bluechampion wrote:
This is an appealing idea, but with no increase in lists, it presents its own problems. At the moment, we have a list of 38 + 5 rookies, which meant that if we had a reserves team, we'd need to top up at least 1 or 2 a week. However, we have an injury list of approx. 11 at the moment, which means that half the seconds side would be short-term top-ups. This is the biggest problem, when you have to scour local leagues and the TAC comp for top-ups who may play one week, or, in the case of replacements for people like McLaren or Teague, 6 weeks to a season.
It's a strain on resources, and experienced players, like Morrell or (last year) Harford aren't going to play with us as top-up players. And lots of the youngsters mention their leadership at the 'Ants when asked.
As much as I like the idea of a Carlton reserves side and a clear development pathway for our youngsters, I worry that this is too big a commitment for a club that's resource-poor at the moment.
Bingo.
With maximum list size 44, there's no way this can happen.
Hell, St Kilda's struggling to make a 22, let alone two!
The concentration of list sizes is a double edged sword in that it filters out those who aren't up to senior footy but reduces the ability to develop a plyer over a number of years.
Maybe if there was the list as is but another list of 'designated' reserves that the club had first dibs on at the draft...a sort of sub rookie listed player.