Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jul 05, 2025 12:02 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:28 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
mandy wrote:
I want to ask a serious question about this thread. So those inclined to bag what I say simply because I don't barrack for Carlton, try and control yourselves.

Admittedly I'm not really sure how I'd feel if my team was in your position right now and I had to read an article like that from a new player the calibre of Judd.

But..... does this really sit well with all of you? I get what he's saying, but I imagine if it was my team I'd prefer to hear this from a player who'd been there for more than 5 minutes. Captain or not. Maybe a player who had actually suffered though the hard times before taking kinda easy pot shots.

I know you're all in love with Judd right now, as you should be. But is this kind of public chastising really acceptable at this stage of his career with Carlton?

I'm honestly not having a dig at Carlton, or Judd. I'd just be interested to know if anyone else felt it was a little bit premature, as I did.


The more they here it from someone who has been at the club for 5 mins the better IMO.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Yep. Judd's had the benefit of looking at our club from outside the hallowed walls and inflated expectations we've experienced ourselves. An unbiased and unclouded opinion of a bloke who knows what he's on about.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:55 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10621
Holy shit Synbad, I agree with you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:51 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Barack Obama wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Barack Obama wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Barack Obama wrote:
Synbad wrote:
In my little mind... we have no excuses to be just floundering...

even if its round 1


we need to see patterns of players understanding the game...

if we cant there something seriously wrong...


We've spent every year since 2003 being drilled to play a long kicking game which does not work any more given the way the game is now played. If you had Carey and Jonathan Brown running around your forward line at their peak maybe...maybe. It will take time to adjust to a short possession game plan which requires sharp decision making and pinpoint skills. I think we have the midfielders to do it (Judd, Murphy, Stevens, Gibbs, Simpson). I don't think we have the bookends. Get those and we're set.


Ok so now we have to go out and get Rutten and Brown or we cant play?????


He's not talking about Rutten and Brown...


who is he talking about???


and BO.. Livingston doesnt play for us anylonger... either does Hotton...

We have alist no worse than anyones..... we need momentum ...


We have a lack of serious quality key position players and won't go anywhere until we get them. If you think we will you're all deluding yourselves.



Do you think this is 'Weird Science'?

If you do... youre living in lalaland...

If we draft a KP player this year he will be 4 years away...
You cant have everything in this age of drafting and salary caps....



What you can do is drill the players into a single unit...


4 years aways is perfect. That's when we'll be challenging for a premiership, 3-4 years. Look at Hawthorn, the basis of their success is going to be their dominant forwardline on Roughead, Franklin, Boyle and Thorp. Of those Roughead, Franklin and Thorp were picks 2, 5 and 7. (Thorp would have been a top 2 in most drafts other than the superdraft). They got their batch of key position players with early picks. We need to do the same. Now of course key position players aren't always top timber early in the draft. In 2005 there weren't that many. In 2006 there were but we got rooted out of a priority pick. I hope KReuzer can make it as a CHF, I think that's where we need him. In 2004 we had to go and win 10 games. This year there are a lot of quality key position players.....

If you think Thornton, Waite and Jamison are going to be able to stop the likes of Franklin, Roughead, Boyle and Thorp, or a Geelong forward line led by Hawkins, Mooney, Ottens, you're dreaming. And next week we're going to have a tough time manning RIewoldt, Kosi, Gherig. And when we kick it down there Fev is triple teamed while we have the stellar options of second gamer Jake Edwards, Fisher who can barely kick it 40 metres, Hartlett if he's not injured or rubbed out...We need more key positions, simple. Until we have those, you can drill us as much as you like but we're going to struggle.





Yeah but will Hawtrhorns backline stop Fisher Fevola Kreuzer etc is our midfield is on top????

Look... if youre going to wait for us to bring in gun defendrs and then spend four years on them... before were a chance... you might as well wave goodbye to Stevens Fevola Scotland and Judd... cos they will be retiring... so then we have to wait another four years to replace them... when Walker Simmo Waite Fisher will be retiring...

Get a grip!!!

Jameson looks good... and we have to drill our team so theyre playing as a single unit.. and then allow our better payers to take over...

I think youre naive if you believe that we cant go forward...

I reckon were having trouble in the development and the drill/coaching area... which is where we have been strugging for the last few years as well as not having enough talent...

Right now we have raw talent.. but that raw talent like a diamond needs to be CUT into something great


Is Ratten the right man for the job????

God knows... but he better be......

Dont forget the match committee didnt have a hell of alot of belief in Ratts. he got a 2 year contract....
he was unproven and came from shit creek....
he was also a mate of some on the board....

so he better be good...

right now i have seen nothing to suggest he understands teaching the game .....

(unlike someone like Chocco) who always has his teams beutifuly drilled... (win or loss).... they look like they know what theyre doing out there....and the skills are sound...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:02 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:49 pm
Posts: 3038
Rome wasn't built in a day...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
italian_styles wrote:
Rome wasn't built in a day...

Either was Richmond..... but theyre still buildng and building and building...

This is year 7 i think.... almost a whole generation...

and just to to put it in perspective for you... how many players has the club turned over since our last finals appearance....

???


That would be interesting but id think we have turned over over EIGHTY FOOTBALLERS....just a guess... but id be shocked if im wrong...


were still building Rome are we????

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:14 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2141
Synbad, who is our defensive unit coach?

If you have a look at Collingwood they look so cohesive in defence.
We look rudderless. Thornton looked good last week, and Jamison is a good player. Why is Sentanta played in the ruck? I think he is wasted there and would give a bit of grit and meanness to the defence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
I have no idea.... maybe Crosisca...

BUT.... seasons are hinged on momentum... we have already lost a home game to one of the weaker sides in the comp... that was one we would have liked to mark down as a win....

BUT... to me more troubling is our setups and the lack of preparedness from players to run...

Watch what Judd does when he gets the ball.. he is looking for options and then runs in a position to link up again...

Thats not due to our play conditioning though ... cos not too many other players do it...

Defensive pressure is non existant..except a couple of players


run ... is non existant...outside a couple of players...


skills????... forget about it....

decision making???... poor...

Fitness??... carrying too many unfit players...


Momentum is everything......... and unless something cicks were in danger from early on in the season...



Are we looking at Melbourne for a win ???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:27 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
tap in 79 wrote:
Synbad, who is our defensive unit coach?

If you have a look at Collingwood they look so cohesive in defence.
We look rudderless. Thornton looked good last week, and Jamison is a good player. Why is Sentanta played in the ruck? I think he is wasted there and would give a bit of grit and meanness to the defence.


We had no one else to use in the ruck, that's why Santy was used in that way. I suspect with Hammo back The Irish will be in defence.

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:30 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:48 pm
Posts: 1392
Synbad wrote:

run ... is non existant...outside a couple of players...


skills????... forget about it....

decision making???... poor...




yeah if you run hard enough, decision making is made easier due to more options and more players by themselves which therefore makes the skill part a bit easier to.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:36 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:47 am
Posts: 1162
Synbad wrote:
Barack Obama wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Barack Obama wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Barack Obama wrote:
Synbad wrote:
In my little mind... we have no excuses to be just floundering...

even if its round 1


we need to see patterns of players understanding the game...

if we cant there something seriously wrong...


We've spent every year since 2003 being drilled to play a long kicking game which does not work any more given the way the game is now played. If you had Carey and Jonathan Brown running around your forward line at their peak maybe...maybe. It will take time to adjust to a short possession game plan which requires sharp decision making and pinpoint skills. I think we have the midfielders to do it (Judd, Murphy, Stevens, Gibbs, Simpson). I don't think we have the bookends. Get those and we're set.


Ok so now we have to go out and get Rutten and Brown or we cant play?????


He's not talking about Rutten and Brown...


who is he talking about???


and BO.. Livingston doesnt play for us anylonger... either does Hotton...

We have alist no worse than anyones..... we need momentum ...


We have a lack of serious quality key position players and won't go anywhere until we get them. If you think we will you're all deluding yourselves.



Do you think this is 'Weird Science'?

If you do... youre living in lalaland...

If we draft a KP player this year he will be 4 years away...
You cant have everything in this age of drafting and salary caps....



What you can do is drill the players into a single unit...


4 years aways is perfect. That's when we'll be challenging for a premiership, 3-4 years. Look at Hawthorn, the basis of their success is going to be their dominant forwardline on Roughead, Franklin, Boyle and Thorp. Of those Roughead, Franklin and Thorp were picks 2, 5 and 7. (Thorp would have been a top 2 in most drafts other than the superdraft). They got their batch of key position players with early picks. We need to do the same. Now of course key position players aren't always top timber early in the draft. In 2005 there weren't that many. In 2006 there were but we got rooted out of a priority pick. I hope KReuzer can make it as a CHF, I think that's where we need him. In 2004 we had to go and win 10 games. This year there are a lot of quality key position players.....

If you think Thornton, Waite and Jamison are going to be able to stop the likes of Franklin, Roughead, Boyle and Thorp, or a Geelong forward line led by Hawkins, Mooney, Ottens, you're dreaming. And next week we're going to have a tough time manning RIewoldt, Kosi, Gherig. And when we kick it down there Fev is triple teamed while we have the stellar options of second gamer Jake Edwards, Fisher who can barely kick it 40 metres, Hartlett if he's not injured or rubbed out...We need more key positions, simple. Until we have those, you can drill us as much as you like but we're going to struggle.







"Yeah but will Hawtrhorns backline stop Fisher Fevola Kreuzer etc is our midfield is on top????"

They will have a much better shot at restricting them than we will of restricting theirs. Fevola IMO at his best is equal to Franklin at his best. Kreuzer at his best will equal thorp I think. Fisher and Roughead are pretty even. So again it comes down to whos backline is better...Remember Hawthorn can throw Roughead/Thorp down back if need be. Look I don't doubt we have talent going forward, but if we get two gun key defenders at the end of this year we will be in such ab etter position it's not funny.

"Look... if youre going to wait for us to bring in gun defendrs and then spend four years on them... before were a chance... you might as well wave goodbye to Stevens Fevola Scotland and Judd... cos they will be retiring... so then we have to wait another four years to replace them... when Walker Simmo Waite Fisher will be retiring..."

You think we can win the premiership this year do you? Scotland IMO is not crucial to the team. Stevens in three years should still be playing, yes as a veteran but every premiership team of the past decades has had a veteran or two. In three - four years Judd will be 28... still at his peak. There is no reason why Fev can't be playing in three or four years at 30.. And of course we will go forward in the meantime but in three or ofur years those key position players we get at the end of this year will be a bonus. Look at how Fraklin/Roughead went today (this is their fourth year!!!!!!)

"Get a grip!!!

Jameson looks good... and we have to drill our team so theyre playing as a single unit.. and then allow our better payers to take over..."

Jamison is excellent, but another key position backman with a good size will dramatically help us too. Jamison can't take Franklin Roughead and Thorp by himself...

"I think youre naive if you believe that we cant go forward..."
I think we can go forward. I think your naive if you don't however see the overwhelming benefit a couple of brilliant extra key positon players will bring. You know how to get them.. you were advocating it last year...

"I reckon were having trouble in the development and the drill/coaching area... which is where we have been strugging for the last few years as well as not having enough talent..."
I don't, I think we're adjusting to a new style of play.

"Right now we have raw talent.. but that raw talent like a diamond needs to be CUT into something great


Is Ratten the right man for the job????

God knows... but he better be......

Dont forget the match committee didnt have a hell of alot of belief in Ratts. he got a 2 year contract....
he was unproven and came from shit creek....
he was also a mate of some on the board...."

He showed a lot last year despite the losses (and in all honesty we probably weren't trying to win). He is drilling us properly I think and eventually the gameplan will work. It doesn't all happen overnight, the first step is to get us used to playing a possession game and that's what we're doing (slowly). You seem to be using Ratten's first game performance as an excuse to have an all out attack on the board. The same board I should point out that got us Swann, Icke and Judd.. Give Ratts time.

"so he better be good...

right now i have seen nothing to suggest he understands teaching the game .....

(unlike someone like Chocco) who always has his teams beutifuly drilled... (win or loss).... they look like they know what theyre doing out there....and the skills are sound..."

M'mm, and as good as Choco was they won one premiership in four years when they were at the top. Get two more gun key position players this year and we could win three or four in a row. I don't doubt we could pinch a premiership with this list. I hope we will and I think in all probability we will. Add a couple more excellent key position players and we have a shot at winning three or four. At the moment we have a shot at a 95 or an 87. Get two more gun key positions and we have a shot at 79-82.

And Ratts will coach us to a premiership. I just hope he can coach us to three or four in a row.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:36 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2141
Synbad wrote:
I have no idea.... maybe Crosisca...

BUT.... seasons are hinged on momentum... we have already lost a home game to one of the weaker sides in the comp... that was one we would have liked to mark down as a win....

BUT... to me more troubling is our setups and the lack of preparedness from players to run...

Watch what Judd does when he gets the ball.. he is looking for options and then runs in a position to link up again...

Thats not due to our play conditioning though ... cos not too many other players do it...

Defensive pressure is non existant..except a couple of players


run ... is non existant...outside a couple of players...


skills????... forget about it....

decision making???... poor...

Fitness??... carrying too many unfit players...


Momentum is everything......... and unless something cicks were in danger from early on in the season...



Are we looking at Melbourne for a win ???



mmm... i agree.

The key is who is prepared to run for the handball receive and break lines.

Not run sideways, or backwards, but forward...?

I am trying to picture a forward runner.

Waite? - yes, to some extent.

Betts? - yes. sometimes.

Murphy - yes

give the forward runners more responsibility. That is a start.


We probably lost 500-1000 potential members at least with that shocking loss to Richmond. Oh well, let's hope the damage is minimised against St Kilda.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:42 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2006 10:47 am
Posts: 1162
tap in 79 wrote:
Synbad wrote:
I have no idea.... maybe Crosisca...

BUT.... seasons are hinged on momentum... we have already lost a home game to one of the weaker sides in the comp... that was one we would have liked to mark down as a win....

BUT... to me more troubling is our setups and the lack of preparedness from players to run...

Watch what Judd does when he gets the ball.. he is looking for options and then runs in a position to link up again...

Thats not due to our play conditioning though ... cos not too many other players do it...

Defensive pressure is non existant..except a couple of players


run ... is non existant...outside a couple of players...


skills????... forget about it....

decision making???... poor...

Fitness??... carrying too many unfit players...


Momentum is everything......... and unless something cicks were in danger from early on in the season...



Are we looking at Melbourne for a win ???



mmm... i agree.

The key is who is prepared to run for the handball receive and break lines.

Not run sideways, or backwards, but forward...?

I am trying to picture a forward runner.

Waite? - yes, to some extent.

Betts? - yes. sometimes.

Murphy - yes

give the forward runners more responsibility. That is a start.


We probably lost 500-1000 potential members at least with that shocking loss to Richmond. Oh well, let's hope the damage is minimised against St Kilda.


Ye and we'll get them back and crack 60,000 members if we string three or four premierships together in a row.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:48 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 4:57 pm
Posts: 457
Quote:
The result, looking back, was pretty embarrassing, and thankfully I can't remember trying to sell my new saying to too many people. The saying was, "The way the cookie crumbles is the way the cookie's formed". I am fully aware of its limitations, and its strengths appear to be non-existent.

But this article isn't about the cookies or the numerous forces that cause them to crumble. It's about the thought upon which the saying is predicated; that is, a strength can also be a weakness.

Hahaha, genuine lol there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 10:21 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
tap in 79 wrote:
Synbad, who is our defensive unit coach?

Crossisca


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:50 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1002
I think that you had better read that article again BO, because you have missed Judds piont completely.

For starters you don't recruit gun defenders, they are tall players with good decision skills that end up playing back.

Secondly and more importantly in the interview Judd did with 3AW on Saturday he mentioned the importance of gelling into a single unit and the time it takes where you can "see the look of a guys face or wink of the eye and know that they are about to do something special, so you get the ball to them". These are the intangables that we don't have because of the high rate of player turnovers and each player just trying to learn their craft.

There can be no more tanking if we are to move forward,play finals and win premierships (3 or 4 if you like BO) because every team that wins premierships has had a pretty stable team lineup for a few years before hand and a good mix of players over various ages. Champion teams are made with a good group of dedicated and skilled players with top ups from the draft each year, not one that tanks for years on end with the hope that it might just click one day and whamo, intsant premiership.

On a personal note to you Mr BO, your attitude to tanking reminds me of the kids fresh out of Uni with a degree in their hands claiming they have the skills required for the position of CEO and will not settle for anything less. i.e no flowering idea!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:26 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 5824
Location: home
Synbad wrote:

BUT... to me more troubling is our setups and the lack of preparedness from players to run...

Watch what Judd does when he gets the ball.. he is looking for options and then runs in a position to link up again...

Thats not due to our play conditioning though ... cos not too many other players do it...


run ... is non existant...outside a couple of players...




QFMFT. We turn it over so often, kicking to players standing still and the opposition just jumps over them for the spoil. Lead you flowers, dont stand still with you hands in the air yelling "kick it to me", lead and command the ball. Run forwards to link up, not wait behind for an easy stat!!!!!! Ratts should ban anyone kicking to a stationary player!!!! Drag them if they do it. We bring the ball forward so slowly, no wonder Fev is continually double and triple teamed

_________________
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:35 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4622
Location: lygon street
3 or 4 premierships in a row, hey??


how many teams in the history of the AFL have won 3 or 4 in a row? you live in a fantasy world BO. fair dinkum mate get real. yes we need a key defender but as synbad said if we're looking at 4 years to develop them we'll then have other holes to fill.

and as for 3 or 4 premierships in a row, stop saying it cos its just crap.

think more along the lines 4 or 5 years of sustained top end finishes resulting in a 17th premiership. anything more than that would be an incredible bonus.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 9:43 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
MIL wrote:
Surely this draft it has to be key position players, ala Hawthorn. Geez they can even afford to draft Stewie Dew now, who got a lazy 25 touches today :(


My dream-team is happy.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 10:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:01 am
Posts: 19089
Location: Wherever bh thinks I should be.
The_Cranium wrote:
how many teams in the history of the AFL have won 4 in a row?


Just one. 8)

_________________
SIDE BY SIDE
COOOOOLLLLLIIIINGWOOOOOOOD

Wojee wrote:
Harmes was out


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: famousblueraincoat, Fenwick Snap, lucablue and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group