Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 01, 2025 8:21 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 7:17 am
Posts: 17381
Location: the Yarran's fertile shores
Humpers wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
Cons
Josh Kennedy, we make every excuse in the world for him, but he just can't get near it. Be interesting to see where he and Paddy Ryder are in a few years. Josh is big but not Rocca esque, he appears one paced and lumbering, he goes to ground whenever he contests a mark, and he has an ordinary spring and doesn't appear overly agile, not exactly the make up I had in mind when we used a #4 pick on him. And please no-one tell me just how hard it is being a drafter. We cannot absolutely cannot use top 4 picks on guys who aren't going to be elite. If you are a CHF with out pace and spring, chances are you won't be elite. Josh has another two years to make it, but the signs are not good, and he must go back to the Ants to try and get some form and confidence.


In the 2005 draft we had to take a KPP with pick #4 and the options were:

- Kennedy
- Paddy Ryder (too short for a ruckman / not enough power or grunt for a KPP)
- Beau Dowler (hasn't done much too date - apparently not making a big impression for the Box Hill Hawks either)
- Mitch Clark (talented but injury prone and supposedly had a question mark against his attitude)

At this stage I think we made the right decision with Kennedy. KPP's take a long time to develop and it must be difficult for Josh considering how weak our midfield is. I'm confident he will be a quality player for us in the future.


Also, Paddy Ryder is being played as a 3rd key back option for full matches

smart coaches know where to "hide" good youngsters to build their experience and confidence.

I would love to see Kennedy used in the same role for us for a season to be run into the play. Next week why can't we see Kennedy on Hale/Petrie, Waite on Edwards and O'hAilpin/Saddington/Thornton on Brown?

No reason why Kennedy couldn't have played on Travis Cloke yesterday.

I know Kennedy is a CHF but better to be run into the play if you're not getting it, and spend a full game on the field than doing bit-jobs in half the game or less up forward and not being used as a target

_________________
Love Cricket? Love me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:28 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
Quote:
In the 2005 draft we had to take a KPP with pick #4 and the options were


Humpers I really hope Kennedy becomes a star, but we didn't have to take a KPP with pick #4, that sounds like our reasoning for getting Livo "next best tall", that doesn't matter much if you don't make it, or guys picked after you are much better than you. With our pick 4 we needed to select a player capable of being elite, I hope that is Josh Kennedy, but at this stage I am not sure he has the skills to be that. It is hard to be an elite CHF or CHB iof you are a lumberer without a big spring. Really hope he becomes elite, if he doesn't and a number of players picked after him out perform him, then I'll want Hughes head on a plate, because high draft picks aren't there to be wasted. Hughes also selected a CHF the year before in Hartlett who is languishing in the backline for the Ants. I just want to see something, good hands, some good attempts to mark, impose himself on a contest, just something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:30 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
Pros:

- Scotland again. Whoever says he's just a lose man in defence and that's about it doesnt know anything about football. He gets plenty of contested ball and uses it so well. Thank god we picked him up (and so cheaply) because we would be crap without him
- Simmo tried his heart out
- Murphy a gun
- Gibba tackling - love it
- Thought Whitnall was good (even though played out of position). His defensive work was very good until their midfield gained control of the game and gave Rocca supply outside 50 that no defender would have been able to stop

Cons:
- Lack of team work
- Selection of Bower when his form didn't warrant it. Blackwell should have been playing
- Pagan's use of the bench. Uterly woeful


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:20 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
KERMIT wrote:
I must have been at a different game today if the consensus is that Saddington was good! Why the hell is he being played? Did his form in the Bullants warrant selection?

Why was Blackwell dropped? Anderson the same.

And for those who would be happy with 6-8 meaningless wins this year wake up to yourself. We have a long way to go in rebuilding this team and I for one don't wan any shortcuts taken (like recruiting duds like Saddington).

I want the priority this year and I don't give a stuff what others say.


He took at least 5 goal-scoring opportunity saving marks in defence both coming in from the side and running back with the flight. Would have been worse without him. Disposal wasn't bad either.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:25 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4629
Not a fan of Saddington, not trying to stick up for him.

Hope his tape is watched by all defenders at the Blues.

Marked, punched and harrassed...and picked every option exactly when he had to.

Waite, Setanta, even Whitts ocassionally take the wrong option. I was at the game and Saddington did well.........mind you I'ld still rather have Setanta there, making errors and learning...but with T-bird out, you have to do something!

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:30 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
nytdog wrote:
Pros:

- Scotland again. Whoever says he's just a lose man in defence and that's about it doesnt know anything about football. He gets plenty of contested ball and uses it so well. Thank god we picked him up (and so cheaply) because we would be crap without him
- Simmo tried his heart out
- Murphy a gun
- Gibba tackling - love it
- Thought Whitnall was good (even though played out of position). His defensive work was very good until their midfield gained control of the game and gave Rocca supply outside 50 that no defender would have been able to stop

Cons:
- Lack of team work
- Selection of Bower when his form didn't warrant it. Blackwell should have been playing
- Pagan's use of the bench. Uterly woeful

It was clear that Waite could have laid a hand on those marks that Rocca took. Rocca simply leaped. Whitnall was on his hammer, just that Lance couldn't jump.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:31 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Also why do so many Carlton players fly for the mark/spoil leaving their opponent on the ground to mop it up. Happens everywhere around the ground - most saliently in our forward line - where their HB line just mops up and runs it out.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 11:43 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
CarltonClem wrote:
Also why do so many Carlton players fly for the mark/spoil leaving their opponent on the ground to mop it up. Happens everywhere around the ground - most saliently in our forward line - where their HB line just mops up and runs it out.


Beacuse we're so badly coached our players can't even get the basics right.
We don't know where to run to in order to create some space or make a lead. We are systemless.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 12:39 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
Pros
Smurph
Scotland
Carlos
Fev
Lappin
1st Half

Cons
Ackland
No contingency plan
Lance in defence
Carlos in the ruck [whilst he was a pro, I still think he should have stayed down back - let him master one position before sticking him elsewhere]
Houli - Not a defensive bone in his body
Losing
Filth supporters in the top of the SS smoking 2 rows in front of me with my 2 year old nephew sitting next to me :twisted: MCC officials and coppers don't do much to enforce the non smoking rule at the G.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 12:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 2:21 am
Posts: 1684
Location: Parkville
DUC, next time they do that, eat a whole bunch of fruit, nuts or whatever, save up a nice juicy baloon of gas in your belly and then take a walk over to those inconsiderate scumbags and let em have it. :wink: Around kids is unacceptable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:02 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 1:26 am
Posts: 8026
Location: Melbourne
Pros - playing attacking footy right to the last. We could have easily shut up shop or get run over.

Cons - the hysteria on this website that now seems to greet any performance. True, I don't want a 'clap them off when only losing by 10 goal", but eek!

We played rubbish and were in front. We fought it out and in the end, the difference was what you'd expect between 6th and 11th.

_________________
Everything before the word "but" is horseshit - J Snow


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 1:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2155
Location: East Melbourne
Can the mods please change the title of this thread? Round 8 is next week. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 2:08 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
malleefowl wrote:
Can the mods please change the title of this thread? Round 8 is next week. :wink:


Haha, sorry. I've changed it, but probably no need to because I'll most likely be sticking Pagan and his game plan in the cons next week again.

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 2:10 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
George Harris wrote:
We are systemless.


George, you've summed it up in 3 words. It's the biggest problem. No reliable system except bomb it long to Fev. How can the youngsters learn??

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 2:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
I agree George. Has been our biggest problem...there is no system. My question was rhetorical unfortunately... :cry:

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 2:15 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
nytdog wrote:
DUC, next time they do that, eat a whole bunch of fruit, nuts or whatever, save up a nice juicy baloon of gas in your belly and then take a walk over to those inconsiderate scumbags and let em have it. :wink: Around kids is unacceptable.


Being a lady stops me from doing that ny, but I am open to paying someone to do that for me.

That were your typical stereotype filth supporters - tracksuits, beanies and the smoke - ferals.

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 12:40 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8187
Pros:
A pretty decent effort against a very well coached/drilled team playing very good footy at the moment.
Key defenders were good: Waite, Saddington and Whitnall. (Although I'd prefer Bower to be getting a shot in that role ahead of Saddington and Whitnall.)
Murphy, Simpson and Scotland in midfield (although there were a couple of really costly turnovers from Scotland early in the last quarter).
Bentick for a half.
Carrazzo (great to see him get a decent run in midfield for the first time in a few weeks).
Fev for a half.
Lappin.
Setanta (beaten but very competitive - one of the few times I've seen one of our ruckmen genuinely competing over the last 3-4 years).
Houlihan's offensive work was outstanding.

Cons:
Got smashed out of the centre square after half time.
Team plan of kicking to our leading 'centre half forwards' in Young and Betts throughout the second half. Not sure why those kicks weren't directed at an option like Kennedy or Fisher.
Houlihan's defensive work was poor (just can't afford to play on goalkickers - should be played midfield/forward).
Umpires over the last 3 weeks (ever since Fev started mouthing off). Particularly frustrated by their seeming love affair with Thomas, Didak and Heath Shaw.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group