Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 4:41 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:12 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Synbad wrote:
We play Collingwood next week.
Then MElbourne.

Then youd have to think we will be playing stronger sides consitently.

0-3 so far.....

Essendon* arent much chop...!!!
The AFL did us a favour and gave us Richmond first up.
StKilda are average....

If Ratts and Co dont turn it around soon....,,,,,, well....


Ratts is on the smallest amount of money of any AFL coah and only a 2 year contract.... his career will have ended quicker than it began....


With respect Synbad, every team we play isn't much chop according to you lately. Richmond i agree with. Who are your teams that are T-Bone Steaks? Geelong, Hawthorn?


Dog I agree with 100%.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:16 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
Just on the forward line - why is it that our forward line often seems as empty
as a school playground on a weekend? Where do our forwards go (Is this what Cat Stevens was really singing about) ?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:24 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Pagan's paddock.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:27 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
dannyboy wrote:
Just on the forward line - why is it that our forward line often seems as empty
as a school playground on a weekend? Where do our forwards go (Is this what Cat Stevens was really singing about) ?


Agree Danny.

We get sucked upfield way too easily. Need to keep a presence of talls and smalls inside 50 at all times.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:02 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10408
Location: Coburg
Or more like Ratts weekend rail yard.

We need some forwards to play in the forward line. Particularly the flanker/crumber types....

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:18 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
kingkerna wrote:
AGRO wrote:
nytdog wrote:
Plus a couple of our senior players put in uncharacterstic average games (Simpson, Scotland, Hoops & probably even Thornton come to mind). So if it wasn't for some unlucky breaks (ie late goals, Fev's posters), poor umpiring decisions and lack of fitness of key players the game would have been ours.



Agree with just about everything you said :shock:.

Except Scotland and Houlihan have got to go and Thornton is on thin ice.


pretty much spot on, except for your Thornton comments, without him we would be even more screwed.

The players that are coasting or not performing up to scratch really do need to be reminded that they are not walk up starters - as mentioned Scotland, Houlihan and even Simpson (whats wrong with him?) need a good talking to.


I do agree that any senior player not giving 110% should be put on notice for their careers. Hoops is the one that really comes to mind. Silky skills and great finisher, but he is a downhill skier with too little intensity sometimes. I want him in the team because you need finishers, but I only want players that give 110%. I would put him on notice.

Scotland and Thornton are trying hard but are just not yet suited to the handball running game plan right now. They tend to hold the ball up and look for options rather than take off and handball to advantage. Their first instinct is to steady and kick. That needs to change. It may take time to convert.

As for Simpson, I never doubt his commitment. He just had an off game and will rebound... just as he did last year. I remember after the first 5-6 games last year the same posters calling for his head. He turned things around pretty quickly and really showed us what he is made of - a leader.

The player that still worries me the most is Carrots. His disposal is just so blah. It doesnt hurt the opposition and it often doesn't advantage us either. But i like his work ethic, so I'm still on the fence of where and if he will fit into the eventual team structure once we hit our strides... and trust me, we will. A win or two and the momentum will begin to grow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:33 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
To often Carrazzo's first instinct once he gets the ball is to "stop and prop" or "double back" - he doesnt hurt the opposition with quick and accurate disposal - I dont question his work ethic or his on training track example - but the fact that sides dont pay him the respect of being tagged despite him getting 25+ disposals every week - should be an indication to us all that he does not hurt other sides.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:56 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Nice post, Dog.
I normally agree with you but I find it hard to accept that this time last year we were 2-1 and this year we are 0-3 and we are improving.
If we are to improve we have to beat the teams who finished more or less level with us last year:
Richmond
Essendon*
Melbourne
Bulldogs.

I think that at the moment we are no better than last year. I think Richmond has improved and I think Essendon* has improved. I think the Doggies have improved and I think Melbourne has gone backwards. I thought we would finish around 12th and still hope we can but it isn't looking good. We had to jump over a few teams to get there and one of them has already beaten us.

Our midfield lacks raw pace and we need to put somebody into it that has it.
Our back six lacks raw pace and we have to put somebody into it that has it.

The team lacks flair and confidence. I know that's hard to display when you are on the losing end but we need players to stick the pill under their arm and run with it occasionally. We need someone to take a speccy. Or at least miss a few. Apart from Judd and Eddie, we don't seem to have anybody that makes the crowd come alive when he gets near the ball. I think Walker's injury has particularly hurt us in that regard.

I am sure we will improve as the year goes on and I am equally sure that Ratts will realize that Houla is a finisher and not a backman's bootlace. I just hope the Andersons and Benjamins of the world get fit PFQ so we can inject pace and flair into the team.

I am also going to go on record as saying I now think Dale Thomas was a better pickup than Murphy. Murphy is a great, solid, thinking player, very workmanlike and makes not too many mistakes but to me, Thomas is more of a matchwinner. Faster, tackles at least as well and plays with more flair. At the time I thought we should have selected Nathan Jones by the way so I am only looking in hindsight.

I can't watch or listen to games without emotion as hard as I try and even afterwards, trying to analyze a loss is hard for me. But I am calmer than Blue Beatle, who will surely die on the couch in front of the telly one of these years.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:57 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Once upon a time, 100% was enough.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:03 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24647
Location: Kaloyasena
Blue Sombrero wrote:
I am also going to go on record as saying I now think Dale Thomas was a better pickup than Murphy. Murphy is a great, solid, thinking player, very workmanlike and makes not too many mistakes but to me, Thomas is more of a matchwinner. Faster, tackles at least as well and plays with more flair. At the time I thought we should have selected Nathan Jones by the way so I am only looking in hindsight.



Marc Murphy will be the AFL's competition next Ben Cousins (without the off field party tricks).

Dale Thomas at the moment is travelling very well in a side where he doesnt have to exhibit too much accountability and has a licence to use this flair - I will reserve judgement.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:05 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21588
Location: North of the border
Some players have been given different roles to play this year so their output doesn't seem as good- Even this week they decided that Thornton wasn't the best go to man to bring it out of defence and he was given a more negating role than he has had recently - Last year Houlihan and Scotland were the go to men off half back - this year some of there work has been spread around to Thornton- Bower and Gibbs - last week Gibbs and Murphy did most of the work in the middle this week it was taken by Judd - Stevens and Hadley and Betts - Ratten seems to be mixing things up trying players in different positions and roles even at the expence of others in the team.

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Murphy was the best player in that draft, and by a long way too.

As for Simmo, if I remember correctly, he started last season slowly too. He'll be fine.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:35 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 11:47 am
Posts: 814
nytdog wrote:
And then theres Judd... oh Judd... 4-5 more weeks and watch out.


QFT


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:47 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:59 pm
Posts: 126
agree with nytdog. great post.

things are slowly clicking.

the judd / stevens combo is looking superb.

team discipline seem to be improving and Fevola maybe on a new path.

Kreuz/Murph/Gibbs/Hampson/Jamison - bright future.

takes time for new players to click with new coaches and understand game plan. am sure that it will all come together nicely.

am very excited about future. except not sure re Carazzo / Russell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 12:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Nice post, Dog.
I normally agree with you but I find it hard to accept that this time last year we were 2-1 and this year we are 0-3 and we are improving.
If we are to improve we have to beat the teams who finished more or less level with us last year:
Richmond
Essendon*
Melbourne
Bulldogs.

I think that at the moment we are no better than last year. I think Richmond has improved and I think Essendon* has improved. I think the Doggies have improved and I think Melbourne has gone backwards. I thought we would finish around 12th and still hope we can but it isn't looking good. We had to jump over a few teams to get there and one of them has already beaten us.

Our midfield lacks raw pace and we need to put somebody into it that has it.
Our back six lacks raw pace and we have to put somebody into it that has it.

The team lacks flair and confidence. I know that's hard to display when you are on the losing end but we need players to stick the pill under their arm and run with it occasionally. We need someone to take a speccy. Or at least miss a few. Apart from Judd and Eddie, we don't seem to have anybody that makes the crowd come alive when he gets near the ball. I think Walker's injury has particularly hurt us in that regard.

I am sure we will improve as the year goes on and I am equally sure that Ratts will realize that Houla is a finisher and not a backman's bootlace. I just hope the Andersons and Benjamins of the world get fit PFQ so we can inject pace and flair into the team.

I am also going to go on record as saying I now think Dale Thomas was a better pickup than Murphy. Murphy is a great, solid, thinking player, very workmanlike and makes not too many mistakes but to me, Thomas is more of a matchwinner. Faster, tackles at least as well and plays with more flair. At the time I thought we should have selected Nathan Jones by the way so I am only looking in hindsight.

I can't watch or listen to games without emotion as hard as I try and even afterwards, trying to analyze a loss is hard for me. But I am calmer than Blue Beatle, who will surely die on the couch in front of the telly one of these years.


Hey Sombo... its been a long time. I hope you're well and its good to hear from you.

As for your comments about us going backwards, it is a fair observation but I'm not sure its 100% correct. Last year we were 2-1 but we had a coach and a game plan that had been building for 3-4 years. We also were relying on the same ol same ol players to win us those games. This year, we have a better spread of talent. But the biggest thing, is that we are adapting to a new coach, a new game plan and with new players. A quarter of our team havent played together... Judd, Hadley, Pfiiffer, Kreuz, Jamo, Hampson... and you could probably throw Bower in there who didnt play much last year. It will take time. In any team sport it takes time to become familiar with your team mates and build trust and understanding. Its particularly hard when your coaches are new and the game plan is so different. So I really don't think we've taken a step backwards, I think we've taken a step sideways and forward (diagonal you could say). The scoreboard will be the last thing to follow. A few more of those 3rd quarters strung together and we'll really see things differently.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:11 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Great post nytdog.

A lot of our kids have been in a modern, supportive football environment for six months at AFL level. I can't see how they could develop quickly under an ancient gameplan and being tossed back and forth between two teams where the coaches didn't speak to each other.

Add in the fact there were virtually no dedicated development resources and we are coming from so far back it isn't funny.

There were so many positives out of Saturday night in terms of seeing a team structure in place that I walked out with a smile on my face. In 18-24 months' time, this is going to be a serious team.

The two areas I am most concerned about is defensive midfield pressure and forward line structure - I think the people we have there are good enough but their positioning and the emphasis on Fev is something we need to keep working on.

Very comfortable with where this team is considering where they've come from six months ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 1:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Blue Sombrero wrote:
Nice post, Dog.
I normally agree with you but I find it hard to accept that this time last year we were 2-1 and this year we are 0-3 and we are improving.


Add to nytdog's comments the fact that Pagan had us primed to hit the nab cup running and this spilled into the first few weeks of the home and away season before the team collapsed later.

I honestly don't make any comparisons between this team and Pagan's reign - everything is so different now I don't see the point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:56 pm
Posts: 230
Sydney Blue wrote:
Some players have been given different roles to play this year so their output doesn't seem as good- Even this week they decided that Thornton wasn't the best go to man to bring it out of defence and he was given a more negating role than he has had recently - Last year Houlihan and Scotland were the go to men off half back - this year some of there work has been spread around to Thornton- Bower and Gibbs - last week Gibbs and Murphy did most of the work in the middle this week it was taken by Judd - Stevens and Hadley and Betts - Ratten seems to be mixing things up trying players in different positions and roles even at the expence of others in the team.



I rwally like this analysis Sydney B.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:49 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:56 pm
Posts: 230
Sydney Blue wrote:
Some players have been given different roles to play this year so their output doesn't seem as good- Even this week they decided that Thornton wasn't the best go to man to bring it out of defence and he was given a more negating role than he has had recently - Last year Houlihan and Scotland were the go to men off half back - this year some of there work has been spread around to Thornton- Bower and Gibbs - last week Gibbs and Murphy did most of the work in the middle this week it was taken by Judd - Stevens and Hadley and Betts - Ratten seems to be mixing things up trying players in different positions and roles even at the expence of others in the team.



I really like this analysis Sydney B.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
I hope both the Dog and Agro can prove me wrong.
I really do.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group