Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 08, 2025 6:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:11 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 24457
Location: Heartbroken
mjonc wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
TheGame wrote:
Why can't people just admit they are wrong?
Carlton One were supposed to save the club and bring us back from the dark old days of cheating, arrogance, finals, flags etc.
You threw a guy out who loved Carlton and replaced with a man who used us for what he wanted and left us to rot.
Ironic the man who you all blame is now having to help dig us out of the mess you all created when you over reacted to the 2002 spoon.


:?

So if I run a knife through someone's chest, and they wind up in intensive care and die on the operating table, am I the murderer or is it the surgeon who operated?


Good question. Answer is the surgeon got called away for a personal phone call and you took the opportunity to bring in a better surgeon who saved that person :-D


So now I'm just an attempted murderer :wink:

_________________
Richard Pratt - A Carlton legend.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:12 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Image

...and a chucker.

cheat. 8)

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:13 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Deano Supremo wrote:
mjonc wrote:
Deano Supremo wrote:
TheGame wrote:
Why can't people just admit they are wrong?
Carlton One were supposed to save the club and bring us back from the dark old days of cheating, arrogance, finals, flags etc.
You threw a guy out who loved Carlton and replaced with a man who used us for what he wanted and left us to rot.
Ironic the man who you all blame is now having to help dig us out of the mess you all created when you over reacted to the 2002 spoon.


:?

So if I run a knife through someone's chest, and they wind up in intensive care and die on the operating table, am I the murderer or is it the surgeon who operated?


Good question. Answer is the surgeon got called away for a personal phone call and you took the opportunity to bring in a better surgeon who saved that person :-D


So now I'm just an attempted murderer :wink:


Well no, because once the operation was successfull, you hooked up with Michael Schofield and I can't tell you the rest cause Prison Break wasn't on this week.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:19 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:34 am
Posts: 991
pigs arse...he's one rutheless mofo that never rests till he wins..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:13 pm
Posts: 1044
Location: sydney
winfieldblue wrote:
is that why no one wanted him to leave when he was being lured into politics..

yeah i gotcha


1987.(President of the Liberal Party)...The World was a different place...Bond,Skase,Hawkins,Adler(father and son) Holmes a'Court,Spalvins,Renouf,Quinn,Antico,Needham etc etc all were heroes but indicative like Elliott of the times!

Where are they now?

And what positive legacy did they leave for shareholders?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:30 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Sat Dec 30, 2006 7:34 am
Posts: 991
bond, skase, holmes et all are all corporate losers chasing after tv networks..

elliot was an industrialists...

bhp and fosters... :-D

asx top 20 :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:28 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: .?../*%$#@
Jarusa wrote:
Image

...and a chucker.

cheat. 8)

I cant help but laugh when I see that picture :lol: ... sometimes he does some downright stupid things he can make an absolute tool of himself like the time he sold his 11million dollar mansion in Toorak and forgot to mention it to his wife :roll:

but mjonc hit the nail on the head in an excellent post.

mjonc wrote:
Elliot = Passion and Commitment to the cause. The cause being restoring Carlton to superpower status again. IMO nobody has more passion, drive and enthusiasm for our Club, IMO nobody typifies the Carlton spirit like Big Jack.

Welcome back Jack, I missed having you around.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 5:26 pm
Posts: 1351
Location: Home of the Easter Gift
Jarusa wrote:
http://www.bigjack.com.au/etiquette.php
Table Manners by John D Elliott

Australians have terrible table manners, however not as bad as Americans, who have none at all.

Having stayed with British Royalty and been briefed accordingly, and dined in the greatest restaurants around the world, the following points can be made to improve the table manners of Australians.

The most important guest should be placed on the right of the host, and the second most important on the left.
As you take your seat as a guest you should pull out the chair for the ladies on your right and left, and not sit down until they are comfortably seated.
Immediately you are seated you should take your serviette/napkin and place it on your lap. It is embarrassing to see the waiters having to do it as it shows your bad manners.
When food is being served it should firstly be served to the person on the right then the person on the left, and then continue by serving second from the left.
If a cold dish is served you should not commence eating until all parties have been served.
If a hot dish is served you should start your meal immediately. This is one of the biggest faults of Australians. They wait until everybody gets served and the food goes cold.
Holding your knife and fork is another important facet to good manners. The fork and knife should be held with each forefinger placed on the top, you should not hold your knife like a pencil, this highlights poor breeding.
You must put your knife and fork down when you are not eating.
Don't chew your food with your mouth open.
It is perfectly acceptable to pick up a bone and chew it, provided you only use one hand.
Dishes should not be taken away from the table until everyone has finished the course.
When a lady leaves the table you stand up, when she returns to sit down you repeat the process.
You can put one elbow on the table but never two.
When you have completed your meal/course you place your knife and fork together to signify completion.

:lol:


Bugger. Looks like I'll never be president of the most successful football club in Australia. :oops: :lol:

_________________
Wherever you go, there you are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:22 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/realfooty/articles/2007/02/14/1171405294303.html

Quote:
FORMER Carlton president John Elliott has been asked to back off making public comments about the Blues after confirming yesterday that he would chair a new coterie group at the request of friend and new club leader Richard Pratt.



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:47 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
DenimUndies wrote:
I made comment on one specific statement that you presented which insinuated as justifiable and accepted fact ie that he has no respect for women in general or in statistical terms over 50% of the Australian population as you put it.

Your right perspective is an interesting thing and when you put things into perspective don't you agree that you were being melodramatic ? and on another instance don't you agree that choosing certain words such a "groping" that your really taking literal license in order to justify what is really just your own personal opinion, not necessarily fact as you have implied?


How about this Denim. A large number of women perceive Jack as misogynistic and disrespectful towards women. A lot of men do as well. Whether or not it's true is not that relevant.

When we're talking about the effect it will have on the club's image, for supporters and sponsors perception is reality. The club doesn't need to be associated with that perception in every article in the paper. It certainly doesn't help, and it probably causes damage to the club's image.

I think everyone should be welcome at the club, but we need to be very careful about who is presented as the public face(s). Jack should know well enough to keep himself in the background. It appears he doesn't, so those that do know better should be letting him know in no uncertain terms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:19 am 
Offline
Carlton Board Member

Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:34 pm
Posts: 110
Location: Melbourne
Mordan wrote:
DenimUndies wrote:
I made comment on one specific statement that you presented which insinuated as justifiable and accepted fact ie that he has no respect for women in general or in statistical terms over 50% of the Australian population as you put it.

Your right perspective is an interesting thing and when you put things into perspective don't you agree that you were being melodramatic ? and on another instance don't you agree that choosing certain words such a "groping" that your really taking literal license in order to justify what is really just your own personal opinion, not necessarily fact as you have implied?


How about this Denim. A large number of women perceive Jack as misogynistic and disrespectful towards women. A lot of men do as well. Whether or not it's true is not that relevant.

When we're talking about the effect it will have on the club's image, for supporters and sponsors perception is reality. The club doesn't need to be associated with that perception in every article in the paper. It certainly doesn't help, and it probably causes damage to the club's image.

I think everyone should be welcome at the club, but we need to be very careful about who is presented as the public face(s). Jack should know well enough to keep himself in the background. It appears he doesn't, so those that do know better should be letting him know in no uncertain terms.




I think this thing has been blown out of all proportion.
If he is involved in the manner in which was proposed in yesterday's paper, he will have no administrative or management role at the Club and no influence over the board in any meaningful way.

He has a skill set that will benefit the Club. No-one, particularly at Board level has suggested he did not make some grave errors in the past but I hope you all can accept it is time to move on. Those that followed him also made grave mistakes. Some that followed him actually worked with him and new about these mistakes. Our brand damage continued well after Elliott had left.

We are moving forward. Everyone is welcome back at our Club. The day for holding grudges has passed.

The Board also acknowledges he has no place talking to the media. He was spoken to yesterday by 3 separate Board members - two of them at least could be considered "very influencial".

We are turning the corner. The ride is just starting and everyone is welcome to hop on.

Anyone at MCLP yesterday must surely agree.

I think it was Rachael Hunter while washing her hair that said "it won't happen over night but it will happen".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:25 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Public Image? We wouldn't have a team if we were concerned with public image, Whitnall, Scotland, Fevola, Lappin, Houlihan to name a few.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:33 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Mark I think most can accept him back at the club.
What worries us is that 2 days into his new role and he's already giving press interviews. You say he was spoken to by 3 board members and thats great but at his age and with his experience, if he didnt know it wasnt his place to comment on where home games should be played I for one am worried that he won't be able to help himself. You can be sure that the media will go to him when they want some controversy. I dont trust that he'll shut-up.

With regard to rachel Hunter, if you get enough supermodels on board, the coterie groups will be knocking people back

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:46 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
Mark H wrote:
I think this thing has been blown out of all proportion.
If he is involved in the manner in which was proposed in yesterday's paper, he will have no administrative or management role at the Club and no influence over the board in any meaningful way.

He has a skill set that will benefit the Club. No-one, particularly at Board level has suggested he did not make some grave errors in the past but I hope you all can accept it is time to move on. Those that followed him also made grave mistakes. Some that followed him actually worked with him and new about these mistakes. Our brand damage continued well after Elliott had left.

We are moving forward. Everyone is welcome back at our Club. The day for holding grudges has passed.

The Board also acknowledges he has no place talking to the media. He was spoken to yesterday by 3 separate Board members - two of them at least could be considered "very influencial".

We are turning the corner. The ride is just starting and everyone is welcome to hop on.

Anyone at MCLP yesterday must surely agree.

I think it was Rachael Hunter while washing her hair that said "it won't happen over night but it will happen".


Mark,

I absolutely agree with what you've said. However, it's important to understand though that most Carlton supporters are very sensitive about the public image of the club at this time. Things are turning around, but until we've had a sustained period where things go right off-field, then any indications that things might go awry are going to be met with concern.

As you say, all administrations have made mistakes. Anyone here who is claiming that one group or another doesn't bear a share of the responsibility should be shot down. Just as it's very important we move on from the past, it's equally important to acknowledge the mistakes that were made, so we never repeat them.

Anyone who can contribute at this time should be welcome. But they must put the club first, and I don't think that John Elliot making comments to the media is putting the club first. If he's been told to pull his head in, and does so, then that's the end of this as an issue.

And you're right, yesterday was pretty exciting. Anyone who wasn't there, and hasn't already should pop over to the Training forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:52 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Just a question...................

Which presidency did the most damage?

Elliot's reign or the Collins / Smorgan years.

Personally, i think the later. Sure Elliot did some silly silly things, but he did about 100 x's more positive stuff for the club than Collins / Smorgan EVER did.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:20 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
ryan2000 wrote:
Just a question...................

Which presidency did the most damage?

Elliot's reign or the Collins / Smorgan years.

Personally, i think the later. Sure Elliot did some silly silly things, but he did about 100 x's more positive stuff for the club than Collins / Smorgan EVER did.


That's a complete no-brainer Ryan, AFAIC. I quote myself (!) from earlier in this thread...

Quote:
When Elliott took over as President, Carlton had just won 3 flags in 4 years. It had the highest membership in the competition. It had more money than any other club in the competition. It was the envy of the competition.

When Elliott was removed 19 years later, Carlton had just won the wooden spoon (and in the 19 years he was there, with a pretty good list most of the time, only two flags). It's membership had fallen dramatically, to rank behind Collingwood, Essendon*, Hawthorn and Geelong (and caught by St Kilda and Richmond, from memory) - not to mention most of the interstate clubs.

It had racked up a massive debt, to be the poorest club in the competition...yes, worse off than North and the Dogs. And it was about to be fined nearly $1m and stripped of multiple draft picks for repeated salary cap rorting ie cheating by the Board and Management, for which Elliott was responsible.

Now, I may not be the best businessman in this country, but it doesn't take a genius to work out that the Club had gone into massive decline over the time of Elliott's reign. Just as the rest of his life had fallen apart, so too was the Club under his control. If that was a business, answerable to shareholders, he, as leader of the business, would have been out on his arse years earlier. In fact, the writing was on the wall in the late 90s, just no one chose to read it.

So, whether or not Elliott should come back to the Club or not is now a matter of personal opinion. But NEVER, EVER let it be said that John Elliott was not ultimately responsible, as President of Carlton, for the disastrous state that the Club found itself in at the time of his removal.


The point being, Elliott drove the Club into the ground (as he did with he personal and business life, so it doesn't come as a surprise). He was singularly responsible, as President of the Club, for that decline. Had that decline not taken place, had there been a competent leader in place, none of this would have happened.

As Smorgon has shown, it's one thing to take over a successful organisation, and keep it successful. He has done this with the business that his father set up. It is another thing entirely to take over a strugling organisation and rebuild it. Smorgon clearly was not up to that task.

Yes, the Boards of Collins and Smorgon failed in their efforts, but the challenge they were confronted by was much more difficult than what Elliott faced. Elliott took a strong, successful and powerful organisation, and ruined it. Collins' and Smorgon's crimes were simply to have been unable to resurrect it.

There is no debate as to who was more culpable.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:44 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Yeah that's a fair post mate.

I'm still going with the Collins / Smorgan years myself, but it's cool hearing other people's opinions on it!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:01 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2864
ryan2000 wrote:
Yeah that's a fair post mate.

I'm still going with the Collins / Smorgan years myself, but it's cool hearing other people's opinions on it!


Yep, the world would be a boring place if we all believed the same things.

And there'd be no Collingwood and Essendon* supporters to get stuck into either! :lol:

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:35 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:58 am
Posts: 3583
Location: Drinking chardonnay with the elites
Mordan wrote:
How about this Denim. A large number of women perceive Jack as misogynistic and disrespectful towards women. A lot of men do as well. Whether or not it's true is not that relevant.

When we're talking about the effect it will have on the club's image, for supporters and sponsors perception is reality. The club doesn't need to be associated with that perception in every article in the paper. It certainly doesn't help, and it probably causes damage to the club's image.

I think everyone should be welcome at the club, but we need to be very careful about who is presented as the public face(s). Jack should know well enough to keep himself in the background. It appears he doesn't, so those that do know better should be letting him know in no uncertain terms.


Well said Mordan

...jeez there is more revisionism going on here than a David Irving tract.

_________________
"Whoever said you can't buy happiness forgot about puppies." - Gene Hill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 2:08 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Cazzesman wrote:
Welcome back Jack.

Hopefully you can build up what you pulled down. Just because Mr. Pratt is your friend don't think for one minute many of us will forget what you did to our club.

Not many people get a 2nd chance to redeem themselves so do the right thing and start the cash registers ringing.

Regards Cazzesman

PS Keep your big mouth shut and work behind the scenes as you have been asked.


Here, here bloody here. My thoughts exactly.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], GWS and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group