LC wrote:
Cazzesman, - I always enjoy your insights - I do not know your medical background but let me tell you having to have an arthroscope at just 19 yrs does not sound like a ‘no big deal’ to me. I have had three and every time the supposed ‘cleanup’ took more and more of my cartilage till now I need a replacement knee!
I won't split hairs here but my understanding is it was a simple procedure to remove (i.e suction) some minor items from within the knee joint. The cartilage and ligaments are fine. I believe it was not a full on knee wrenching arthroscope. There was apparently little to no swelling or bruising after the op, hence he should be fine and back in full training in a week or two. Hence the 'no big deal' comment. I have had 3 arthroscopes myself so I know the deal and the pain. It was suggested he will be back in full training in 2 weeks and based on my experience I took that to mean the op was minor and hardly invasive.
Yes I fully agree that we should give the kids time and ease them in but when it is all said and done the Hammer was recruited to play in the ruck so he has to have some time in the role.
In the practice games he has played 30-40 minutes in a game so that isn't being over-worked. He is not being played like a draft horse, nor are any other kids. Ratts is very mindful of the amount of playing time the kids have.
Hammer has had a brilliant pre-season and is extremely fit. The match committee won't crucify him but they have to give him some chance to grow into the role. The club knows he is a 10-15 year prospect and will treat him as such.
The thing about these 'Injury posts' & "Are the club doing the right thing?" etc etc is this ................
Those in charge this year, in both Coaching and Fitness are completely different from last year. Cordy is an elite fitness manager who is highly regarded world wide. Mr Pratt went after the best and he got him.
I just get peeved with all the couch potatoes 2nd guessing every little thing that happens at the club at the drop of a hat.
It seems posters are happy to build mountains out of molehills at every turn.
Could the club get better in all areas?.....................of course, couldn't every club!................
Is the club aiming for 'Worlds best practice?............most certainly!...........But these things take time...................
With time comes the ability to obtain financial stability, resources, equipment and expertise. Some luck along the way also helps.
Now while I'm ranting.............the following thoughts are more an overview of TC.................... but sometimes...................I say sometimes............
Some posts are formed poorly and the content lacks any real substance or evidence to support the argument. It's often the case that 'statements are made as if they are Fact' rather that a question being posed along the lines of "Is this happening because of this, this and that.'
We all have opinions but opinions are not facts.
Sometimes the 'Cause and effect' bare no resemblance to each other and yet some posters attempt to draw the long bow and look for sinister answers and conclusions. The Stevens recent neck issue is a 110% classic example of what I am on about. It was a complete and utter beatup of the highest order.
Henny 'flowering' Penny is all to much alive and well on this site and it wears thin on me unfortunately.
SE 'flowering ' N has alot to be blamed for IMHO. Their agenda for grandstanding is so obvious and yet supporters still fall for it. Not only do they fall for it they wallow in it. The gossip, the rumor and the innuendo is just plain sad sometimes.
SEN has to fill 24/7 and so they take the smallest particle and beat the absolute suitcase out of it until it becomes bigger that Ber Hur. As a result I think it rubs off on sites like this one. The desire to have the breaking news is secondary to the notion that there may not be any substance to the story. It's all 'Break the rumor now, check it later' journalism.
Some conclusions drawn with limited or no facts are similar to statistics in politics. Depending who manipulates the numbers they can make the answer and the result anything they like in the short term.
Regards Cazzesman