Sydney Blue wrote:
Indie wrote:
Here we go again

I'd think any business which had been shut out of recruiting the best staff while being plunged into heavy debt might have a problem. But it's hard to look for examples in the business community because it goes without saying that such limitations are never placed on businesses, and businesses aren't allowed to trade in the parlous position that Carlton was in. .
They wrote off the value of the stands because Collo wanted them to move to the Dome- Take the right down out of the equation plus the loss of revenue generated by the stadium and things were not as glum as they might have appeared. Its the oldest political stunt in the world _ " Look at the mess the Previous mob left us" Howards still using it after 11 years
The numbers speak for themselves - He has been the most least effective coach in the club history .
And Mav you are really getting desperate when you start blaming the financial situation of the club on the ability of the coach to perform.
Think about this maybe if we had won a few more games the finances might have been better- Chicken and Egg stuff
Have a look back over previous threads. You'll notice that Pratt has made it clear that his main priority is not to save money and reduce debt, but it is to pour badly needed money into areas that might see us improve on the field. There has been far more investment in recruiting, cioaching, strength and conditioning. The flip side of that is that the lack of such expenditure has hurt the club over the previous years. That's the important thing about the financial state of the club over the last few years - forget about trying to juggle the figures to show that there was heaps of money as the only important thing is that the money wasn't being spent on the field.
Try to tell me that Hughes doesn't appreciate the extra resources he has now. And tell me that he wouldn't have liked them right from the beginning.
But it was good to see that you didn't try to attack the observation that the draft pick penalties adversely impacted upon us, and indeed you couldn't.