Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat May 10, 2025 9:16 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 6:22 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
A question to the "insiders" amongst us here.

With player meetings going on and an unhappy father publicly bagging his sons non-selection, is there player discontent at Carlton?
Is there a player/coach(ing staff) problem?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 7:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16793
Location: Melbourne
1. The player meeting was not that type of meeting. It was about a group taking a good hard look at itself in the mirror. Nothing to do with DP.

2. There is no proof the guy on the radio was who he said he was.

3. Linking the two together is pure fiction in your own mind Budzy.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 9:35 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 175
I agree Cazzesman that the Players' meeting just can't be viewed as a sign of dissension. It was a public statement that the players needed to get their act together. After all, it was a meeting that took place shortly before training. And it was publicised no doubt in conjunction with the club.

You'd think that a mutinous meeting would be held in secret, and away from the club. And if news got out about such a meeting, you'd think it would be because the rebels would be all too willing to tell the media about their concerns.

This is an example of how hard it is to pull out of a nosedive. Even events that are intended to show solidarity are interpreted in a paranoid fashion to suggest disunity.

But the issue with Jordan Bannister is different. If the caller was not his father, surely there will have to be a very public statement made to this effect, and it should be done quickly. If this does not happen, the silence will be deafening.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16793
Location: Melbourne
Mav even if it was his father......lets face it parents can be precious, can't they. :shock:

My neighbour recently took his 5 yr old to Oz Kick for the first time. 2 weeks later he is the coach :lol:

I spoke to him tonight and said...."How's it going"...He said..."It's started"

?????????

Apparently a number of parents.....of 5 and 6yr olds are already putting pressure on him to......'Play little Johnny at FF', "Why isn't little Johnny getting a run on the ball", Why isn't my boy getting a game" etc, etc, etc.

The poor bloke is not up to the pressure and has started smoking again. :?

If it was Jordy's father calling the ABC.......then I'm sure Jordy would be very embarrassed by the call. Jordy may be disappointed about being dropped (who wouldn't be) but I doubt he thinks he is the man to hold down CHF for the Blues.

If it was his dad then he needs to have a good hard look at himself and realise what pressure he has now brought to bare on his son. Does he really think anything he says will affect the selection group at CFC.

He's dreamin.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 28, 2005 10:39 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:56 am
Posts: 175
Sure, Cazzesman, it might be just a case of a tennis Dad running out of control. But there's a good chance he reflects Jordan's views. That is why it might be very embarrassing for Jordan - the private mutterings he expressed to his father unexpectedly get a public airing. If the caller was Jordan's father, his comments are most unfortunate at a time that our players need to play hard committed team football. And here we are lurching from Angwin's bulldust to these comments. Most unwelcome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2005 7:28 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Cazzesman wrote:


3. Linking the two together is pure fiction in your own mind Budzy.

Regards Cazzesman


They were questions Cazzesman...not statements. Don't be so touchy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Footy Dads
PostPosted: Sun May 29, 2005 1:03 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 7187
Been involved in the junior and local footy scene for many years.Its a nightmare ! Of one thing i can assure you.

BALLET MUMS ARE ANGELS COMPARED TO FOOTY DADS.

_________________
All my dangerous friends


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], killpies, Traveller86 and 107 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group