badbuzz wrote:
We may be jumping the gun a little, re: the game plan.
Tonight I thought we controlled the ball well enough from our defencive 50. Skill errors were not as apparent as last weeks. Seems as though the guys are understanding the need to maintain possesion rather than bombing to a contest 40 to 50 meters up the ground.
The downside with tonights game was that the transition from defensive 50 through the middle into our forward 50 was too slow, allowing St Kilda to push numbers back choking our forwards.
In a clear comparison, StKilda were just as unsuccessful as we were when their transition was slow, but were able to capitalise when they moved it quickly.
Ratts possible approach to the new game plan could be in stages.
1. Stop kicking long and hoping for the best.
2. Improve your short game skills to allow the team to move the ball without risking a turnover.
3. Increase the tempo.
Personnaly I can see some significant changes, and do believe by around round 6-7, we should see the forward line operating a lot more effectively.
This is very true. Don't know about the approach scenario but the rest is pretty spot on.
We need to get another ruckman into the team to support Hampson, ie. Ackland or Aisake/Jacobs. Doesn't matter who as long as we have 2 ruckman other than Cloke. Then put the big fella @ CHF and tell him to use his "bulk" to create opportunities and demand us going through him using the corridor. This will do 2 things make opposition defenders aware we have a "big body forward" to negate and allow Fev, Fisher and Edwards the luxury of playing correctly. Kruezer should only be used as a replacement for Edwards not CHF right now. Last night my decision was made that Cloke is the man for this job right now. His endevour is right, don't know about his footy nouse. Setanta is the other but again ...