Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:59 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 485 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 25  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:02 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
timetodeliver2004 wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
FLiPMoDE2 wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Ratten was out coached today. The changes Sheedy made in the second half, Ratten didn't know how to respond (and didn't).

At the start of the year we beat Essendon*, towards the end of the year we lost to Essendon*. Have we improved under Ratten?


Yes We Have, Fevola kicked 8 goals against them last time, how many did he kick today? 0. If it wasnt for Fevola they would have crushed us last time.


Did we win today?


Did we have Stevens and Cloke out there today? Ratten wasn't outcoached - there were no specific moves or lack of moves that led to us losing. There are consistent reasons as to why we aren't able to get across the line:

- our lack of a proper ruckman. Having Setanta in the ruck takes away one of our key defenders. Bring in Cloke (who was doing really well at the start of the year) and we do better in the centre clearances and have a tighter defence.

- our lack of that little bit of extra midfield polish. Stevens in frees up Murphy and good luck to any opposition when that happens.

Dont criticise Ratten for doing what people on here have been calling for for a long time. He had faith in the kids - I'm really glad he kept Jamison on Lloyd for the whole game. I thought Jamo had a really good game and looks really good.


All I am reading are excuses for a poor performance. I wish you were my boss at work.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 8:11 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Posts: 816
I'm not excusing the fact that we lost today, we had plenty of opportunities, outplayed Essendon* for most of the match and won most match-ups and still lost.

My comments are based on your comparison to Round 3 - dont compare apples and oranges.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 11:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18031
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Ratten was out coached today. The changes Sheedy made in the second half, Ratten didn't know how to respond (and didn't).

At the start of the year we beat Essendon*, towards the end of the year we lost to Essendon*. Have we improved under Ratten?


Gee, let me think.
The last 4 weeks of Pagans coaching, we probably lost by an average of 10 goals per game.
Under Ratten, we've just been pipped on the line by teams in finals contention. :?

What a difficult equation. :lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:00 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
Blue Vain wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
Ratten was out coached today. The changes Sheedy made in the second half, Ratten didn't know how to respond (and didn't).

At the start of the year we beat Essendon*, towards the end of the year we lost to Essendon*. Have we improved under Ratten?


Gee, let me think.
The last 4 weeks of Pagans coaching, we probably lost by an average of 10 goals per game.
Under Ratten, we've just been pipped on the line by teams in finals contention. :?

What a difficult equation. :lol:


You must be a very happy natured person. You seem to laugh a lot when your posts are not funny. I hope you were not laughing at what I had to say because that would be rude.

For a team to improve during the season I would want to see that team beating the same teams it lost against earlier in the season and continue to beat the same teams we beat.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:13 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
DIAMOTISM wrote:
For a team to improve during the season I would want to see that team beating the same teams it lost against earlier in the season and continue to beat the same teams we beat.


Not my argument but that's a very simple view of improvement. What about improvement in defensive clearances, underlying players, teamwork, protecting the ball carrier etc.

In how many years has Carlton beaten Essendon* twice in a season? We came close last year when we were both on the bottom but footy is rarely so linear.

I think at vital times yesterday we still went to a 1 on 3 when we needed to hold the ball up. Whether our forward line had been sucked down to defence or not, I couldn't tell, but it will take a while to get rid of bad habits. A full pre-season and a bit more maturity that goes with that will be a good way to assess improvement - until then, 4 close losses in a row that we were in a position to win is an outstanding lift from the morass that we were in in the 5 weeks of hell.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:34 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
molsey wrote:
DIAMOTISM wrote:
For a team to improve during the season I would want to see that team beating the same teams it lost against earlier in the season and continue to beat the same teams we beat.


Not my argument but that's a very simple view of improvement. What about improvement in defensive clearances, underlying players, teamwork, protecting the ball carrier etc.


Winning and being the best is the ultimate measure of high performance in sport. Don't let simplicity trip you over.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:05 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I think we're a long way from having that as our main assessment tool.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 10:14 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
camelboy wrote:
If Connolly is there in a development role to assist the kids, or some other task that is not directly involved with the match day role, well, I could possibly warm to that idea.

8)

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 12:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
I love the 'at my work' or 'my boss' crap.

show me a workplace with a salary cap

show me a position that can only be filled via a draft....

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 12:21 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21551
Location: North of the border
dannyboy wrote:
I love the 'at my work' or 'my boss' crap.

show me a workplace with a salary cap

show me a position that can only be filled via a draft....


Danny a lot of work places have locked them selves into AWA and EBA thus restricting the people you can employ because if you employ someone he has to full with in the wage structure of the aggreement

We are currentltly finding it difficult to employ quality skilled staff and keep them in the wage levels of the work place agrrements

So it is no different

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:47 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 1376
Location: Melbourne
I really dont think we can judge fully Ratten on his performance in the last 6 weeks especially when in the eyes of most people he is doing an excellent job in delivering 4 games where we could have won every game against opposition teams that are playing off in the finals.

When you see the senario since Ratten has taken over.
He has been put in with the last 6 weeks of the season. He has changed the gameplan which is never something that will have imidiate effect when for 4.5 years the players have been made to play a different game plan. He works under an umbrella where the media, many supporters possibly many in the Blues Hierachy would prefer a honarable loss to a win due to the nature that a win now would be seen as more dertimental to the Blues than 6 honarable losses. Note Pick 1 an 3 is not only important from early draft picks but could also be the key with pick 3 to lure a very high profile player and still retaining pick 1


So what has Ratten brought to the team in the last 4 weeks
What i have seen is a far more effective game plan with flexibility to adjust and also retain possesion. Also much better team spirit and players playing for each other with shephards and to protect the ball player.

Have seen the emergence of players like Bower, Jamison, Jackson, Russell, Blackwell all have a good run and all showing more than what i had see under Pagan. In fact Jamison and Jackson have both been great new additions which will hopefully see more senior experience. Have been great to see these 2 kids show what they can do and will be welcome additions in 2008.
Even Simpson has lifted to a new level and Forgotten players like Saddo and Banister seem to be playing with more purpose.

All in all i have no issue in how Ratten has performed considering the situation he has been put in and with all the scrutiny of Playing for the PP and showing a competative spirit and being in situations where maybe if there was more incentive to win ie we where out of the PP zone or playing to get into the 8 i am sure we probabaly would have won 3-4 of the last 4 games.

Lets judge Ratten on 2008 when he has a full preseason can properly install the new game plans have the assistant coaches he wants and also have the new additions in the footy department with developement coaches..

There is lots to look forward to in 2008 and hopefully in 2008 we will finally see a upward movement up the ladder,

_________________
CFC TAC Squad everyone over 25 must be traded sounds like Loguns Run


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 6:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18031
dannyboy wrote:
I love the 'at my work' or 'my boss' crap.

show me a workplace with a salary cap

show me a position that can only be filled via a draft....


Come work for me.....I can manage all the above criteria. :-D

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 6:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
I like Swann's reply on MMM (as reported in the press today) to what assistants?......and he replied "we wouldn't be appointing anyone not approved bty Ratts".............................................. :-D

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 2220
The correct time to judge Bretts performance will be in 2008 and more so in 2009.

Any judgements that people wish to make now will soon be seen to be very foolish and premature.

If Connolly was there as an assistant, Brett would be adaptable enough to work with him, but we need to understand that Brett is his own man who seeks assistance on a needs basis - he doesnt need a Connolly style coaching assistant, looking over his shoulder - this would be a poor move.

_________________
My Blue Heaven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 12:06 pm
Posts: 2098
Warby wrote:
I like Swann's reply on MMM (as reported in the press today) to what assistants?......and he replied "we wouldn't be appointing anyone not approved bty Ratts".............................................. :-D


Fair enough, if Ratts is appointed Coach he should be able to appoint his own team. We don't want another Pagan/Mitchell stand off!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 7:49 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
The Sheriff always apponts his own deputies.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 8:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
SB are you sayinbg you can only spend so much on your employees?

That you cannot spend more on your wages (in full, not individually) than the next company?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
Swann on 3aw said that the club have gone OUT AND GOT THE BEST COACH AVAILABLE.
Am i reading to much into it, or does that mean that Ratts may not have the gig? :?

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:28 pm 
Online
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21551
Location: North of the border
dannyboy wrote:
SB are you sayinbg you can only spend so much on your employees?

That you cannot spend more on your wages (in full, not individually) than the next company?


You can employ more people but you cant pay them more than what they the current employees are on with out increasing all their salaries .It's a crap system you good workers dont get rewarded therefore you can not encourage productivity as there is no incentive to do so.Much the same as you cant pull in Judd and pay him a million plus while the rest are on less

So you are resticted in buisness aswell as football.Most industries have a salary cap of sorts mostly governed by the persons qualifications .

You are also restricted in the amount you can charge your labour due to competition so therefore that also restricts the salaries of your staff.

Every organisation has limits -Football should be no different

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 9:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
do you seriously think the restraints in buisness are similiar to a draft or salary cap where the worse you perform the more the system assists you?????

No wonder so many buisnesses go under - they are doing too well :shock: 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 485 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ... 25  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], kezza, mymanmurph and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group