Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 9:25 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:53 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
The Duke wrote:
We already have a lottery - it's called the draft. Richmond had picks 1 and 3 and decided not to take Franklin or Roughead :roll: .

Nothing they do can help idiots like the tiggers.


Now now... Deledio and Tambling are guns... arent they ? :-D :-D :-D :-D

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:04 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:58 am
Posts: 3583
Location: Drinking chardonnay with the elites
Donstuie wrote:
Hang on a second. She accuses us of tanking, when there is actually no evidence that this occured. Isn't that defamatory?


That's what pissed me off the most - no "allegedly", "generally thought to" etc., - I think its outrageous.

_________________
"Whoever said you can't buy happiness forgot about puppies." - Gene Hill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:18 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
I like the courage of her convictions.

the article is pretty spot on.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 12:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
I don't mind Caro's articles in general, irrespective of whether they are good, bad or indiffrent to the Blues.

the reality is simple ... the organ grinder and his monkey will have to prove tanking actually took place ... how is this likely to happen ?

if the AFL embarked on a journey of discovery and came to the conclusion that tanking took place ... what could they do ? .... take away MK et al ... fine us, again ...kick us out of future draft picks ? .... not likely

I don't think the AFL would be that stupid to open this can of worms as it would only lead to unhappiness ... for the AFL that is ..... court challenge to the legitimacy of the AFL not to mention the real big one ...restraint of trade ! :twisted:

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
We played within the rules did we not?


Tanking is an issue when teams yo-yo (Melbourne), or have a "down" year to cherry-pick the draft (Collingwood). When a team is genuinely the worst performed over a 5 year period then why shouldn't they look to build a side for the future and be afforded that opportunity?

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:14 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 2095
Location: handcuffed to a seasoned drinker
Pruneface wrote:
"The Blues not only were rewarded for tanking by gaining the best tall young footballer to emerge in the national draft for several years, but untried coach Brett Ratten won a coaching contract on the back of six successive losses. This is the same Carlton that lost draft picks for cheating several years earlier. Talk about a farce."



Something about this paragraph just doesn't seem right... surely she could have squeezed something in about Harms and Sheldon in '79.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:41 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
Posts: 2361
Location: September Baby!!!!
Dominator_7 wrote:
The Duke wrote:
We already have a lottery - it's called the draft. Richmond had picks 1 and 3 and decided not to take Franklin or Roughead :roll: .

Nothing they do can help idiots like the tiggers.


Now now... Deledio and Tambling are guns... arent they ? :-D :-D :-D :-D


You can pass on Franklin once (hey even the Hawks did) but TWICE :-D :-D :-D :-D

And NEVER forget Fiora ahead of Pavlich


Did the Tiges get Judd in the end? I heard they had the best offer on the table!

_________________
Ecclesiastes 1:4, "One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but The Blues abide forever."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:47 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24648
Location: Kaloyasena
blu944 wrote:
Pruneface wrote:
"The Blues not only were rewarded for tanking by gaining the best tall young footballer to emerge in the national draft for several years, but untried coach Brett Ratten won a coaching contract on the back of six successive losses. This is the same Carlton that lost draft picks for cheating several years earlier. Talk about a farce."



Something about this paragraph just doesn't seem right... surely she could have squeezed something in about Harms and Sheldon in '79.




Apparently the first sentence we got was not enough - everyone wants to have another go.

Come to think of it the AFL did have another go by reaming us with a retrospective change of Draft Rules in 2006 which flowered us to Picks 1 and 17 instead of Picks 1 and 3.

Its like shooting the bejesus out of Ned Kelly in the Glenrowan Hotel nursing him back to health and then hanging him.

Oh yeah they did that didnt they. :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 2:56 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 8:16 pm
Posts: 303
I would rather say we tanked, rather than saying we're shit.

Yes we could've beat collingwood...if we wanted to, but why should be waste Kruezer and Judd on them.

Who cares we tanked. and about ratten. he had a job to do, play like you can win a game, but don't win any...perfectly done ratts.

We are building a premiership team, not a finals team. Everyone plays to win flags and not games.

I don't want us to tank this year, unless we are totally out of it, then i say...tank away.

_________________
cruise (Kreuze) missile:
a very accurate flying bomb.
SOURCE: http://library.thinkquest.org/3785/glossary.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:39 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
Some nobs on SEN are re itterating what Caro said in her article about why isnt Carlton being investigated for match fixing (for tanking last year) if Roos is ?'

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:49 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
Eh... I could care less what that sour old prune thinks about Carlton, her feelings for our club have been set in stone from her family and that's that.

She is generally a pretty good investigative journo - where she falls down horribly is her inability to set her own personal feelings aside and just write objectively on a subject which touches on one of her 'hot' topics. Carlton is just one of those.

If she was going to be objective about a discussion on tanking, she would have included Wallace's comments from last year, Collingwoods blatant tanking in 05 and the Roos doing the same in 2006 (as some said here Hawthorn took full advantage a couple of years ago and are lauded for it).

Poor old Caro can't let an article go by without a personal shot at the Blues and once again she's let herself down badly.

Anyone else notice how the more blatantly anti-Carlton mediots (Wilson, Smith) are becoming increasingly hysterical about the Blues? They're verging on defamation at the moment. Any coincidence with our rise from the ashes? Think not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 3:52 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24648
Location: Kaloyasena
Dominator_7 wrote:
Some nobs on SEN are re itterating what Caro said in her article about why isnt Carlton being investigated for match fixing (for tanking last year) if Roos is ?'



Knobs = SEN.


Not a contradiction in terms.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Dominator_7 wrote:
Some nobs on SEN are re itterating what Caro said in her article about why isnt Carlton being investigated for match fixing (for tanking last year) if Roos is ?'

Might have something to do with there actually being evidence against Roos, and none against us.
Punter22 wrote:
Anyone else notice how the more blatantly anti-Carlton mediots (Wilson, Smith) are becoming increasingly hysterical about the Blues? They're verging on defamation at the moment. Any coincidence with our rise from the ashes? Think not.

It's not bordering on defamation, it IS defamation. Public prejudices are so skewed that people in power can say whatever they want about us without consequences. Eg, what happened to Brian Waldron after he admitted to tanking? Nothing. What about Terry Wallet? Zippo.

But what makes me happy is that it's OUR administration that's showing these nobheads what professionalism means and not reducing themselves to their level.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Last edited by Donstuie on Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 6:14 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:44 pm
Posts: 63
Surely the proof of our tanking will be proven with the comming season. If Carlton was throwing games for the last two months of the season, we can simply turn the tap on and win. If we tanked then we will win the next two months of games and sit atop the ladder undefeated, after the first two months with eight wins.

After all tanking means we could have won, but were not trying, isn't that right? So Caro must expect us to be a serious force this year, it will be interesting to see where she tips us to finish at the end of the year. We must be top eight with a chance at the flag, cause we would have won the last eight games if we tried.

Honesty I'm sick of hearing this crap, as others have pointed out five seasons of appalling results, including three wooden spoons surely indicate that the team was not up to it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:57 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 615
There is a difference between it not being in our best interests to win and tanking. To me tanking implies you are good enough to win, but don't. Winning about 20 games in 6 years probably suggests to anyone with half a brain that you are not good enough to win.

Coming off wins twice last year and then playing good sides who took us seriously because of our winning form, we got hammered (Geelong round 2 and Hawthorn mid year).

After years of butchering the draft, then been suspended from it, and in the middle of the mess making one of the all time worst coaching appointments, I'm surprised anyone could finish below us on the ladder.

However someone managed to. Maybe they were tanking (or maybe they are just really crap).

_________________
Get comfortable being uncomfortable


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24648
Location: Kaloyasena
As far as I am concerned the AFL not only owed us one by raping us of the Priority Pick in 2002, they owed us another one by so dishonourably thieving it from us in 2006 just as we had finished on the bottom for 2 consecutive seasons.

Wilson conveniently ignores this point in her articles.

We have paid the AFL sanctioned penalty for our supposed crimes (and then some :roll: ) yet it is always dragged up again and its implied that the AFL went easy on us.

Wilson is only carrying on about this because her beloved Richmond missed out on a PP in 2007 yet if she does raise this point then she paints herself in a corner by not raising Carlton's loss of a first round PP in 2006.

Completely biased and a convenient selection of facts to back up her gin sodden labours. :evil:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Let's not forget Wallet's admission that they pretty much tanked that last game too.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 10:41 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 9:00 am
Posts: 281
I'd like to take out a big QC and whack her around the head with it.

After a record embarrasing performance against Brisbane where the coach was sacked mid-week, how could you relistically oppose making wholesale changes to the team, including trying out younger players for an extended period (something most Carlton supporters had been calling for, for years) and having players trialled in different positions.

Surely this was the only thing Carlton could expect to gain from the last 6 games with a new coach.

In fact, apart from the North game, we were far more competitive in the other 5 games than we had been for the previous 5 games. So I would argue that we were a better team in the last 6 weeks and probably unlucky not to have won a couple.

JUDD as well we didn't though 8)

_________________
^^^

Don't worry Essendon* ....... We still hate your guts

^^^


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 12:47 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:20 pm
Posts: 1086
tanking.. 9/11 conspiracies.. whats the difference?

_________________
"You're not gonna believe this. The guy killed 16 czechoslovakians. He was an interior decorator."

"His house looked like shit!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 05, 2008 7:24 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 462
AGRO wrote:
As far as I am concerned the AFL not only owed us one by raping us of the Priority Pick in 2002, they owed us another one by so dishonourably thieving it from us in 2006 just as we had finished on the bottom for 2 consecutive seasons.

Wilson conveniently ignores this point in her articles.

We have paid the AFL sanctioned penalty for our supposed crimes (and then some :roll: ) yet it is always dragged up again and its implied that the AFL went easy on us.

Wilson is only carrying on about this because her beloved Richmond missed out on a PP in 2007 yet if she does raise this point then she paints herself in a corner by not raising Carlton's loss of a first round PP in 2006.




Completely biased and a convenient selection of facts to back up her gin sodden labours. :evil:


Initially, when I read the article by CW, I thought to myself that it was a fair article but your argument has tipped the scales.

_________________
Bulldogs captain Steve Mortimer stood up to address his troops before they ran out. ''I'm a proud c---,'' he told them, ''I'm a winner, I wish myself a good g...ame, I wish everyone a good game. Let's get out there and f---ing bash them


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Cazzesman and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group