Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 5:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:13 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
-
Well according to Rohan Connolly anyway...


Image

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:50 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
Well, if that happens we will have improved one spot on the ladder at least over 2006.
Does that mean that a #1 draft pick doesn't count for much?
Essendon* have jumped heaps more than us.
If we get the PP and according to Rohan we will, we will also get #3.
Now, who are we going to use them on? If we want Kreuzer we will have to use the PP because Richmond is slavering at the prospect of getting him.
They trumped us a couple of years ago in the PSD (fortunately) and we got Eddie so maybe it's our turn to return the favour.
Pick 3#? I want Ebert. Ready made and good size.
It is interesting to note that Rohan's ladder is based on ability or lack thereof and not tanking...

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:44 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
Rohan's table is based on pretty sound logic. Unless there are some really bizarre results, Melbourne will be able to win in round 22 without losing their priority pick. And we won't. Ergo, they will win.

Although it has been suggested elsewhere, I don't know that there is any benefit to the Dees in trying to out-tank us in the round 22. They won't get pick 1 regardless of what happens, and pick 2 or 3 is much of a muchness really.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:43 am 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Posts: 423
tough draw for the Tigers. only a chance against Port really. at least we wont come last again... even tho we are the worst team in the league.


Last edited by Abaddon on Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:44 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Well, that R22 game will be a real spectacle won't it. :lol:

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 8:50 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
camelboy wrote:
Well, that R22 game will be a real spectacle won't it. :lol:


The Kamikaze Cup


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:14 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Just curious..............

Now that Richmond know that it's pointless for them to finish last, they will most likley be going on an all out attack to overtake us.

Would Carlton supporters put up with another wooden spoon, our 3rd in 3 years, if it meant getting Kruzer?

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:20 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 1:13 pm
Posts: 972
Blues Clues wrote:
camelboy wrote:
Well, that R22 game will be a real spectacle won't it. :lol:


The Kamikaze Cup


The Gibbs cup was a draw


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:26 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 11:46 am
Posts: 3509
Location: Brisbane
Good question Ryan,

I'm not sure I could stomach another spoon. That said, I really don't see how Richmond can get another three wins to overtake us. Their coach is as bad as ours (with an even bigger drawback that the club's powerbrokers still seem to have faith in him), and they have the same lack of A-grade footballers as us. They have very little height in Key Positions, and that they do have is either too old (Richo) or being wasted by poor coaching (Polak). Call the young players a draw, and the reality is that they have as much hope of winning three games as we do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:46 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Actually, Wallet is a hell of a lot worse than Pagan. Sedat has said for years here that Tanning Salon Terry doesn't rate big men, and ran down the Bulldogs' list, and now, according to Wallsy, he's doing the same to Richmond with their drafting/recruiting policy: Tigers caught short in Draft

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:05 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Actually, Wallet is a hell of a lot worse than Pagan. Sedat has said for years here that Tanning Salon Terry doesn't rate big men, and ran down the Bulldogs' list, and now, according to Wallsy, he's doing the same to Richmond with their drafting/recruiting policy: Tigers caught short in Draft


Thats crazy. Simmons and Polak were the 2 big trades that the Tanned one chased. Look at the Bulldogs team and see how many of the players were from Terry's time 4 years ago, still a lot.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
nightcrawler wrote:
Rohan's table is based on pretty sound logic. Unless there are some really bizarre results, Melbourne will be able to win in round 22 without losing their priority pick. And we won't. Ergo, they will win.

Although it has been suggested elsewhere, I don't know that there is any benefit to the Dees in trying to out-tank us in the round 22. They won't get pick 1 regardless of what happens, and pick 2 or 3 is much of a muchness really.


If we beat the Dees they get #2 guaranteed as we won't have the priority and they will stay below us. If they beat us not only do we get the PP, we also push them up to pick 4 and in a shallow draft that could mean the difference between Kosi and Livingston :roll: .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 11:22 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Our player psychologist is gunna have his work cut out if we don't win another game... :?

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:27 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
Best case for Melbourne is to get thrashed each week pushing their % right down below us.
That way when they win the Rd22 game they will still sit 15th and get the no3 pick.
Only problem with that is mean we cannot get thrashed but considering our last 3 games have been 100, 77 and 61 points Melbourne will need to lose by 80 points a game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
to say Wallace is worse then Pagan is a terrible comment, we are talking about coaching ability and not personalities here.

Thinking back to tigers fans putting that massive spoon in front of PP makes me want them to get it regardless of the consequences

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 12:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:52 am
Posts: 12808
buzzaaaah wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Actually, Wallet is a hell of a lot worse than Pagan. Sedat has said for years here that Tanning Salon Terry doesn't rate big men, and ran down the Bulldogs' list, and now, according to Wallsy, he's doing the same to Richmond with their drafting/recruiting policy: Tigers caught short in Draft


Thats crazy. Simmons and Polak were the 2 big trades that the Tanned one chased. Look at the Bulldogs team and see how many of the players were from Terry's time 4 years ago, still a lot.


A lot of the players still there predated Wallet too, West - Grant - Darcy - Johnson etc

Guys like Gilbee and McMahon were average flankers in his and Rohde's time before Eade made them into good players. It's a bloody long bow to draw to give him credit for where the Dogs are at now considering he left 5 years ago

_________________
Cer 'ch 'n alluog Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:07 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10590
budzy wrote:
Our player psychologist is gunna have his work cut out if we don't win another game... :?


Budzy, after the last 5 years, we now need to hire 1 per player and coach. :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:03 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 939
Rohan is being extraordinarily kind to St Kilda in this analysis.

I would be afraid to log onto TC if we lose the last game and miss the PP . . .

Such horror you cannot imagine


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 4:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:36 pm
Posts: 1289
Location: here
YEAH!

Get out the balloons!

SIGH... :roll:

_________________
They coud'nt.....could they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12544
Location: Brisbane
ryan2000 wrote:
Just curious..............

Now that Richmond know that it's pointless for them to finish last, they will most likley be going on an all out attack to overtake us.

Would Carlton supporters put up with another wooden spoon, our 3rd in 3 years, if it meant getting Kruzer?


I would.

If we are fair dinkum, really fair dinkum, as I have said many times before, both premierships and wooden spoons do not mean as much in a competition where each team doesn't play each other twice.

Better to win the premiership than not win it? Of course. But not as valid as in times gone by.

Broken record. Whining. Whinging. Fact. Call it what you will.

The AFL, as a true competition, is a joke. It is unfair before the first ball is bounced at the start of the season. Blind Freddy could see that.

Might as well reap the rewards on offer for finishing last.

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 42 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group