Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 4:06 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:30 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Blues87 wrote:
Absolute rubbish to say that Stevens was poor today!!!

He was clearly our best midfielder and was damaging almost every time he got the ball. He was credited with 11 contested possessions and was working very hard. Plus his two goals were pure class. Ryan, your criticism of Stevens today shows that you clearly have a one eyed hatred of him with not an ounce of objectivity. As if we would drop our most effective midfielder.

Murphy on the other hand had a shocker today. 44% effectiveness. He was bereft of confidence with his kicking which is why he butchered that chance in the 2nd quarter when he handballed to Fev. I love Murph but there is no way he was a pro today.



Sorry mate. That's the way i saw it. You disagree? GREAT........ Good news for you..... each person on here is entitled to their opinion. And mine is of Stevens, who is a so-called A-list elite midfielder and his less-than-impressive form in the last 3 games. One good quarter against Port, hardly anything against Collingwood and half assed attempts today despite racking up 25+ possessions.

Murphy, whilst his skill level has been poor (and i have made mention of this heaps of times) still chases hard, wants the ball and has the intensity that makes the difference.

Sorry......just the way i see it.

Doesn't mean i hate him,......just means i want him to give a little bit more. But if your happy with his performances this year..... good for you.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:39 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10402
Location: Coburg
'As for saying we will get beaten, mate i know we are still shit and slowly becoming a bunch of pretenders because supporters like you and many Carlton supporters manage to talk up players as superstars when there nothing but ordinary footballers.'

you're right Melvey our supporters are a bunch of front running pretenders. Where have all the hard supporters gone?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:01 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
Geez your a tool Melv

With statements like we are still shit and are pretenders get a reality check hey

We have improved from 2007

Not sure where i stated all our players where superstars .... we have some good potential players who are getting valuable games and show definate good signs but hey yer all our players are shit Melvey and

Contested possesions maybe you should get some info before stating Blues are around 7th in the League for Contested Possesions.

End of the day we got smashed in the Middle. Our best player got concussed in first quarter. we have some good players maybe some will become greats for the club and also some wont make it this happens every year have we improved yes.
As for pace only one of the bombers with stacks of pace was lovett murray .i reckon simmo did a pretty good job for us doing a similar thing.

But yep we are pretenders and have gone backwards lets trade all our duds like Murphy, Gibbs, Judd, Kruzer, Fev etc

_________________
CFC TAC Squad everyone over 25 must be traded sounds like Loguns Run


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:11 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
Pro's:
Team learn't a valuable lesson in that as good as it is that we can fight our way back in the last, this is not always going to result with a win.

Another game into all our young guys in front of a good crowd

Lesson learned of what happen when you get in front of yourselves. Better now in a development year rather than when the window opens.


Con's:

We lost a game that we could and should have won.

Blew finals chance this year.

Again team not switched on from the first bounce. Happened too many times this year.

TC after a loss. Too many barrackers and not enough supporters on this site, get too far ahead of themselves when we win and bash all their favourite whipping boys or agenda's when we lose.
Being a Carlton supporter means that you support the team win or lose, but especialy after a loss when they need the support the most.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:25 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
Pros:
Gibbs and Stevens

Cons:
Carrazzos 10 critical errors. Allowing a spud like Monfries to kick 4.
Signing up Fisher for 2 years


Last edited by Rhys26 on Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:33 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:26 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Pros
When we dominate, we are very, very good team.
Look out when we play 4 qtrs of footy.

Cons
Melvin has a reason for getting up in the morning.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:00 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Pros; It was good while it lasted (being in the 8)
Fev, Stevens, Simpson

Cons: Giving them a 7 goal lead early
Setanta has still got a lot learn about defensive play and may need to learn it in the Ants
Getting smashed in clearances. We've been roving to opposition ruckmen all year before yesterday.
Orange boots and Monfries getting a kick

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:14 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 10:14 am
Posts: 36
Location: Sunshine State
PROS

We came back from a huge deficit again today and could have won... Even though we really deserved to get beaten badly.

A kick in the pants does most teams the world of good. We are a much better team than the dons and this loss should hurt bad.

Stevens - Seems he CAN do the hard stuff wen needed. Also, how good is his kicking for goal. Pity some of our forwards don't have his accuracy or distance.

Setanta - Lucas did jack all. The last 2 spoils were noted but otherwise another great game. Sticks to the task like no other. Put him on Richo next week, and tell him to stay with him ALL game.

Gibbs - For mine is the most consistent in this team. Even a couple of weeks back when Ratten said he wasn't playing well, I still thought he was doing better than most. A gun

Armfield - Good to see we have found that tough quick back pocket we are after. Check that one off, now, how do we find a CHF or any other forward that our midfielders will trust to kick goals...

Fev - He was great, but our dependence on him is not.

Wiggins - Gee his upside is small but his week in week out efforts.... if only everybody put in like this.







CONS


Fisher - He should be given kicking distance and accuracy training for the next month, until he can kick 10 in a row from 45 out straight in front, he is in the two's.

Ratten - Have been very happy with him, but way too slow to react today, let alone being proactive... Carrots should have been moved way earlier in the first quarter and we may not have had much of a deficit to chase. How bout putting Kruez forward and leaving him there. Just like pagan did with Kennedy. 5 mins at CHF if you don't turn the game in that time, you are outa there. We should have had the hammer in this week. Why bring in browne when we are struggling to cover Essendons height anyway? Also why did we leak like a sieve again today. What happened to our new defensive game plan.......

Murphs disposal - ouch

Carrots - has been great in the back pocket the last 3 weeks, but today very ordinary.

Cloke - I really like him, but where do you play him? Too small and not enough leap for the ruck. Great kick, but just can't seem to get it at CHF. I guess just too easily spoiled?

_________________
Window = Open


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:17 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Rhys26 wrote:
Pros:
Gibbs and Stevens

Cons:
Carrazzos 10 critical errors. Allowing a spud like Monfries to kick 4.
Signing up Fisher for 2 years


I would call Stevens a con......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:26 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
Haven't seen the game at all, and don't intend on seeing it. But I would say that a real pro from this game is that it was a learning experience. Our young team simply got ahead of itself. That happens to many young sides on the rise, and I was fearful it may happen. The main thing is to turn this into a positive... ie the lads remember what winning feels like, and they know what losing feels like, so they make sure they don't get ahead of themselves and drop their bundle like this again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:35 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
Rhys26 wrote:
Pros:
Gibbs and Stevens

Cons:
Carrazzos 10 critical errors. Allowing a spud like Monfries to kick 4.
Signing up Fisher for 2 years


I would call Stevens a con......


Glad somebody aggrees with me.

Look............somebody else on here said it best (can't find the person so sorry if it sounds like i'm stealing your material). Stevens has a pretty good 'offensive' side to his game, but 'deffensivly' he is shit. Woefull. Far to many times i see him give up a chase after two or 3 steps.

For him to be Vice Captain and a leader at this club i would expect better.

Murphy, whilst his dissposal is down, has the intestity and determination in his 2nd efforts that put him ahead of Stevens in my book.

Just IMO

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:48 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
PROS:
Excellent games by Fevola and Stevens. Simpson was good. Gibbs was quite good too, for someone of his inexperience he looks like he's played 100 games, just needs a fulltime midfield role now.

Superb effort to come back from so far down, and even take the lead during the last.

Some of the goals kicked yesterday were rippers.

CONS:
Too many players not getting enough of the ball - Armfield 5, Bentick 6, Cloke 10, Grigg 10, Jamison 5, O'hAilpin 4, Russell 3.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:35 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
Melvey wrote:
As for saying we will get beaten, mate i know we are still shit and slowly becoming a bunch of pretenders because supporters like you and many Carlton supporters manage to talk up players as superstars when there nothing but ordinary footballers.


Sometimes Melvey 25% of what you come out with I consider home truths and although it's hard for me to admit it, I actually think at those times that you are a Carlton supporter and have some understanding of the game.

The above post blows that out of the water. If you truly believe what you have stated in the above post you obviously have no idea whatsoever. You talk about others on this site having a lob-sided "Pro Carlton" view on things, well what the flower do you think that your posts are? Well balanced? Objective? Constructive? Level headed?

Clearly you are not a Carlton supporter, and if for some unknown reason you actually are, you are a very poor one.

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:20 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 11:00 am
Posts: 449
PRO:

The heart to keep trying and even get in front from so far back.


CONS:

Turnovers most notably by Marc Murphy and Andrew Carazzo

The margin blowing out by so much in the end and losing to this joke of a team twice this season.

Grigg went missing ... Judd concussed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:58 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:21 pm
Posts: 817
ryan2000 wrote:
Blues87 wrote:
Absolute rubbish to say that Stevens was poor today!!!

He was clearly our best midfielder and was damaging almost every time he got the ball. He was credited with 11 contested possessions and was working very hard. Plus his two goals were pure class. Ryan, your criticism of Stevens today shows that you clearly have a one eyed hatred of him with not an ounce of objectivity. As if we would drop our most effective midfielder.

Murphy on the other hand had a shocker today. 44% effectiveness. He was bereft of confidence with his kicking which is why he butchered that chance in the 2nd quarter when he handballed to Fev. I love Murph but there is no way he was a pro today.



Sorry mate. That's the way i saw it. You disagree? GREAT........ Good news for you..... each person on here is entitled to their opinion. And mine is of Stevens, who is a so-called A-list elite midfielder and his less-than-impressive form in the last 3 games. One good quarter against Port, hardly anything against Collingwood and half assed attempts today despite racking up 25+ possessions.

Murphy, whilst his skill level has been poor (and i have made mention of this heaps of times) still chases hard, wants the ball and has the intensity that makes the difference.

Sorry......just the way i see it.

Doesn't mean i hate him,......just means i want him to give a little bit more. But if your happy with his performances this year..... good for you.


I thought we were talking about pros and cons from yesterday, not the season.

I don't care whether Stevens has a reputation as an A grader or about his salary or his ambitions for captaincy or his season to date. Looking at yesterday, he was clearly a pro as 90% of the people on here have stated.

We all know Murphy is a fantastic player as well but again based on yesterday he was no pro. I'm sure Murphy would've been very disappointed with himself as those turnovers were under minimal pressure and were very costly. He is only young and is going to have a fantastic career but yesterday he was poor.

_________________
Don't blame it on the sunshine, don't blame it on the moonlight, don't blame it on the good times, blame it on the WIGGINS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 12:23 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Blues87 wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
Blues87 wrote:
Absolute rubbish to say that Stevens was poor today!!!

He was clearly our best midfielder and was damaging almost every time he got the ball. He was credited with 11 contested possessions and was working very hard. Plus his two goals were pure class. Ryan, your criticism of Stevens today shows that you clearly have a one eyed hatred of him with not an ounce of objectivity. As if we would drop our most effective midfielder.

Murphy on the other hand had a shocker today. 44% effectiveness. He was bereft of confidence with his kicking which is why he butchered that chance in the 2nd quarter when he handballed to Fev. I love Murph but there is no way he was a pro today.



Sorry mate. That's the way i saw it. You disagree? GREAT........ Good news for you..... each person on here is entitled to their opinion. And mine is of Stevens, who is a so-called A-list elite midfielder and his less-than-impressive form in the last 3 games. One good quarter against Port, hardly anything against Collingwood and half assed attempts today despite racking up 25+ possessions.

Murphy, whilst his skill level has been poor (and i have made mention of this heaps of times) still chases hard, wants the ball and has the intensity that makes the difference.

Sorry......just the way i see it.

Doesn't mean i hate him,......just means i want him to give a little bit more. But if your happy with his performances this year..... good for you.


I thought we were talking about pros and cons from yesterday, not the season.

I don't care whether Stevens has a reputation as an A grader or about his salary or his ambitions for captaincy or his season to date. Looking at yesterday, he was clearly a pro as 90% of the people on here have stated.

We all know Murphy is a fantastic player as well but again based on yesterday he was no pro. I'm sure Murphy would've been very disappointed with himself as those turnovers were under minimal pressure and were very costly. He is only young and is going to have a fantastic career but yesterday he was poor.


We are talking about Pros and Cons yesterday.......and again, much like the whole season, yesterday Stevens showed that he has failed to lift the 'Defensive' side of his game, and to be an A-List elite player like he is claimed AND PAID to be, he needs to do this.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
For mine, Stevens was a pro yesterday. Like it or not, Stevens' role in our set up is to be on the end of the handball and sticking down Fevs gob, or sticking it through the goalposts.

Sadly, yesterday showed that we have a bare minimum of truly effective, consistent kicks in our team. Stevens is one of them, however - so you don't want him getting the hard ball, you want him positioned where he's going to do the most damage. If we had 12 blokes who could reliably hit a target week in week out, then maybe more onus would be on him to pick up the defensive side of his game.

We got smashed at clearances, contested ball and efficiency yesterday. All the endeavour in the word won't overcome that. Murph and Carrots had absolute mares, and accross the board there looked like an emotional let down from the last two weeks. Throw in a few positive articles and you can see where a young team will get ahead of itself and just think turning up will be good enough.

Lesson learned yesterday, hopefully there's some long term benefit out of this, because losing to that mob is never good.

Gibbs was good, who knows what would have happened had that shot been a little to the left in the last. Simmo was good, Betts servicable, Kreuz was good around the ground. Fev was Fev. Just not enough contributors, however.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:45 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Punter22 wrote:
Gibbs was good, who knows what would have happened had that shot been a little to the left in the last. Simmo was good, Betts servicable, Kreuz was good around the ground. Fev was Fev. Just not enough contributors, however.


Good point mate. If that Gibbs goal had gone through, i reckon we would have won. But ahhh well....... it wasn't the easiest of shots.

Kreuzer was good around the ground. He's gonna be something special, no doubt about it.

Appreciate your points on Stevens..... and aggree with you to a degree, but also argue the point that when he chases 'half-heartedly' and doesn't look like caring, it doesn't reflect well on teammates around him, especially the youth.

Each to their own. Stevens, IMHO only, needs to lift that side of his game before i can even consider him an A-List / Elite / Leader!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:30 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:21 pm
Posts: 817
Punter22 wrote:
For mine, Stevens was a pro yesterday. Like it or not, Stevens' role in our set up is to be on the end of the handball and sticking down Fevs gob, or sticking it through the goalposts.

Sadly, yesterday showed that we have a bare minimum of truly effective, consistent kicks in our team. Stevens is one of them, however - so you don't want him getting the hard ball, you want him positioned where he's going to do the most damage. If we had 12 blokes who could reliably hit a target week in week out, then maybe more onus would be on him to pick up the defensive side of his game.

We got smashed at clearances, contested ball and efficiency yesterday. All the endeavour in the word won't overcome that. Murph and Carrots had absolute mares, and accross the board there looked like an emotional let down from the last two weeks. Throw in a few positive articles and you can see where a young team will get ahead of itself and just think turning up will be good enough.

Lesson learned yesterday, hopefully there's some long term benefit out of this, because losing to that mob is never good.

Gibbs was good, who knows what would have happened had that shot been a little to the left in the last. Simmo was good, Betts servicable, Kreuz was good around the ground. Fev was Fev. Just not enough contributors, however.


Spot on.

_________________
Don't blame it on the sunshine, don't blame it on the moonlight, don't blame it on the good times, blame it on the WIGGINS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:33 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
In the 3rd Eddie Betts got 2 centre clearances in a row, where not one of our other players looked like doing it. To my reckoning, he didn't return to the centre square again

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider and 70 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group