Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 28, 2025 5:40 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:06 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Elwood Blues wrote

Quote:
When Scotland and Houlihan are battling to hold their spots that will be the sign we are improving and have some real depth....


I agree with that. I hope that happens in 2008 without Scotland and Houla losing form.

I expect presure to come from the kids, both newbies and recent draftees: Anderson, Grigg, Russell, Jackson, Pfieffer, Hadlee, Armfield, Browne, Benjamin and probably Shields.

Whilst I can't see Scotland losing a place in the 22 in 2008-9, I can see him moving further downfield making room in the HB line with speedier, closer checking and maybe taller kids.

Houihan, no doubt has great skills, and he has 1000's of miles in his legs, a stronger body and importantly experience over the kids. Nevertheless, I see his position under threat as the kids step up. But geez, they've got to earn it first.

The pressure is on everyone to perform week in week out; that includes Betts, Simpson, Carrazzo, Gibbs... Any excuse to give the kids 'knocking on the door' a chance, is a chance the MC may/ should take to ensure we keep the pressure to perform on everyone.


Houlihan and Scotland are not great tacklers IMHO and they have a few mates....how many times have I seen Ablett, Chapman etc barge straight through our players and cant be dragged down, ditto for Didak, Farmer, S Grant, Mitchell, Hodge etc etc....

Armfield, Hadley, Pfieffer and Browne is theme recruiting and that theme is strong bodies, good tacklers, body on the line, attack the footy and the man hard with a good level of skill to back up those other attributes.

Houlihan and Scotland provide you with skill level and rebound but none of the other attributes.
Wiggins, Bannister give you hard bodies and effort but dont have the skills to hurt you on the rebound...

Hughes this time has gone for players who are all of the above and its a sensible approach....agree that Houlihan and Scotland may find roles further up the ground but its going to be a packed midfield of talent and some are going to miss out...
Spot on EB. The penny finally dropped that we needed some shut down type players. Over the past 5 years you just new the usual suspects would tear us up regardless of what form they were in. It was so frustrating and appeared we were doing nothing about it. I think our new picks will really address this + more.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 9:43 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18040
Geez, I reckon Scotlands copping a bad wrap here.
He has deficiencies in his game with accountability being a glaring example but tackling has never been a problem IMO.
I've seen him stick many tackles that 75% of our team couldnt implement.

He has areas of deficiency but commiting his body has never been one IMO. He's also copped more hits from keeping his eyes on the ball than most of our players.

I'm a huge Stevo fan but I'd be addressing these areas in HIS game before worrying about Scotland.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 12:24 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
Elwood Blues wrote

Quote:
When Scotland and Houlihan are battling to hold their spots that will be the sign we are improving and have some real depth....


I agree with that. I hope that happens in 2008 without Scotland and Houla losing form.

I expect presure to come from the kids, both newbies and recent draftees: Anderson, Grigg, Russell, Jackson, Pfieffer, Hadlee, Armfield, Browne, Benjamin and probably Shields.

Whilst I can't see Scotland losing a place in the 22 in 2008-9, I can see him moving further downfield making room in the HB line with speedier, closer checking and maybe taller kids.

Houihan, no doubt has great skills, and he has 1000's of miles in his legs, a stronger body and importantly experience over the kids. Nevertheless, I see his position under threat as the kids step up. But geez, they've got to earn it first.

The pressure is on everyone to perform week in week out; that includes Betts, Simpson, Carrazzo, Gibbs... Any excuse to give the kids 'knocking on the door' a chance, is a chance the MC may/ should take to ensure we keep the pressure to perform on everyone.


Houlihan and Scotland are not great tacklers IMHO and they have a few mates....how many times have I seen Ablett, Chapman etc barge straight through our players and cant be dragged down, ditto for Didak, Farmer, S Grant, Mitchell, Hodge etc etc....

Armfield, Hadley, Pfieffer and Browne is theme recruiting and that theme is strong bodies, good tacklers, body on the line, attack the footy and the man hard with a good level of skill to back up those other attributes.

Houlihan and Scotland provide you with skill level and rebound but none of the other attributes.
Wiggins, Bannister give you hard bodies and effort but dont have the skills to hurt you on the rebound...

Hughes this time has gone for players who are all of the above and its a sensible approach....agree that Houlihan and Scotland may find roles further up the ground but its going to be a packed midfield of talent and some are going to miss out...
Spot on EB. The penny finally dropped that we needed some shut down type players. Over the past 5 years you just new the usual suspects would tear us up regardless of what form they were in. It was so frustrating and appeared we were doing nothing about it. I think our new picks will really address this + more.

Basically, we need an injection of new blood which displays a vastly increased intensity which pressures the opposition into making mistakes.
Out with the fragile softies.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 1:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
exsing wrote:
ACHILLES wrote:
budzy wrote:
Stevens in for Houlihan


Do not right off Houlihan just yet! Could be the X factor!


I agree. Houlihan is very inconsistent. But when he turns it on, he is silky smooth. Frustrating that he can't improve his consistency. Will be awesome if he can. Bloody classy player.

So inconsistent, in fact, that he finished 5th in our B&F last year.
C'mon, Achilles, you're normally better than that.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:40 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Barack Obama wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I keep reading about our depth, and see the jockeying for spots when posters put their best team forward.

When weighing up the changing of the guard, I can see the following new 2008 guys filling the void retired players have left rather than existing players filling in that void; a direct swap:

Kouta.......Judd
Lappin......Stevens
Whitnall....Hadley
Kennedy...Kreuzer

They're all wins as far as I'm concerned. Just that alone should give as an extra 10% in pace (at least) and 10% in class.

I also see the following new players on our 2008 list displacing many of those who played in our first 22 in 2007:

Pfieffer....Anderson, Russell and Grigg
Jackson...Blackwell, Bentick, Bannister and Wiggins
Aisake.....Hampson
Cloke......Ackland
Jamison...Bower and Saddo (given Ratts is grooming Thornton, Waite and Setanta as the big backmen)

They're wins in the main, or at the very least break even (with Ando) as far as I'm concerned. I expect that it gives us another 5% more KP and ruck height and 5% more pace than last year.

Hartlett (who has yet to play a game), along with those I identify as 'pushed out' in Anderson, Russell, Grigg, Blackwell, Bentick, Wiggins, Hampson, Ackland and Bower will be fighting to break into the side.

Does this list imply depth of talent?

Then there's the kids Browne and Armfield who will want to mark their mark in 2008 too (albeit a bit young and inexperienced); also competing with those who have lost their positions to the new brigade.

If the above 12 is the peripheral group, then we are a very different team in 2008. I reckon we are at least a 20% better team with the changes; Judd alone imakes up 19% of that. I reckon the new guys make a huge difference in class and pace, and with the improvement in fitness levels and better coaching in 2008, the it all points out to a much better year with the new inclusions.

My biggest punt on new guys getting straight into the team are on Hadley and Pfieffer; the others are a shoe in. If those 2 are selected (and there's good reason why they would), they really put a lot of pressure on everyline in one way or another.

Will the new guys make it in round 1 or later in 2008? Why or why not?

Will the new guys push out the 2007 players to the periphery in 2008?


Should set us up nicely for some honorable losses.

It's all about Natinui and Hurley now :P


8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:04 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Blue Sombrero wrote:
exsing wrote:
ACHILLES wrote:
budzy wrote:
Stevens in for Houlihan


Do not right off Houlihan just yet! Could be the X factor!


I agree. Houlihan is very inconsistent. But when he turns it on, he is silky smooth. Frustrating that he can't improve his consistency. Will be awesome if he can. Bloody classy player.

So inconsistent, in fact, that he finished 5th in our B&F last year.
C'mon, Achilles, you're normally better than that.


5th? :wink:




Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
DenimUndies wrote:
Barack Obama wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
I keep reading about our depth, and see the jockeying for spots when posters put their best team forward.

When weighing up the changing of the guard, I can see the following new 2008 guys filling the void retired players have left rather than existing players filling in that void; a direct swap:

Kouta.......Judd
Lappin......Stevens
Whitnall....Hadley
Kennedy...Kreuzer

They're all wins as far as I'm concerned. Just that alone should give as an extra 10% in pace (at least) and 10% in class.

I also see the following new players on our 2008 list displacing many of those who played in our first 22 in 2007:

Pfieffer....Anderson, Russell and Grigg
Jackson...Blackwell, Bentick, Bannister and Wiggins
Aisake.....Hampson
Cloke......Ackland
Jamison...Bower and Saddo (given Ratts is grooming Thornton, Waite and Setanta as the big backmen)

They're wins in the main, or at the very least break even (with Ando) as far as I'm concerned. I expect that it gives us another 5% more KP and ruck height and 5% more pace than last year.

Hartlett (who has yet to play a game), along with those I identify as 'pushed out' in Anderson, Russell, Grigg, Blackwell, Bentick, Wiggins, Hampson, Ackland and Bower will be fighting to break into the side.

Does this list imply depth of talent?

Then there's the kids Browne and Armfield who will want to mark their mark in 2008 too (albeit a bit young and inexperienced); also competing with those who have lost their positions to the new brigade.

If the above 12 is the peripheral group, then we are a very different team in 2008. I reckon we are at least a 20% better team with the changes; Judd alone imakes up 19% of that. I reckon the new guys make a huge difference in class and pace, and with the improvement in fitness levels and better coaching in 2008, the it all points out to a much better year with the new inclusions.

My biggest punt on new guys getting straight into the team are on Hadley and Pfieffer; the others are a shoe in. If those 2 are selected (and there's good reason why they would), they really put a lot of pressure on everyline in one way or another.

Will the new guys make it in round 1 or later in 2008? Why or why not?

Will the new guys push out the 2007 players to the periphery in 2008?


Should set us up nicely for some honorable losses.

It's all about Natinui and Hurley now :P


8)


BAN! BAAAAAAAAAN!
*shakes fist in the air*
:x

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 10:11 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Blue Vain wrote:
Geez, I reckon Scotlands copping a bad wrap here.
He has deficiencies in his game with accountability being a glaring example but tackling has never been a problem IMO.
I've seen him stick many tackles that 75% of our team couldnt implement.

He has areas of deficiency but commiting his body has never been one IMO. He's also copped more hits from keeping his eyes on the ball than most of our players.

I'm a huge Stevo fan but I'd be addressing these areas in HIS game before worrying about Scotland.


BV...Dont disagree that Stevens has issues but he isnt being asked to mind G Ablett, Chapman, Johnson etc. he is playing the kick chasing mid that Scotland is suited for and used to play ....Scotland isnt a shirker and does contest well but he couldnt mind an elephant if it was trapped in a telephone box.
I will agree to disagree with you on the merits of his tackling.....
Both Houlihan and Scotland are offensive players who were thrown into defense to provide rebound and some decent disposal skills.......but when its players of the calibre of the Geelong trio then thats not good enough...you need defenders in the classic mode ie Andy Mckay/Dean Rice to shut them down IMHO....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:49 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:36 pm
Posts: 1057
Location: melbourne
only a couple of the new boys will make an impact!!!
1. c judd say no more.
2. sir dick hadley-will make a masive impact this year no doubt.190 cent tall running hard nut, great with both sides of the body, experinced body and will show the kids how to play.
3. matty kreuzer-will be great across the forward flanks.big, tall and mobile. will give our midfielders a fantastic target up forward.
will take these 3 guys any day over 5 or 6 blokes that seem to get a game every week, i think we all no who should be getting a run and who has been at the club for a few years and yet they are still producing pies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
go blues.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: azzurro, dannyboy and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group