Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 5:44 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 701 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 36  Next

To tank or not to tank???
YES - lets get picks 1 and 2 this year and be a force for the next 10 seasons 42%  42%  [ 77 ]
NO - we will be right with what we've got 58%  58%  [ 106 ]
Total votes : 183
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 11:39 am
Posts: 30269
Location: riding shotgun on Agros Karma Train
I assume that it is the mean of the number of games per draft pick (or something) - looking at the chart it is going up and down like a yo-yo - not in steady decline as the line indicates

_________________
Between our dreams and actions lies this world


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
kingkerna wrote:
I assume that it is the mean of the number of games per draft pick (or something) - looking at the chart it is going up and down like a yo-yo - not in steady decline as the line indicates


:roll:

Ever heard of a trend line?

Least squares?

Addition, subtraction? :lol: :wink:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
all i have to say to this debate is

with pick #3 of the 2001 National Draft, West Coast Eagles will take Chris Judd

we will get pick 2 or 3 this year

a few sides of have surprised me (north and bombers) so we will finish either second last or third last despite how many games we win and i think we will win more than 4 so the talk of PP is a waste of time

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 4:11 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
i think the PP talk is done with.
we will win atleast 2 more in the next 5 games.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 2:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
Jarusa wrote:
http://footygeek.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1889&Itemid=81
Image


Jars provide the same analysis without the original club criteria.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:58 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
No, you didn't say please. :P

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:46 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:25 pm
Posts: 1547
Location: Cork,Ireland
We have Melbourne x2, Brisbane (fine chance at revenge), Filth/Scum(just cause we always seem to raise our games for them) which are def winnable. Freo isn't exactly setting the world alight and Port are there for taking so maybe Denis will get near his 10 wins afterall. No PP this year anyway

_________________
Setanta Ó hAilpín 64 AFL Games 45 Goals

Up the Rebels All-Ireland Hurling Champions 2004/2005


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:55 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Kevin Bohane wrote:
We have Melbourne x2, Brisbane (fine chance at revenge), Filth/Scum(just cause we always seem to raise our games for them) which are def winnable. Freo isn't exactly setting the world alight and Port are there for taking so maybe Denis will get near his 10 wins afterall. No PP this year anyway


Why did you stop at 10.???. why not win 11???.. make the finals and storm to the gf where we spit out WC...and win our 17th???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:59 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
bluebeard wrote:
It is more than evident that picks 4,5,6 & 7 are ussually as good as picks 1, 2, & 3.

Move on...there is nothing to see here....

I hope the Blues win every game they play...thats why I dont have any fingernails left today...

Go Blues...


So thats your logic?
4 5 and 6... is better than 1 AND 3...???

You dont have any fingernails left today because ou did something weird to them thinking it was a great idea at the time....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:02 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 2095
Location: handcuffed to a seasoned drinker
Analysing the draft over a period of time is pointless, it changes every year because every year there are different kids in it. If we're talking about how much better pick 3 is to pick 5, then it depends who WH rates as the top 5 players and how much difference there is between them. In 2000 there was a massive difference between the top 3 and the rest, we had pick 4 - shame about that. Last year Brisbane played North towards the end of the year, the winner would take pick 4 the loser pick 3, seemingly a difficult game when many thought there was a standout 3 kids in Gibbs, Gumblton, and Hansen; but who knows? maybe Brisbane rated the draft Luenberger, Selwood, Thorp and they ended up with their first choice.

Maybe WH will be under instructions to use one of his first 2 picks on a ruckman, given there are so many available in this draft it's highly likely that the one we take at pick 4 could have been taken at pick 22. But by the same token, after all is said and done, maybe someone leaps from the pack and becomes a standout no.1 and picks 2 onwards are average in comparison, if that happens it has nothing to do with whether pick 2 has historically been any good.

Having more picks early is of course better because the recruiter can choose the ones they like, but the difference between the pick number may not be as large as it seems and recruiters can stuff up even with the right picks. Collingwood has been lauded for their picks of late, but in 2004 they traded out of pick 7 to get pick 10 and Chad Morrison believing the draft tapered off after the top 6. Pick 7 ended up being Jordan Lewis while they were stuck with Chris Egan and 2 years of Chad Morrison.

Historically clubs with strong lists have benefitted from getting a number of starting 22 players from the one draft or over a 2 year period. Geelong did it in 2001 with Bartel, Ablett, Kelly, Steve Johnson and David Johnson - they also rookied Carrazo and Malony. The Saints did it over 2 years getting Reiwoldt, Kosi, Ball, Clarke, Dal Santo, McGuire and Montagna - In 2 drafts worth of picks only Josh Houlihan, Daniel Wulf and Mark Gale are not in their best 22, poor drafting, trading and injuries since then has crueled them, but they were set up magnificently from those 2 drafts.

They aren't all early picks, they were just the right ones and developed well when they go to the club. Richmond had 5 picks inside 20 in 2004, at this stage it looks like 3 are going to be players, 1-2 being of any quality.

I can understand the pro-tankers given the priority system now makes it extremely hard to get 2 early picks and we're teetering on eligibility, but I'd wait and see what players are on offer before I start forming opinions on what is better for the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:16 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:36 pm
Posts: 1289
Location: here
Synbad wrote:
bluebeard wrote:
It is more than evident that picks 4,5,6 & 7 are ussually as good as picks 1, 2, & 3.

Move on...there is nothing to see here....

I hope the Blues win every game they play...thats why I dont have any fingernails left today...

Go Blues...


So thats your logic?
4 5 and 6... is better than 1 AND 3...???

You dont have any fingernails left today because ou did something weird to them thinking it was a great idea at the time....


Ussually as good as is not BETTER THAN Synbad.

No fingernails due to the stress of watching a game that I was starting to think would slip away AGAIN!

AND

I dont think personal attacks is approriate.

Good to see that you threw the punches when I was away from TC...keep up the work champ. :-D

_________________
They coud'nt.....could they?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:34 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
blu944 wrote:
Analysing the draft over a period of time is pointless, it changes every year because every year there are different kids in it. If we're talking about how much better pick 3 is to pick 5, then it depends who WH rates as the top 5 players and how much difference there is between them. In 2000 there was a massive difference between the top 3 and the rest, we had pick 4 - shame about that. Last year Brisbane played North towards the end of the year, the winner would take pick 4 the loser pick 3, seemingly a difficult game when many thought there was a standout 3 kids in Gibbs, Gumblton, and Hansen; but who knows? maybe Brisbane rated the draft Luenberger, Selwood, Thorp and they ended up with their first choice.

Maybe WH will be under instructions to use one of his first 2 picks on a ruckman, given there are so many available in this draft it's highly likely that the one we take at pick 4 could have been taken at pick 22. But by the same token, after all is said and done, maybe someone leaps from the pack and becomes a standout no.1 and picks 2 onwards are average in comparison, if that happens it has nothing to do with whether pick 2 has historically been any good.

Having more picks early is of course better because the recruiter can choose the ones they like, but the difference between the pick number may not be as large as it seems and recruiters can stuff up even with the right picks. Collingwood has been lauded for their picks of late, but in 2004 they traded out of pick 7 to get pick 10 and Chad Morrison believing the draft tapered off after the top 6. Pick 7 ended up being Jordan Lewis while they were stuck with Chris Egan and 2 years of Chad Morrison.

Historically clubs with strong lists have benefitted from getting a number of starting 22 players from the one draft or over a 2 year period. Geelong did it in 2001 with Bartel, Ablett, Kelly, Steve Johnson and David Johnson - they also rookied Carrazo and Malony. The Saints did it over 2 years getting Reiwoldt, Kosi, Ball, Clarke, Dal Santo, McGuire and Montagna - In 2 drafts worth of picks only Josh Houlihan, Daniel Wulf and Mark Gale are not in their best 22, poor drafting, trading and injuries since then has crueled them, but they were set up magnificently from those 2 drafts.

They aren't all early picks, they were just the right ones and developed well when they go to the club. Richmond had 5 picks inside 20 in 2004, at this stage it looks like 3 are going to be players, 1-2 being of any quality.

I can understand the pro-tankers given the priority system now makes it extremely hard to get 2 early picks and we're teetering on eligibility, but I'd wait and see what players are on offer before I start forming opinions on what is better for the club.


Now thats a post.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:42 am 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Synbad wrote:
Kevin Bohane wrote:
We have Melbourne x2, Brisbane (fine chance at revenge), Filth/Scum(just cause we always seem to raise our games for them) which are def winnable. Freo isn't exactly setting the world alight and Port are there for taking so maybe Denis will get near his 10 wins afterall. No PP this year anyway


Why did you stop at 10.???. why not win 11???.. make the finals and storm to the gf where we spit out WC...and win our 17th???


Not to mention the $1million smackeroos for winning both the pre-season and season proper Cups.

Synners, you may be on to something here.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:42 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
blu944 wrote:
Analysing the draft over a period of time is pointless.


What the graph shows is that the draft works (and those that use it know what they are doing) in that on average in terms of games played the players go from best to worst.

Nothing more nothing less.

Calling things pointless is pretty pointless though. :wink:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:49 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24612
Location: Kaloyasena
And the cornerstones of our list now from the class of 2000/2001 are?? :?

- Luke Livingstone
- Trent Sporn
- Simon Wiggins
- Sean O'Keefe
- Callan Beasy
- Justin Davies
- Jarrad Waite
- Sam Cranage

Out of those 8 only 2 remain - I would doubt that any amount of winning culture would have saved the rest of the 6.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:49 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
blu944 wrote:
Analysing the draft over a period of time is pointless, it changes every year because every year there are different kids in it. If we're talking about how much better pick 3 is to pick 5, then it depends who WH rates as the top 5 players and how much difference there is between them. In 2000 there was a massive difference between the top 3 and the rest, we had pick 4 - shame about that. Last year Brisbane played North towards the end of the year, the winner would take pick 4 the loser pick 3, seemingly a difficult game when many thought there was a standout 3 kids in Gibbs, Gumblton, and Hansen; but who knows? maybe Brisbane rated the draft Luenberger, Selwood, Thorp and they ended up with their first choice.

Maybe WH will be under instructions to use one of his first 2 picks on a ruckman, given there are so many available in this draft it's highly likely that the one we take at pick 4 could have been taken at pick 22. But by the same token, after all is said and done, maybe someone leaps from the pack and becomes a standout no.1 and picks 2 onwards are average in comparison, if that happens it has nothing to do with whether pick 2 has historically been any good.

Having more picks early is of course better because the recruiter can choose the ones they like, but the difference between the pick number may not be as large as it seems and recruiters can stuff up even with the right picks. Collingwood has been lauded for their picks of late, but in 2004 they traded out of pick 7 to get pick 10 and Chad Morrison believing the draft tapered off after the top 6. Pick 7 ended up being Jordan Lewis while they were stuck with Chris Egan and 2 years of Chad Morrison.

Historically clubs with strong lists have benefitted from getting a number of starting 22 players from the one draft or over a 2 year period. Geelong did it in 2001 with Bartel, Ablett, Kelly, Steve Johnson and David Johnson - they also rookied Carrazo and Malony. The Saints did it over 2 years getting Reiwoldt, Kosi, Ball, Clarke, Dal Santo, McGuire and Montagna - In 2 drafts worth of picks only Josh Houlihan, Daniel Wulf and Mark Gale are not in their best 22, poor drafting, trading and injuries since then has crueled them, but they were set up magnificently from those 2 drafts.

They aren't all early picks, they were just the right ones and developed well when they go to the club. Richmond had 5 picks inside 20 in 2004, at this stage it looks like 3 are going to be players, 1-2 being of any quality.

I can understand the pro-tankers given the priority system now makes it extremely hard to get 2 early picks and we're teetering on eligibility, but I'd wait and see what players are on offer before I start forming opinions on what is better for the club.



stop talking commensence :evil:

this thread is for ranting and raving :evil:





:wink: good work mate, couldnt agree more

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:51 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
Jars, please provide the same information regardless of the same team criteria. It may even things up a but because higher picks are less likely to change clubs. Also, it may be worth taking out the bottom and top 5 percent in each category cause to get a real mean you need to adjust for the annomolies. In fact, if you don't mind sending me the raw data, I'd love to take a look.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:02 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:29 pm
Posts: 391
Lets get one thing straight...I LOVE Carlton just as much as anyone else in here.

For the good of the club, i am still hoping we get the PP. You can all say what you like but i've had enough over the last 5 years. We are close to finally rising again. Picks 1 & 3 will make sure we get there.

If we lose to Port this week, we will get the PP. Just wait and see.

_________________
Walk on, Walk on,
With hope, in your heart,
And you'll never walk alone,
YOU'LL NEVER WALK ALONE!!!

08/02/1981 - GATE 7...Our brothers will never be forgotten!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:07 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:34 am
Posts: 991
AGRO wrote:
And the cornerstones of our list now from the class of 2000/2001 are?? :?

- Luke Livingstone
- Trent Sporn
- Simon Wiggins
- Sean O'Keefe
- Callan Beasy
- Justin Davies
- Jarrad Waite
- Sam Cranage

Out of those 8 only 2 remain - I would doubt that any amount of winning culture would have saved the rest of the 6.


perfect example why we should tank for draft picks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:08 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
nytdog wrote:
Jars, please provide the same information regardless of the same team criteria. It may even things up a but because higher picks are less likely to change clubs. Also, it may be worth taking out the bottom and top 5 percent in each category cause to get a real mean you need to adjust for the annomolies. In fact, if you don't mind sending me the raw data, I'd love to take a look.


Thanks for saying please.

This graph was done about 2-3 years ago so it is getting a bit old (it has been brought up in about a million tanking threads on TC and TBV. Took a long time to collate the data. I might give it a go again in the near future both with and without original club.

I don't really buy the top picks do not get traded as much argument. I reckon it would be the opposite (without any facts to back me up at this stage).

You just look at the number one picks. five out of the roughly 21 number one picks have been traded to other clubs.

John Hutton
Darren Gaspar
Jeff White
Michael Gardiner
Des Headland

Gaspar played 207 games for Richmond, White has played 180 odd for Melb so far and Headland looks like he will go on to play 200+ for Freo. So just there the average for number one would go up.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 701 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 ... 36  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 134 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group