Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 12:03 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:00 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Posts: 423
Fisher can't kick more than 35m and well Eddie Betts, he'd be a lot more valuable to the team if he was kicking 2-3 goals per game, rather than getting kicks up on the wing, but "apparently" he's doing a lot more now.

Ideally we would play Waite at CHF, but our backline is very weak, as exposed by has-beens Lloyd, Lucas, McPhee and duds like Monfries. OHailpin has to go. He's not up to AFL standard. But that leaves us even more exposed down back. CHB is a whole other problem we are all aware of.

We desperately need Hartlett or Edwards in the team. We need another avenue to goal, and at the moment these guys are our only hope. Either one should be give 5 weeks in the team without the pressure of being dropped.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:02 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:56 pm
Posts: 230
The Tyrant wrote:
juddlovesme wrote:
Who are our other options?
Fisher who when he fails to mark the result is chaos? when he does mark has to be 30 out directly in front of it's a rarity he'll kick the goal?
Deluca?
Raso?
Hartlett?
Morrell?
Edwards?
Angwin?

We have failed at drafting rejects, we have failed at drafting under 18 players, and we have failed at trading for key forwards. Something needs to be done and it needs t obe done now.


Why are you asking me that? My point was that we lost today in the midfield not due to a lack of forwards.

But let me ask you this: which of the draft picks we did have - Murphy, Gibbs etc - would you give up to have this key forward on our list? Which key forward would you take instead of those players? (ie Gumbleton instead of Gibbs?)

Who should we have traded instead of Kennedy to get Judd?

We basically had a completely shithouse list, an awful midfield brigade, no key defenders and no ruckman. We have a lot of great young players in all those roles now.... except the key forward. Bringing in a key forward would have been at the expense of someone.


I'm with ya Tyrant.

We were 39 points down at quater time and what were the clearance stats at that point? Way in Essendon*'s favour.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:02 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 622
The Tyrant wrote:
ACHILLES wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
Why are we focussing on a lack of forwards?

We got killed in the midfield.... if we win more clearances we win the match. Easy

The lack of forwards would only be an issue if Fevola misses the match.

Part of the problem, as someone else said, is that our players go to Fevola when there are other options.

Judd was completely off. Bentick was a bit off in the stoppages too, and Hille killed us in the ruck. Carrazzo and Murphy's skills were off. Waite struggled to get into the game as well. Thornton was dragged back inside 50 for much of the first half. Defensive midfield pressure awful, especially on blokes like Stanton who did as they please in the second half.

Angus Monfries played the game of his life and exposed Scotland/Carrazzo etc lack of defensive pressure... and putting Armfield on him was a bit too late.


Thanks for spoting out the obvious!


Well if that is obvious, why are you harping on about Fisher? Brad Fisher didn't lose us the game


OH WELL!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:05 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4948
Abaddon wrote:
We desperately need Hartlett or Edwards in the team. We need another avenue to goal, and at the moment these guys are our only hope. Either one should be give 5 weeks in the team without the pressure of being dropped.


I'd like to see Hartlett given an extended run...providing his body holds up of course.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:06 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Humpers wrote:
Abaddon wrote:
We desperately need Hartlett or Edwards in the team. We need another avenue to goal, and at the moment these guys are our only hope. Either one should be give 5 weeks in the team without the pressure of being dropped.


I'd like to see Hartlett given an extended run...providing his body holds up of course.


So would I and lets hope his body can hold up as i think he has more to offer than those all ready there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
After Ackland's game today, how exciting would it be having him kick 8 and Fevola kick 7 week in week out! :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:15 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21570
Location: North of the border
We have been sacrificing forwards to make way for Fev for years now - We turned Whitnal into to back , Waite into a back , and spent two years trying to make Hartlett a back - We send Edwards to the reserves push blokes like Fisher and Deluca up the ground away from the goals and play blokes like Wiggens up forward - Ratten even Said Ohalpin was going to be a froward but got in the way of Fev so he moved back . As good as Fev is when that ball goes forward it's all about Fev and no- one else - If the likes of Franklin and co had the ball delivered to them as much as we go through Fev they would kick a 1000 a yar never mind 100. of our first 15 entries to the forward 50 , 13 went to Fev for the total some of one goal .

We lost that game today when we woke up to the Headlines Fev knocks back 2 million deal - deflates the rest of the team

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:17 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 6:34 pm
Posts: 2033
Location: Melbourne
who the @#$%&! played on ackland today :!: :?: :!: :?: :!: :?:

:shock: :shock:

_________________
"You don’t get much more Navy Blue than Stephen Kernahan" - Marc Murphy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19468
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
The difficult thing with the forwards as Tyrant pointed out is that which picks would you have used instead of the ones in the 04/05/06/07 drafts on key forwards?

For the past four or so drafts I've wanted us to be lucky enough to have a gun forward fall to our pick but it doesn't seem to have happened.

Do you go reaching for a key forward who has less talent than a midfielder who you could pick at the same pick.

It is just unfortunate/unlucky that there doesn't seem to have been a forward worthy of being picked at any of our picks so far besides JK who when he's played for WC has looked very impressive.

Last year everyone wanted Gourdis/Gaertner as a late pick/rookie but we kept a pick for the PSD and Pfeiffer looks a talent.

I hope with our first pick this year that there is a key forward there who we would pick but if there is a midfielder/utility who we rated much higher who is available there then we'd pick them.

Two teams in the past who seem to have picked in talent even though at the time looked like they needed to draft a KP player are Geelong and Port Adelaide in 2002 and 2006 respectively. Geelong with pick 7 took Mackie and Port with pick 6 took Boak, even though they might have needed a key forward. Mackie has turned into an excellent player and Boak could be a future Brownlow Medallist.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:23 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
shuffagus wrote:
who the flower played on ackland today :!: :?: :!: :?: :!: :?:

:shock: :shock:


Obviously not Scarlett.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:37 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
ACHILLES wrote:
Melvey wrote:
Because we not playing Hartts and continue with wiggins and fisher as forward options who in my eyes are useless.

Surely both must get dropped this week


Melvey I agree with you!

KK you were bagging my thoughts last week RE: Fisher!

Is it time to bring in Harlett??

I have said it many times WE NEED TO DEVELOP ANOTHER FORWARD WHO CAN KICK GOALS!

KK you can throw any stat you like at me!

Let's have a poll now!


Exactly. Time to try something different and also work on our delivery into forward line and how that forward line presents.

If you ever watch Footscray live the way their forward line moves is fantastic. Always active, always giving options and not getting in each others way and not exactly a bunch of big names. Also, most of them are NATURAL goalkickers, something which we lack.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
I totally agree with creating more Forward options and trying things new

Bring in Edwards... Hampson/Kreuzer up forward.....

but we don't need to drop Fisher to do that.

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
The Tyrant wrote:
I totally agree with creating more Forward options and trying things new

Bring in Edwards... Hampson/Kreuzer up forward.....

but we don't need to drop Fisher to do that.


I thought one area we really got shown up today was PACE. Guys like Fisher, Wiggins, Russell, Bentick, Stevens looked really lacking in that area. It was more obvious when Armfield got the ball, really made a difference being able to run the lines.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:49 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10406
Location: Coburg
Melvey wrote:
Humpers wrote:
Abaddon wrote:
We desperately need Hartlett or Edwards in the team. We need another avenue to goal, and at the moment these guys are our only hope. Either one should be give 5 weeks in the team without the pressure of being dropped.


I'd like to see Hartlett given an extended run...providing his body holds up of course.


So would I and lets hope his body can hold up as i think he has more to offer than those all ready there.


so would Ratts and co but so far each time he has played his body hasn't held up - @#$%&! me too many isolationists in this place!

So nice to see @#$%&! Abbadabbaeverythingiswronga back this week. :garthp:

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:50 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
The solution is sooooooooo simple
1) Brad Fisher plays as a permanent forward pocket. If Fevola is not an option up the ground, bomb it to the goal square. I'd back Fisher to take quite a few contested marks 15-20m out (Fisher is a one trick pony. Let's exploit that trick) If he becomes successful at it, you might see the opposition worrying about him just as much as Fev. In summary, tether Fish to no more than 30 m out of goal permanently

2) Play Carrots as a permanent forward. He can certainly find the ball. Never know, if he finds it 25 times, we might even get a couple of goals and a couple of assists out of it. Release Betts into the midfield even more, but also supporting Carrots putting real defensive pressure in our f50

Anyway, that's my 2 bobs worth

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:50 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
The Tyrant wrote:
The other thing is, no intelligent person could criticise Fisher for not being the a taller marking option.... he's Brad Fisher not Barry Hall.

The weakness in the team structure isn't Fisher's fault. He plays a very positive role, with Wiggo, leading up onto the wings.

With a "Jonathan Brown" CHF Fisher's importance as an option maker would be magnified. Anyone who criticises Fisher for not being Jonathan Brown is a dead-set moron
This isn't his best year admittedly but had a few good years previously. Last year 40 goals from 19 games. See why we re-signed him. He's a 3rd tall, as you said, not a 2nd tall. We'd kill him if we persisted with that. Do notice alot more up the ground too this year. Need Waite back at CHF. Has the twofold effect of taking numbers and pressure off Fev and well as making Fisher a tough match-up as a 3rd tall. Certainly then increases our options going forward.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:58 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:05 pm
Posts: 396
Location: Avondale Heights
I would of considered trading Fisher if we hadn't signed him for two more years already.
Waite need to get out of the backline into the mid/foward line, our big backs are growing: TBird, Jamo, Setants, Bower and Austin.

I reckon Tim Boyle would be good if given more supply/opportunity. Very nice kick and mark, plays same role as Fisher but better kick and better at ground level. Shouldn't be too expensive(same as Murphy from Freo)

If AB, Cloke, Scotland or Houlihan have any trade value at years end, I reckon we go for it, Not sure about Russell, Edwards yet or possibly even Carrots at a good price.

For the time being, Waite play up forward, Harts has been playing well in the ressies too. Give Gibbs more of a key role down there too maybe

_________________
The climbing has alread began


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21570
Location: North of the border
What I find amazing is every time we come up against a side with more than one dominant forward option we struggle big time .

Lucas/ Lloyd/Hille/ Laycock
Brown / Bradshaw
Mooney/ Ottens/ Hawkins -whoever else
Reiwolt, Gehrig, kosi, Milne
Richo/ Browne

The only game we have lost where they didn't have hte big guns up forward was to the crows- Sides like Port Tredrea + ?, collingwood Cloke + ? Eagles Lynch+ ? , Freo Pavlich+ ? Melb Robbo+ ?


Yet we continue with this policy ourselves

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Posts: 423
Sydney Blue wrote:
What I find amazing is every time we come up against a side with more than one dominant forward option we struggle big time .



shouldn't really be a surprise as the backline is still very weak.
Disappointing to let a dud like Monfries kick 4 goals. O'Hailpin is a real worry down back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Like i keep saying....

The Ratten game plan revolves around Judd leading the comp in hard ball gets and clearances and Fev kicking bags every week...


If one of these two is down we are struggling.. if theyre both down were gone...

Thats the Ratten gameplan...

we have 2 superstars and theyre being flogged to death to win games..

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 250 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Crusader, Google Adsense [Bot] and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group