Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 4:01 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 507 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:44 pm
Posts: 1600
who's gonna get the blame if we don't do well next year then?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 3:29 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
AGRO wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
AGRO wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Collo was the only alternative at the time came in and trimmed a lot of deadwood, he cut and burned and had to make some tough decisions.

He made some wrong ones including extending Pagan's contract.



Collo was a horrible choice and hardly a viable alternative. More useless than tits on a bull - EVERY time he opened his mouth he spouted negativity in a time when the club was crying out for something to be positive about.




Didn't see too many other alternatives put up their hand that night at Crown Casino in November 2002.

As the Greek saying goes "you shit in the frypan, you have to eat it". :wink:


I agree somewhat - no one else stood up in 02 (perhaps in the interests of presenting a united front for the new administration) - However, I'll reiterate my point

If the shit stirrers (widely reported to be the USC but no doubt others as well) had any balls they would have moved to dump the board and coach at the end of 03, 05 and 06 seasons.

We lost our way as a club and mediocraty became accepted - it was easier to blame the draft penalties and the AFL rather than to recognise that we had serious issues with the coaching and administration staff throughout those years



The USC stirred the pot no doubt and were the catalyst that got the Elliott Administration tossed.

"Carlton One" were the united board that was put in place at the AGM at the Crown Casino in November 2002.

As I recall there was definitely a lot of love in that room that evening (I am actually being serious) - and the honeymoon period that Collins and the Carlton One Board got from that evening was quite a lengthy one.

We were told that a lot of deadwood needed to be trimmed and player salarys had to be trimmed as we were still over the salary cap and they were.

We were then told by Denis Pagan at the Big Rally at Princes Park in December of 2002 - that he expected Finals Action in 2003 - we didn't get it obviously - but we did know that our list was crap after and we needed an injection of something,

Pagan went for the quick fix at the end of 2003 with the "Bowyers, Harfords, Bannisters" etc etc - and we finished a miraculous 10th and then we won the 2005 Pre-Season Competition.

Then Collo extended Pagan's contract without consulting the Board.

We all fell for it - you only have to look at the posts at "The Blue View", "Talking Carlton" and "CSC" at the time - the majority ALL fell for it - including me :oops: .

As they say in a democracy - you get the representation you deserve - and we deserve what we got with the Board we put in place - and we deserved Smorgan because he was part of "Carlton One" as well.

All we can say now is thank god for Richard Pratt - the rest of the board may be fair to mediocre right now - but at least we got Dicky - and at least he has put the administration in place to keep us moving forward in a positive direction.


Fantastic post Aggers - you're one of the a selected few posters who doesn't indulge in blatant revisionism to prove a point.

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 1:08 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Blue Vain wrote:
Jarusa wrote:
I'm not going to argue over which factor was the most important. That is very subjective and pointless. My argument is it is silly just to blame the coaching for 2003.


Couldnt agree more.
Thats why I get frustrated by supporters blaming Wayne Brittain for 2002 results.
Yet some foolishly do.

(Not you of course Jars) :wink:


Brittain s problem was the opposite extreme of Pagans... He was in awe of the senior players to the point they self governed ( and I dont mean in terms of new age modern business practices) their ego s grew and their performances shrunk. At the same time (as was the opinion of many within the club) his ability to communicate with the younger players declined and he was considered as not being particularly good at player development.

Pagan as it turns out was the wrong choice as perhaps was the retention of a majority of the playing personnel he inherited( hindsight is a wonderful thing) but Brittain was never a long term prospect, he was nothing more than an assistant. His foray into coaching post Carlton is a testament to that.

Its easy with the luxury of hindsight to be critical of wrong choices ... so what -------- to have tried and failed deserves greater credit than settling for second best---Risk can bring failure or success --At the time Pagan was regarded as being the best of the best available. The club acquired him just as they have now acquired a player regarded as being the best.

Get over it ......... Its all part of the journey..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:20 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:58 am
Posts: 3583
Location: Drinking chardonnay with the elites
sideshow bob wrote:
who's gonna get the blame if we don't do well next year then?


Houlihan

_________________
"Whoever said you can't buy happiness forgot about puppies." - Gene Hill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:26 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34548
Location: The Brown Wedge
:roll:



:idea: Can't we all just move on?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:54 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Just to put things in a little bit of perspective the Pagan references make up just 2 pages out of a 232 page book, most of which is positive with things like the 1995 Grand Final - but also very touching stories such as him nursing his dying father in the three months leading up to the 1998 season; his care for a young girl who died of leukemia in her teenage years, the last game at Princes Park - on top of his early career in athletics, and his triumph on Dancing with The Stars.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:48 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
AGRO wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
AGRO wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Collo was the only alternative at the time came in and trimmed a lot of deadwood, he cut and burned and had to make some tough decisions.

He made some wrong ones including extending Pagan's contract.



Collo was a horrible choice and hardly a viable alternative. More useless than tits on a bull - EVERY time he opened his mouth he spouted negativity in a time when the club was crying out for something to be positive about.




Didn't see too many other alternatives put up their hand that night at Crown Casino in November 2002.

As the Greek saying goes "you shit in the frypan, you have to eat it". :wink:


I agree somewhat - no one else stood up in 02 (perhaps in the interests of presenting a united front for the new administration) - However, I'll reiterate my point

If the shit stirrers (widely reported to be the USC but no doubt others as well) had any balls they would have moved to dump the board and coach at the end of 03, 05 and 06 seasons.

We lost our way as a club and mediocraty became accepted - it was easier to blame the draft penalties and the AFL rather than to recognise that we had serious issues with the coaching and administration staff throughout those years



The USC stirred the pot no doubt and were the catalyst that got the Elliott Administration tossed.

"Carlton One" were the united board that was put in place at the AGM at the Crown Casino in November 2002.

As I recall there was definitely a lot of love in that room that evening (I am actually being serious) - and the honeymoon period that Collins and the Carlton One Board got from that evening was quite a lengthy one.

We were told that a lot of deadwood needed to be trimmed and player salarys had to be trimmed as we were still over the salary cap and they were.

We were then told by Denis Pagan at the Big Rally at Princes Park in December of 2002 - that he expected Finals Action in 2003 - we didn't get it obviously - but we did know that our list was crap after and we needed an injection of something,

Pagan went for the quick fix at the end of 2003 with the "Bowyers, Harfords, Bannisters" etc etc - and we finished a miraculous 10th and then we won the 2005 Pre-Season Competition.

Then Collo extended Pagan's contract without consulting the Board.

We all fell for it - you only have to look at the posts at "The Blue View", "Talking Carlton" and "CSC" at the time - the majority ALL fell for it - including me :oops: .

As they say in a democracy - you get the representation you deserve - and we deserve what we got with the Board we put in place - and we deserved Smorgan because he was part of "Carlton One" as well.

All we can say now is thank god for Richard Pratt - the rest of the board may be fair to mediocre right now - but at least we got Dicky - and at least he has put the administration in place to keep us moving forward in a positive direction.


I know what you are saying with respect to the wool being pulled over supporters eyes - few posters were prepared to speak up against pagan/collo for a few years on these boards. It was fairly obvious early on that they werent the right people for the job though (as my posts back on the TBV would attest :wink: - we, as a club embraced mediocraty and negativity. There past couple of months have seen a massive swing away from that and a push towards selling the club in a positive light (one of rattens greatest strengths - recall back to his initial interview upon getting caretakers- I'm hopeful that it will continue, particularly with our marketing campaign (the something blue campaign sucked).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
If Pagan was on Dancing with the stars, I wonder who his partner should be?

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 9:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
The Tyrant wrote:
If Pagan was on Dancing with the stars, I wonder who his partner should be?


The Bearcat.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:44 pm
Posts: 1600
The Tyrant wrote:
If Pagan was on Dancing with the stars, I wonder who his partner should be?


marge simpson
or
amanda vandstone
or waynekingcarey


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:02 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24650
Location: Kaloyasena
The Tyrant wrote:
If Pagan was on Dancing with the stars, I wonder who his partner should be?



The correct answer is his sister. :wink:



Or is this a trick question. :P

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
no... the correct answer was Barry Mitchell

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:51 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:44 pm
Posts: 1600
The Tyrant wrote:
no... the correct answer was Barry Mitchell

where's his office?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 1:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
sideshow bob wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
no... the correct answer was Barry Mitchell

where's his office?


the cubicle

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18715
Location: threeohfivethree
4thchicken wrote:
I know what you are saying with respect to the wool being pulled over supporters eyes - few posters were prepared to speak up against pagan/collo for a few years on these boards. It was fairly obvious early on that they werent the right people for the job though (as my posts back on the TBV would attest :wink:


There seems to be a suggestion in some of the posts in this thread that some people "got it right" and some "got it wrong" re Pagan's appointment. There's a middle position with all this that some took at the time and are taking again with Ratten. When Pagan was appointed I had no idea if it would work but I liked the idea of a coach taking on some of the senior playing group who'd grown lazy and believed they should set the agenda. Different coaches bring different ideas and techniques and there's more than one way of getting a side to a premiership however there are always going to be some players who prefer the old ways to the new. I didn't have a problem with Pagan getting up the nose of a guy like Simon Beaumont because Beaumont was a flower who preferred technical training regimens like lifting bricks anyway. :P

I don't go to training every time it's on and I'm not one of the players so from an outsiders perspective all I can do is give any new coach a fixed period of time to prove themselves. I said this about Pagan back then and I'm saying it about Ratten now. I don't really know exactly what sort of a coach Ratten's going to be but I like what I've seen so far. I liked what I saw from Pagan in his first couple of years too.

Hindsight's a wonderful thing but none of us have it at the start of a coach's tenure (as much as many would claim to). By halfway through the third year of Pagan's time it was clear there were massive problems that weren't fixable and at that time I decided I didn't want him as our coach. Unfortunately we'd just re-signed him. :?

I'll give Rat's the same sort of timespan to show he deserves another contract but he's certainly starting from a better place than Pagan ever was and for that he has the personnel changes (and subsequent culture change) of the last five years to thank. For all of Pagan's faults and inability to get the playing group to follow him if Ratten wins a flag with the bulk of this group then Pagan (along with a number of others) should get a little credit too.

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:39 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
The Tyrant wrote:
sideshow bob wrote:
The Tyrant wrote:
no... the correct answer was Barry Mitchell

where's his office?


the cubicle


Which is near the box seat.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 2:51 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
GWS wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
I know what you are saying with respect to the wool being pulled over supporters eyes - few posters were prepared to speak up against pagan/collo for a few years on these boards. It was fairly obvious early on that they werent the right people for the job though (as my posts back on the TBV would attest :wink:


There seems to be a suggestion in some of the posts in this thread that some people "got it right" and some "got it wrong" re Pagan's appointment. There's a middle position with all this that some took at the time and are taking again with Ratten. When Pagan was appointed I had no idea if it would work but I liked the idea of a coach taking on some of the senior playing group who'd grown lazy and believed they should set the agenda. Different coaches bring different ideas and techniques and there's more than one way of getting a side to a premiership however there are always going to be some players who prefer the old ways to the new. I didn't have a problem with Pagan getting up the nose of a guy like Simon Beaumont because Beaumont was a flower who preferred technical training regimens like lifting bricks anyway. :P

I don't go to training every time it's on and I'm not one of the players so from an outsiders perspective all I can do is give any new coach a fixed period of time to prove themselves. I said this about Pagan back then and I'm saying it about Ratten now. I don't really know exactly what sort of a coach Ratten's going to be but I like what I've seen so far. I liked what I saw from Pagan in his first couple of years too.

Hindsight's a wonderful thing but none of us have it at the start of a coach's tenure (as much as many would claim to). By halfway through the third year of Pagan's time it was clear there were massive problems that weren't fixable and at that time I decided I didn't want him as our coach. Unfortunately we'd just re-signed him. :?

I'll give Rat's the same sort of timespan to show he deserves another contract but he's certainly starting from a better place than Pagan ever was and for that he has the personnel changes (and subsequent culture change) of the last five years to thank. For all of Pagan's faults and inability to get the playing group to follow him if Ratten wins a flag with the bulk of this group then Pagan (along with a number of others) should get a little credit too.


I've kept some good Press articles from 2003/04/05 that cover this era in depth and some detail.

I intend to put them up on the site in "Warby's Scrapbook" in the off season hopefully.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:28 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:44 pm
Posts: 99
some of u more seasoned posters would recall when i was the only advocate ridding the cancer in pagan and kouta


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21594
Location: North of the border
GWS wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
I know what you are saying with respect to the wool being pulled over supporters eyes - few posters were prepared to speak up against pagan/collo for a few years on these boards. It was fairly obvious early on that they werent the right people for the job though (as my posts back on the TBV would attest :wink:


There seems to be a suggestion in some of the posts in this thread that some people "got it right" and some "got it wrong" re Pagan's appointment. There's a middle position with all this that some took at the time and are taking again with Ratten. When Pagan was appointed I had no idea if it would work but I liked the idea of a coach taking on some of the senior playing group who'd grown lazy and believed they should set the agenda. Different coaches bring different ideas and techniques and there's more than one way of getting a side to a premiership however there are always going to be some players who prefer the old ways to the new. I didn't have a problem with Pagan getting up the nose of a guy like Simon Beaumont because Beaumont was a flower who preferred technical training regimens like lifting bricks anyway. :P

I don't go to training every time it's on and I'm not one of the players so from an outsiders perspective all I can do is give any new coach a fixed period of time to prove themselves. I said this about Pagan back then and I'm saying it about Ratten now. I don't really know exactly what sort of a coach Ratten's going to be but I like what I've seen so far. I liked what I saw from Pagan in his first couple of years too.

Hindsight's a wonderful thing but none of us have it at the start of a coach's tenure (as much as many would claim to). By halfway through the third year of Pagan's time it was clear there were massive problems that weren't fixable and at that time I decided I didn't want him as our coach. Unfortunately we'd just re-signed him. :?

I'll give Rat's the same sort of timespan to show he deserves another contract but he's certainly starting from a better place than Pagan ever was and for that he has the personnel changes (and subsequent culture change) of the last five years to thank. For all of Pagan's faults and inability to get the playing group to follow him if Ratten wins a flag with the bulk of this group then Pagan (along with a number of others) should get a little credit too.



Half way through Pagans third year you were suggesting I was an idiot for saying that Pagan was the problem and not the draft - Selective memory seems to be a problem around here .

It such a pity that Ratten was forced into tanking the last 6 games because by now we would have realised what Kouta is talking about.

The unfortunate part of Kouta's comments were that he didn't make them 3-4 years ago. Now we will enter 2008 and all the credit for the rapid improvement we are about to see will be put squarely on the input of Chris Judd and the return of Stevens and once again people will be saying if only DP had Judd he would be acheiving the same result where I know and have been saying for some time that the results next year would have been mirroring all the other years if Pagan had been left to finish his contract .

I'm not prepared to give Ratten time because I know that the improvement will come and come at a rapid rate to the point where I believe we will make the 8 next year

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 3:55 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18715
Location: threeohfivethree
Sydney Blue wrote:
Half way through Pagans third year you were suggesting I was an idiot for saying that Pagan was the problem and not the draft - Selective memory seems to be a problem around here .


Selective memory indeed.

There were a whole stack of reasons I suggested you were an idiot. :lol:

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 507 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group