Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 7:39 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:14 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
c) some of you would never be brave enough to say what you post to John's face.


Mate, said it straight to his face the night of Walkers debut. My mates and i were walking from the social club to the great northern after the game and he walks out with his folks trying to gee us on.

We all told him exactly what we thought of him.

He's a fool, and i agree that this is Dick's first mistake since becoming ElPresidente. I hope he doesn't make anymore :evil:

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Mordan wrote:
DenimUndies wrote:
I made comment on one specific statement that you presented which insinuated as justifiable and accepted fact ie that he has no respect for women in general or in statistical terms over 50% of the Australian population as you put it.

Your right perspective is an interesting thing and when you put things into perspective don't you agree that you were being melodramatic ? and on another instance don't you agree that choosing certain words such a "groping" that your really taking literal license in order to justify what is really just your own personal opinion, not necessarily fact as you have implied?


How about this Denim. A large number of women perceive Jack as misogynistic and disrespectful towards women. A lot of men do as well. Whether or not it's true is not that relevant.

When we're talking about the effect it will have on the club's image, for supporters and sponsors perception is reality. The club doesn't need to be associated with that perception in every article in the paper. It certainly doesn't help, and it probably causes damage to the club's image.

I think everyone should be welcome at the club, but we need to be very careful about who is presented as the public face(s). Jack should know well enough to keep himself in the background. It appears he doesn't, so those that do know better should be letting him know in no uncertain terms.


Yes Mordan finally someone has interpreted this scenario in its actuality.

I agree with your take on the scenario and understand that its a concern for some. I have never disputed that element of the argument.

I just found it grossly unfair that a sweeping statement such as the one that was made be allowed to go unchallenged.

Lets face it we all know JE will never again hold an official management position within the club and I have been satisfied from the time of the initial announcement that RP and the rest of the Board had a handle on the situation. It was made very clear that he is not an official of the club.

Jacks public credibility on serious issues has wained to the point that he is not taken all that seriously these days anyhow and as a result I am no longer concerned that his views can hurt the club.

Yet despite his lack of credibility in a management sense, his passion for the CFC which can often be described as blind & wreckless cannot be denied and honestly believe it is recognized and admired in childlike sort of way by many in the rest of football world.

Jack wont hurt the club because despite the mistakes he has made in the past its one the few things that he values and truly loves at this point in his life that he has left.

We all make mistakes and I applaud the club for making this move and inviting him back because its shows we are less absorbed with politics and vengeance and more concerned with being a club for all supporters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:27 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
TheGame wrote:
Why can't people just admit they are wrong?
Carlton One were supposed to save the club and bring us back from the dark old days of cheating, arrogance, finals, flags etc.
You threw a guy out who loved Carlton and replaced with a man who used us for what he wanted and left us to rot.
Ironic the man who you all blame is now having to help dig us out of the mess you all created when you over reacted to the 2002 spoon.


Oh please, you're in your own little world aren't you.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:33 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
teagueyubeauty wrote:
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
c) some of you would never be brave enough to say what you post to John's face.


Mate, said it straight to his face the night of Walkers debut. My mates and i were walking from the social club to the great northern after the game and he walks out with his folks trying to gee us on.

We all told him exactly what we thought of him.

He's a fool, and i agree that this is Dick's first mistake since becoming ElPresidente. I hope he doesn't make anymore :evil:


Is there any official in the history of the club past or present that your happy with?

Mate no one is perfect.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 3:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Mark H wrote:
Mordan wrote:
DenimUndies wrote:
I made comment on one specific statement that you presented which insinuated as justifiable and accepted fact ie that he has no respect for women in general or in statistical terms over 50% of the Australian population as you put it.

Your right perspective is an interesting thing and when you put things into perspective don't you agree that you were being melodramatic ? and on another instance don't you agree that choosing certain words such a "groping" that your really taking literal license in order to justify what is really just your own personal opinion, not necessarily fact as you have implied?


How about this Denim. A large number of women perceive Jack as misogynistic and disrespectful towards women. A lot of men do as well. Whether or not it's true is not that relevant.

When we're talking about the effect it will have on the club's image, for supporters and sponsors perception is reality. The club doesn't need to be associated with that perception in every article in the paper. It certainly doesn't help, and it probably causes damage to the club's image.

I think everyone should be welcome at the club, but we need to be very careful about who is presented as the public face(s). Jack should know well enough to keep himself in the background. It appears he doesn't, so those that do know better should be letting him know in no uncertain terms.




I think this thing has been blown out of all proportion.
If he is involved in the manner in which was proposed in yesterday's paper, he will have no administrative or management role at the Club and no influence over the board in any meaningful way.

He has a skill set that will benefit the Club. No-one, particularly at Board level has suggested he did not make some grave errors in the past but I hope you all can accept it is time to move on. Those that followed him also made grave mistakes. Some that followed him actually worked with him and new about these mistakes. Our brand damage continued well after Elliott had left.

We are moving forward. Everyone is welcome back at our Club. The day for holding grudges has passed.

The Board also acknowledges he has no place talking to the media. He was spoken to yesterday by 3 separate Board members - two of them at least could be considered "very influencial".

We are turning the corner. The ride is just starting and everyone is welcome to hop on.

Anyone at MCLP yesterday must surely agree.

I think it was Rachael Hunter while washing her hair that said "it won't happen over night but it will happen".


Mark, you may be right in saying that you think this has been blown out of all proportion but believe you me within this board and others plus carlton supporters who never frequent here their would be a fair majority that despise the actions this man did to the club.

May i also remind you that the highest membership we ever had in Elliotts years was around 27,000. The year after the fightback campaign we reached our highest ever membership of about 33,500, this being on the back of ordinary performances and a wizard cup win.

You're right in saying that we need to move on but don't for one second don't think that bringing back Jack will help to bring everyone back to the club. We as a group of members might not be corporate high flyers or have enough money to be part of coterie groups but i believe we're as one no matter how much money we have.

If you can keep JE in the background and his gob shut from talking to anyone even remotely involved in the media it will definitely help but i will say that i wish you and the board a rather large slice of luck because he just can't help himself.

If you and the rest of the board could somehow get an apology for his actions out of him then i'm sure all would be forgiven quite quickly but i guess there'd be a much better chance of winning Tattslotto.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:23 pm 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7561
Location: NowHere.....
It's kinda like the good old times having jack officialy back.

I'm sure that Sticks and Pratt will keep him in check, and make sure he brings funds into the club.

Remember we need all the contributions we canget!

Keep it shut Jack, if you really love the club it shouldn't be so hard......

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:32 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
winfieldblue wrote:
he fosterised the yanks and bhp is a global giant...

what more could he do?


Selling the yanks one of our 'not so palatable' beers would have been that difficult - since all their beers are shit... :wink:

As far as Jack is concerned, I don't care much for him - and as we are still in the mire that was caused by the board during his presidency I have not forgiven him... but it has to be said that the man bleeds navy blue *and he did help bring us a few flags :wink: * - so I'm happy having him help around the club... as long as he stays away from the financials and player contracts... :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 12:03 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:39 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Within the Tao except when I am here.
There is an old saying

"Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer'

It is no secret that I have no love for John and even less in time for his antics, but by bringing him in to the club to run a coterie group, he will less able to shoot his mouth off to the media and he will be were an eye can be kept on him.

That said someone should be standing by with a big roll of gaffer tape to wrap around his mouth if the temptation to gob off overwealms him.

_________________
A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty" -Winston Churchill

L.M 35-06


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:13 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
teagueyubeauty wrote:

May i also remind you that the highest membership we ever had in Elliotts years was around 27,000. The year after the fightback campaign we reached our highest ever membership of about 33,500, this being on the back of ordinary performances and a wizard cup win.


You can't blame Elliot for membership figures. What was our membership in 2006?

If you also check the % improvement of club membership across all clubs, I would predict that Carlton is ranked near the bottom since Elliot was voted out.

So what does that tell you? Carlton One have done nothing to increase our membership base and have simply been about scare tactics hence the 2 years we had 32k + membership figures. Blame Elliot all you want, Carlton 1 have done nothing in terms of promoting our club, only made it the laughing stock it is.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
mjonc wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:

May i also remind you that the highest membership we ever had in Elliotts years was around 27,000. The year after the fightback campaign we reached our highest ever membership of about 33,500, this being on the back of ordinary performances and a wizard cup win.


You can't blame Elliot for membership figures. What was our membership in 2006?

If you also check the % improvement of club membership across all clubs, I would predict that Carlton is ranked near the bottom since Elliot was voted out.

So what does that tell you? Carlton One have done nothing to increase our membership base and have simply been about scare tactics hence the 2 years we had 32k + membership figures. Blame Elliot all you want, Carlton 1 have done nothing in terms of promoting our club, only made it the laughing stock it is.


2000: 27,571
2001: 27,725
2002: 26,503
2003: 33,252
2004: 32,445
2005: 33,534
2006: 28,756



Actually it was 3 years above 32,000 and that is at a time when the club was stretched for resources more than just about any other (thanks to the previsou regime) and 3 spoons were 'won' in 5 years.

Bag Carlton One if you want (and they do deserve some criticism) but please be reasonable about it and use some common sense and facts.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:30 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Scare tactics no longer worked, what happened? Approx 5k drop in members. No vision, no hope, no members.

We will watch and see this year how much money Elliot brings into the club and judge him then. I can guarantee it will be more than Smorgon and his board have over the past term in office.

Money talks, bullshit walks.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:35 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
mjonc wrote:
Scare tactics no longer worked, what happened? Approx 5k drop in members. No vision, no hope, no members.

We will watch and see this year how much money Elliot brings into the club and judge him then. I can guarantee it will be more than Smorgon and his board have over the past term in office.

Money talks, bullshit walks.


Agree that the scare tactics were used for about 2 years too long, and they should be criticised for that.

But to highlight a drop in one years membership is a bit simple IMO. Maybe 2003-2005 were a bit high and 2006 a bit low?

Look at Elliot's years and you can do the same thing if you want to nitpick.

memberships
1986: 15,279
1987: 11,118

Far bigger drop in memberships in percentage terms than 2005-2006 and on the back of a Grand Final appearance no less. Elliot treated the ordinary members with contempt, instead concentrating on the big end of town. In the last decade or so Essendon* and Collingwood have done everything they could to build up their membership of ordinary every day members. With great success, especially in attracting sponsors eager to tap into a large and active mebership base.

How can you promise that Elliot will bring more in one year than CO did in 4, anyway? How will you possibly know the numbers. That statement just does not make any sense. I think you are laying on the rhetoric a bit thick. :wink:

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 7:07 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Time will tell. The measurement will be by how much our debt reduces IMO. Elliot is obviously seen as a critical element in this to entice the donations from the wealthier Carlton supporters.

As for the membership figures, two different eras. I would be interested if anyone had them of membership figures for each club during the 21st century. This would hopefully prove my point I'm trying to make.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 9:08 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Don't be crediting elliot with any rise in membership. I'll tell you now, there's few people signing up because of him.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 10:09 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
I'm not crediting Elliot with rises in membership. Pratt is responsible for the large increase the past few weeks, purely and simply because people were sick of Carlton 1 and he offers hope a plan and a future, not doom, gloom and disunity.

PS: I just had a friendly neighbour tell me he bought a membership because JE is back along with 4 of his cousins.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:20 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3193
Location: Whistler
mjonc wrote:
I'm not crediting Elliot with rises in membership. Pratt is responsible for the large increase the past few weeks, purely and simply because people were sick of Carlton 1 and he offers hope a plan and a future, not doom, gloom and disunity.

PS: I just had a friendly neighbour tell me he bought a membership because JE is back along with 4 of his cousins.


Well I guess that says a lot about your neighbour.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 11:57 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:12 am
Posts: 10076
mjonc wrote:

Money talks, bullshit walks.


BUT HOW DOES BULLSHIT WALK, VICTOR?

_________________
Oompa loompa doompety dee
If you are wise you'll listen to me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:03 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Headplant wrote:
mjonc wrote:
I'm not crediting Elliot with rises in membership. Pratt is responsible for the large increase the past few weeks, purely and simply because people were sick of Carlton 1 and he offers hope a plan and a future, not doom, gloom and disunity.

PS: I just had a friendly neighbour tell me he bought a membership because JE is back along with 4 of his cousins.


Well I guess that says a lot about your neighbour.


perhaps his neighbor can see the positive aspect in all people and isn't blinded by vengeance. 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
DenimUndies wrote:
Headplant wrote:
mjonc wrote:
I'm not crediting Elliot with rises in membership. Pratt is responsible for the large increase the past few weeks, purely and simply because people were sick of Carlton 1 and he offers hope a plan and a future, not doom, gloom and disunity.

PS: I just had a friendly neighbour tell me he bought a membership because JE is back along with 4 of his cousins.


Well I guess that says a lot about your neighbour.


perhaps his neighbor can see the positive aspect in all people and isn't blinded by vengeance. 8)


If that was the case the neighbour should have had a membership for the last 4 years at least. 8)

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 12:12 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 3193
Location: Whistler
Jarusa wrote:
DenimUndies wrote:
Headplant wrote:
mjonc wrote:
I'm not crediting Elliot with rises in membership. Pratt is responsible for the large increase the past few weeks, purely and simply because people were sick of Carlton 1 and he offers hope a plan and a future, not doom, gloom and disunity.

PS: I just had a friendly neighbour tell me he bought a membership because JE is back along with 4 of his cousins.


Well I guess that says a lot about your neighbour.


perhaps his neighbor can see the positive aspect in all people and isn't blinded by vengeance. 8)


If that was the case the neighbour should have had a membership for the last 4 years at least. 8)


Or even upped the level of their membership as some of us have.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group