verbs wrote:
AGRO wrote:
Do you need to know the exact number to the last cent?
The point is he is getting too much and he is not worth or performing to the level of what he is being paid.
Whether its 400 or 500 or 600 or 700 - it is way too much.
Way too much. How does knowing the exact figure help your point?

Yes I do ned to know if he is getting $400K or $500K or $600K or $700K a year or less or more, or somewhere in between.
AGRO...have you read my theories? They need deconstruction, debate and debunking. No-one is prepared to do so. So what is Camporeale really on $400K a year? More? Less? No-one is prepared to actally crunch the numbers and provide an informed and rational opinion.
Instead its "He's on this..." with no substantiation of any facts whatsoever.
IF HE IS ON $620,000 THEN HE MUST HAVE BEEN ON MUCH MUCH MUCH MORE ($930,000) BEFORE THE TROUBLES OF 2002 RIGHT?
Someone prove otherwise.
If you can't then I hold the trump card! Which is "nobody has any idea".
And you can't argue shit if you have no idea.
i do know...
i dont have to share with you cos you have noothing to share with me .. except being anal...
i want to be your friend... can i be your friend verbs???
i really dont mind that your anal..and that your posts are funny... its ok.. *smiles*
Campo = gun.= double his salary next contract.
Tie up 1/3 of the total salary cap between 4 guys.. 3 of which are over the hill and wont be around to take us forward... plus pay 400k more outside of the salary cap and you can see why were gawn!!!
verbs can you be my friend????
PLEASE>??????????????
