Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:23 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 233 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:32 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
kingkerna wrote:
Jars if we were to appoint a new coach OVER Mitchell wouldn't that new coach have the confidence that he was chosen instead of Mitchell? And also wouldn't Mitchell be aware that he isn't going to be chosen as senior coach if this was to occur?

I think Barry is happy enough to coach at any senior level - including VFL, he is not stupid and I am sure he knows that he is not high on the list of potential coaches - St Kilda didn't even interview him, did they?


New Senior coaches usually have the perogative to install their own people such as assistant coaches and some members of the football department. If prospective coaches were being sought out and they are either being told or think that BM cannot be removed as coach of the Bullants then anyone wanting the job would have to have no issue with a compromised football department.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:40 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18048
Jarusa wrote:
I make no presumptions in that post BV, just stating what the perception seems to be out there.

You on the other hand time and again have made presumptions about Pagan. You call him childish and many other names under the sun yet you have no idea whether he is being childish or not.


I'm just giving my opinion Jars.
Greg Swann and Michael Malouf have both publically stated that Denis Pagan refuses to talk to Barry Mitchell.
No one is asking him to like Barry Mitchell however a senior coach needs to interact with his reserves coach for the club to function.
Refusing to do so is childish and blatantly unprofessional.
But hey, thats just my opinion.
I'm just giving my thoughts on reported facts.


*Insert closing swipe here* :oops:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Last edited by Blue Vain on Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:45 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
I found this quite funny!............

Quote:
WHEN Denis Pagan agreed on radio three days ago that as senior coach he should have full say over his assistants, he did far more than simply breathe oxygen into the Barry Mitchell controversy.


Why? Oh i just think it's convenient that after an insipid performance and another notch in the belt that is the 12+goal drummings that is Pagans coaching career, he chooses to finally give the media something to play with.

Am i reading to much into that? Why now Denis? You've refused to give an inch in the past, now it seems you've given the equivilent of a mile. Why? Cause you want to divert attention away from yourself? Hmmmmm............perhaps i am reading to much into this.

But i found this quote more interesting.........................

Quote:
Mitchell's supporters, who reportedly number a large group of the club's younger players, insist that he has been shockingly maligned.


That's right boys and girls. The most important thing at the club right now is our younger players. Forget Gibbs & Murphy, there givens! It's the Grigg's, Jackson's, Anderson's, Aisakie's, Bower's and others who's development is crucial over the next few years.

They are the players that will (hopefully) be at our club for 5-10 years! Pagan, even if he sees out his current contract, will probably only be around for another 18months!

And no, i'm not suggesting Mitchell should be coach (although i do think he'll make a decent AFL coach), i am just saying that Mitchell is, quite simply too frigen important to our young kids to just piss-off because Pagan is to childish.

As i've said before...............i got knifed in a worse situation that Pagan at my previous job by a mate who i'd worked with for years. I was asked to leave because of it.
Funny enough, 8 months on & Business wasn't doing so well & the place shut down due to poor-performance. Now the guy who stole my job was looking for a new one and just-so-happened to find one with my new employer forcing me to work closley with this back-stabbing prick once again.

I worked with him for the next 12months+ before leaving to do my own thing.

Never once did i kick up a storm or a hissy fit, but more importantly..............never once did i let it effect my work or the company.

I think Pagan is acting like a child...............and it's not the first time either. He has a history of doing this.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:49 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
ryan2000 wrote:
But i found this quote more interesting.........................

Quote:
Mitchell's supporters, who reportedly number a large group of the club's younger players, insist that he has been shockingly maligned.


That's right boys and girls. The most important thing at the club right now is our younger players. Forget Gibbs & Murphy, there givens! It's the Grigg's, Jackson's, Anderson's, Aisakie's, Bower's and others who's development is crucial over the next few years.

They are the players that will (hopefully) be at our club for 5-10 years! Pagan, even if he sees out his current contract, will probably only be around for another 18months!


Are you saying the players should choose the coach?

ryan2000 wrote:
I think Pagan is acting like a child...............and it's not the first time either. He has a history of doing this.


Especially when he was a child. :wink:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 9:53 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:13 pm
Posts: 1830
Location: Fitzroy
ryan2000 wrote:
The most important thing at the club right now is our younger players. Forget Gibbs & Murphy, there givens! It's the Grigg's, Jackson's, Anderson's, Aisakie's, Bower's and others who's development is crucial over the next few years.


Exactly!! That's why it's completely unacceptable to have 2 coaches not communicating with each other. What sort of example does it set? Imagine the repercussions if Whitnall and Stevens were now not talking over the Captaincy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:04 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Quote:
"Jarusa"
Are you saying the players should choose the coach?


- No, not at all.............and i'm not suggesting Mitchell should be our coach. I'm just asking the question as to who is more important to these kids development?

- Pagan? Who's contract will not likley be renewed by the end of 2008 season.
or
- Mitchell? Who is experienced enough in the game as it was yet youthfull enough to keep up with it's ever-changing morern style. Not to mention being a wonderfull mentor for these kids.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:05 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
But Slo Mo, where can you show BV that it has that effect? We have to stick to reported "facts". And because Sticks is the one who's free to talk to the press (and Pagan saying "you won't get any arguments from me" is enough to inspire a lynch mob), we'll have to wait until Sticks says something to support you. Until then, we have to accept what we are told, that the relationship is workable.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:08 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18048
Indie wrote:
But Slo Mo, where can you show BV that it has that effect? We have to stick to reported "facts". And because Sticks is the one who's free to talk to the press (and Pagan saying "you won't get any arguments from me" is enough to inspire a lynch mob), we'll have to wait until Sticks says something to support you. Until then, we have to accept what we are told, that the relationship is workable.


This is like being in grade 5 all over again. :lol:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:16 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
ryan2000 wrote:
Quote:
"Jarusa"
Are you saying the players should choose the coach?


- No, not at all.............and i'm not suggesting Mitchell should be our coach. I'm just asking the question as to who is more important to these kids development?

- Pagan? Who's contract will not likley be renewed by the end of 2008 season.
or
- Mitchell? Who is experienced enough in the game as it was yet youthfull enough to keep up with it's ever-changing morern style. Not to mention being a wonderfull mentor for these kids.

When Thomas was sacked, Nick Riewoldt cried (again). It became apparent that the youngsters in the team were very upset at him being sacked and they thought he was an incredibly positive influence on them.

Within a week, things calmed down.

Since Lyon has taken over, I'd imagine they're happy with him as a coach.

In the case of Thomas/Lyon, we're talking about a senior coach and not just a VFL coach. Unlike with a senior coach, a young player would only look at the VFL coach as being his temporary coach. Name a youngster who wants to stay in the VFL for a few years.

The players quickly adjust to a new coach. The transition should have taken place a long time ago, but you have to do what you can do now. And you're kidding yourself if you think we can't get a replacement for him who will be good for the kids too. Ratten and Crosisca both have coached their own teams, Crosisca in the VFL. Libba could do it. Terry Daniher could do it. Ashman could do it. Irreplaceable he's not.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:19 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 7:28 am
Posts: 1073
Blue Vain wrote:
Indie wrote:
But Slo Mo, where can you show BV that it has that effect? We have to stick to reported "facts". And because Sticks is the one who's free to talk to the press (and Pagan saying "you won't get any arguments from me" is enough to inspire a lynch mob), we'll have to wait until Sticks says something to support you. Until then, we have to accept what we are told, that the relationship is workable.


This is like being in grade 5 all over again. :lol:

Maybe this time you'll learn something.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:31 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:51 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Hampton Park -- Vic
Indie wrote:
The players quickly adjust to a new coach. The transition should have taken place a long time ago, but you have to do what you can do now. And you're kidding yourself if you think we can't get a replacement for him who will be good for the kids too. Ratten and Crosisca both have coached their own teams, Crosisca in the VFL. Libba could do it. Terry Daniher could do it. Ashman could do it. Irreplaceable he's not.




EXACTLY!! -- Nobody is irreplaceable.. Like it or not Dennis is senior coach and if he doesn't want Mitchell there.. Mitchell shouldn't be there. End of story.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:34 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:43 pm
Posts: 322
if mitchell is the 'messiah' of coaching, why hasn't he got a senior AFL gig yet?

we keep getting told how great mitchell is at VFL level and how he is great at developing the younger players. i don't doubt that he is good at his job, bit IMO he is not that good.

from reading many post about mitchell, I get the feeling people are trying to say mitchell is the key factor in young players making it at afl level.

well didn't mitchell have a fair bit to do with: sporn, livingston, davies, smith, batson, mott, beasy, croad, o'keefe, mckenzie, steiner, hedge, pleming, boyd, becker????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:43 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
People closer to the club than me rate Mitch. But I just don't like him much. His 3/4 time address is dull and dreary, uninspiring
He seems to have little rapport or charisma. He might be a reasonable coach but there has never been a suggestion that he has
been considered for a senior job, (aprt from the Carlton Board debacle). And no other club seems to be beating down the door to get him as an assistant.
He's been around a long, long time, at the same club, not broadening his experience at other clubs. I wouldn't be sorry to see him go. Britts struck me as a
very good developer of young players and he's coaching no-one. Having said all that Pagan is being childish. I don't think either will be there next season.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:50 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
maxm68 wrote:
Indie wrote:
The players quickly adjust to a new coach. The transition should have taken place a long time ago, but you have to do what you can do now. And you're kidding yourself if you think we can't get a replacement for him who will be good for the kids too. Ratten and Crosisca both have coached their own teams, Crosisca in the VFL. Libba could do it. Terry Daniher could do it. Ashman could do it. Irreplaceable he's not.




EXACTLY!! -- Nobody is irreplaceable.. Like it or not Dennis is senior coach and if he doesn't want Mitchell there.. Mitchell shouldn't be there. End of story.
A decent organisation doesn't get rid of it good employees and keep the trash. Pagan is considered" short-term" at the club, Mitchell "long-term". Let's face it, Pagan wouldn't be here if we have the finances to pay him out last year. Soon Denis will be gone, no point having a good employee like Mitchell gone too over this. Pagan's the one not talking, if he doesn't want to talk to Mitchell then he knows what he can do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:00 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18048
BIBI01 wrote:
well didn't mitchell have a fair bit to do with: sporn, livingston, davies, smith, batson, mott, beasy, croad, o'keefe, mckenzie, steiner, hedge, pleming, boyd, becker????


Yes, how he didnt turn that lot into Brownlow medallists is beyond me.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:27 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1651
Mitchell at another club - i may be proven wrong but i doubt it. It seems to me that other clubs wouldn't touch him with a 10ft pole. He may be damaged goods.

btw pagan is also damaged. This is his last gig.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:45 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 5338
Location: Melbourne
The best thing we could ve done is either sort this out and get them back working together, and if the situation is beyond repair (which it seems to be) move one of them on...
Why do people on our Club, through their actions, insist on giving the media reason to bag us...
One loss and it didnt take long for the doomsdayers to drag out all the negative crap again... with this and the Lance situation still at a head, all the good work is quickly being undone...

_________________
James Hird and Essendon* FC - #FOREVERDRUGCHEATS


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:08 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:10 am
Posts: 881
Location: Netherlands
jim wrote:
maxm68 wrote:
Indie wrote:
The players quickly adjust to a new coach. The transition should have taken place a long time ago, but you have to do what you can do now. And you're kidding yourself if you think we can't get a replacement for him who will be good for the kids too. Ratten and Crosisca both have coached their own teams, Crosisca in the VFL. Libba could do it. Terry Daniher could do it. Ashman could do it. Irreplaceable he's not.




EXACTLY!! -- Nobody is irreplaceable.. Like it or not Dennis is senior coach and if he doesn't want Mitchell there.. Mitchell shouldn't be there. End of story.
A decent organisation doesn't get rid of it good employees and keep the trash. Pagan is considered" short-term" at the club, Mitchell "long-term". Let's face it, Pagan wouldn't be here if we have the finances to pay him out last year. Soon Denis will be gone, no point having a good employee like Mitchell gone too over this. Pagan's the one not talking, if he doesn't want to talk to Mitchell then he knows what he can do.


Hang on a sec here - is it a case of Mitchell being a good employee or a good mate???? I very much suspect the latter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:55 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8217
Pickle wrote:
jim wrote:
maxm68 wrote:
Indie wrote:
The players quickly adjust to a new coach. The transition should have taken place a long time ago, but you have to do what you can do now. And you're kidding yourself if you think we can't get a replacement for him who will be good for the kids too. Ratten and Crosisca both have coached their own teams, Crosisca in the VFL. Libba could do it. Terry Daniher could do it. Ashman could do it. Irreplaceable he's not.




EXACTLY!! -- Nobody is irreplaceable.. Like it or not Dennis is senior coach and if he doesn't want Mitchell there.. Mitchell shouldn't be there. End of story.
A decent organisation doesn't get rid of it good employees and keep the trash. Pagan is considered" short-term" at the club, Mitchell "long-term". Let's face it, Pagan wouldn't be here if we have the finances to pay him out last year. Soon Denis will be gone, no point having a good employee like Mitchell gone too over this. Pagan's the one not talking, if he doesn't want to talk to Mitchell then he knows what he can do.


Hang on a sec here - is it a case of Mitchell being a good employee or a good mate???? I very much suspect the latter.
Looking at his peformance I think a damn good employee. Obvious, unless one has a anti-Mitchell agenda. It Denis didn't do such an awful job in the last 4 years this would never be a problem. Denis only has one person to blame............himself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:04 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:36 pm
Posts: 1289
Location: here
At the end of 2007 get rid of both of them.

Pagan is not going to lead this team to a premiership if he coached them for another decade.

Mitchell is connected to all of Carltons failure over the past 5 years.

REMEMBER: he was an assistant under Brittian ( not pretty!)

I know he was around when Parkin was at the helm, but a retarded cane toad could be an assistant under Parkin and look good.

Why not employ a coach in 2008 that has contemporary ideas.

_________________
They coud'nt.....could they?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 233 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Traveller86 and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group