Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 12:27 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:24 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 2194
Location: Melbourne
Lance is fat. :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
But Bower's being dragged by Mitchell for the same reasons.

Somehow, I don't think telling a defender to stick to his man is complex or confusing.

Has football changed so much that no one, even defenders, can be asked to stand a man?

Others who failed to get the message that they had certain roles have fallen away too.

Kenna, the crumber who refused to crumb - liked running past the contest in the hope someone would kick the ball to him after they'd won it.

Mott didn't like running outside the centre square. Why didn't Pagan just accept that this was his natural game? Gee, Mott could have been the ruckman we've been searching for if we'd structured our game around him.

Strangely enough, no one picked them up when we delisted them.

By all means, let's get in a coach who lets the boys do whatever they want. Running the club like a social football drop-in centre may just work.


Last edited by Indie on Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:31 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Indie wrote:
But Bower's being dragged by Mitchell for the same reasons.

Somehow, I don't think telling a defender to stick to his man is complex or confusing.

Has football changed so much that no one, even defenders, can be asked to stand a man?

Others who failed to get the message that they had certain roles have fallen away too.

Kenna, the crumber who refused to crumb - liked running past the contest in the hope someone would kick the ball to him after they'd won it.

Mott, the ruckman who didn't like running outside the centre square.

Strangely enough, no one picked them up either.

By all means, let's get in a coach who lets the boys do whatever they want. Running the club like a social football drop-in centre may just work.


Pagan picked Mott up
Pagan picked Kenna up on a half of football he whitnessed at Box Hill.
Bower has a million kicks and is 6ft 4... and 19.

Bower is a player.... i dont give a shit what Denis thinks.

Anyway.. Denis has toi go because he cant extract anything from the players.
Unless you believe we should keep him and sack 30 players???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:39 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
Because 1 man won't play on his man, Pagan can't extract anything from the rest. Amazing.

It seems we now have a new yardstick to measure the suitability of prospective coaches. Can they construct a game plan that will allow Bower to run free as a bowerbird.

SYnbad, it seems that you were happy with Lance;s ability to play loose man in defence. You just wanted to upgrade to someone who is faster across the ground.

Bottoms up to the new Lance :-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:55 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Indie wrote:
Because 1 man won't play on his man, Pagan can't extract anything from the rest. Amazing.

It seems we now have a new yardstick to measure the suitability of prospective coaches. Can they construct a game plan that will allow Bower to run free as a bowerbird.

SYnbad, it seems that you were happy with Lance;s ability to play loose man in defence. You just wanted to upgrade to someone who is faster across the ground.

Bottoms up to the new Lance :-)


But Denis is unable to sell a message to a footy team over 5 years....

Like i said Ayres was in a smilar position with his message but a change fixed all that.

Dont worry at least Bower can run.... :wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
woof wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I've had a gutfull of the miserable, whining, bitchy comments on this site. Lance Whitnall has been the best player the club has had in its most testing period, playing in positions he wouldn't want to play and has done the job without a complaint, head-drop, dummy spit or tantrum, yet gets treated like he thinks the club owes him something.

He has been the most selfless player on our list and we will be far worse off when he retires.

You're all a bunch of flower miserable sooks :roll: .

Nobody is denying any of that, Duke, but we can't pick a team on sentiment or Braddles would have played another year at least. All good players have to go sometime. Sometimes it isn't pretty. I remember when Big Nick's time was up. Some thought he had played a year too many. Some wanted him to play forever. It's the law of the jungle. if you can't keep up, goodnight and thanks for coming. That's where Lance is at and there is no denying it.


I'm realistic enough to know that BS, and yes, some are denying his commitment and leadership around the club, that's why I responded.


Which part of continually turning up excessively overweight to pre season training makes you "committed" and showing "leadership" to your club?


We all know he doesn't have the physique of Kouta, he turns up 'overweight' as you call it, because injuries restrict his off-season preperation. When he's been fit, he's come back in as good a shape as Lance's body will get.

You have to accept that he isn't a Greek God and never will be no matter how hard he trains. He has more to offer than broad shoulders and rippling triceps.

He continues to turn up fat yet wins the B & F and plays positions that no one else on the list is capable of playing (ie dropping into a whole and getting smashed by the leading forwards) then goes forward to kick some goals when his excellancy, Fevola, spits the dummy and sooks off!! He's missed 3 games in 3 and a half years while injured. If that isn't a sign of an inspirational leader than I don't know what is :? .

But hey, just stick to Synbad's 'fat' tag and you'll make yourself laugh for the 100th time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
The Duke wrote:
woof wrote:
The Duke wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I've had a gutfull of the miserable, whining, bitchy comments on this site. Lance Whitnall has been the best player the club has had in its most testing period, playing in positions he wouldn't want to play and has done the job without a complaint, head-drop, dummy spit or tantrum, yet gets treated like he thinks the club owes him something.

He has been the most selfless player on our list and we will be far worse off when he retires.

You're all a bunch of flower miserable sooks :roll: .

Nobody is denying any of that, Duke, but we can't pick a team on sentiment or Braddles would have played another year at least. All good players have to go sometime. Sometimes it isn't pretty. I remember when Big Nick's time was up. Some thought he had played a year too many. Some wanted him to play forever. It's the law of the jungle. if you can't keep up, goodnight and thanks for coming. That's where Lance is at and there is no denying it.


I'm realistic enough to know that BS, and yes, some are denying his commitment and leadership around the club, that's why I responded.


Which part of continually turning up excessively overweight to pre season training makes you "committed" and showing "leadership" to your club?


We all know he doesn't have the physique of Kouta, he turns up 'overweight' as you call it, because injuries restrict his off-season preperation. When he's been fit, he's come back in as good a shape as Lance's body will get.

You have to accept that he isn't a Greek God and never will be no matter how hard he trains. He has more to offer than broad shoulders and rippling triceps.

He continues to turn up fat yet wins the B & F and plays positions that no one else on the list is capable of playing (ie dropping into a whole and getting smashed by the leading forwards) then goes forward to kick some goals when his excellancy, Fevola, spits the dummy and sooks off!! He's missed 3 games in 3 and a half years while injured. If that isn't a sign of an inspirational leader than I don't know what is :? .

But hey, just stick to Synbad's 'fat' tag and you'll make yourself laugh for the 100th time.


Corey didnt have a heart and he won the best and fairest too... but this aint the Wizard of Oz...

Its an elite football competion .. for elite athletes and sportsmen....
Now if we were talking darts and a pint id catch your drift....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:03 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
The Duke wrote:

We all know he doesn't have the physique of Kouta, he turns up 'overweight' as you call it, because injuries restrict his off-season preperation. When he's been fit, he's come back in as good a shape as Lance's body will get.


He turns up overweight each pre-season because in the off season he spends all his time at the epping pub sinking pots and eating chick parma’s.

duke,

How many times have we had to send Lance to the fat farm???
Do you accept that from a professional footballer???


Last edited by Rhys26 on Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:06 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
The Duke wrote:
We all know he doesn't have the physique of Kouta, he turns up 'overweight' as you call it, because injuries restrict his off-season preperation. When he's been fit, he's come back in as good a shape as Lance's body will get.


Duke,

In the years he has turned up overwieght to pre season training has had very little or nothing to do with injuries and more to do with what he has been putting into his mouth.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:06 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
C'mon boys, you can do better than that :o .

The ol' KFC jokes were the REALLY funny ones. I reckon they get better and better the more I read them :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
Rhys26 wrote:
for the sake of the club going forward lets hope that its career ending.


Would you wish the same on Rama, or Caracella?

I hate the Pies and the Dons - but I hoped that they would pull through to play again...

How about Nick Stevens?! What's the difference between him and Whitnall? One can play better than the other!? Is that the basis for hoping for a career ending injury, and possibly something Lance would have to monitor for the rest of his life?

Not baking you mate, but have a think about it... I'd much rather them just tell him he's no longer required for next year.



That said, a captain for one year - only to be dumped the following? Has that even happened before?! I'm thinking the Blues will probably let Lance leave on his own terms - better or worse for the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:17 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
Whichever way this plays out, I think the club has been really smart this week. Denis mentions a degenerative knee condition that Lance has been carrying for 5 weeks. Icke is quoted on the record as saying there is an injury problem and that Lance is seeing a specialist this week.

What does this achieve?

1) It allows the club an out by omitting Lance on the basis of an injury rather than dropping him. It's perception only, but it can be important when dropping someone of Lance's stature - no pun intended ;)
2) It puts both Lance and Nixon on notice that the club is concerned about both his performance and long-term future and might reduce their expectations during contract talks
3) It puts on the table a performance based contract, rather than simply stumping up for a wad of cash
4) It gives the club a way of managing the situation through the press should Lance not be re-contracted.

This shows a degree of thought (or common sense) that was missing during both Collins and Smorgons reigns as President of the CFC.

If Lance is re-contracted, please let it be on a performance based contract, and if not, then that reminds me of a certain club in the early 80's that wasn't afraid to move players on when it thought that their best was behind them.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
Andain wrote:
A little support from Carlton supporters for our reigning Best and Fairest winner and captain wouldn't go astray at the minute when he's struggling from injury and yet still pushing through the pain week in and week out so he can be on the field like a good captain should.

I hope you're recovery is quick Lance. Good luck with the treatment.


Oh and what he said... one year a shining light in an otherwise bleak year - the next year we have people bagging him - AFTER we learn that he's been playing injured.

When Kouta was playing with a dodgy knee, I think I remember him receiving a lot of sympathy and support - how about the same for another guy that bleeds Navy Blue??


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
Synbad wrote:
Dont worry at least Bower can run.... :wink:

Is it better to have a player who can't stay with an opponent because of a loack of pace, or a player who won't stay with an opponent because he doesn't want to do so?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:23 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
steve wrote:
Whichever way this plays out, I think the club has been really smart this week. Denis mentions a degenerative knee condition that Lance has been carrying for 5 weeks. Icke is quoted on the record as saying there is an injury problem and that Lance is seeing a specialist this week.

What does this achieve?

1) It allows the club an out by omitting Lance on the basis of an injury rather than dropping him. It's perception only, but it can be important when dropping someone of Lance's stature - no pun intended ;)
2) It puts both Lance and Nixon on notice that the club is concerned about both his performance and long-term future and might reduce their expectations during contract talks
3) It puts on the table a performance based contract, rather than simply stumping up for a wad of cash
4) It gives the club a way of managing the situation through the press should Lance not be re-contracted.

This shows a degree of thought (or common sense) that was missing during both Collins and Smorgons reigns as President of the CFC.

If Lance is re-contracted, please let it be on a performance based contract, and if not, then that reminds me of a certain club in the early 80's that wasn't afraid to move players on when it thought that their best was behind them.


Fair summary.....I think the club are looking for a clean way of dealing with the lance issue... injury and a performance based contract offer are methods that could be used to sever ties without any blood on the floor.
I dont think he will be at the club next year....

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Last edited by Elwood Blues1 on Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:26 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
SparkyBlue wrote:
Rhys26 wrote:
for the sake of the club going forward lets hope that its career ending.


Would you wish the same on Rama, or Caracella?

I hate the Pies and the Dons - but I hoped that they would pull through to play again...

How about Nick Stevens?! What's the difference between him and Whitnall? One can play better than the other!? Is that the basis for hoping for a career ending injury, and possibly something Lance would have to monitor for the rest of his life?

Not baking you mate, but have a think about it... I'd much rather them just tell him he's no longer required for next year.



That said, a captain for one year - only to be dumped the following? Has that even happened before?! I'm thinking the Blues will probably let Lance leave on his own terms - better or worse for the club.


The only reason why I said that is because our coach and match committee haven’t got the guts to drop a guy who is clearly not suited to the modern game.
From a pain perspective of course I don’t wish it on him or anyone else for that matter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Indie wrote:
Synbad wrote:
Dont worry at least Bower can run.... :wink:

Is it better to have a player who can't stay with an opponent because of a loack of pace, or a player who won't stay with an opponent because he doesn't want to do so?


So youre saying you would rather have Lance than Bower???

You havent even seen Bower play....
A minute here and there is not what you wish to see!!

But if you want to keep defending Denis..... you have ten weeks then he is gone.
Lance is pretty good odds to not be then too.

:wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:33 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
The point is that uncontested marks to the opposition I50 aren't good, whether they result from lack of discipline, pace or fitness.

And training someone to play that way or rewarding them for doing so is hardly the best way to develop them.

And whatever will be at the end of the year will be. I'll still be buying my membership and supporting whoever is around next year ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Indie wrote:
The point is that uncontested marks to the opposition I50 aren't good, whether they result from lack of discipline, pace or fitness.

And training someone to play that way or rewarding them for doing so is hardly the best way to develop them.

And whatever will be at the end of the year will be. I'll still be buying my membership and supporting whoever is around next year ;-)


Most people buy their membership.
But to not question recurring themes in mediocrity makes you impicit for the mediocrity itself.

When the club thinks it can wallpaper huge cracks .. its because supporters will go along with anything for their hit of momentary high.

Thats why junkies do what they do.... theyre not interested in tomorrow.. only how they can get their fix to make them feel better today... whatever it it takes...

You must foirget about stuff that isnt making your life better long term to get better long term...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:27 pm
Posts: 1689
Very poor form guys, this thread is only up to page 4, I would have expected so much more from so many more, especially when Synbad has been rattling a few cages. Come on, jump on board and kick our Captain!!

Line up and put shit on a guy who has been loyal to our Club over a number of years. Cast aspersions about his application, dedication and passion for the Navy Blue. Try out a few new fat jokes - they'll always get a good laugh!

God knows that many posters here have given more to the Blues than Lance ever has. Feel free to sit back on your comfy arsed chair and hang shit on a guy that the club appointed Captain, awarded the B&F to and who has played over 150 games.

:roll:

Seriously, the club is a professional organisation. It wants what each of us want - success. If Lance is past it the Club will make the call.

Having Carlton supporters bag the shit out of a true Carlton person is appalling.

It is unbelievable that so many TC posters sit back and take pot shots at a guy who has given all that he can (despite all of his limitations) to our club during a very bleak time.

Just 'cos people on TC say that he is shit, doesn't make is so. His career may be coming rapidly to an end BUT he has given more to the Blues than any one on TC.

_________________
A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group