Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:34 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Do you think Fev is trustworthy enough for a 3 year contract extension?
Yes 52%  52%  [ 55 ]
No, 2 years maximum 37%  37%  [ 39 ]
No, 1 year maximum 7%  7%  [ 7 ]
No, trade him! 5%  5%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 106
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:25 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?

I mean seriously are we going to trade or possible lose an elite player for taking a piss outside a bar in the early hours of the morning?

Lets get some perspective here, we have the best full forward in the AFL and we are nervous about signing him in case he misses the toilet when nature calls, time to get real and grow up. Give him the 3 year deal with performance bonuses to keep his focused and move on.


Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?

All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 8:30 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
4thchicken wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
such as the Whitnall's and Campo's of the world, who would either not put enough in off the field (Lance) or sulk while on it at the lack of easy ball(Campo).


Actually Fev has been quite guilty of not putting in enough on the training track and of sulking on the field when things got difficult. Yet because he kicks goals regularly these factors seem to be conveniently overlooked.

FWIW, I've voted for 2 years


It has been far from overlooked, but when he is like the only shining light on the field, that must cut him some slack. For those saying same rules for everyone blah blah blah, your being naive. Imagine a Fevless Carlton between 2003-07 - we would of had absolutely no marquee/drawcard player, and not being dramatic, is the kind of thing that keeps clubs going though dark times.

I didn't realise we gave Ackland a 2 year contract with an option of a 3rd, I have a feeling we wont be taking up that option.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 9:28 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:03 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
TruBlueBrad wrote:
badboy wrote:
yeh, spot on wojee 3 years to secure him but heaps of clauses (santa, mrs and the babies)

i reckon give him success and he will stay on the straight and narrow


Fev's on field problems have always been a lack of team success.

Win games and the dummy spits are gone.


Bull dust. His on field problems is directly related to his attitude both on and off the ground.

You can't be a flower off the ground 6 days a week and an angel on the ground for the 7th. Likewise, you can't be a sook when we are losing and ok when we are winning. Its a bad attitude and lacks professionalism.

Sick and tired of the excuses he is constantly shown.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 10:07 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.


All true steve, but we are not being paid in excess of $500,000 dollars a year now are we?

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:05 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
baz_baz wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.


All true steve, but we are not being paid in excess of $500,000 dollars a year now are we?


So more money buys a higher moral standard?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:22 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Steve_C7 wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.


All true steve, but we are not being paid in excess of $500,000 dollars a year now are we?


So more money buys a higher moral standard?


It brings with it higher expectations, and by defaul a higher moral standard

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:23 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.
.

I was being sarcastic.

If in between pissing on a window and having a sulk he continues to fit in, Coleman medals, All Australian selection, Michael tuck medals, leading goal kicker awards & BOG in SOR games, I couldn't give a stuff.

I pay money to watch him win Carlton games not to worry about silly indiscretions. The supporters that worry about that need a life :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:58 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 7:16 pm
Posts: 295
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.
.

I was being sarcastic.

If in between pissing on a window and having a sulk he continues to fit in, Coleman medals, All Australian selection, Michael tuck medals, leading goal kicker awards & BOG in SOR games, I couldn't give a stuff.

I pay money to watch him win Carlton games not to worry about silly indiscretions. The supporters that worry about that need a life :-D


Now lets get this straight doofdoof

1 post you say "All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??"

now you say "I pay money to watch him win Carlton games not to worry about silly indiscretions. The supporters that worry about that need a life :-D"


so you beleve he should be sacked on the grounds of what he has done of the field but then you don't worry what silly indiscretions this player has done becuase you pay money to watch him and thinkk all supporters that worry about his indiscretions should get a life...

i am not sure what you are saying doof doof

you want him sacked

or are you not worried of his indiscretions and wanna see him keep playing?

cheers
OZ


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:19 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
he didn't make himself clear he was being sarcastic with the first post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 3:05 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
ozdevil wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.
.

I was being sarcastic.

If in between pissing on a window and having a sulk he continues to fit in, Coleman medals, All Australian selection, Michael tuck medals, leading goal kicker awards & BOG in SOR games, I couldn't give a stuff.

I pay money to watch him win Carlton games not to worry about silly indiscretions. The supporters that worry about that need a life :-D


Now lets get this straight doofdoof

1 post you say "All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??"

now you say "I pay money to watch him win Carlton games not to worry about silly indiscretions. The supporters that worry about that need a life :-D"


so you beleve he should be sacked on the grounds of what he has done of the field but then you don't worry what silly indiscretions this player has done becuase you pay money to watch him and thinkk all supporters that worry about his indiscretions should get a life...

i am not sure what you are saying doof doof

you want him sacked

or are you not worried of his indiscretions and wanna see him keep playing?

cheers
OZ


It's interesting when you read a post and someone else reads the very same post, 2 different opinions are made.

Reading doof's comments, he is being sarcastic, but I can understand the misunderstanding.

Doof, you need to use emoticons more. They are to the left of your screen when posting. :-D

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:37 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
baz_baz wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.


All true steve, but we are not being paid in excess of $500,000 dollars a year now are we?


So more money buys a higher moral standard?


It brings with it higher expectations, and by defaul a higher moral standard


No, the higher payment reflects the value he brings to the team and what the market is prepaired to pay. His payment along with every other players salary is based on skills, impact and ability to play football at the highest standard, hence why players like wiggo don't get $1 mil a year although he holds such a high moral standard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:44 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
http://www.carltonfc.com.au/tabid/4311/Default.aspx?newsid=59633

Sticks believes Fev can reach his goalkicking record in this article. CFC interviewed are goalkicking championship and you gotta love this from the greatest number 25 in the history of Australian Rules.

Quote:
He’s certainly got some talent. He’s a goalkicker, but sometimes he lets himself down by sooking. If he can get that out of his game he’ll go on.


:-D

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:55 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Adam Chatfield wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Adam Chatfield wrote:
such as the Whitnall's and Campo's of the world, who would either not put enough in off the field (Lance) or sulk while on it at the lack of easy ball(Campo).


Actually Fev has been quite guilty of not putting in enough on the training track and of sulking on the field when things got difficult. Yet because he kicks goals regularly these factors seem to be conveniently overlooked.

FWIW, I've voted for 2 years


It has been far from overlooked, but when he is like the only shining light on the field, that must cut him some slack. For those saying same rules for everyone blah blah blah, your being naive. Imagine a Fevless Carlton between 2003-07 - we would of had absolutely no marquee/drawcard player, and not being dramatic, is the kind of thing that keeps clubs going though dark times.



actually your posts overlooks/excuses poor on field behaviour and poor efforts on the training track :roll: In any professional sport such behaviour is unacceptable.

As for a Fev-less carlton - its impossible to for either side of the fence to say what would have happened. We might not have had such a 'big name' marquee player or others might have stepped up in his absence. There is little doubt that a fair few of our forwards might have developed more had they received more than token interest* when we enter F50. Alternatively we may have picked up another player in the PSD with Fev's salary (combined with any spare $ would have been 500k+/season

*Token interest in that they received approx 10-15%of F50 entries combined for all other forwards in the pagan era


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 4:57 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Steve_C7 wrote:
baz_baz wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.


All true steve, but we are not being paid in excess of $500,000 dollars a year now are we?


So more money buys a higher moral standard?


nothing to do with moral standards - more having an expectation of a level of professionalism in his approach towards the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:00 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2007 1:54 pm
Posts: 2251
DownUnderChick wrote:
ozdevil wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
doofdoof wrote:
Steve_C7 wrote:
Am I the only one that thinks that his so called off field behaviour is really just a media beat up?



Hey you forgot he also put a barman in a headlock, took his boots off, gave his teammates dirty looks, argued with umpires, gave away 50 metre penalties, appeared to not chase & displayed bad body language......have I missed anything?



All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??


No I am not forgetting the barman incident, but he has been an AFL player for 9 years so if you look at the average of it all, it's really not that bad. I bet if you looked at a couple indiscressions that each poster has done over the last decade on this site, very few would fare any better.

You may want to get Fevs view point on the boots off incident before taking a stand on it, remember there are always 2 sides to a story and the truth lies betwen them.

And if we are going to sack players for arguing with umps or bagging teammates, the list is pretty long, how would you go without Thorton, Waite, Stevens, Scotland, Fev etc.

I am not defending Fevs antics, because lord knows he can improve on them, but I will not stand on the moral high ground and destroy a players career for failing to meet the lofty stanards that very few here would meet themselves.
.

I was being sarcastic.

If in between pissing on a window and having a sulk he continues to fit in, Coleman medals, All Australian selection, Michael tuck medals, leading goal kicker awards & BOG in SOR games, I couldn't give a stuff.

I pay money to watch him win Carlton games not to worry about silly indiscretions. The supporters that worry about that need a life :-D


Now lets get this straight doofdoof

1 post you say "All offences that surely should culminate in his sacking right??"

now you say "I pay money to watch him win Carlton games not to worry about silly indiscretions. The supporters that worry about that need a life :-D"


so you beleve he should be sacked on the grounds of what he has done of the field but then you don't worry what silly indiscretions this player has done becuase you pay money to watch him and thinkk all supporters that worry about his indiscretions should get a life...

i am not sure what you are saying doof doof

you want him sacked

or are you not worried of his indiscretions and wanna see him keep playing?

cheers
OZ


It's interesting when you read a post and someone else reads the very same post, 2 different opinions are made.

Reading doof's comments, he is being sarcastic, but I can understand the misunderstanding.

Doof, you need to use emoticons more. They are to the left of your screen when posting. :-D


OK then :mrgreen:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:16 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:21 pm
Posts: 297
Location: Lurking inside 50
Worth every penny. He is bums on seats.

_________________
A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject - Winston Churchill

https://savemidownload.com. Authorised Game and Software retailer.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16984
Location: Melbourne
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Quote:
Mark Kleimann was a keen Carlton supporter before he went to work for Collingwood.


.


Kleimann is now a player manager.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 6:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17228
Quote:
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Quote:
Mark Kleimann was a keen Carlton supporter before he went to work for Collingwood.


.


Kleimann is now a player manager.

Regards Cazzesman


I didn't write that....Don't you read my posts Caz? :shock:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 15, 2008 7:21 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 976
it'll be cheaper of we lock him in for a 5 yr front loaded contract


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Keithy and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group