This is the part I dont understand Verbs.
I stated the other day you only stir shit.
You seemed to take offence but has this thread not proved the point?

Your only contribution has been to take pot shots.
What actual involvement have you had here other than to shit stir?

Synbad told us we would draft Walker months before the draft.
He told us Beaumont would not play again for Carlton 2 months before he was traded.
We were told Carlton were chasing Longmuir and Chambers prior to the draft.
He knew Russell was our target and often stated that Deledio was a standout at number one but he would like to take Tambling.

He informed us what was happening during the overthrow of Elliot and often tells us the composition of the team days before selection.

Liar? coward?



Whats been your contribution other than cheap shots?

Synbad may be delusional in your eyes but he's given plenty of inside information to us.

What's been your contribution again?

yes and that cheque book argument is such a load of tripe - what collingwood didn't? gee how silly of them.

What Essendon* didn't

Are you say but thats just the rich clubs.

Then do a look at Diamond Jim Tilbruk (?) for Melbourne - the Dees tried buying players but gee wizz they failed dismally - might have something to do with their culture.

Now richmond's a god case - had money and players and then, well fell into an almighty heap quite frankly - gee should have been easy for them.

St Kilda has plenty of good players and even good sides but they had a F@%&#! culture down there, nothing to do with money,a lot to do with drugs and beer etc.

Okay Fitzroy yes, but once upon a time they were fine, what happened/ Egg and chicken argument there.

Sth Melbourne - well yes, sad basket case so i'll give you that one.

Roos - well okay they were F@%&#! until they got money and a sweet, sweet 10 year rule from the VFL (even then they wanted to shaft some of us) and then they out bought the lot of us.

And the biggie, the absolute monster of them all - what the F@%&#! about Hawthorn - what about their brilliant sides raight rhough the 70's, 80's etc. How did they do that if it was all about just money you simplistic dick!

Gee maybe there are a few other things working here besides money - now if you wish to think carelton were only good because of money (which is what flower from crappy performing sides would have you belive, or tools like p. Smith who hates out guts) then go ahead and denigrate but in my mind that means you miss the whole point of this F@%&#! club!!!!

Again i find myself agreeing with you BV.

After being out yesterday and now ploughing through this thread it is very easy to get the impression that Verbs is in it for the stir.

It is becoming increasingly clear in a number of posts, that our chum from Qld takes a contrarian view to Synbad purely for the sport of it.

By all means debate,but stick to the issues,the sniping does you little credit!

Verbs...you are out of line whacking into Synbad about the credibility of the info he gives us...not all of what he tells is for Talking footy consumption and some who he can trust get the info a long time before it becomes public. His info is on the money as well..as BV said we all knew Walker would be picked.....Russell, Longmuir, Chambers...even Mott...thats not pissing in his pocket either....his info is as good as it gets.

Even team selections..ins and outs..he gets it right...

The facts are a good proportion of the posters are here for the info he gives us and I bet numbers treble at draft time/trade time, because he is a proven and reliable source....

I disagree with him on tanking but you need to get some runs on the board in terms of credibility of your own info before you start attacking someone on this site who has a proven track record of delivering the goods..