Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jul 18, 2025 9:53 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:00 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 7:50 pm
Posts: 279
Pros:
- Murph showed in the first half how dangerous he will be this year not having to cope with a hard tag every week
- Stevo looked overweight and unfit but still has the vision and skill
- Houlihan's goal from 40 m out took me back about 6 years
- Thought Bannister played a good game on Deledio
- We got Judd!

Cons:
- Still too many players can't kick properly (Carrazo, Thornton)
- Desperately need someone to come in and teach most of the team how to stick a tackle
- Judd looked very uncomfortable in his movement
- Struggled to run out the full quarters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
molsey wrote:
PROS
- Edwards. Those yarping about him being dropped need to consider 8 beautiful leading marks from a debutant. He kicked 1 goals 2. Convert better and that is a perfect introduction.


even robert walls reckon we have a winner here! and i agree on what little i have seen

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
95perfection wrote:
We were only 7 points down with 12 minutes to go and as bad as it appeared we were going (particularly the end result) we were still in with a real chance at that stage.


and had fev and edwards not messed one another up a goal would have put us only a point down.

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:16 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48555
Location: Prison Island
pro: we're not melbourne


con: we didnt play melbourne

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:47 am
Posts: 1162
grrofunger wrote:
pro: we're not melbourne


con: we didnt play melbourne


Yay we can beat melbourne. we're on track now. yiiiiiiiipppeeee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48555
Location: Prison Island
Barack Obama wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
pro: we're not melbourne


con: we didnt play melbourne


Yay we can beat melbourne. we're on track now. yiiiiiiiipppeeee


i bet you're the guy who sits behind bax at the footy

:garthp: [/b]

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:24 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4629
Barack Obama wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
pro: we're not melbourne


con: we didnt play melbourne


Yay we can beat melbourne. we're on track now. yiiiiiiiipppeeee


well, a wise Carlton coach once said that Bailey didn't inherite Phar Lap did he :wink:


also

Pros.

at least 4 passes that travelled 40 metres, no higher than 3 metres and hit someone on the tit. More in one game than I saw all season in 2007 (2006,..5,..4,...3)

Cons

still plenty of kicks that went over heads or dropped short
missed old sticky fingers Fisher who is the only player that's been able to grab "those" passes

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35992
Location: Half back flank
Well I finally got around to watching the replay...switched it off after Eddie's running goal in the 2nd. Thought we looked really good, can't understand why everyone's being so negative. :wink:

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:23 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Elwood Blues wrote:
wrote:
Couple of our players took their eye of the footy and didnt go hard enough.

blue beatle wrote:
name names for those of us who haven't seen the game yet.


The two blatant examples were Waite running one way and being comnprehensively outmarked by Hughes running with the flight becasue Hughes wanted it more and Gibbs dropping a simple mark at half back because he took his eyes off it. The tigers rushed it forward and get a goal. Overall our intensity was pathetic, Richmond's intensity allowed them to turn the game around by 50 points. Most disappointing aspect of the game. You don't need talent to be as intense or to try as hard as your opponent (Just ask Wiggo). Our tackling was a good example of our attitude.

The first thing Ratts has to do is getting them to be as desperate as their opponents.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:43 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
simonverbeek wrote:
molsey wrote:
Carrazzo's 4 or 5 failed entries into I50 were a symptom of something else- I think we forgot to wait.


Don't agree. He had good leads on a number of situations. And just missed them plain and simple. The goal for Richmond that started their revival after we were 4 up came from Carrazzo missing Fev on a regulation lead.

And btw, we're still bombing it to Fev versus 15 players way too often.


I think on many of his failed kicks he had a lead in a tiny bit of space but he still had options in midfield. I'd much prefer, particulary for someone like Carrots, for him not to aim at the 20% chance 30 metre spear pass but to handball to Stevens (in one case) who was on his shoulder and in space.

I'm all for kicking to good leads but I also think some players need to play within their limitations. Carrazzo is smart but as we all know his kicking isn't precise. We needed to find ways for Houlihan or Stevens or Scotland to be brought into the running-down-the-wing play to make a better first of a low probability lead. Either that or take them on themselves - in the case I'm thinking of the 2 only had 2 Tiger in front of them, and another in front of Fev - they could have created something between them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:54 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:21 pm
Posts: 817
I'm surprised by the number of people who are saying that Thornton can't kick. He is technically a very sound kick and usually hits his targets well. The problem on Thursday night was that he made some shocking decisions and therefore turned the ball over.
I remember one specific incident where he had the ball about 20m out from goal. Simpson was all on his own near the boundary line 50m out. Thornton chose not to kick to him, ran another 20m, all options were suddenly covered and as a result he kicked it to space where Richmond regained possession. This was not a bad kick, it was a bad option. 1st option is usually the correct one.

_________________
Don't blame it on the sunshine, don't blame it on the moonlight, don't blame it on the good times, blame it on the WIGGINS!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 1:08 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
molsey wrote:
simonverbeek wrote:
molsey wrote:
Carrazzo's 4 or 5 failed entries into I50 were a symptom of something else- I think we forgot to wait.


Don't agree. He had good leads on a number of situations. And just missed them plain and simple. The goal for Richmond that started their revival after we were 4 up came from Carrazzo missing Fev on a regulation lead.

And btw, we're still bombing it to Fev versus 15 players way too often.


I think on many of his failed kicks he had a lead in a tiny bit of space but he still had options in midfield. I'd much prefer, particulary for someone like Carrots, for him not to aim at the 20% chance 30 metre spear pass but to handball to Stevens (in one case) who was on his shoulder and in space.

I'm all for kicking to good leads but I also think some players need to play within their limitations. Carrazzo is smart but as we all know his kicking isn't precise. We needed to find ways for Houlihan or Stevens or Scotland to be brought into the running-down-the-wing play to make a better first of a low probability lead. Either that or take them on themselves - in the case I'm thinking of the 2 only had 2 Tiger in front of them, and another in front of Fev - they could have created something between them.

Good teams playmakers (Geelong Hawthorn WC) all have great disposal. After last season I considered Carrotts had improved his disposal to at least 'reasonable'.
I thought that with another pre-season and practice he could improve his decision making/disposal further and be a genuine elite midfielder/playmaker.
Last Thursday his disposal was generally poor I thought. It may be a one off, I'm hoping, but if it continues we'll have to look for someone else to fill the role.
To be a successfull side it is mandatory for ALL our midfielders/playmakers to have excellent disposal.
Nothing less than excellence!!

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:14 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
The posters on here bagging edwards must have been watching a different player to me.

A great debut from Jake... well done young man!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:03 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Blues87 wrote:
I'm surprised by the number of people who are saying that Thornton can't kick. He is technically a very sound kick and usually hits his targets well. The problem on Thursday night was that he made some shocking decisions and therefore turned the ball over.
I remember one specific incident where he had the ball about 20m out from goal. Simpson was all on his own near the boundary line 50m out. Thornton chose not to kick to him, ran another 20m, all options were suddenly covered and as a result he kicked it to space where Richmond regained possession. This was not a bad kick, it was a bad option. 1st option is usually the correct one.


In 2007 had the highest kicking efficiency in the team of 89%.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:29 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
cons

improving kicking efficiency by slowly chipping the ball sideways and backwards under little pressure giving the opposition time to zone up and block rebounding space

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:32 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
pros

Simmo & Juddy running hard and forward breaking the lines trying to create movement...

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
BlueWorld wrote:
Blues87 wrote:
I'm surprised by the number of people who are saying that Thornton can't kick. He is technically a very sound kick and usually hits his targets well. The problem on Thursday night was that he made some shocking decisions and therefore turned the ball over.
I remember one specific incident where he had the ball about 20m out from goal. Simpson was all on his own near the boundary line 50m out. Thornton chose not to kick to him, ran another 20m, all options were suddenly covered and as a result he kicked it to space where Richmond regained possession. This was not a bad kick, it was a bad option. 1st option is usually the correct one.


In 2007 had the highest kicking efficiency in the team of 89%.


yeah kicking the ball behind him to targets 20 meters away doesnt make you an accurate kick.....

You cant even look at Thornton and point to him for accuracy...he is one of the crabs... doesnt take a risk going forward either by presenting or moving the ball quickly....

.. which of course means if you have to kick it at a 45 degree behind you to find him wide and then he kicks it wide or a chip... theyre setting up...

We dont need that kind of play.. we need it to go to gutbusting runers who can run it 20 to 30 meters and kick it to a players advantage moving it forward swiftly...

This bullshit you kick to me and ill chip it back to you is rubbish....

Were going to get murdered if thats how we load up our defence and setups going forward...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:19 pm 
Offline
formerly p(12)terg
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:46 pm
Posts: 7012
Location: Western Sydney, NSW.au
Pros
Edwards - answered the call with no hesitation
Simmo - comes off the bench and enters the fray at least twice
Setant - same as Simmo, but I only saw that once
Murph - finally, a goal!
Eddie - there should be more crumbers like him
The first 3/8 of the game
Thornton - possession leader

Cons
The last 5/8 of the game
The fact that I can't bring myself to watch the last 1/2 of the game
Thornton - one goal in 110 games!
We lost to the Tiges


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:27 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10414
Location: Coburg
Synbad wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Blues87 wrote:
I'm surprised by the number of people who are saying that Thornton can't kick. He is technically a very sound kick and usually hits his targets well. The problem on Thursday night was that he made some shocking decisions and therefore turned the ball over.
I remember one specific incident where he had the ball about 20m out from goal. Simpson was all on his own near the boundary line 50m out. Thornton chose not to kick to him, ran another 20m, all options were suddenly covered and as a result he kicked it to space where Richmond regained possession. This was not a bad kick, it was a bad option. 1st option is usually the correct one.


In 2007 had the highest kicking efficiency in the team of 89%.


yeah kicking the ball behind him to targets 20 meters away doesnt make you an accurate kick.....

You cant even look at Thornton and point to him for accuracy...he is one of the crabs... doesnt take a risk going forward either by presenting or moving the ball quickly....

.. which of course means if you have to kick it at a 45 degree behind you to find him wide and then he kicks it wide or a chip... theyre setting up...

We dont need that kind of play.. we need it to go to gutbusting runers who can run it 20 to 30 meters and kick it to a players advantage moving it forward swiftly...

This bullshit you kick to me and ill chip it back to you is rubbish....

Were going to get murdered if thats how we load up our defence and setups going forward...


agree 100% T-Bird is not the player you want to make these decisions..He never gambles and so it all comes unstuck.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19607
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
The stats show our ruckmen were beaten; Richmond's hitouts were to their advantage 33% of the time while Carlton's were only to advantage 15% of the time.

Hopefully Hammer is fit for round 2.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 148 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], MPH78 and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group