50 [if Fev is not in tackling mode].


..yeah, but if fish is out on a wing, kicking it to the 50m arc, he won't even have the range to kick across the entire 50m arc, say he can cover half.. ..you've got both harts and fev in the same area, dragging their opponents together.. ..it's just not open any longer.. ..lookit, fish struggles at ground level in creating defensive pressure (he has good goal crumbing sense though).. ..his ability to chase is a let down anywhere on the ground, so best it be as far from their goals as possible, and when near our goals his roving ability can crumb goals..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 5:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..it's pretty much how wce got the best out of judd,, ,,and not just in the middle, fev could benefit from a few well placed blocks, very much in the mold of how the swans go about it..

everyone does it....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group