Indie wrote:
Nightcrawler, I reckon you might be underestimating the complexity of the modern senior coaching role.
Grant Thomas wrote an article earlier this year in which he set out all of the aspects which a modern coach has to control. I'm not a big wrap for GT, and I don't agree with some of what he wrote, but he does at least paint a broad picture.
He has to deal with the media, the coterie groups, the Board, the supporters, the assistants, the conditioning staff, recruiting staff, video reviews, match committee meetings, meet-and-greets with sponsors etc. etc.
Your 4 criteria just scratch the surface.
Assistants are much better placed to understand the demands of the role, but even they find the transition hard.
Well I haven't read the GT article, but that sounds rather like vintage Thomas. Micro managing everything when he should be delegating and letting other people do their own jobs. I can just see old GT ... renegotiating Ball's contract, then ducking down to the AV room to personally cut together 22 player's video review tapes, before stopping off at Riewoldt's on the way home to tuck him into bed.
I'm not saying the head coach's jobs is not complicated, or that they don't have to be capable of people and time management. Of course they do. But is there seriously anything in that list that you think a guy like Buckley or Voss couldn't do? They've probably only sat through about 500 player reviews between them, I'm sure they've got some idea how to deliver one. And they have staff and assistance coaches to help put the tapes together for them. And I'm sure both of them are capable of ducking in for the last 30 minutes of a Blue Suits meeting, taking a cue from Swann and talking about football to a bunch of well heeled footy tragics.
The off field bells and whistles are important, but they're less important if you have a good CEO and strong admin team. At the end of the day, the most important thing for the coach to be able to do is to analyse other teams strengths and weaknesses, develop a game plan to beat them, communicate it to his players, get them to stick to it, and be cable of anticipating and reacting during a game situation if plan A is not working. If he can do that, who cares if he's a crap media performer (although none of the propective coaches I'm talking about are).