The argument that we will be worse surprises me...
you look at who we've lost from our best 22 in 2006, and the answer is French, and maybe you could make an argument for McGrath. Yes we'll have a lot of kids in our team this year, but they are replacing guys like Teague, Bannister, and McGrath. The output from those last three guys was pretty negligible last year - so I don't see how the three kids who replace them can do worse than break even.
The difference this year is that the core of the team is older and more experienced. That means guys like Walker, Simmo, and Bentick have now put a full season of AFL footy behind them, and that can only help. Then we have the kids who got a taste of the action last year such as Murphy, Kennedy, Bower, Blackwell, O'Hailpin and Russell. Even providing for a case of second year blues, there has to be a belief that most of these kids will be better for their learning in season 2006.
We also now have a group of young veterans who have been around the team for a while. This would include Thornton, Fisher, Waite, Carrazzo, Betts and Wiggins. The output from Fisher and Waite was minimal last year, and you'd expect at least one of them to have a much better season.
Then we head to the senior guys. Can we expect Kouta to be much less effective than last year? He'll probably be about the same again, so no loss their. Stevens is by all reports looking sound, and Scotland and Lance should be in their prime. Same goes for Fev. Saddington may even give us some improvement in the area of the senior players - if he doesn't we still haven't lost out from last season. And likewise, Ackland's output should break even with that of French.
So, I just look at it and think that we'll be better. We should have roughly the same output from our senior players. There is scope for improvement in our younger veterans - particularly if Fisher and Waite can stay injury free. The group of Simmo, Walker, etc now have a full year behind them and know much more about the AFL caper. The 2005 draftees have had a taste and so should be better. The 2006 draftees only need to break even with guys like Bannister and Teague to keep us treading water.
The real variable is the 2004 draftees. If two of Russell, Hartlett, Blackwell, and Raso can prove themselves (unlikely, I know but you can always hope) then we could make some strides towards the eight.
For the moment though I'll hedge my bets. I think there will be seven wins. Most of them will come late season, and they'll be based on the increased understanding and efforts of guys like Walker, Simpson, Bentick, Betts, Carrazzo, and Thornton. Plus the odd cameo from guys like Murphy, Kennedy, Bower, and Gibbs.
|