Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jul 15, 2025 4:55 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 8:36 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 3:26 pm
Posts: 236
I thought Cory was a bit unlucky to get delisted, but seeing all the great players we got in the drafts, I would not take him back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:28 pm
Posts: 2220
Good honest player, nothing special, but still unlucky to get delisted.

Most of his comments arent really new news.

_________________
My Blue Heaven


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:12 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:02 pm
Posts: 2826
Location: melbourne
dont really mind.

interesting comments he makes tho...not groundbreaking, but interesting.

_________________
"In fairness it did seem in the early days of the draft teams would just pick a name totally at random out of a hat. I'm pretty sure we picked James Cook at #2 one year. The mediocre forward, not the explorer" - Me, 12/9/2011

Carlton 2012: Lets remind them why they once feared the Dark.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
At his age, I was surprised he lasted as long as he did. Very lucky!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:25 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands

Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 3:55 pm
Posts: 431
Location: The Valley, California
I'm surprised Cory was so surprised he was delisted. Wasn't his removal from the club inevitable? A few helpful games here and there doesn't cement your spot in the clubs list especially in such turbulent times.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:04 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:20 am
Posts: 504
Location: A Fevola punt from TEAC oval.
GodisNavyBlue wrote:
Corey was unlucky to be delisted and I am sure he would have still been on the list if Teague was out of contract at the end of last season.


At 27 and with Teague (contract or no contract he managed only 7 games in 2006) and Wiggins still on the list he should count himself unlucky. In a team short on foot skills he was a beautiful long raking left foot kick and had a solid 2006 being 8th in tackles, 12th in kicks (higher in effectives) and 11th in marks ... he was in our best starting 22 even allowing for injuries.

Unlike a lot of his team mates: he could kick a football.

_________________
"It was like calling your ex girlfriend after a night on the booze, just a really bad decision".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 1:58 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm
Posts: 2123
Mishgee wrote:
I'm surprised Cory was so surprised he was delisted. Wasn't his removal from the club inevitable? A few helpful games here and there doesn't cement your spot in the clubs list especially in such turbulent times.


I don't think he was ever going to survive until our next premiership because he was hardly a star but he was a serviceable player who after being generally a permanent fixture in the side probably is justified in feeling somewhat aggrieved at his delisting. Cory played 38 out of a possible 44 games over his last two seasons at the club, which might explain his and many supporters' surprise at his delisting. There were just a few others who might've got the chop before Cory.

_________________
Formerly Blues-Back2003.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:27 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 2:25 pm
Posts: 247
Proves what I have been saying all along.....The longer we keep Penguin the further we will sink down the bottom of the sea.....

He has no idea and it shows with the way we play......

_________________
Blueboy forever


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:30 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Blues2005 wrote:
Mishgee wrote:
I'm surprised Cory was so surprised he was delisted. Wasn't his removal from the club inevitable? A few helpful games here and there doesn't cement your spot in the clubs list especially in such turbulent times.


I don't think he was ever going to survive until our next premiership because he was hardly a star but he was a serviceable player who after being generally a permanent fixture in the side probably is justified in feeling somewhat aggrieved at his delisting. Cory played 38 out of a possible 44 games over his last two seasons at the club, which might explain his and many supporters' surprise at his delisting. There were just a few others who might've got the chop before Cory.


Yup. He's almost 28 and hardly had all manner of clbs chasing his services.

I liked his attitude, but how long were we going to keep him anyway at his age and skill level?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:49 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34561
Location: The Brown Wedge
LosAzules wrote:
GodisNavyBlue wrote:
Corey was unlucky to be delisted and I am sure he would have still been on the list if Teague was out of contract at the end of last season.
Quote:

At 27 and with Teague (contract or no contract he managed only 7 games in 2006) and Wiggins still on the list he should count himself unlucky. In a team short on foot skills he was a beautiful long raking left foot kick and had a solid 2006 being 8th in tackles, 12th in kicks (higher in effectives) and 11th in marks ... he was in our best starting 22 even allowing for injuries.

Unlike a lot of his team mates: he could kick a football.


0 goals 4 behinds Vs Geelong last season - all gettable for a competant footballer.

I liked CORY, but he had his limitations. It's a good thing that we don't need his services anymore - it means where finally in a position we're we don't have to carry sub-standard footballers anymore.

Carrazzo and Teague next year.

How do we know it was Dennis' decision to axe him? I thought the board was running the show :P .


Last edited by The Duke on Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:53 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
If he was so brilliant, he would've been snaffled in a flash by someone else.

Good, not great.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:23 am 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:38 am
Posts: 622
The Duke wrote:

How do we know it was Dennis' decision to axe him? I thought the board was running the show :P .


Coz alot of people around here just assume!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:33 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
A number of those expressing surprise at the delisting are talking about his 19 games in 2006, or his likely appearance for the seniors in 2007 (assuming he wasn't delisted).

I'd argue your timeframe is all wrong. We are finally, after wasting a bitof time in the process, starting to rebuild a list to compete in 2008 and 2009. With that sort of timeframe, there's no point in retaining a 28 year old tryer who simply won't be around then, and if he was, we'd be up the chute entirely.

I agree he was a tryer and far from our worst for most of the year but when you rebuild you have to assess who is going to be a good player when you ready to make your tilt. You don't just fill gaps until someone else comes along.

There are others on the list that may be in the same position but they are generally 3-4 years younger and may still show something, although unexpected I guess.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 8:36 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
woof wrote:
If David Teague did not have an existing contract perhaps Cory would still be on the list.


BINGO, unlucky but through circumstances and the amount of picks we wanted he had to go.

Sad but ultimately he got about as much out of his career that his talent allowed him to. Should just be thankful for that.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:10 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1239
it was essentially cory vs bannister for that last spot and the mc have gone with bannister. no doubt cory was a great club man and trainer, but he wasn't going to win us a flag (probably neither is bannister).

tho, doesn;t discount his comments which will have some level of truth to them. too many telling the same story....old skool coach with old skool ideas...

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:03 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8229
Wet Willie wrote:
Yes, 19 memorable games that cemented his future...Come on BW, he was never a key player for the team or our future...

The club has to turn players over to build something better than what we currently have, or else we just bounce along the bottom forever.

These guys are paid well for the experience.

I'm sure Cory will be welcome for a drink at the table of bitterness with Beaumont, Manton and Campo etc. Shame he feels the need to rant on radio (in a different state) to come to terms with it...


The list is building. Tells you something. It's common knowledge by know that he's lost the players well and truly, unless, of course you live with your head buried firmly in the sand. If Pagan was out of contract would you give him another one right now?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:40 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:23 am
Posts: 1797
Location: Half Back Flanker...
I thought this thread was about McGrath...??

_________________
"...that's the thing about opinion - you don't have to know anything to have one..." Andre Agassi commenting on Pat Cash 2004
"...the less you know - the more you believe..." - Bono 2006


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:14 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
molsey wrote:
A number of those expressing surprise at the delisting are talking about his 19 games in 2006, or his likely appearance for the seniors in 2007 (assuming he wasn't delisted).

I'd argue your timeframe is all wrong. We are finally, after wasting a bitof time in the process, starting to rebuild a list to compete in 2008 and 2009. With that sort of timeframe, there's no point in retaining a 28 year old tryer who simply won't be around then, and if he was, we'd be up the chute entirely.

I agree he was a tryer and far from our worst for most of the year but when you rebuild you have to assess who is going to be a good player when you ready to make your tilt. You don't just fill gaps until someone else comes along.

There are others on the list that may be in the same position but they are generally 3-4 years younger and may still show something, although unexpected I guess.


So why is wiggins on the list.?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:26 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I thought this thread was about McGrath?

Seriously, Wiggins had a good 2006 and the role he played will be needed in the next few years. Don't you agree? He may be one that doesn't last until 2008 like Teague, Bannister etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:35 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
The Duke wrote:
How do we know it was Dennis' decision to axe him? I thought the board was running the show :P .


Probably wasn't. He was probably told by the board. If it were up to Denis he'd probably have been kept on, along with a few others.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group