Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 8:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:28 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 6:03 pm
Posts: 3510
Location: East Brunwick
Josh Kaplan wrote:
Our "possession" game plan enforces our own players to think that this means chip the ball around and dont run and make an option.
Why do we play on 20% of the time when Essendon* today (and I went to the match) played on at EVERY OPPORTUNITY.
Why was their forward line so open for Lloyd when ours is always clogged with 5 players on Fev?
Why was Ryder (a second year player) able to do a purely defensive job and more then hold his own on Edwards, when our second year players still get caught in the headlights?
Why are purely B/B+ players like Dempsey, McVeigh, Nash, Slattery etc RUNNING RUNNING AND RUNNING out a whole game until they are absolutely exhausted, when we have players like Thornton Bower and Hartlett on Thursday night barely raising a sweat.
These are ALL questions for our coaching staff- and quite frankly Ive been hearing excuses for 6 years now.
There is an underlying cancer within our football club that "everything will be alright because we're Carlton." I heard it again all summer that "everything is OK because we got Judd." Well that rational killed us in 2002, it raped us in 2003, in fact it has pervaded this football club every year for the past 7 years.

The most shattering thing about Thursday night was the fact that our players simply gave up. They did not give a flowering shit. And this is something all the calls for patience and calm by some of you on here CANNOT address.


Finally someone who makes some sense. Well said mate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:31 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
On the static style - I agree I think there are reasons. I think we need a CHF who moves even as he marks. I think we need a back line that works together and moves decisively out of defense. I think this will take time.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:33 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:47 am
Posts: 1162
Synbad wrote:
I suppose we can give Ratts 5 years..... ok....


Look.. there is no excuse to not have players looking like they know what to do.... (unless were recriting some of the dumbest players to have ever played the game .. ever....)

There is no excuse to not have players that want to run and back each other up... unless they have their hands and legs painted on and theyre just a bunch of invalids...

We have a group of plyers that dont know what to do and are not zealous at working hard...

Its simple....

If it doesnt kick in soon.. ill start barracking for Rich.. and pick 1 and 2....

Cos thats the best we will be able to salvage for this season...


What is your secret to bringing up the tanking talk and not copping a week or 2 week holiday.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
if we go for another clean out then next year is year 1

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:37 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
Synbad wrote:
SA Blue wrote:
:Essendon* best: McVeigh, Lloyd, Watson, Fletcher, Ramanauskas, Houli, Dempsey

The first 5 names are the old brigade. I absolutely agree our kids need to stand up, but it is the leadership of the Judds, Stevens, Fev, Scotland that we need to lead from the front.

Rocca won the game for the Woods on Sat. He and Richo did what Fev needed to.


We have Waite Simpson Judd Stevens Thornton Fevola Houlihan..Waite..Cloke... etc..

They dont have less young kids in than we do......


No, but they have better LEADERS!! The ones that show the way for the kids on and off-field...

Look, I agree we need to improve on Thursday night. No doubt. But I don't agree we should expect Ratten to have sorted out the mess this soon.

As for the game plan, I agree with you & Josh & others that we need a lot more run. But some of the philosophies that are being thrown up here sound like they are just straight out of DP's game book. We needed a fundamental change in our style of play. Ratten is trying to implement that change. Give him at least 6 games....fair dinkum games....not pre-season games, NOT the last 6 games of last year....

I'm sick of being losers too, but we came into this season knowing Ratten was an unknown quantity as a coach and, let's face it, due-process concerns surrounding the appointment still linger for some. But the fact is he's our new coach, and he's trying to get a group of players who are either young or battered (or both) to play a different way. And he's doing so with a new leadership group.

I'm giving it at least until Round 6...if we haven't shown an improvement in game STYLE by then (I'm not talking wins/losses necessarily), THEN I'll be the first to admit we are probably in as deep a shit as you say we are... :P

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Barack Obama wrote:
Synbad wrote:
I suppose we can give Ratts 5 years..... ok....


Look.. there is no excuse to not have players looking like they know what to do.... (unless were recriting some of the dumbest players to have ever played the game .. ever....)

There is no excuse to not have players that want to run and back each other up... unless they have their hands and legs painted on and theyre just a bunch of invalids...

We have a group of plyers that dont know what to do and are not zealous at working hard...

Its simple....

If it doesnt kick in soon.. ill start barracking for Rich.. and pick 1 and 2....

Cos thats the best we will be able to salvage for this season...


What is your secret to bringing up the tanking talk and not copping a week or 2 week holiday.

Possibly because he's not obsessed

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:58 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:47 am
Posts: 1162
Josh Kaplan wrote:
I think everyone here is missing the point besides Synbad.
Look at Hawthorns defence- Brown, Gilham, Croad, Birchall- 2 former rejects, one mid 30's pick, one rookie.
Sydney- Roberts Thompson, Bolton, Kennelly, Barry- rejects, no hoperrs, Irishmen
Adelaide- Rutten, Bassett, Bock, Johncock etc- again players nobody gave a chance to and one taken in the draft at 70+ have turned into a cohesive unit in defence.
Roos- Firrito, Pratt, etc

The problem with our team is that we dont play for EACH other. We dont gut run for one another, get back to help each other out in defence, tackle in numbers, basically do all the things that the good teams do.

We dont need top ten picks to do this as BO suggests, we need an injection of spirit and a well drilled gameplan, something the Malthouses, Worsfolds Craigs Roos's and even bluddy Laidley's of this world know how to execute and get from their players. Our challenge is to have Ratten execute a similar mindset in our players.


You're right. We should not need top draft picks to pick up a defence. Unfortunately my point is that our recruiting is not up to it and hence we need them served up on a platter. If our recruiting team was up to it we would have been able to find a backline.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:10 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19563
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Give Jamo/T-Bird/Bower some time to gel. The ball was entering Richmond's 50 with ease in the second half.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:11 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 536
Location: Melbourne
dannyboy wrote:
Its pointless arguing with you guys because you want to see everything as equal when it clearly isn't. And you do not wish to consider the other side. Bath water - well gee Synbad try and think what I might mean , I am certain you can, but you don't want to, ranting is far easier.

And Josh I have respect for your opinions but to think its been 7 years is wrong I am afraid. Its been 7 years to get the list right - thats shit I agree, but that is how long it took this stupid club. If we lose patience now we will end up a Richmond, ditching coaches and teams as regularly as some people change hairdos.

If we trust the list we have now got then we must give them time, I think a year (and thats all it is, not 7) is not asking too much.


We are the Hawthorn model not the Essendon* model - and it is a very different model. Add Clarkson and Schwabb - how long did it take them? How long Clarkson before their game plan made sense? Do you remember that game against them in his first year, they played ring a ring a rosie - looked stupid didn't it, and now they are as direct as it gets.

This will take a full year, I suggest you go away for a holiday come back when its over. At the end of this year the game plan will begin (yes begin) to solidify so that under pressure/when fatigued/when there are no options/ it will be this game plan the plays automatically fall into, choosing the options that their teammates will understand because they fall into it to.

How long ago were people asking for Bomber Thompson's head - yet we expect Ratts to gel this group in weeks not years....

The genius of Paul Roos, to me is that if you never rebuild (that horrible phrase) if you never tank ( a worse phrase) then every player is always playing for the team. We have lost that and now we have to work to get it back. It isn't a switch but its integral to team sports.

The scary part is that if you are both right and Ratts isn't the man, or worse, its the club's culture, then we are about to become the new Melbourne. I do not think you are right, I just think you are hasty. I think Ratts will need a lot more time. I think the players will need a lot more time.


G'day guys, I'm a first-time browser of this forum and with all due respect to Synbad and Abaddon, I think it's way too early to panic- and I agree with Danny's summation of where we are at this point. With the damage caused by the initial penalty of the AFL in 2002 and furthermore, the club stymied by an instrangient and inflexible Pagan, we are still a way behind. However, look at Richmond- give credit's when its due; they were up for the win after feeling so "wronged" from last season and they did have a solid pre-season (except for the performance against the Aints in the NAB).

Synbad, you do have a point- where was the passion, the spirit and the desire to bleed for the jumper and for the teammate. Maybe, that's what we need to judge Ratten on for this season, apart from his gameplan- I'd say the spirit of unity and the Blues was probably bludgeoned by Pagan and his co-horts. If anyone witnessed P's pre-game speech at the last Optus Oval game in 2005 will know what I mean. Anyway, thanks for letting me have my piece and...GO THE BLUES! 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Welcome PD's PC

I said it a week ago... the book Steven Pressfield "Gates of Fire" is exactly what this group need to read...

All about comaraderie.. sacrifice.. selfness... drilling and working hard mentally and physically till when the day comes... its all instinct...and above all.. honouring your colours..

And a great book about the human spirit... and "winning" when there is no win to be won..


I think Ratten and the players should all get a copy of it...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
aboynamedsue wrote:
Abaddon wrote:
even more depsressing after watching Essendon* today.
Essednons kids are exciting. they're already shown improvement. Carlton is still shit. even after all this time. 5 years of making excuses.


Essendon* aren't recovering from 5-6 years of being a rabble (on and off field), and they still have some good on-field leaders who have played in premierships for the club.

I'm not making excuses for Carlton (and I agree it's depressing), I'm just saying there are reasons for why we won't improve as quickly as some other clubs. It's still going to be a long way back for us, let's face it...

That's not true,Essendon* recruited some good young teens because of Sheedy,he gets results.

_________________
Bang Bang.


Last edited by Rambo Stallone on Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:35 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 8:24 pm
Posts: 2821
Location: In The Boot Of Brendan Fevola Car
dannyboy wrote:
Abaddon wrote:
dannyboy wrote:
5 years!

Now Synbad don't start putting words in mouths. Its a bad habit.

I saw improvement on Thursday

and then I saw players not working hard enough and not supporting each other - and these parts will take time - You mention Essendon* so here's an argument against the continual tankers - keep a core, recruit around the core and suddenly the core don't seem so bad after all.

Keep chucking out the bath water and eventually the baby goes out with it.

We have to now give birth all over again. It is not going to happen in the first game of a new year.


as Juddy said. enough excuses already...
We didnt play Geelong, or St Kilda, or Hawthorn.
We played Richmond... and we looked that bad...


actually this is what Judd said

'Looking forward to Carlton's season, I'm excited by a new set of challenges. The club is in a rebuilding phase and there's a lot of hype.

Unfortunately, this hype isn't going to help us win games of football — as the loss to Richmond last Thursday night showed. We showed glimpses of how we want to play footy and midway through the second quarter, things were looking good. The challenge now is to go through a whole game like that.'


He also said sooner or later if the guys don't put in,their will be a new group taking over,too me his talking about players like carrazzo,no good getting the ball and turning it over all the time or Fevola,no good getting on the piss 4 games before the game and thinking you can get your best preparation for the game.

I'm betting Judd will have a big say who won't be getting signed if they off contract and traded away,he won't take 50% effort on the field or off.

He would be thinking if you haven't the skill you come to training earlier and leave later and even learn it away and practice.

_________________
Bang Bang.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:39 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4956
Steve C7 wrote
Quote:
we went into the game without our no 1 ruckman, no 2 forward, walks and a host of midfielders that were underdone as well as Carlos who would have played on Richo if fit.


I agree Steve, if it weren't for these injuries I think we would have won comfortably.

People rant on about the performances of some of Essendon*'s youngsters today however they only came to the fore once the Kangaroos intensity dropped off. The damage was really done by the senior Essendon* players such as McVeigh, Lloyd and Hille.

It is much easier for young players to shine when the senior players can lead the way. When Judd and Stevens reach full fitness and the likes of Fisher and Hampson return we will be a much stronger side and our kids will be able to flourish.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 1763
I really feel we need to give it time with the team this year. Whilst it was a bitter pill to swallow last Thursday, I do agree that the constant in all games is to show heart and hardness in terms of the approach.

This will be a crunch year for quite a few players on our list, make no mistake. I will not name names as it serves no purpose this early in the season - the players will know who they are and they will get their chance to claim their spot on the team or be shown the door at the end of the year.

Maybe our players (other than Judd) felt now that Judd is here, the wins will happen? Maybe this is the reality check the players needed to suggest they all need to extract the digit and contribute as a team? There are many defining losses teams have that actually change clubs' fortunes. Could last Thursday's be ours? Will it be another loss?

The way some are carrying on here makes it sound like a mid or post season review. I don't care where other teams are at and what they did in Round 1 - I'll be interested after Round 22 where we are at compared to teams that won in Rd 1.

_________________
For some silly reason, you people want to assassinate him, and it's just rubbish. You people. All of you, ALL of you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:58 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 11:59 am
Posts: 536
Location: Melbourne
As Wallsy stated in the Age preview before this season started, Essendon* would be primed to start the year with all guns a'blazing but then would taper off, due to the relative youth and dare I say it, Knight's gameplan.....it is only one game. IIRC the corresponding game last year, Essendon* gave 2006 runners-up Sydney a touch-up and then went middlin' with Hird.... :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:07 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21611
Location: North of the border
Our problem is we have been that busy trying to secure draft picks over the last three years that we have forgotten how to win.

If Ratts cant get picks 1 1 1 2 and the best player in the comp all firing and at least competitive he doesn't deserve his job.

I still think our major problem is that we have centred our whole attack around a head case and when that head case is on - first two quarters on thursday we look good - when he is off which is more often then on we lose our entire structure and start chipping sideways or bombing it . We have been doing it for years . We are sacrificing forwards for Fev and it's not working - Waite -Whitnal - Deluca - Kennedy - Hartlett even Livo was recruited as a forward moved back Fisher drifts to far from goal and Edwards will now start to get reluctant to go for marks after colliding with Fev on thursday

Synbad and Josh talk about planning and drilling we do that when the man up front is firing which is usually for about 15- 20 minutes in a game as soon as he switches off thats it .

We need options in attack and lots of them so the players will feel the need to run and carry becaue whilst they look up and all they see is Fev we aint going no where

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:11 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24653
Location: Kaloyasena
I'm prepared to give Ratts a little longer to see whether he can drill a system into this list.

Malthouse and Collingwood are used as an example of a "well drilled" team where youngsters are seamlessly brought into the unit and do well - however dont forget Collingwood did take 3 seasons under Malthouse to start looking like a threat.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Options in attack only come if you can make room and deliver and link up...
Whats the point of having options in attack if you cant get the ball up there decisively...

.. thats like having the biggest hardest dick but chicks hate u.......

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:30 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:18 pm
Posts: 56
Synbad wrote:
.. thats like having the biggest hardest dick but chicks hate u.......


Absolute gold!

_________________
I wasn't going to go there, but I'm so glad I did


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16996
Location: Melbourne
Synbad wrote:
.. thats like having the biggest hardest dick but chicks hate u.......


That might explain why the blood has drained out of the brains of the 'chicken littles' who have ventured onto TC since Thursday night. :wink:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mymanmurph, rodrocketman, windy and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group