Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 5:31 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 160 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 9:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:52 am
Posts: 12809
jim wrote:
I can't see how Fev's love tap will get more than a reprimand. Low contact, low impact, negligent. Lowest end of the scale. Given a 25% reduction for an early guilty plea and another 25% for a good recent record (not suspended since Rd 4 2005) would make him a monte for a reprimand.


Got suspended after Rd 3 2006 for a soft as shit charge on Brett Kirk. Don't think that 25%'s applicable.

_________________
Cer 'ch 'n alluog Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 9:23 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
thehalford wrote:
jim wrote:
I can't see how Fev's love tap will get more than a reprimand. Low contact, low impact, negligent. Lowest end of the scale. Given a 25% reduction for an early guilty plea and another 25% for a good recent record (not suspended since Rd 4 2005) would make him a monte for a reprimand.


Got suspended after Rd 3 2006 for a soft as shit charge on Brett Kirk. Don't think that 25%'s applicable.
I thought his last one was against Freo in 2005 but I stand corrected if I'm wrong. Even so, a love tap with an early plea should still result in a reprimand.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 10:16 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:46 pm
Posts: 713
Location: New York
jim wrote:
thehalford wrote:
jim wrote:
I can't see how Fev's love tap will get more than a reprimand. Low contact, low impact, negligent. Lowest end of the scale. Given a 25% reduction for an early guilty plea and another 25% for a good recent record (not suspended since Rd 4 2005) would make him a monte for a reprimand.


Got suspended after Rd 3 2006 for a soft as shit charge on Brett Kirk. Don't think that 25%'s applicable.
I thought his last one was against Freo in 2005 but I stand corrected if I'm wrong. Even so, a love tap with an early plea should still result in a reprimand.


I agree Jim. Fev was merely trying to block Selwood's run so that Judd could get clear path to the ball. I don't think it was malicious in that it wasn't a punch, but a forearm. I also think that it wasn't the force of the contact that got Selwood but the placement of the contact and the fact he was tired. I think Fev will either not be cited or should get off. As for some here that want to throw Fev under the bus, yes he makes mistakes. He plays on instinct and emotion. He has had a ripper year and enjoyed the win more than anyone last night. The guy has passion for the jumper which is what everyone has been crying out for the past 6 years. His positives far outweigh his negatives and I wish people would not be so willing to crucify one of the three genuine stars we have in the team. We wouldn't win many games of football without Fev and so you may want to think about that before being so willing to get rid of him.

_________________
I send an SOS to the world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 10:32 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
fjanyc wrote:
jim wrote:
thehalford wrote:
jim wrote:
I can't see how Fev's love tap will get more than a reprimand. Low contact, low impact, negligent. Lowest end of the scale. Given a 25% reduction for an early guilty plea and another 25% for a good recent record (not suspended since Rd 4 2005) would make him a monte for a reprimand.


Got suspended after Rd 3 2006 for a soft as shit charge on Brett Kirk. Don't think that 25%'s applicable.
I thought his last one was against Freo in 2005 but I stand corrected if I'm wrong. Even so, a love tap with an early plea should still result in a reprimand.


I agree Jim. Fev was merely trying to block Selwood's run so that Judd could get clear path to the ball. I don't think it was malicious in that it wasn't a punch, but a forearm. I also think that it wasn't the force of the contact that got Selwood but the placement of the contact and the fact he was tired. I think Fev will either not be cited or should get off. As for some here that want to throw Fev under the bus, yes he makes mistakes. He plays on instinct and emotion. He has had a ripper year and enjoyed the win more than anyone last night. The guy has passion for the jumper which is what everyone has been crying out for the past 6 years. His positives far outweigh his negatives and I wish people would not be so willing to crucify one of the three genuine stars we have in the team. We wouldn't win many games of football without Fev and so you may want to think about that before being so willing to get rid of him.
Hope we're right !!!

I do have to stand corrected on his good record. His one game suspensions in both 2005 & 2006 will actually ADD 20% to his activation points if he is cited.

The way I read it in the link below, if he is cited, it is a level 1 offence, worth 80 points (negligent, in play, low contact, with either low or medium impact on the contact is a Level 1 offence). Add 20% for the 2 games he's been suspended in the last 3 AFL seasons that gives him 96. Take away 25% for an early guilty plea gives him 72 points. As every 100 points gives you a week, he should get a reprimand. Given that, he may as well fight the charge if I read it correctly.

It's all described in the link below.

http://www.afl.com.au/Portals/0/afl_doc ... t_2008.pdf


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 03, 2008 10:43 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12615
Location: Brisbane
Assuming this is all correct, an excellent deduction. :wink:

And good news for Fev and Carlton.

Here's hoping there are no injuries in the AllStars match.

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 9:20 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 12:00 pm
Posts: 177
Location: Melb
i think setanta is developing along nicely.

his learning has been in a team that has been smashed since the day he arrived. if he had been introduced into a better team early on, he wouldn't have had so much expectation on his game.

he is improving every time he plays and i love his enthusiasm, passion, ability to hit a target (ok, he got it wrong once on fri night but overall he hit just about every target and chose just about every right option), agility and ball-handling.

keep up the good work setanta!

_________________
"You're my boy(s), Bluuuee(s)..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 10:32 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:00 am
Posts: 8229
Location: canberra
One thing that struck me as I watched the replay yesterday was the leadership shown by Judd and Stevo especially in the second half when we needed to stem WC's flow . I think it was highlighted after the goal by Gibbs from Judd's handball when they got together in the goal square and barked off instructions to other players upfield. And didn't Gibbs love that goal!

I thought Simmo, Scotland and Carrots also led by example all playing really good games.

Well done leaders.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 11:57 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:23 am
Posts: 1797
Location: Half Back Flanker...
fjanyc wrote:
jim wrote:
thehalford wrote:
jim wrote:
I can't see how Fev's love tap will get more than a reprimand. Low contact, low impact, negligent. Lowest end of the scale. Given a 25% reduction for an early guilty plea and another 25% for a good recent record (not suspended since Rd 4 2005) would make him a monte for a reprimand.


Got suspended after Rd 3 2006 for a soft as shit charge on Brett Kirk. Don't think that 25%'s applicable.
I thought his last one was against Freo in 2005 but I stand corrected if I'm wrong. Even so, a love tap with an early plea should still result in a reprimand.


I agree Jim. Fev was merely trying to block Selwood's run so that Judd could get clear path to the ball. I don't think it was malicious in that it wasn't a punch, but a forearm. I also think that it wasn't the force of the contact that got Selwood but the placement of the contact and the fact he was tired. I think Fev will either not be cited or should get off. As for some here that want to throw Fev under the bus, yes he makes mistakes. He plays on instinct and emotion. He has had a ripper year and enjoyed the win more than anyone last night. The guy has passion for the jumper which is what everyone has been crying out for the past 6 years. His positives far outweigh his negatives and I wish people would not be so willing to crucify one of the three genuine stars we have in the team. We wouldn't win many games of football without Fev and so you may want to think about that before being so willing to get rid of him.


Barry Hall did the same thing and got to play in a Grand Final...so, surely Fev will be fine. 8)

_________________
"...that's the thing about opinion - you don't have to know anything to have one..." Andre Agassi commenting on Pat Cash 2004
"...the less you know - the more you believe..." - Bono 2006


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 1:07 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Jez1966 wrote:
What would JR have to do to impress you, do you know what his role was last night. Had a good first half then IIRC shadowed Armstrong for the rest of the game.


fair enough point on the 'come-back'................. but we still faded out when we should have really run away with the game.

Don't get me wrong,.........happy we did gather together and found our way again............. but it seems like every game we have a qtr that we just loose our way.

Well aware of JR's role............. but (and this is based on his career, not just his game the other night) in the crucial moments, he doesn't deliver.........
4 goals from 34 games is pretty poor too.

But to be honest............ i wouldn't be dropping him. We have too many imjuries so he's gotta be in the side anyway.

But you'll be hard pressed to find a spot for him once Walker / Houlihan are fit and ready to come back in.

But i am loving the development of Grigg and Bower.............. two players who have been heavilly criticised................ both are looking very good. Still raw, but looking good.
Love Bowers run out of the backline.


One more PRO i forgot to mention..................... yet another game that we have kept our opposition to less than 100 points. First time that's happened since 2006.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 2:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25443
Location: Bondi Beach
sinverbeek wrote

Quote:
When the chips were down tonight, Carrots and Scotland weren;t in the TV screen tonight. Judd Stevens Simpson and Bower dragged us out of the mire and then those 2 bobbed up again.


That's not what happened.

Quote:
Not saying Carrots didn;t play a great game - he was very useful. But still, they need to stand up when the chips are down.


You are saying he didn't play a great game.

simon, Carrots was a PRO tonight anyway you look at it. He busted a gut, he ran to space, he created play, he linked in the same play, he gave it off again and he presented again. Not too many footballers in the AFL can do that.

The consensus is Carrots was easily BOG; you don't want to see it

CONS

We got killed in the ruck and this didn't allow our players have a sniff in the 3rd Q. It wasn't that they stopped trying; that's footy. It has flows and ebbs.

Some of the posters' negative comments about some players' 2nd half. They weren't even there and don't even know if the player they have a go at was even on the field. Yeah, but go ahead and call it as you didn't see it.

You're not the only one svb. Have areas at the first 5 pages, there's a few absolute shockers...I had enough of reading this thread at that stage.

WE @#$%&! WON THE GAME. WE LOST IT IN THE RUCK.

Everyone showed significant improvement in their fitness and in their game; have a look at the first 3 rounds as a reminder of where we've come from.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 2:43 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25443
Location: Bondi Beach
PROS

Whoever thinks Waite hasn't got a footy brain is delusional.

Whoever thought Bentick's performance was peripheral or that his disposal was poor, needs to have a look at the game again.

Fev didn't get a sniff in the 2nd half, because the ball wasn't going to him. We had a lot of goalkickers; a spread. I prefer that. That's not an indictment on Fev. And you can't criticise Fev for the tap,; he's innocent till proven guilty. FFS give him a brea; he bleeds navy blue.

JR had a role to play, and I thought he looked as good if not better than Goddard last night. JR keeps his feet!

It was a great team performance, with my favourite youngsters putting a big smile on my face (looking to the future):

Bower
Setanta
Jamison
Russell
Browne
Betts
Kruezer
Bentick

as did the usual young suspects:

Murphy
Gibbs

GREAT games from our leaders

Judd
Stevens
Scotland
Carrazzo
Simpson
Judd
Fisher

CONS

What are we going to give up to get JK back; I'm sure part of him wants to come back; the big part.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14733
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Good post Bondi


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 6:45 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:16 pm
Posts: 303
bondiblue wrote:
PROS

Whoever thinks Waite hasn't got a footy brain is delusional.

Whoever thought Bentick's performance was peripheral or that his disposal was poor, needs to have a look at the game again.

Fev didn't get a sniff in the 2nd half, because the ball wasn't going to him. We had a lot of goalkickers; a spread. I prefer that. That's not an indictment on Fev. And you can't criticise Fev for the tap,; he's innocent till proven guilty. FFS give him a brea; he bleeds navy blue.

JR had a role to play, and I thought he looked as good if not better than Goddard last night. JR keeps his feet!

It was a great team performance, with my favourite youngsters putting a big smile on my face (looking to the future):

Bower
Setanta
Jamison
Russell
Browne
Betts
Kruezer
Bentick

as did the usual young suspects:

Murphy
Gibbs

GREAT games from our leaders

Judd
Stevens
Scotland
Carrazzo
Simpson
Judd
Fisher

CONS

What are we going to give up to get JK back; I'm sure part of him wants to come back; the big part.


he deserves two nominations :-D

_________________
cruise (Kreuze) missile:
a very accurate flying bomb.
SOURCE: http://library.thinkquest.org/3785/glossary.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 04, 2008 7:02 pm 
Offline
www.blueseum.org
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:02 am
Posts: 1623
http://www.blueseum.org/tiki-index.php? ... West+Coast

One Pro is that despite our last 6 or so years, Carlton's winning ratio against the Eagles is back up to 50%.

From the Blueseum

_________________
Check out www.blueseum.org for all of your Carlton information needs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 8:09 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:58 am
Posts: 3583
Location: Drinking chardonnay with the elites
fjanyc wrote:
jim wrote:
thehalford wrote:
jim wrote:
I can't see how Fev's love tap will get more than a reprimand. Low contact, low impact, negligent. Lowest end of the scale. Given a 25% reduction for an early guilty plea and another 25% for a good recent record (not suspended since Rd 4 2005) would make him a monte for a reprimand.


Got suspended after Rd 3 2006 for a soft as shit charge on Brett Kirk. Don't think that 25%'s applicable.
I thought his last one was against Freo in 2005 but I stand corrected if I'm wrong. Even so, a love tap with an early plea should still result in a reprimand.


I agree Jim. Fev was merely trying to block Selwood's run so that Judd could get clear path to the ball. I don't think it was malicious in that it wasn't a punch, but a forearm. I also think that it wasn't the force of the contact that got Selwood but the placement of the contact and the fact he was tired. I think Fev will either not be cited or should get off. As for some here that want to throw Fev under the bus, yes he makes mistakes. He plays on instinct and emotion. He has had a ripper year and enjoyed the win more than anyone last night. The guy has passion for the jumper which is what everyone has been crying out for the past 6 years. His positives far outweigh his negatives and I wish people would not be so willing to crucify one of the three genuine stars we have in the team. We wouldn't win many games of football without Fev and so you may want to think about that before being so willing to get rid of him.


Selwood should go for that pathetic dive. :evil:

_________________
"Whoever said you can't buy happiness forgot about puppies." - Gene Hill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 8:34 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34548
Location: The Brown Wedge
Con - We got that great lead on the back of the Eagle's attitude. We would've kicked a few of those goals, but the 50s helped alot.
Fev shooshing the crowd at the 10 minute mark of the 1st :roll: FFS Fev - pull your head in.

Pro - We withstood the charge from a more experienced and stronger side. Everyone made excuses for the WCE by saying they only had 12 players from the premiership side :shock: That's 11 more than us :shock: :shock: .

We were smacked in the ruck - AGAIN and still won AGAIN!! Imagine what will happen when we start winning the ruck :lol:

Bentick was instrumental in closing up the takeaways when we didn't win the ruck contest. I don't know many other players who can dive into a pack, extract the footy and dish off a handball. I love this kid :wink: .

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
A big Pro is the form of Steven Browne.....well organized player with good skills and is mature thinking and doesnt get panicked under pressure.
The small defender/back pocket role has been one we have not been able to fill but Browne is the real deal and will serve the club well I predict now and for the future...Browne wa sgood recruiting and the maligned Wayne Hughes gets a tick from me on this draft pick....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 05, 2008 1:59 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Haven't read all pages so apologies if raised but a couple of points I was thinking of...

PROS

Bentick's hardness at the contest was tremendous. Without him and his tackling ability, I have no doubt there would have been several take aways for the Eagles at pace.

Murph right now is above average and quickly progressing to elite.

Browne's composure at this stage of his career is outstanding

Betts - his presenting up the ground is first rate

Bower/Jamo - legitimate AFL defenders

Stevens - his work late in the third and early fourth quarters was superb. The work of a leader. Rapt for him.

Carrots - Hardest working player in the team and I didn't think he was that bad disposing of it this week. I can only think of 3-4 occasions where the pill did end up where it was supposed to go and if he's getting it 42 times I'll wear that. If he doesn't win the NRS this week I'll be furious :shock:

Judd - nuff said.

CONS

Fev of course. Such a shame you can't inject brains into people.

Gibbs - Shouldn't be taking kick outs. He's great around the ground but a total liability there. If we're not careful Houlihan will get back in to take the kick outs.

Setanta and Russell - I am not questioning the effort from these two (in fact I really want them to both work out) but put simply they cannot dispose of the ball to AFL standard. Russell looks really good until he's got to do something with it. Against a good team we'll get killed by the sorts of turnovers he creates.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 10:15 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:05 pm
Posts: 396
Location: Avondale Heights
Pros:
Murph- classy
Bower- better every week
Grigg- same as Bower
Betts- really stepped up this year
Judd- absolute gun
Browne- good signs
simmo- back to his best over last couple of weeks
Stevo- same as simmo, stood up when needed
Carrots- ball magnet and efficient with it.
Defence- improving every week
One play in the 1st or 2nd quarter where we ran the ball up with a string of handballs (im pretty sure it was grigg the main man) weeving through traffic finally landing on the chest of fev, didn't look as classy and smooth as geelong but its starting.
Young guys flying the flag
Fisher in the first half really presented around CHF/Wing
Win interstate


Cons:
Ruck- may have rucks who can compete at ground level but no where near it at the bounces,
Kreuz will get there
Cloke as much as i love his passion and aggression for the club he is unable to do what is needed (not tall or athletic enough), should only really be a back-up and around the ground throw ins etc, needs to try him up forward or something.
Hammer, Aisake or Jacobs need to be given the opportunity to show what they've got, we won't get a dominant tap ruckman overnight but we just need someone to compete and bring the ball to ground not to their advantage all the time. Our Midfield is performing extremely well, would be much better with a competitive ruckman. (the Judd to Fev in the 3rd or 4th quarter was evidence of what could happen more often)
3rd quarter- demolished us in most departments as well as us giving away stupid free kicks and 50m's.

_________________
The climbing has alread began


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 06, 2008 11:06 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:29 pm
Posts: 173
Location: Adelaide
My thoughts are:


Pro's

Our side is starting to get settled and players are not being thrown around everywhere each week.

Back 6 again getting settled next to each other.

Jamo not much of ball but slaughtered McKinley.

Setanta finding some form

JR first half was brilliant he gave us a target across half forward, why he went to Armstrong in the 2nd half i have no idea.

Grigg and Bower excite the hell out of me, they both have height and run and they are now confident to take the game on.

Browne = composure.

Most impressive was our toughness, finally we dont shirk the issue and stick up for each other and it is coming from Murph and Gibbs, gr8 to see.

Finally, we know how to win and we believe in ourselves.


Cons:

Still getting killed in the ruck, need to bring Hammer in.

Need more fwd options, maybe Kruez and Cloke changing is the answer.

_________________
Blue boy thru and thru


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 160 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], GWS, harmsey, windy and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group