Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:22 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 8:40 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6434
Do a Capuano with Ackland
Delist him
Pay him out and admit the decision makers who got Ackland made a mistake
Promote Jacobs
Work in tandem with Hampson to ease the load on both boys but

We must play 2 ruckman next week and beyond
We have nothing to lose

I am sick of us playing non ruckman or players who arnt up to it

All this shit that you cant play young kids is crap

If I hear that shit again :evil: :evil: :evil:
Play Hammo and big sauce for 50 minutes a game

Having Ackland in the team serves no purpose


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 7:39 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:56 pm
Posts: 723
Location: Melbourne
i may be just reacting to the past 6 years, but i reckon it's time to roll the dice with the rucks ... let's play hammo and either aisake or jacobs (or both on a rotational basis) and have kreuzer playing as a roaming forward.

i think the club must create a fair dinkum development system and back itself in developing young players. i haven't checked the bullants thread and maybe aisake played a shocker and maybe he's gone etc ... but can we really afford to offload recently drafted players like aisake? should we not look to offload mid to senior players (houlihan, stevens, scotland, even fev etc)? i'm asking this as a question, not that i know the answer ...

playing Ackland to supposedly counter charman was simply a fantasy decision by a conservative MC that wasn't swallowed by the public, nor i suspect by the playing group. i decided not to dwell on the decision and not to focus on the hack's performance, afterall, it wasn't his fault the powers at be selected him.

if aisake is arrogant or difficult or whatever then it's up to the coaching staff to get to the bottom of things and try to bring the best out of him. i would rather a warrior out there than a cream-puff, blacmange pretend footballer. it's taken the hack 8 season to painfully inch his way to 75 games at 3 clubs ... but that seems to be the sort of track form our MC reckons is ideal to combat the "monster" that is charman ...

let's roll the dice ... hammo and aisake (or jacobs) sharing the ruck duties, kreuzer as a high forward. cloke needs to add a few more strings to his bow in order for him to remain on the list ...

_________________
... an eagle flew out of the night. he was something to observe, came in close i heard a voice, bending stretching every nerve, had to listen had no choice ...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 7:47 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6434
maxyblue wrote:
i may be just reacting to the past 6 years, but i reckon it's time to roll the dice with the rucks ... let's play hammo and either aisake or jacobs (or both on a rotational basis) and have kreuzer playing as a roaming forward.

i think the club must create a fair dinkum development system and back itself in developing young players. i haven't checked the bullants thread and maybe aisake played a shocker and maybe he's gone etc ... but can we really afford to offload recently drafted players like aisake? should we not look to offload mid to senior players (houlihan, stevens, scotland, even fev etc)? i'm asking this as a question, not that i know the answer ...

playing Ackland to supposedly counter charman was simply a fantasy decision by a conservative MC that wasn't swallowed by the public, nor i suspect by the playing group. i decided not to dwell on the decision and not to focus on the hack's performance, afterall, it wasn't his fault the powers at be selected him.

if aisake is arrogant or difficult or whatever then it's up to the coaching staff to get to the bottom of things and try to bring the best out of him. i would rather a warrior out there than a cream-puff, blacmange pretend footballer. it's taken the hack 8 season to painfully inch his way to 75 games at 3 clubs ... but that seems to be the sort of track form our MC reckons is ideal to combat the "monster" that is charman ...

let's roll the dice ... hammo and aisake (or jacobs) sharing the ruck duties, kreuzer as a high forward. cloke needs to add a few more strings to his bow in order for him to remain on the list ...


Well said


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 18, 2008 7:59 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
keogh wrote:
Do a Capuano with Ackland
Delist him
Pay him out and admit the decision makers who got Ackland made a mistake
Promote Jacobs
Work in tandem with Hampson to ease the load on both boys but

We must play 2 ruckman next week and beyond
We have nothing to lose

I am sick of us playing non ruckman or players who arnt up to it

All this shit that you cant play young kids is crap

If I hear that shit again :evil: :evil: :evil:
Play Hammo and big sauce for 50 minutes a game

Having Ackland in the team serves no purpose


Best idea I have heard in a longtime, can we send it to Ratts?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dodo27, ScottSaunders2, Traveller86 and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group