Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 12:26 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 376 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:09 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25447
Location: Bondi Beach
Cheers and good morning BV.

BV wrote

Quote:
Nah, Jackos the shut down player Bondi.
With a midfield of Judd and co. you'd be pretty happy to go head to head but if one of the opposition gets off the leash, you need a plan B.
Jackos the man for that job.


Jackson's a beauty, I knew you'd have some sort of contigency plan for him...and what you desribed suits him and Carlton to a T.

I was kidding about Blackers, I just didn't have the eart to make a joke about Pagan, the bench with BV in the same sentence. I can't see Blackers winning a spot at all with the midfield depth we have.

A further point that keeps on going around my read regarding the HBF and their role in midfield rotations.

We are all crying out for a stable back 6. This year there's choice. I wonder though if rotating different players at HB would descrease stability.

I get the feeling the rotations from the HBF position, in yours and other posters teams, with the likes of Scotland, Walker and Gibbs, are suggested because they can't fit them into the midfield, despite them being adept to the position of midfielder.

I'm on the fence on that; there's positives for sure, but I can also see one negative. I don't have an answer, just an opinion.

I love the idea of the tough, uncompromising Scotland in the midfield. Before Judd came on board, and with question marks on Stevens, I was hoping that Scotland could start in the midfield with Carrazzo and Murphy.

BV, with all the focus on hands on development by experts, you must be happy and building confidence in the prospects of this team. You needn't answer that; I think we all know where you sit on that point.

When I think of drills, I don't think Bunnings, I think BV. :wink:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:51 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
I didn't write that Bondi. :roll:

But as for Scotland, I think he does the sweeper role better than he does a midfield role. In midfield, he is too unaccountable. Down back, he can run around free and mop up, and does it very well.

Walker will stay in defense until he can prove he can use the ball. He had a game at The Dome this year where he had a game high 12 turnovers I think. It's just not good enough from a no.2 draft pick. So for the time being he should stay down back.

And besides, we have plenty of true midfielders now, with Judd, Stevens, Carrazzo a ball magnet, Simpson on a wing, and then there's Bentick for the time being, and also Hadley who deserves a shot in the midfield.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:52 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Sorry, you meant Blue Vain.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 7:54 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
bondiblue wrote:
Virgin Blue wrote

Quote:
Other than the ruck which is a toss up between Ackland and one or two of...


Ackland... :shock:... plus 1 or 2...? Who is Ackland better than? Even Jacobs in his present condition seems a better prospect. I reckon you're hoping Ackland finds a bit of heart and height...somehow I think he's got his work cut out for him.

Quote:
All we need then is a year or two for Kreuzuer and Hampson to mature


How long do we wait for Ackland to mature?

Wishful thinking VB, but I hope he steps up because as it stands amongst most supporters of the club and those close to the team, Ackland was dropped last year and replaced by a kid playing footy in his 3rd year...basically, they gave up on him. You're living in hope.


It's not about expecting him to step up. It's about protecting the kids in the short term. I think Ackland is hopeless, but he has the sort of big build that can handle a whole year of crash and bash, so he will ruck in 2008 but will then be delisted. Have to protect the kids in 2008. But by 2009 they should be ready to rip. A Kreuzer type will struggle late in 2008.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:22 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25447
Location: Bondi Beach
VB = Virgin Blue wrote

Quote:
It's not about expecting him to step up. It's about protecting the kids in the short term. I think Ackland is hopeless, but he has the sort of big build that can handle a whole year of crash and bash,


You give a good reason for your choice VB.

But... the fact of the matter is that he doesn't crash and bang. He is embarrassing to watch. Just the fact that he doesn't even go up to compete or alternatively, he jumps early to avoid the clash is a problem. It's intolerable for supporters and his roving midfielders as well. Everyone has to pull their weight and be 100% committed.

Quote:
so he will ruck in 2008 but will then be delisted.


We'll see about that. I'd say Cloke is miles ahead of him. Miles!
Yes he will be delisted, or just plain ignored, unless he turns the tables on himself. Too short anyway.

Quote:
Have to protect the kids in 2008. But by 2009 they should be ready to rip. A Kreuzer type will struggle late in 2008.


They can protect themselves. The bottom line is Hamson showed more application and ability at the end of this season than Ackland did throughout.

Kreuzer aside, despite the fact I think he has the goods to jump, ride and use his long arms to tap, why not Aisake (he's not a kid), he's a tough nut and super competitive. At the very least, if we don't win the tap outs we should at the very least nullify being dominated like we have for 5 years.

I think the order of rucks in terms of ability, strength and experience is:

Cloke
Hampson
Aisake
Kreuzer
Jacobs



Ackland


My preference in order (iand for development too) is:

Aisake
Hampson
Kreuzer

Cloke (emegency or CHF)

We've got nothing to lose; it's a development year not a push for the flag.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:19 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Believe me mate, if I were coach, I would give Ackland 3 games to prove he has some mettle, but if he didn't turn it on I'd be going with Cloke, Hampson, Aisake and Kreuzer for the other 19 games.

I think we're on the same page.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:26 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
BBs love child

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 2:27 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
From Wiki. I think the last line says it all...


Quote:
Cain Ackland (born March 16, 1982) is an Australian rules football player with the Carlton Football Club.

He was drafted by Port Adelaide in the second round of the 1999 AFL National Draft. He spent four years with the Power, played only 12 games before being delisted at the end of the 2004 season.

The Saints, who had a shortage of quality ruckman, especially following the departure of Trent Knobel, awarded Ackland the second chance by selecting him in the second round of the 2004 AFL National Draft. He played 22 games during the 2005 season and quickly became a regular first team member of the Saints. He quickly earned the Rex Hunt nickname "The Street" in his commentary, in reference to the St Kilda nightspot Acland Street. Although his start to the 2006 season was far from his best, he has gained plenty of respect as he gave his all although he was out-sized by most of his opponents.

Out of contract with St Kilda, Ackland joined Carlton in 2007, with Carlton using the first pick in the pre-season draft to secure him.[1]. Ackland, whom St Kilda reportedly sought to retain, rejected the Saints' two year offer, accepting a three year deal with the Blues. Ackland's first year at Carlton was quite underwhelming, being dropped twice despite Carlton's lack of ruckmen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:51 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
FB: Armfield/Browne Jamison Thornton
HB: Bower S.O'hAlpin Carazzo
C: Simpson Stevens Walker
HF: Fisher Waite Houlihan
F: Betts Fevola Kruezer
Foll: Cloke Judd Murphy
Int: Hampson Gibbs Hadley Scotland Edwards
Emg: Grigg Jackson Austin

2008 Delist: Ackland Saddington Wiggins Bannister
Playing for career: Russell, Blackwell, Bentick, Hartlett.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 2:56 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
dane wrote:
FB: Armfield/Browne Jamison Thornton
HB: Bower S.O'hAlpin Carazzo
C: Simpson Stevens Walker
HF: Fisher Waite Houlihan
F: Betts Fevola Kruezer
Foll: Cloke Judd Murphy
Int: Hampson Gibbs Hadley Scotland Edwards
Emg: Grigg Jackson Austin

2008 Delist: Ackland Saddington Wiggins Bannister
Playing for career: Russell, Blackwell, Bentick, Hartlett.


Unless the rules have changed I'm pretty sure they're are only four players allowed on the bench :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 3:21 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 68
I think the lineup for 2008 Round 1 should be :

B : Bower Thornton Jackson
HB : Scotland S O'Hailpin Gibbs
C : Simpson Stevens(c) Walker
HF : Houlihan Waite Fisher
FF : Betts Fevola Cloke
RR : Hampson Judd Murphy
INT : Kreuzer Hadley Carrazzo Jamison
EMG : A O'Hailpin Bentick Saddington Grigg

8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 6:06 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:39 pm
Posts: 260
Location: Melb
Did ANYONE have Acland in their 22? I can't remember a more hated player for us.


Anyway, I'm not sold on Cloke. Given Setanta can do a little bit if required I'd rather we don't play guys like Acland or Cloke. 60% Hammo, 20% Setanta 20% Kreuzer would do me fine. Given Hadley's interupted pre-season I think he is going to be borderline for round one. I've given his spot to Jackson for now. I think little Eddie is going to struggle now for a spot. Browne and Armfield provide more flexibility than he does. Both are well built enough to play next year. With a full pre-season in front of them I can see them holding down pocket roles at either end of the ground. I'm keen too for Hoops to return to his forward line days where we can see his skills at work. I have begrudgingly put waite at CHB because ratten says he is playing him there. I'd really only want him there against Pavlich and Riewoldt though. I like the idea of Grigg out of the backline this year. Is quick, has a bit of size and seems to read it well. Clean hands and doesn't panic. Yet struggles to create and strugges to win contested possessions. Hence seems a monty for a backline role. I think the side below has balance: 3 marking forwards, 3 spoiling defenders, plenty of run, little wasted space ruckmen. O'hailipin provides the flexibility. Jamieson allows for a complete revamp - can push him back and then Waite forward if Kreuzer isn't working out. Carrazzo and Jackson provide the type of run off the bench that Swan gives the Pies.

Any of the following playing at any time would be fine for me: Edwards, Austin, Anderson, Hadley, Betts. At a stretch Russell. Anyone else and I think we are not doing so well. And yes that includes Cloke who I just don't rate. Anyway, here's my team:

Armfield Thornton Grigg
Scotland Waite Bower
Walker Judd Simpson
Houlihan Fisher Gibbs
Kreuzer Fevola Browne
Hampson Murphy Stevens

Jamieson Carrazzo Ohailipin Jackson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16985
Location: Melbourne
Thornton Ohailipin Anderson
Scotland Bower Walker
Simpson Carrazzo Houlihan
Murphy Waite Fisher
Gibbs Fevola Betts

Cloke Judd Stevens

Hampson Jamieson Hadley Russell

How nice it is struggling to fit them all in.

Out of my 22 Anderson and Russell could be interchangeable with Jackson and Edwards at this time and I wouldn't be fazed.

I have left out the 3 young lads (Kruz, Army and Browny) because there is no need to throw them in the deep end at this time.

I've got Jamieson as a tall defender if one of the other 3 talls is getting beat. Gibbs along side Fev because Gibbs knows how to create space and will create room for Fev. He will drag his opponent away. He is also about 190cm now so he presents as a hard matchup. His defensive game will help keep the ball in the F50.

Houls and Simo on the wings to give us some decent kicks coming inside 50. Scotto and Houls to rotate if need be.

With Judd, Stevens and Carrots in the middle I think I would let Cloke have a crack at it and if he loses well hopefully the talent at his feet will help. It's not ideal but Hampson doesn't need to be flogged just yet.

Onball rotation of 7 or 8 should also help to mix things up.

Wiggo and AB will have to do it the hard way for the time being.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 9:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
Cazzesman wrote:
Thornton Ohailipin Anderson
Scotland Bower Walker
Simpson Carrazzo Houlihan
Murphy Waite Fisher
Gibbs Fevola Betts

Cloke Judd Stevens

Hampson Jamieson Hadley Russell

How nice it is struggling to fit them all in.

Out of my 22 Anderson and Russell could be interchangeable with Jackson and Edwards at this time and I wouldn't be fazed.

I have left out the 3 young lads (Kruz, Army and Browny) because there is no need to throw them in the deep end at this time.

I've got Jamieson as a tall defender if one of the other 3 talls is getting beat. Gibbs along side Fev because Gibbs knows how to create space and will create room for Fev. He will drag his opponent away. He is also about 190cm now so he presents as a hard matchup. His defensive game will help keep the ball in the F50.

Houls and Simo on the wings to give us some decent kicks coming inside 50. Scotto and Houls to rotate if need be.

With Judd, Stevens and Carrots in the middle I think I would let Cloke have a crack at it and if he loses well hopefully the talent at his feet will help. It's not ideal but Hampson doesn't need to be flogged just yet.

Onball rotation of 7 or 8 should also help to mix things up.

Wiggo and AB will have to do it the hard way for the time being.

Regards Cazzesman


Bower at CHB? Back to his All Australian possie, very interesting Cazz. Great for our structure if he could this.

Tell me he's beefed up and you'll almost sell me on this one. Know his current height and weight?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 08, 2007 10:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16985
Location: Melbourne
Well he was standing next to Saddington the other day and with his new short haircut you actually got a good idea of his size. He looked the equal of Saddo who is 194. I'd say he was probably 90+kg. Looks in fine condition and is training as well as anyone so far. He is happy with life and well settled now that he has moved in with his best mate Gumbleton.

He can tend to play wide at times but if he gets that right he is certainly athletic enough to compete with the best of them IMHO. I think if Ratts said to him......."We want you to be our CHB for the next 10 years he will rise to the occasion".

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 11:03 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
Cazzesman wrote:
Well he was standing next to Saddington the other day and with his new short haircut you actually got a good idea of his size. He looked the equal of Saddo who is 194. I'd say he was probably 90+kg. Looks in fine condition and is training as well as anyone so far. He is happy with life and well settled now that he has moved in with his best mate Gumbleton.

He can tend to play wide at times but if he gets that right he is certainly athletic enough to compete with the best of them IMHO. I think if Ratts said to him......."We want you to be our CHB for the next 10 years he will rise to the occasion".

Regards Cazzesman


Very encouraging and we'll have to rely on you to get this across the line with Ratts. Seems he has Waite slotted in there already, so it won't be easy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:54 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2006 7:39 pm
Posts: 260
Location: Melb
Cazzesman wrote:
Well he was standing next to Saddington the other day and with his new short haircut you actually got a good idea of his size. He looked the equal of Saddo who is 194. I'd say he was probably 90+kg. Looks in fine condition and is training as well as anyone so far. He is happy with life and well settled now that he has moved in with his best mate Gumbleton.

He can tend to play wide at times but if he gets that right he is certainly athletic enough to compete with the best of them IMHO. I think if Ratts said to him......."We want you to be our CHB for the next 10 years he will rise to the occasion".

Regards Cazzesman


I agree. In fact I reckon if Ratts said "all I want you to do this week is not let your bloke get a kick" then he'd take over CHB immediately. Kind of the pressure release valve that seemed to work with Fev - "all we want you to do is chase and tackle and keep the ball in". In both instances natural talent makes them find the ball. I watched him closely at training this week, he seems really switched on, in great shape, and as likely as anyone to demonstrate the most improvement in 08. I was rapt when we drafted him as I felt he was a long term cure for CHB and I am now more convinced than ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:45 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
This is so difficult ... but here is my updated team

Armfield S O'hAilpin Jamison
Houlihan Thornton Scotland
Simpson Stevens Walker
Gibbs Waite Fisher
Murphy Fevola Kreuzer

R: Hampson Judd Carazzo

I: Hadley, Betts, Cloke, Blackwell


Appologies : Jackson, A O'hAilpin, Russell, Bower


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 10, 2007 10:22 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 9:20 pm
Posts: 789
Location: Melbourne
Thornton Ohailipin Jackson
Bower Jamieson Walker
Simpson Carrazzo Russell
Gibbs Waite Murphy
Fisher Fevola Betts

Cloke Judd Stevens

Hampson A Ohailpin Scotland and Houlihan

I think this gives us the opportunity to play Cloke Hampson or Aisake as a fourth tall forward or in the ruck and move Waite to CHB if need be. Aisake could even play as a ruck rover and provide another option for the defence when rebounding. I think it's time we gave him a prolonged taste of the seniors.

I am not sure if Hadley will be fit for round one and IMO it is probably best if we take it slowly with him and bring him in later when the kids need a rest. I have gone for Jackson in the back pocket as I think he adds more versatility to the side and could be used as a run with player on ball or against the opposition match winner. He may get beaten for smarts but he won't stop all day.

Hopefully play a four man rotating forward line Waite Fisher Fevola and one of Cloke Hampson or Aisake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:01 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 3464
This is the hardest it's been in years...

FB: Armfield - O'Hailpin - Thornton

HB: Walker - Waite - Hadley

C: Houilihan - Carrazzo - Simpson

HF: Fisher - Hartlett - Stevens

FF: Gibbs - Fevola - Scotland

R: Cloke - Judd - Murphy

INT: Wiggins - Jackson - Hampson - Anderson

EM: Bower - Pfeiffer - A. O'Hailpin
(Kreuzer)


Yes, Wiggo on the bench...
We've drafted leg-speed. We've drafted grunt. We've drafted blokes with mature bodies who seem ready to go. Wiggo is all of these things, and I suspect may, with a more possession oriented, less helter-skelter game plan, be a regular starter. He can also play all over the ground - allowing a player I have forward or back (Walker / Gibbs) into the middle as part of the rotation.
Hartlett gets first crack at CHF.
Armfield has been earmarked to play on the small forwards... So he goes straight in.
Scotland and Houlihan into attacking positions. Same with Gibbs - I agree he'll make a tricky match-up in the forward-line.
Ease Hadley back into footy from HB. Stevens the same at HF.
Walker the x-factor across Half-back.
Big, tall, fast (erratic), aggressive blokes in the key-defensive positions.

And just for the hell of it...

2nds:

Saddington - Jameison - Shields

Bannister - Bower - Browne

Grigg - Blackwell - Russell

Betts - Austin - Benjamin

LAPPIN - Edwards - Kreuzer

O'Hailpin - Bentick - Pfeiffer

INT: Ackland - Hill - Joseph - Ellard

TEAGUE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 376 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], killpies and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group