AGRO wrote:
Richard Pratt will do the same thing - and before he even starts doing that he already has the ear of every major corporate boardroom in Australia.
And this is the myth from where I sit.
He may well, let's face it, it's not a case of "may", he does have the contacts and clout to at least have the right people hear what he has to say, but at that level, who doesn't?
Shit, on Thursday morning, I assembled 20 brilliant business minds in Australia and the UK for a 3 hour presentation. Does it mean I'll be able to get them to fork over millions of investment dollars into my company??
They need to see or at least have faith in a somewhat guaranteed return before they do.
But this notion of the public and private sector all of a sudden redirecting investment away from their own strategic vessels and into Carlton just because Pratt is there, is complete bollocks.
You will probably land some decent sponsorship, but there's only one thing that will determine if companies get the required return (and commercial reality is EVERYTHING in today's market) and that's continued on-field success.
Now hear this: I have no doubt that clubs can be turned around in 2-3 seasons quite smartly - I saw it at my own - I just think it is dangerous, given your recent experiences with "saviours", to simply assume Pratt will influence some miraculous recovery and the bad days are over effectively immediately.
Apart from bigger personal wealth (splitting hairs once it gets past a few hundred mil, mind you), I see no difference between what Smorgon and Pratt have to offer at this stage.