Very very harsh on Scotland.
Every successful team has a linkman, someone who finds space and gives his team an avenue out of defence; Scotland provides this week in week out....so why can't we have one too?
Scotland had 37 possessions; nearly 20 contested. The way he is able to pick up the fast spinning ball in a contest against 1 or 2 Cats even impressed the Cats supporters, so I don't know what Scotland has to do to impress you.
He won contested ball too you know ...doesn't that count?...or do you prefer a one sided version of what actually happened? Of course that being your version of events being the only way we should see it.
As a result, here comes the blame game.
Why was the ball going in the Cats forwardline so easily, even when Houlihan was playing Ablett in the BP? The Cats won nearly every bounce in the ruck...that's where it starts.
Wiggo vs Houla.....what next? Houla vs Ackland? Houla vs Cloke?
If anything, I was disappointed in Houla's kicks for goal in the last 2 weeks...that's what I question.
It's not about Houla and Scotland...that's just an an excuse to witch hunt.
Think about it.
The ball entered their forwardline with constant ease in waves...a tsunami.
Why?
We've got no genuine rucks to compete against genuine 200+ cm ruckmen. With the advantage of the dominant ruckmen, Cats' midfielders were given first use, and were able to shepherd our midfielders out of the contest ...because they knew where the ball was going, let alone the fact that the Cats midfielders were bigger and stronger and tougher at the contest.
They dictated play right from the bounce, and the kids lost their way...it became an avalanche...obviously the MC didn't know what to do about it...I don't know why...but I do know that sort of thing happens to most teams.
As for Lance....
Get behind the team and hope that Aisake, Hampson and Jacobs develop really fast....to give our onballers at least a 50/50 chance.