Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 2:55 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 15  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:12 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Sydney Blue wrote:
What about we offer Lance the coaching job for next year.

He supposed to have the best football brain


if he is passed it... i don't think this would be a bad idea.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:13 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
look I'm a big Lance and Kouta fan but when your time is up it is up.

Nothing worse than seeing a player play that one season to many

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
dane wrote:
Synbad wrote:
dane wrote:
honestly i think there should be some ramifications on this board for posters who want to come out and say that one of the great players and a great club man should be retired in such a way. its very low, and a sad reflection upon yourselves.

Lances output over 6 years has been pretty poor for his renumeration.
So hes been an ok footballer... but his time is up!

Like i said.. i doubt he will be at the club next year....


maybe the game is passing him by, but.... i'm willing to give him another chance. you understand what i mean about the low posts in this thread though right?


i dont try to understand you dane.. if i did.. i would be more like you and less like me..

all i know is he is washed up and has been for years.. and only the dreamers believed he was what we need in this era...

Nothing wrong with dreaming as long as sometimes you wake up!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:15 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Sep 15, 2005 5:00 pm
Posts: 391
i just hope that if lance does not play next year, that he is not picked up by another club. He has been a loyal servant in a terrible time for the club and deserves much better than what is been dished out to him by some people who supposedly love the club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
The Duke wrote:
I've had a gutfull of the miserable, whining, bitchy comments on this site. Lance Whitnall has been the best player the club has had in its most testing period, playing in positions he wouldn't want to play and has done the job without a complaint, head-drop, dummy spit or tantrum, yet gets treated like he thinks the club owes him something.

He has been the most selfless player on our list and we will be far worse off when he retires.

You're all a bunch of flower miserable sooks :roll: .

Nobody is denying any of that, Duke, but we can't pick a team on sentiment or Braddles would have played another year at least. All good players have to go sometime. Sometimes it isn't pretty. I remember when Big Nick's time was up. Some thought he had played a year too many. Some wanted him to play forever. It's the law of the jungle. if you can't keep up, goodnight and thanks for coming. That's where Lance is at and there is no denying it.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:22 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:12 am
Posts: 1730
buzzalenko wrote:
i just hope that if lance does not play next year, that he is not picked up by another club. He has been a loyal servant in a terrible time for the club and deserves much better than what is been dished out to him by some people who supposedly love the club


What about at the end of 2003 season where he wanted to join Hamill at St.kilda and met up with him and Grant Thomas. Big red was pretty keen to get out of carlton at the time - the only reason why the deal didn't come through was that the saints didnt have the room in the cap to cater for his salary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:25 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
buzzalenko wrote:
i just hope that if lance does not play next year, that he is not picked up by another club. He has been a loyal servant in a terrible time for the club and deserves much better than what is been dished out to him by some people who supposedly love the club


Buzza it is a two way relationship. The club I believe has paid over the odds for his output which hopefully he and his manager recognise. Perhaps his lack of willingness to present himself in appropriate condition to several of the clubs pre season campaigns has finally caught up with him. When you start from a long way back you put more strain on your body to catch up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:29 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
Garry Lyon had a real go at Ackland as well on the Channel Nine show. Highlighted his lack of effort at a marking contest in our defence, I think it was.

Others are starting to see it, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:36 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34525
Location: The Brown Wedge
Blue Sombrero wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I've had a gutfull of the miserable, whining, bitchy comments on this site. Lance Whitnall has been the best player the club has had in its most testing period, playing in positions he wouldn't want to play and has done the job without a complaint, head-drop, dummy spit or tantrum, yet gets treated like he thinks the club owes him something.

He has been the most selfless player on our list and we will be far worse off when he retires.

You're all a bunch of flower miserable sooks :roll: .

Nobody is denying any of that, Duke, but we can't pick a team on sentiment or Braddles would have played another year at least. All good players have to go sometime. Sometimes it isn't pretty. I remember when Big Nick's time was up. Some thought he had played a year too many. Some wanted him to play forever. It's the law of the jungle. if you can't keep up, goodnight and thanks for coming. That's where Lance is at and there is no denying it.


I'm realistic enough to know that BS, and yes, some are denying his commitment and leadership around the club, that's why I responded. My beef is with the people who sink the boots into this bloke who has been nothing but loyal and committed to the club.

The time when Lance went investigating the move to st kilda was when he was offered up via the media for trade very publicly. If we remember Fev also went searching around Punt Rd for a new home and these same people are happy for him to do that :? .

I think the personal abuse and anger toward him says more about the personality of the posters than it does about the man himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:39 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
kennyhunter wrote:
Garry Lyon had a real go at Ackland as well on the Channel Nine show. Highlighted his lack of effort at a marking contest in our defence, I think it was.

Others are starting to see it, too.


Just off topic on Ackland, Friday night really pissed me off, sometimes he just stood there and did nothing in a ruck contest because he was out of position. Taylor and Brown were willing to dive in hard for the ball and use their big bodies time and time again on our small blokes while Ackland was watching. Santy should smack him in the mouth again, just for all the TC's.


As for Lance, I've said it before, if he is unfit and cannot train then he should not play.
A fit and in form Lance is slow enough on the field as it is but a injured Lance is slower again.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:41 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6408
The Duke wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I've had a gutfull of the miserable, whining, bitchy comments on this site. Lance Whitnall has been the best player the club has had in its most testing period, playing in positions he wouldn't want to play and has done the job without a complaint, head-drop, dummy spit or tantrum, yet gets treated like he thinks the club owes him something.

He has been the most selfless player on our list and we will be far worse off when he retires.

You're all a bunch of flower miserable sooks :roll: .

Nobody is denying any of that, Duke, but we can't pick a team on sentiment or Braddles would have played another year at least. All good players have to go sometime. Sometimes it isn't pretty. I remember when Big Nick's time was up. Some thought he had played a year too many. Some wanted him to play forever. It's the law of the jungle. if you can't keep up, goodnight and thanks for coming. That's where Lance is at and there is no denying it.


I'm realistic enough to know that BS, and yes, some are denying his commitment and leadership around the club, that's why I responded. My beef is with the people who sink the boots into this bloke who has been nothing but loyal and committed to the club.

The time when Lance went investigating the move to st kilda was when he was offered up via the media for trade very publicly. If we remember Fev also went searching around Punt Rd for a new home and these same people are happy for him to do that :? .

I think the personal abuse and anger toward him says more about the personality of the posters than it does about the man himself.




It aint personal. Its about a player who cant play the modern game no more. If his knee was right then he would still be a liability. He is also average in height as lists have got taller and players have become more athletic. We all have a used by date in life pursuits. Its a harsh reality of life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
The Duke wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I've had a gutfull of the miserable, whining, bitchy comments on this site. Lance Whitnall has been the best player the club has had in its most testing period, playing in positions he wouldn't want to play and has done the job without a complaint, head-drop, dummy spit or tantrum, yet gets treated like he thinks the club owes him something.

He has been the most selfless player on our list and we will be far worse off when he retires.

You're all a bunch of flower miserable sooks :roll: .

Nobody is denying any of that, Duke, but we can't pick a team on sentiment or Braddles would have played another year at least. All good players have to go sometime. Sometimes it isn't pretty. I remember when Big Nick's time was up. Some thought he had played a year too many. Some wanted him to play forever. It's the law of the jungle. if you can't keep up, goodnight and thanks for coming. That's where Lance is at and there is no denying it.


I'm realistic enough to know that BS, and yes, some are denying his commitment and leadership around the club, that's why I responded. My beef is with the people who sink the boots into this bloke who has been nothing but loyal and committed to the club.

The time when Lance went investigating the move to st kilda was when he was offered up via the media for trade very publicly. If we remember Fev also went searching around Punt Rd for a new home and these same people are happy for him to do that :? .

I think the personal abuse and anger toward him says more about the personality of the posters than it does about the man himself.


Lances problem is he was unprofessional from day 1.
He refused to do everything possible to keep his body in check.
Hois lack of professionalism may or may noy have contributed to his problem.. but the fact remains... Lances body was no temple!

And on the kind of money he was on... he had to realise that his first priority was to himself as the his pay was at some stage dependent on his output!

The other problem i have is with the club making mistake after mistake with Lance and others as far as list management is concerned!

Having Lance around costs a kid a game .. which transpires into this club developing at a much slower rate.

The word is Pagan thinks Bower is NO GOOD!!!(Just like he thought Simmo was no good when he was being hidden for campo)

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
No one will pick up Lance on the open market.

We already tried that one - and no takers.

Face it, Duke - he is yesterday's man.

The greatest footballers of all time have to retire at some stage, otherwise Leigh Matthews would still be running around for Hawthorn, instead of coaching the Lions right now.

Lance's time is up, and the club has to be bigger than the individual.

1999 and 2000 are a very long time ago...

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:50 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 1:13 pm
Posts: 972
keogh wrote:

A name doesnt guarentee you a game(King Geelong, Grant Bulldogs)



Both are injured if your going to name examples at least get it right. Grant is an automatic selection in the current bulldogs team.

Lance deserves the respect of the Carlton supports a decision will be made a the end of the year by Lance and the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:56 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6408
blueboy8 wrote:
keogh wrote:

A name doesnt guarentee you a game(King Geelong, Grant Bulldogs)



Both are injured if your going to name examples at least get it right. Grant is an automatic selection in the current bulldogs team.

Lance deserves the respect of the Carlton supports a decision will be made a the end of the year by Lance and the club.



King was dropped because he was playing shit and a young kid was developing in Blake who has been given a go and is thriving.
Lance gets a game and Kennedy and Hartlett dont

Grant could have played seniors straight away but has to earn his stripes and will play at least 3 games. Kouta walks straight in.

Get the picture


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
Not sure about how accurate tthe word is.

Simmo's contract was extended after he had his triple bagel games. I think if we go back and look at old posts, there would have been a few doubts at that time about him. Not because he wasn't a good footballer, but because there were issues about his ability to put meat on his bones sufficiently to play the game at the elite level.

See, it's a 2 way street. As with Lance, it aint personal. The question was whether he'd cut it in the big time. But, as I say, his contract was reneweed, and he was given the opportunity to make it at AFL level.

There seem to be concerns over Bower's willingness to play as instructed. It isn't too much to ask of a defender that he stays on his man, is it? Unfortunately, if he's going to refuse to play as directed, there really is a big issue.

On SEN, Dermie Ox and Bucks were discussing Adelaide. The comment was made that Craig rated the team's performances by how well they stuck to the roles assigneed to them. So much so that they are called the Crow-bots. Roos also has his expectations. Don't go down this line of saying that players should be allowed to play their "natural game". In a team sport, that's nonsense.

I hope that every effort will be made to bring him around. But if he's uncoachable, it might be best to trade him back to WA rather than have a loose cannon like Taz or Farmer to deal with later.

Imagine a backline with Bower, Houla and Scotto in it. You wouldn't know who was on whom, so you'd never be able to blame any of them when goals are kicked.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Indie wrote:
not sure about how accurate tthe word is.

Simmo's contract was extended after he had his triple bagel games. I think if we go back and look at old posts, there would have been a few doubts at that time about him. Not because he wasn't a good footballer, but because there were issues about his ability to put meat on his bones sufficienlty to play the gama at the elite level. See, it's a 2 way strrret. As withy Lance, it aint personal. The question was whether he'd cut it in the big time. But, as I say, heis contract was reneweed, and he was given the opportunity to make it at AFL level.

There seem to be concerns over Bower's willingness to play as instructed. It isn't too much to ask of a defender that he stays on his man, is it? Unfortunately, if he's going to refuse to play as directed, there really is a big issue.

On SEN, Dermie Ox and Bucks were discussing Adelaide. The comment was made that Craig rated the team's performances by how well they stuck to the roles assigneed to them. So much so that they are called the Crow-bots. Roos also has his expectations. Don't go down this line of saying that players should be allowed to play their "natural game". In a team sport, that's nonsense.

I hope that every effort will be made to bring him around. But if he's uncoachable, it might be best to trade him back to WA rather than have a loose cannon like Taz or Farmer to deal with later.

Imagine a backline with Bower, Houla and Scotto in it. You wouldn't know who was on whom, so you'd never be able to blame any of them when goals are kicked.


Well maybe the Adelaide players under Ayres had the same problem?
One common factor in Denis' stay at Carlton.. is the continal lament that players arent doing what theyre asked to do.
Maybe that is a reflection on Denis and not the players.
Maybe the message is confusing and maybe the gameplan is [REDACTED] and doesnt work.
The players at times dont understand what to do under certain circumstances.

Thats why Denis MUST GO!!!... he cant extract it out of the players over a long period of time..


Its either that or we have a recruting staff and MC that are bringing the wrong players to the club.

Either way by the process of elimination it must start with Denis...!!!

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:18 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Mrs Caz wrote:
Blue Bird wrote:
I never thought I’d see the day where an injury to a Carlton player would be celebrated but something tells me to stand by.


It's a sad indication of todays society BB....I can't get used to seeing it, and it upsets me every time.

I don't think anyone is 'celebrating' his injury/unfit state.
More like people are upset & disappointed with Lances situation ...and moreso the club for persisting with an unfit Lance and making him Captain, thus making the current situation more difficult for his supporters.

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
The Duke wrote:
Blue Sombrero wrote:
The Duke wrote:
I've had a gutfull of the miserable, whining, bitchy comments on this site. Lance Whitnall has been the best player the club has had in its most testing period, playing in positions he wouldn't want to play and has done the job without a complaint, head-drop, dummy spit or tantrum, yet gets treated like he thinks the club owes him something.

He has been the most selfless player on our list and we will be far worse off when he retires.

You're all a bunch of flower miserable sooks :roll: .

Nobody is denying any of that, Duke, but we can't pick a team on sentiment or Braddles would have played another year at least. All good players have to go sometime. Sometimes it isn't pretty. I remember when Big Nick's time was up. Some thought he had played a year too many. Some wanted him to play forever. It's the law of the jungle. if you can't keep up, goodnight and thanks for coming. That's where Lance is at and there is no denying it.


I'm realistic enough to know that BS, and yes, some are denying his commitment and leadership around the club, that's why I responded.


Which part of continually turning up excessively overweight to pre season training makes you "committed" and showing "leadership" to your club?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:21 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
The Duke wrote:
I've had a gutfull of the miserable, whining, bitchy comments on this site. Lance Whitnall has been the best player the club has had in its most testing period, playing in positions he wouldn't want to play and has done the job without a complaint, head-drop, dummy spit or tantrum, yet gets treated like he thinks the club owes him something.

He has been the most selfless player on our list and we will be far worse off when he retires.

You're all a bunch of flower miserable sooks :roll: .

Thank goodness you didn't call anyone 'ignorant'. 8)

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 291 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 15  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group