TheGame wrote:
Indie wrote:
I agree he gets a raw deal. But he's brought it on himself to a large degree.
It was very unwise for him to smile and laugh with Mal Michael after playing for and getting a soft free kick for hands in the back at the beginning of the NAB Cup. It was shown in close up on the TV . The umps tend to remember being conned or mocked in that fashion. Fortunately, the same thing is happening to Lindsay Thomas now. You could hit him over the head with a sledgehammer and he won't get a free kick.
Unfortunately, he's exacerbated this by going over the top in his whinging about the failure of umpires to pay a free to him. By failing to go after the ball, he's let them off the hook as the umps would know that he would be the object of derision from non-Carlton footy fans rather than them.
He now needs to do his time and take it on the chin. Hopefully after a while, he'll be back in the good books and get the soft free-kicks that Lloyd gets.
That's ridiculous! Be a good boy and we'll give you free kicks. How about they just umpire by the rules?
Agreed. That would be ideal. But we know that in practice this sort of stuff happens. You have to deal with the reality.
I listened to MMM at the game, and IIRC Kouta wasn't paid a mark in the goalmouth and then ran away from goal and was tackled and didn't dispose of the ball correctly. We grabbed the loose ball and kicked a goal. Dunstall was asked about whether Kouta should have been pinged. He said it was one of those 50/50s, and the umpire probably gave us the benefit of the doubt because he didn't pay the mark. To the comment that this isn't how decisions to be made and that the rules had to be applied independently of previous incidents, Dunstall said he accepted that but it is the way that umpires think and always has been. I reckon he's spot on.
So Fev can tilt at windmills and complain that things aren't ideal, or he can get on with business and do the best thing by the club and himself.