Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 30, 2025 8:15 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
A big part of the game is running hard!
Running when it hurts....its too easy to not run hard to link up or to chase...
We dont run anywhere near hard enough across the board to create options when you compare ius to say a Collingwood or a Hawthjorn.
Too many wait for the ball to come to them!
Walker Simmo Carrots and the yountgsters do do it.
This kind of running that allows you to have opportunities both defensively and offensively.
Lance and Kouta dont/ cant do it.. so others have to work harder to plug the holes.
Also because as the senior players theyre demonstrating a lack of work ethic to the others.


The other problem is because they are passangers and coupling that with Denis' refusal to use the bench in a modern day manner.. the team is out of puff as well as not working with any real intensity.

bondi its good to see you with abit of shit in you! :wink:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:22 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
Synbad wrote:
A big part of the game is running hard!
Running when it hurts....its too easy to not run hard to link up or to chase...
We dont run anywhere near hard enough across the board to create options when you compare ius to say a Collingwood or a Hawthjorn.
Too many wait for the ball to come to them!
Walker Simmo Carrots and the yountgsters do do it.
This kind of running that allows you to have opportunities both defensively and offensively.
Lance and Kouta dont/ cant do it.. so others have to work harder to plug the holes.
Also because as the senior players theyre demonstrating a lack of work ethic to the others.


The other problem is because they are passangers and coupling that with Denis' refusal to use the bench in a modern day manner.. the team is out of puff as well as not working with any real intensity.

bondi its good to see you with abit of shit in you! :wink:


I don't think even all the youngsters ran hard on Friday night Synbad. Pretty hard to tell on TV but even those that normally run hard looked to be trailing their opponents at 75% intensity. I'm not saying drop them, I'm not saying take them out the back for a flogging, but quite a few of them were poor.

I can't get my head around Denis' use of the bench. We've struggled to run out games many times this year, why wouldn't we extract every bit of run we can out of the bench? I just can't think of a reason why not.

I think some of our problems can be fixed now, but many of them just need time. In the end we're pretty much building a list from nothing. You can't have a truly competitive list without 25 - 28 year old players leading the way. We're still a few years away from that I think, and no amount of dropping players or changing coaches will change that unfortunately.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
I reckon its a big ask to have kids running hard all the tiume.. when senior players doint do it!
And there is a coch who is relentless in "They must learn to play 4 quarters of football"
Denis is a Fossil.
He just doesnt understand modern day football!!!
Stick him in a museum.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:34 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
Everyone will probably LOL,but i'd make 1 AW captain,with vc's of Carrots,


and



























SETANTA 8) :idea:

Think about it,always gives 110%,has some mongrel,could put to shame many players that have grown up playing the game with his dedication and comittment. :-D

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:36 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 9:28 pm
Posts: 796
Location: Funky Town
Pagan needs to learn to use the bench properly...

_________________
"Dont count the games, make the games count"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:56 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 2220
Theres a lot of sense in making leaders of the hardest workers in the team at the momemt.

So in that sense, Walker Carrazo and O'Hailpin are worthy of leadership roles, irsepective of the level of experience they might have or whether they are 'ready' or not.

_________________
My Blue Heaven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:16 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:43 pm
Posts: 322
Dodo27 wrote:
Mark J wrote:
I pose this Q.
How will DP sleep tonight :shock: :shock: :shock:



Denis is one of those guys who never takes full responsibility for any Loss...The guy either has some sort of a memory Loss or just lives his coaching life in Denial all the times...


I havnt watched his post conference, but the usual excuses will be presented... he just reads them off a Paper he prepared 3 years a go


denis should not have to take full responsibility as it is a team game.

denis can't kick the ball for the players, he can't tackle the opposition for the players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:34 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Josh Kaplan wrote:
agree with synners
the last few years we have been caught in the 'david mundy- steven dodd' recruiting mould- tall rangy types who have a good fitness base but arent explosive
i would have dearly loved an andrew swallow or jordan lewis or shannon hurn - gun in an under FOOTBALLERS as opposed to continuously trying to turn blokes into Kouta


Agree...

Swallow was bagged as being a poor kick...
Lewis.. a U18 bully who would go nowhere...too slow
Hurn....another U18 bully who was too slow...

The standout theme with these players is......they could all play straight away...no projects, no remedial skill work etc.....
We have tended to get perhaps too many projects and not enough ready mades........we are always waiting for ours to develop in the Ants while the others mentioned develop in the seniors.

One of my beefs has always been the emphasis placed on draft camp results ahead of players who are natural footballers....I think we have to get a better balance..more footballers and a bit less of the project athlete types.......

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:58 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Fabulous wrote:
Pagan needs to learn to use the bench properly...


...and in other news the sky is blue.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:20 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
TheGame wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TheGame wrote:
I must admit Synbad you were right about trading Lance a couple of years ago. I can't see him going on after next year, he's like an old man out there.

Well.. i did say he will be finished aged 28... how old is Lance???

And like i keep saying.. he might play the odd good 10 minutes.. or quarter.. or even half a game.. but he cant string together whats needed in the modern game to have any kind of sustainability about his game that we need.


What do you reckon we could get for him now? :lol:
Not much for this reason.

" Pagan said Blues captain Lance Whitnall, who had only nine possessions last night, had played under duress. "Lance's knee has been causing issues. He hasn't been able to train for the last five weeks … I just think it's a degenerative knee … he's got a knee joint that's been through a lot of battles." "


If that's the case, why is he playing at all. Let's not blame the player. Let's blame the coach and MC for playing him. And then, of all the dumb things, to play him in defence when the ball comes into the opposition forward line as fast as it did. At worst play him in the forward pocket but really not at all. If he has a degenerative knee you won't get anything at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:22 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
BIBI01 wrote:
Dodo27 wrote:
Mark J wrote:
I pose this Q.
How will DP sleep tonight :shock: :shock: :shock:



Denis is one of those guys who never takes full responsibility for any Loss...The guy either has some sort of a memory Loss or just lives his coaching life in Denial all the times...


I havnt watched his post conference, but the usual excuses will be presented... he just reads them off a Paper he prepared 3 years a go


denis should not have to take full responsibility as it is a team game.

denis can't kick the ball for the players, he can't tackle the opposition for the players.
It's his job to get the players playing to the best of their ability physically and mentally, of which he is incapable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:58 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:34 am
Posts: 26
Location: Near the milk bar
Dodo27 wrote:
Mark J wrote:
I pose this Q.
How will DP sleep tonight :shock: :shock: :shock:



Denis is one of those guys who never takes full responsibility for any Loss...The guy either has some sort of a memory Loss or just lives his coaching life in Denial all the times...


I havnt watched his post conference, but the usual excuses will be presented... he just reads them off a Paper he prepared 3 years a go



Next time Denis doesn't chase, kicks out on the full, misses a hand pass by a mile, kicks a point from point blank or simply makes a poor decision in traffic come back here and post seriously. That goes for you too Jim.

To win is always a team effort.
To lose we must blame one person? :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25463
Location: Bondi Beach
tomalvin, we all accept that Dennis is the coach.

Ultimately the responsibility of the team's performance falls on him.

Only he has the choice to make changes to improve the team; yet he chooses to play Lance.

It's his responsibility to ensure development of the players; and he's had bloody 5 seasons to to that and failed.

If he doesn't want that responsibility, then he shouldn't be coach. All coaches know this when they take on the job.

He is paid a handsome ransome and has agreed by accepting this payment, that he is willing to cop it when the team fails...... for a few million dollars, wouldn't yo?

If it's too hot in the kitchen, he can @#$%&! off!!

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19535
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
tomalvin wrote:
To win is always a team effort.
To lose we must blame one person? :roll:


He has had a major hand in not addressing the ruck problem through the National Draft for so long.

Surely if you're rebuilding you pick a rookie ruckman early on the piece given the time it takes for them to develop. Only last year did the club bite the bullet and pick a ruckman who will take at least 3 years before we see any results.

Pathetic list management! :x


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:15 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:08 pm
Posts: 1277
Location: Perth
jim wrote:
TheGame wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TheGame wrote:
I must admit Synbad you were right about trading Lance a couple of years ago. I can't see him going on after next year, he's like an old man out there.

Well.. i did say he will be finished aged 28... how old is Lance???

And like i keep saying.. he might play the odd good 10 minutes.. or quarter.. or even half a game.. but he cant string together whats needed in the modern game to have any kind of sustainability about his game that we need.


What do you reckon we could get for him now? :lol:
Not much for this reason.

" Pagan said Blues captain Lance Whitnall, who had only nine possessions last night, had played under duress. "Lance's knee has been causing issues. He hasn't been able to train for the last five weeks … I just think it's a degenerative knee … he's got a knee joint that's been through a lot of battles." "


If that's the case, why is he playing at all. Let's not blame the player. Let's blame the coach and MC for playing him. And then, of all the dumb things, to play him in defence when the ball comes into the opposition forward line as fast as it did. At worst play him in the forward pocket but really not at all. If he has a degenerative knee you won't get anything at all.


The term degenerative to me suggests that it's a permanent, ongoing thing, regardless of rest. If that's the case, then Lance must have serious question marks, because he'd have to manage this over the rest of his career.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:45 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:43 pm
Posts: 322
jim wrote:
BIBI01 wrote:
Dodo27 wrote:
Mark J wrote:
I pose this Q.
How will DP sleep tonight :shock: :shock: :shock:



Denis is one of those guys who never takes full responsibility for any Loss...The guy either has some sort of a memory Loss or just lives his coaching life in Denial all the times...


I havnt watched his post conference, but the usual excuses will be presented... he just reads them off a Paper he prepared 3 years a go


denis should not have to take full responsibility as it is a team game.

denis can't kick the ball for the players, he can't tackle the opposition for the players.
It's his job to get the players playing to the best of their ability physically and mentally, of which he is incapable.


i disagree, IF i was a professional footballer I would be doing all I can to get the best out of my ability.
unfortunatly i'm just a park footballer, but when i run out to take the field i expect myself and my 21 team mates to win the game, not the coach.

if I can't get the best out of myself, how could I expect someone else to do so.

i am not trying to absolve pagan of responsibility, but there is only so much a coach can do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:01 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:43 pm
Posts: 322
Effes wrote:
tomalvin wrote:
To win is always a team effort.
To lose we must blame one person? :roll:


He has had a major hand in not addressing the ruck problem through the National Draft for so long.

Surely if you're rebuilding you pick a rookie ruckman early on the piece given the time it takes for them to develop. Only last year did the club bite the bullet and pick a ruckman who will take at least 3 years before we see any results.

Pathetic list management! :x


its hard to argue, as our rucks are a real concern.

we had so many area's to address with our playing list, where do you start first?

if it is true that pagan leaves all the draft selections to the recruitng manager then this also needs to be addressed with the recruiting dept.

mott, bryan, deluca, batson, o'hailpin, mclaren, seems the problem was addressed but addressed very poorly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:18 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24653
Location: Kaloyasena
BIBI01 wrote:
needs to be addressed with the recruiting dept.

mott, bryan, deluca, batson, o'hailpin, mclaren, seems the problem was addressed but addressed very poorly.



Hampson and Jacobs are really the only true young ruck talents we have drafted in the National Draft since Mark Porter in 1997 (and even he was a mature age rookie).

Aisake was drafted because he was taller, faster and younger than Setanta - the fact that he is being tried as a ruckman is really only a happy accident.

The names you have highlighted like Mott, Bryan, Deluca McLaren (and you can throw Knobel in that list - thank god Richmond took him and we were forced to take Eddie Betts instead) only go to highlight Pagan's stop gap, short term and finger in the dyke approach to solving our problems.

If we had of bitten the bullet in 2004 and taken someone like Cameron Wood - we would be in a far better position than where we are now.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:36 pm 
Offline
formerly Army the Wonderkid
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:30 pm
Posts: 2058
Location: The Burbs
AGRO wrote:
BIBI01 wrote:
needs to be addressed with the recruiting dept.

mott, bryan, deluca, batson, o'hailpin, mclaren, seems the problem was addressed but addressed very poorly.



Hampson and Jacobs are really the only true young ruck talents we have drafted in the National Draft since Mark Porter in 1997 (and even he was a mature age rookie).

Aisake was drafted because he was taller, faster and younger than Setanta - the fact that he is being tried as a ruckman is really only a happy accident.

The names you have highlighted like Mott, Bryan, Deluca McLaren (and you can throw Knobel in that list - thank god Richmond took him and we were forced to take Eddie Betts instead) only go to highlight Pagan's stop gap, short term and finger in the dyke approach to solving our problems.

If we had of bitten the bullet in 2004 and taken someone like Cameron Wood - we would be in a far better position than where we are now.


And look at where we got each of them - all very late picks, pre-season draftees or Rookies. Nothing against taking a stab at a smokey with a late pick, but when the Club is in need of someone to fill a spot for 10 years you don't keep trying to throw dollar coins in to a well and hoping.

Add to that that half of those blokes are 196cm, like our current NO1 ruckman, and you just have to shake your head.

Not once in Pagan's tenure have we thrown a top draft pick, or traded someone to get another pick, or traded someone good to get a ruckman. Finally this year they picked up Hammer but he'll need 3 years.

_________________
Formerly: Ackland the Wonderkid / Army the Wonderkid / quivering mess / molsey / Tony Lynn Fan Club


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:41 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
BIBI01 wrote:
jim wrote:
BIBI01 wrote:
Dodo27 wrote:
Mark J wrote:
I pose this Q.
How will DP sleep tonight :shock: :shock: :shock:



Denis is one of those guys who never takes full responsibility for any Loss...The guy either has some sort of a memory Loss or just lives his coaching life in Denial all the times...


I havnt watched his post conference, but the usual excuses will be presented... he just reads them off a Paper he prepared 3 years a go


denis should not have to take full responsibility as it is a team game.

denis can't kick the ball for the players, he can't tackle the opposition for the players.
It's his job to get the players playing to the best of their ability physically and mentally, of which he is incapable.


i disagree, IF i was a professional footballer I would be doing all I can to get the best out of my ability.
unfortunatly i'm just a park footballer, but when i run out to take the field i expect myself and my 21 team mates to win the game, not the coach.

if I can't get the best out of myself, how could I expect someone else to do so.

i am not trying to absolve pagan of responsibility, but there is only so much a coach can do.
While I see what you're saying bit it's the first job a coach has is to get the respect of the players parammount in getting the best out of then. If he can't do that he shouldn't be there. The coach isn't a passive observer. If he has respect the you won't performances like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 77 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group