Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 29, 2025 1:54 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:20 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
Blue Vain wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Jarrad has been named in our best players 6 times this year.
Now lets remember, up to 6 players get named in our best players each week!
Compare that to Scotland who has been in our best 12 times or a second year player like Murphy who has been in our best 11 times.

I doubt either of those 2 would be completely happy with their season but at least they offer some sort of consistency.

As Effes stated, Jarrad is leading the AFL for clangers. Sure his best is quite good but it is too often overshadowed by the very very poor.


As I've said many times, Waitey has lots of ability but his consistency is poor.
Using a 3rd place in our B&F doesnt alter that view at all.

Nytdog wrote:
Basically because its a shit judging system. It rewards players that have stand out games rather than consistency.


Good to see you agree. :wink:

I'd love to see Waite improve his consistency because that would mean he's eventually becoming a quality performer.
Seeing Carlton players improve is something I love seeing, I get no pleasure from seeing them underachieve.

Stating that I'd hate seeing him finish 3rd was a foolish comment.
Do we understand each other?


Not really. It's hard to see a "Carlton" player improve if you trade him for a second or third round draft pick (ie he's no longer a Carlton player), which is what you want to do :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 9:49 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
218 - Carrazzo - Deserevd it! Congratulations! Not bad for a rookie pick-up!
212 - Scotland - Had a good year. Hope he does it again in 08'
144 - Waite - WOW! A bit of a shock really. Good year, but 3rd?
142 - Houlihan - Ditto. Although he has gone up a notch since Pagan left. Play him forward in 08'.
126 - Simpson (5th) - Was my selection for B&F. Showed true spirit and leadership this year, even before he became captain. Hope he gets the nod in 08'. Carrazzo & Scotland are in perfect position to rack up endless amounts of possesions!

94 - Fevola - Sure, agree with that.
90 - Fisher - Probably would have swapped him with Waite's 3rd.
86 - Bentick - Shock to see him so high, although he had a good start!
74 - Gibbs - Good on ya kid. Polling so high after playing 12+games in defense AND in your 1st year no less. Couldn't have asked for anything more from the kid. Exceeded my expectations!
58 - Walker (10th) - I was picking him for a top 3 finish earlier on in the year. I'm a bit dissapointed cause i love the kid so much!
53 - Murphy - So low due to getting so much attention post-stevens. Will win the B&F in the next few years!

(NOTE:- SETANTA SHOULD BE HERE--->_____________ )

30 - Bower - Killer end to the season. Expecting great things from him in 08'.
26 - Thornton- Very dissapointed in Thorntons year. Sometimes he looked like he didn't even care. Hope it's just a bad year.
16 - Whitnall - poor, from your captain.
15 - Kennedy - will poll higher next year.

10 - Ohailpin
- FAR TOO LOW IMHO!!!!! WAY WAY WAY TOO LOW! Did everything asked of him and more! Played forward, back, mid & ruck! Should be much much higher than Thornton,Saddington, Whitnall, Kennedy, Bower & Lappin IMHO.

6 - Russell
- Sorry, i know he's still young and learning, but not good enough from a 3rd year player with the amount of games he got! Hope he steps up next year.

0 - Ackland - Was pisses me off the most is that this lazy prick will still get games next year JUST BEACUSE he has a 3 year contract. Screw him......piss him off NOW! I don't want our new recruits getting to the club and seeing us rewarding a player that obviously doesn't give two shits about the club or his team-mates! Sends the wrong message!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:27 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Quote:
Basically because its a shit judging system. It rewards players that have stand out games rather than consistency.


Games that players scored votes in:

15 - Carrazzo
15 - Scotland
12 - Houlihan
12 - Simpson
10 - Waite
10 - Fisher
9 - Walker
8- Bentick
8 - Gibbs
7 - Fevola
6 - Murphy
5 - Betts
5 - Thornton
5 - Bannister

'Stand out' games (20+ votes):

Carrazzo 5
Waite 4
Scotland, Houlihan, Simpson 2
Fisher, Stevens, Gibbs, Walker, Fevola, Lappin 1

Probably true that Waite did better than others because he had more 'Stand out' games but otherwise number of games scoring votes is pretty simlar to how they finished. Bentick managed 8th without any 'Stand out' games but 8th most in number of games. Fevola had only one 'Stand out' game and votes in less games than others but still came 6th.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:46 am 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 2:05 pm
Posts: 84
Location: moonee ponds
the more i think about it...what a load of crap setanta finished below saddington, kennedy...ect. and fisher should have been much higher...but Setanta was robbed! lets hope he does better next year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 11:58 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
Looks like BlueWorld may have a good spreadsheet on all this but for those hack statisticians like me interested in the votes and stats for the year, you can access them in a simple summary in the Blueseum:

http://www.blueseum.org/cfc/tiki-downlo ... ?fileId=14


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
BlueWorld wrote:
Quote:
Basically because its a shit judging system. It rewards players that have stand out games rather than consistency.


Games that players scored votes in:

15 - Carrazzo
15 - Scotland
12 - Houlihan
12 - Simpson
10 - Waite
10 - Fisher
9 - Walker
8- Bentick
8 - Gibbs
7 - Fevola
6 - Murphy
5 - Betts
5 - Thornton
5 - Bannister

'Stand out' games (20+ votes):

Carrazzo 5
Waite 4
Scotland, Houlihan, Simpson 2
Fisher, Stevens, Gibbs, Walker, Fevola, Lappin 1

Probably true that Waite did better than others because he had more 'Stand out' games but otherwise number of games scoring votes is pretty simlar to how they finished. Bentick managed 8th without any 'Stand out' games but 8th most in number of games. Fevola had only one 'Stand out' game and votes in less games than others but still came 6th.


Carrots had 3 more polling games that Simmo, but 90 more votes! Explain that!

Although Carrots deserved to be right up the top, there is no way he was a 40% better player than Simmo this year. Carrots racked up possessions at will, but were they damaging? How many times does Carrots get the pill and run hard with it like Simmo?

A classic Simmo posession is getting the pill from 1st, 2nd, 3rd efforts and then running hard with it, having a bounce and delivering ball long with more precision.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:09 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
And according to our awesome voting system, Nick Stevens had a better season than Setanta!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:13 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
# Name Games G B K H Avg M Total Dis
17 - Setanta Ó hAilpín 22 13 3 124 107 10.5 62 231

5 - Josh Kennedy 13 6 5 57 40 7.5 50 97

31 - Jordan Bannister 12 6 3 91 67 13.2 63 158

9 - Jason Saddington 12 4 0 75 72 12.2 76 147

18 - Paul Bower 10 1 Nil 63 66 12.9 45 129


Hmmmmmmmmmm, something SERIOUSLY wrong there!

Don't get me wrong, i'm not in the least trying to say that stats mean everything or saying that Kennedy, Bower, Saddo, Banno had poor seasons but Setanta was EASILLY better and more consistant than those players yet he finishes lower than them?

WHAT? :?

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:54 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1700
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
My Votes on the night:
3. BOG, Murph's girlfriend, a number one pick. Ticks all the boxes.
2. Jacko's girlfriend extra votes for wearing Jacko's Carlton jumper late back at Odean after.
1. Sugar's lady, just to show my hidden depth away from blondes. Very nice and had more intensity than Cain at the bar. Nice dress too a bit less flashy.

_________________
Green Shooter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 4:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 10:41 am
Posts: 1
Location: Funkytown
Hi every1, long time reader first time poster and all that junk. it's only taken a year for my first post lol. Just wondering if any1 who attended the b&f has posted any pics up on the net??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:17 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Bookie wrote:
My Votes on the night:
3. BOG, Murph's girlfriend, a number one pick. Ticks all the boxes.
2. Jacko's girlfriend extra votes for wearing Jacko's Carlton jumper late back at Odean after.
1. Sugar's lady, just to show my hidden depth away from blondes. Very nice and had more intensity than Cain at the bar. Nice dress too a bit less flashy.


Pics?

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2007 6:30 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
ryan2000 wrote:

Don't get me wrong, i'm not in the least trying to say that stats mean everything or saying that Kennedy, Bower, Saddo, Banno had poor seasons but Setanta was EASILLY better and more consistant than those players yet he finishes lower than them?

WHAT? :?


You don't get votes for just rocking up and getting a couple of kicks. This award is for the best player and considering Setanta conceded a lot of goals when played in defence and was beaten badly in the ruck when he played there where would he be getting these votes from?
I don't want to kick the guy as he's coming along nicely but he isn't anywhere near a top player yet.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 1:23 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
TheGame wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:

Don't get me wrong, i'm not in the least trying to say that stats mean everything or saying that Kennedy, Bower, Saddo, Banno had poor seasons but Setanta was EASILLY better and more consistant than those players yet he finishes lower than them?

WHAT? :?


You don't get votes for just rocking up and getting a couple of kicks. This award is for the best player and considering Setanta conceded a lot of goals when played in defence and was beaten badly in the ruck when he played there where would he be getting these votes from?
I don't want to kick the guy as he's coming along nicely but he isn't anywhere near a top player yet.


Could you name for me somebody in the team that DIDN'T concede a great number of goals?

I'd like to see the stats, but i'd dare say that Setanta was actually one of our better defenders. Dare i say it, he was a much stronger performer than the likes of Thornton and Saddo who just happen to poll better than him.

Ditto Bower, who played less that 10 games.......

Sorry, but I'm not a fan of how we are judging in the B&F.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 9:05 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1700
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
Sorry guys no pics, my friend took one of me and the Ranga (Lance) on his blackberry thingo but its so hazy it looks like it's through nightvision goggles.

_________________
Green Shooter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:18 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
ryan2000 wrote:
TheGame wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:

Don't get me wrong, i'm not in the least trying to say that stats mean everything or saying that Kennedy, Bower, Saddo, Banno had poor seasons but Setanta was EASILLY better and more consistant than those players yet he finishes lower than them?

WHAT? :?


You don't get votes for just rocking up and getting a couple of kicks. This award is for the best player and considering Setanta conceded a lot of goals when played in defence and was beaten badly in the ruck when he played there where would he be getting these votes from?
I don't want to kick the guy as he's coming along nicely but he isn't anywhere near a top player yet.


Could you name for me somebody in the team that DIDN'T concede a great number of goals?

I'd like to see the stats, but i'd dare say that Setanta was actually one of our better defenders. Dare i say it, he was a much stronger performer than the likes of Thornton and Saddo who just happen to poll better than him.

Ditto Bower, who played less that 10 games.......

Sorry, but I'm not a fan of how we are judging in the B&F.


After the first 6 or so weeks Setanta had conceded the most goals to his opponent in the AFL.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2007 7:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
There's a few photos up on the club site now...

http://carltonfc.com.au/Season2007/News ... wsId=50914

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 12:56 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
TheGame wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
TheGame wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:

Don't get me wrong, i'm not in the least trying to say that stats mean everything or saying that Kennedy, Bower, Saddo, Banno had poor seasons but Setanta was EASILLY better and more consistant than those players yet he finishes lower than them?

WHAT? :?


You don't get votes for just rocking up and getting a couple of kicks. This award is for the best player and considering Setanta conceded a lot of goals when played in defence and was beaten badly in the ruck when he played there where would he be getting these votes from?
I don't want to kick the guy as he's coming along nicely but he isn't anywhere near a top player yet.


Could you name for me somebody in the team that DIDN'T concede a great number of goals?

I'd like to see the stats, but i'd dare say that Setanta was actually one of our better defenders. Dare i say it, he was a much stronger performer than the likes of Thornton and Saddo who just happen to poll better than him.

Ditto Bower, who played less that 10 games.......

Sorry, but I'm not a fan of how we are judging in the B&F.


After the first 6 or so weeks Setanta had conceded the most goals to his opponent in the AFL.


Are you talking about when our game plan was to kick 150 points a game and let the opposition do likewise?? That's Pagan's fault not Setanta's. Think back to how many cheap ones Lloyd kicked on him. Under Ratts game plan you won't see Setanta get ample goals kicked on him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 6:58 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
nytdog wrote:

Are you talking about when our game plan was to kick 150 points a game and let the opposition do likewise?? That's Pagan's fault not Setanta's. Think back to how many cheap ones Lloyd kicked on him. Under Ratts game plan you won't see Setanta get ample goals kicked on him.


As I said I'm not bagging the guy just saying he can't get best player votes if he's getting out rucked and lots of goals kicked on him otherwise we may as well call it the Mediocre and Fairest award.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
TheGame wrote:
nytdog wrote:

Are you talking about when our game plan was to kick 150 points a game and let the opposition do likewise?? That's Pagan's fault not Setanta's. Think back to how many cheap ones Lloyd kicked on him. Under Ratts game plan you won't see Setanta get ample goals kicked on him.


As I said I'm not bagging the guy just saying he can't get best player votes if he's getting out rucked and lots of goals kicked on him otherwise we may as well call it the Mediocre and Fairest award.


I think you'll find that many had him in the best against Essendon* when he had 6 (cheap ones) kicked on him. And I certainly thought Jamison was in our best last week against Melbourne (after getting 6 kicked on him). I'm not saying that Setanta was our best player this year, but I think he deserved more votes that he got.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2007 7:35 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Well in the TC voting Setanta finished in 21st place and got 3 votes comapred to the winners 49 votes (equivalent to 6% of the winners votes).

In the official B&F Setanta finished in 23rd place and got 10 votes compared to the winners 218 votes (equivalent to 4.5% of the winners votes).

Not much difference there.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group