Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 8:33 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 10:53 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought the pro retread mentality died with the arrival of Mark Murphy.

God, is Blue Vain the only champion of forward thinking (apart from ‘yours truly’ :wink: ) on this board? For those who think that the retread route was a necessary evil, let me first commend you for at least acknowledging that it was, indeed, evil. However, let’s just assume, for the moment, that you have a good point. Given that, haven’t you blokes heard of the word subtle? This is not a Pro-Pagan/Anti-Pagan argument. The fact is; we could have put ourselves in “tread water to save the clubâ€

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
[quote="Pafloyul"]Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought the pro retread mentality died with the arrival of Mark Murphy.

God, is Blue Vain the only champion of forward thinking (apart from ‘yours truly’ :wink: ) on this board? For those who think that the retread route was a necessary evil, let me first commend you for at least acknowledging that it was, indeed, evil. However, let’s just assume, for the moment, that you have a good point. Given that, haven’t you blokes heard of the word subtle? This is not a Pro-Pagan/Anti-Pagan argument. The fact is; we could have put ourselves in “tread water to save the clubâ€

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:40 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:47 pm
Posts: 228
Location: Perth
[quote="Pafloyul"]The fact is; we could have put ourselves in “tread water to save the clubâ€

_________________
thats pretty bad-ass!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:24 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:42 am
Posts: 336
Molly wrote:
A good set of articles indeed, and exactly the sort of positive press the club needed.

I'm puzzled about one thing - Pagan's comment to the match committee that the players he drafted in 2003 would be lucky to still be around in two years. One has to ask why they were drafted then?

Anyway, otherwise it was great to be given such positive coverage :-D

When Pagan first came to Carlton, all players were in their own comfort zone and they wasn’t going to change their style of game they were used to, as I’m sure they felt in the end the Coach will go before the players will, this is why Pagan had to have a quick solution plus there wasn’t much young talent left in that draft anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 11:25 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 2:18 pm
Posts: 675
Location: Adelaide
[quote="Pafloyul"]Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought the pro retread mentality died with the arrival of Mark Murphy.

God, is Blue Vain the only champion of forward thinking (apart from ‘yours truly’ :wink: ) on this board? For those who think that the retread route was a necessary evil, let me first commend you for at least acknowledging that it was, indeed, evil. However, let’s just assume, for the moment, that you have a good point. Given that, haven’t you blokes heard of the word subtle? This is not a Pro-Pagan/Anti-Pagan argument. The fact is; we could have put ourselves in “tread water to save the clubâ€


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:04 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:42 am
Posts: 336
Blue Vain wrote:
rhys87 wrote:
no point drafting kids with shitty picks if you know that they also are not gonna be the future.


Really?
Was their no quality kids left when we drafted Bowyer?
What about Chambers or Longmuir? Was their no one left then?
What early picks did we use on Fisher, or Betts, or Bentick, or Jackson, or Thornton, or Carrazzo?

Sorry but that argument has been exposed plenty of times.


It’s very easy for everyone to criticize afterwards, but at that time almost everyone was exited about the new playing list and I bet just about all of us thought that we were going to finish in the eight, I guess hindsight is a marvelous thing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
Was their genuine excitement here whan Longmuir or Chambers were recruited?
I dont believe so. From memory I descibed Longmuir as a poor mans Russell Robertson.
We should have gambled on kids.

Perhaps you were excited but it doesnt mean the rest of us were.
Hindsight is a marvellous thing but hindsight is just plain frustrating when you already had the foresight.

Lets not forget we were a presidential intervention away from having Gardiner on our injury list and Zantuck on our list!

Next.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:18 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:52 am
Posts: 12808
Blue Vain wrote:
Lets not forget we were a presidential intervention away from having...Zantuck on our list!


No wonder we got rid of him :P

_________________
Cer 'ch 'n alluog Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:03 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:42 am
Posts: 336
thehalford wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Lets not forget we were a presidential intervention away from having...Zantuck on our list!


No wonder we got rid of him :P


Regardless how Cloke will turn out for us in the long term and I’m exited the way he's turning out so far but I still think it was disgraceful the way Zantuck was treated, it is a pity they did not allow for both players to be picked up, as we could have done with both of them.

It’s good to have an exiting young list but you must have some vigor in the side to protect these young kids as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
bluekettle wrote:
Regardless how Cloke will turn out for us in the long term and I’m exited the way he's turning out so far but I still think it was disgraceful the way Zantuck was treated, it is a pity they did not allow for both players to be picked up, as we could have done with both of them.


Disgraceful?

If you want to feel sorry for someone, try Luke Livingston who gave everything to play AFL footy and busted his butt to help the community. Or Sean O'Keefe who lived footy and would have given his right arm to be retained on Carltons list.

Ty Zantuck was given 2 opportunities to play AFL football and blew them both.
He couldnt show the commitment or discipline required.

Sorry Bluekettle. I'd rather feel for the hundreds of kids who hope to get drafted every year but dont even get a look in.
Ty Zantuck had his chances and didnt want it enough.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:53 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:42 am
Posts: 336
Blue Vain wrote:
bluekettle wrote:
Regardless how Cloke will turn out for us in the long term and I’m exited the way he's turning out so far but I still think it was disgraceful the way Zantuck was treated, it is a pity they did not allow for both players to be picked up, as we could have done with both of them.


Disgraceful?

If you want to feel sorry for someone, try Luke Livingston who gave everything to play AFL footy and busted his butt to help the community. Or Sean O'Keefe who lived footy and would have given his right arm to be retained on Carltons list.

Ty Zantuck was given 2 opportunities to play AFL football and blew them both.
He couldnt show the commitment or discipline required.

Sorry Bluekettle. I'd rather feel for the hundreds of kids who hope to get drafted every year but dont even get a look in.
Ty Zantuck had his chances and didnt want it enough.


But the point was that Carlton has promised him that he was going to be picked up and then at the last moment they done a turn around, at least that’s how I understood it, otherwise just like you have said stiff cheddar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
bluekettle wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
bluekettle wrote:
Regardless how Cloke will turn out for us in the long term and I’m exited the way he's turning out so far but I still think it was disgraceful the way Zantuck was treated, it is a pity they did not allow for both players to be picked up, as we could have done with both of them.


Disgraceful?

If you want to feel sorry for someone, try Luke Livingston who gave everything to play AFL footy and busted his butt to help the community. Or Sean O'Keefe who lived footy and would have given his right arm to be retained on Carltons list.

Ty Zantuck was given 2 opportunities to play AFL football and blew them both.
He couldnt show the commitment or discipline required.

Sorry Bluekettle. I'd rather feel for the hundreds of kids who hope to get drafted every year but dont even get a look in.
Ty Zantuck had his chances and didnt want it enough.


But the point was that Carlton has promised him that he was going to be picked up and then at the last moment they done a turn around, at least that’s how I understood it, otherwise just like you have said stiff cheddar.


Carlton didnt make the promises Pagan did.
He wanted Zantuck.
He wanted Gardiner
He wanted Knobel.
He wanted Spriggs...


He has an addiction to rubbish.
"Are you a good judge??"

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 9:27 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Blue Vain wrote:
bluekettle wrote:
Regardless how Cloke will turn out for us in the long term and I’m exited the way he's turning out so far but I still think it was disgraceful the way Zantuck was treated, it is a pity they did not allow for both players to be picked up, as we could have done with both of them.


Disgraceful?

If you want to feel sorry for someone, try Luke Livingston who gave everything to play AFL footy and busted his butt to help the community.


I agree on everyting you've wrote here BlueVain except this myth about Livo being some sort of model footballer.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 6:47 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Synbad wrote:
bluekettle wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
bluekettle wrote:
Regardless how Cloke will turn out for us in the long term and I’m exited the way he's turning out so far but I still think it was disgraceful the way Zantuck was treated, it is a pity they did not allow for both players to be picked up, as we could have done with both of them.


Disgraceful?

If you want to feel sorry for someone, try Luke Livingston who gave everything to play AFL footy and busted his butt to help the community. Or Sean O'Keefe who lived footy and would have given his right arm to be retained on Carltons list.

Ty Zantuck was given 2 opportunities to play AFL football and blew them both.
He couldnt show the commitment or discipline required.

Sorry Bluekettle. I'd rather feel for the hundreds of kids who hope to get drafted every year but dont even get a look in.
Ty Zantuck had his chances and didnt want it enough.


But the point was that Carlton has promised him that he was going to be picked up and then at the last moment they done a turn around, at least that’s how I understood it, otherwise just like you have said stiff cheddar.


Carlton didnt make the promises Pagan did.
He wanted Zantuck.
He wanted Gardiner
He wanted Knobel.
He wanted Spriggs...


He has an addiction to rubbish.
"Are you a good judge??"


You wanted Knobel as well.

There are some interesting posts over on TBV where you are comparing Ackland and Knobel as well. 8) :wink:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 8:13 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24635
Location: Kaloyasena
Jarusa wrote:
You wanted Knobel as well.

There are some interesting posts over on TBV where you are comparing Ackland and Knobel as well. 8) :wink:



I think we all are guilty of wanting Knobel at the time (well any ruckman that was over 200cm) when we had a rucking division of Merrington and Prendergast - both at 192cm.

But thank god we got Eddie Betts - may only be 170cm tall - but will make more of an impact on AFL competition than Knobel will methinks.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:46 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
[quote="Pafloyul"]Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought the pro retread mentality died with the arrival of Mark Murphy.

God, is Blue Vain the only champion of forward thinking (apart from ‘yours truly’ :wink: ) on this board? For those who think that the retread route was a necessary evil, let me first commend you for at least acknowledging that it was, indeed, evil. However, let’s just assume, for the moment, that you have a good point. Given that, haven’t you blokes heard of the word subtle? This is not a Pro-Pagan/Anti-Pagan argument. The fact is; we could have put ourselves in “tread water to save the clubâ€


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 9:52 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 5821
Location: home
AGRO wrote:
But thank god we got Eddie Betts - may only be 170cm tall - but will make more of an impact on AFL competition than Knobel will methinks.


Don't know if you saw it, but he got a hit out last week too. :-D

_________________
The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

Ronald Reagan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:12 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:39 pm
Posts: 109
killpies wrote:
AGRO wrote:
But thank god we got Eddie Betts - may only be 170cm tall - but will make more of an impact on AFL competition than Knobel will methinks.


Don't know if you saw it, but he got a hit out last week too. :-D


..oh and Eddie Betts for his dominance in the rucking contests, yeah theyre my favourite players!


Next Question?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:28 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
[quote="SparkyBlue"][quote="Pafloyul"]Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I thought the pro retread mentality died with the arrival of Mark Murphy.

God, is Blue Vain the only champion of forward thinking (apart from ‘yours truly’ :wink: ) on this board? For those who think that the retread route was a necessary evil, let me first commend you for at least acknowledging that it was, indeed, evil. However, let’s just assume, for the moment, that you have a good point. Given that, haven’t you blokes heard of the word subtle? This is not a Pro-Pagan/Anti-Pagan argument. The fact is; we could have put ourselves in “tread water to save the clubâ€


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 59 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Back Seat Sniper, ByteDanceSpider and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group