Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 3:54 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:45 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16823
Location: Melbourne
Can someone answer the following few questions for me please. :-)

There will be an AGM in 2007. March they say.

Smorgon has his Unity ticket with 8 friends plus Sticks and Lee. That makes 11 plus the lonely Diggins who is flapping in the breeze.

The AFL and Smorgon wanted 6 board members on the board a short time.

There were 10 last week, 2 went and 4 came onboard via the tradesmans entrance. That made 12.

Now there is talk that young Tom and 3 others will have a ticket. Could be more, could be less. That ticket will join Sticks and Lee if they get up. Diggins is will still be flapping with all her friends.

So my question is......When it comes to the AGM how many are we actually voting for to put onto a CFC Board.

Where does it say how many we can vote for? Who says how many we can vote for. If Smorgons Unity ticket fails to get a vote. Is there a min and/or a max.

If the members only want 6 then Smorgons cast of thousands will miss the boat.

Any answers????

What about you Sal. How about an answer instead of a question :wink:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:50 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Good question Cazzesman, maybe the AFL will decide considering they own us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 5:56 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 8128
Sal wrote:
don't answer a question with a question, especially the original question.

so what's ya question? :-D

_________________
There's so much I could say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:24 pm
Posts: 29
I'm still forming a solid opinion hence the reason for my query on your thoughts and not as some of the sinister contributors have suggested but I would hope there would be good balance of "football" types and "business" oriented people as well as a contribution of a well credentialed media personality. That said and not taking into consideration tickets something to the effect of and in no particular order or portfolios
"Football" - F. Brown, R.D.Barrasi, Fitzpatrick, Kernahan, A. McKay, Williams and say a Phil Cleary.
"Business" - Ricky Munday, Gary Lyon or James Brayshaw, a legal type I think there's been one mooted, Lee, Moulton ?, Harrison ?.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: New Board.
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:38 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Rhys26 wrote:
Sal wrote:
With most calling for a few if not all changes at Board level, can some of you at least offer alternative solutions based on the general chit chat

Hey Sal,
What are some of the plans or ideas that Smorgan has come up with during his time on the board?
Except of course running to the AFL for handouts and wanting to play home games interstate.
Have you seen the Watts report Sal?? You're one of Smorgos puppets surely you would have come across it.


What about the redevelopment of Optus Oval into an elite training centre? Not a bad effort considering we're so badly in debt that we can barely pay our players.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:44 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:24 pm
Posts: 29
Andain, WTF have I ever suggested I'm a Smorgon supporter, I have clearly outlined my views on him and you are falling into that category with him. Don't let your ignorance get in the way of rational discussion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 6:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Sal wrote:
Andain, WTF have I ever suggested I'm a Smorgon supporter, I have clearly outlined my views on him and you are falling into that category with him. Don't let your ignorance get in the way of rational discussion.

Your either didn't notice that I quoted Rhys26's post, or you can't accept alternative views. Which one is it?

I don't care what your opinions are about Smorgan. I was answering a question from Rhys26 since it was obvious nobody else was going to mention it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:00 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:46 am
Posts: 2547
Location: Melbourne
Smorgan's not great at the PR side of the job, no doubting that, and he's running a divided board with at least one idiot gossiping to the media every time they have a disagreement at board level (disagreements happen often at every board I'm sure). He's also running a club with a debt so astronomical that every other type of business would've just declared bankruptcy and called it a day. When you've got money there are plenty of things you can do to make more money and to strengthen the club on field and off field. Unfotunately we're broke and when you're broke the only real thing you can do is survive and try to pay off you're debts. Smorgan is doing that. He's got an excellent backround in business and has been in the job for barely a year. I personally think we should just sit back, let the man do his job and just accept the reality that its going to be at least 4-5 years before Carlton will turn it around financially regardless of who happens to be president.


Last edited by Andain on Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:24 pm
Posts: 29
My humble apologies Andain I failed to see who you were quoting. My whole point is that it's easy for some to sit at their key board and shit pot the club but at some point find a positive idea or solution or God forbid, stand for the Board, easy............


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:33 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Cazzesman wrote:
So my question is......When it comes to the AGM how many are we actually voting for to put onto a CFC Board.

Where does it say how many we can vote for? Who says how many we can vote for. If Smorgons Unity ticket fails to get a vote. Is there a min and/or a max.

If the members only want 6 then Smorgons cast of thousands will miss the boat.

Any answers????

What about you Sal. How about an answer instead of a question :wink:

Regards Cazzesman


ASFAIK all bar Sticks & Lee are up for election. I assume if Smorgan puts 10 up for election then 10 spots will need to be filled.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:52 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Andain wrote:
Unfotunately we're broke and when you're broke the only real thing you can do is survive and try to pay off you're debts. Smorgan is doing that.


Andain,
I find this comment puzzling. Smorgan is paying off debt? Last year the board had to seek 2 million dollars special assistance of which 1.5 million become more debt.
Are you all there?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:54 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
10 spots up for grabs.

Whoever the new group is (that is if there is only one of them) will have to get 6 or more members of their ticket in the top 10 in terms of votes (I assume it is a preferential system again).

Lets say the alternative ticket puts up 10 people and there are also a couple of independants, that means there could be at least 22 people on the ballot. :lol: Muddy waters indeed.

That is going to take a lot of organising from the alternative ticket/s, a lot of people are too stupid to be able to order their votes correctly according to 'ticket' lines. There are going to have to be 'how to vote' cards/proxies and the whole shebang.

Should be interesting to see what happens.

Are there scrutineers involved in the vote counting?

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Last edited by Jarusa on Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
woof wrote:
Andain wrote:
Unfotunately we're broke and when you're broke the only real thing you can do is survive and try to pay off you're debts. Smorgan is doing that.


Andain,
I find this comment puzzling. Smorgan is paying off debt? Last year the board had to seek 2 million dollars special assistance of which 1.5 million become more debt.
Are you all there?


AFAIK the debt has been paid off somewhat over the last five years.

IIRC it was in the $12-15Million range 5 years ago.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 7:58 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
gerry atric wrote:
Quote:
Also I think we are understating the difficulty of the job. Why will sponsors flock to be associated with a basket case, particularly in a marketplace where Storm and Victory are successful and more international and taking part of the market. How do you instatntly trade out of an $8m debt? Or do it over years with a team that can't win. Any ideas? We are a football team, not a company. We need to be run on business principles but the whole point is the team. When it is shocking, it's hard to do business and I'm not sure we can blame Smorgo for Parkin's recruiting policies, or Big JAck rorting the cap to pay star imports like O'Reilly.


Ask Eddie McGuire at Collingwood. In the first two years of his presidency Collingwood finished last and second last. The money still came in.
You can be a half glass full type of person or a half glass empty type of person.
Eddie Half glass full. Smorgo and you .... Half glass empty.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:03 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
Jarusa wrote:
woof wrote:
Andain wrote:
Unfotunately we're broke and when you're broke the only real thing you can do is survive and try to pay off you're debts. Smorgan is doing that.


Andain,
I find this comment puzzling. Smorgan is paying off debt? Last year the board had to seek 2 million dollars special assistance of which 1.5 million become more debt.
Are you all there?


AFAIK the debt has been paid off somewhat over the last five years.

IIRC it was in the $12-15Million range 5 years ago.


Through generating more income or cost cutting? Remember we are competing against 15 other clubs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:05 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Smorgon has done his absolute best to knock things over and make things very complicated.

But come
March the new people will streamline everything .

So it doesnt matter...

Just vote for a ticket when its presented.. and you can bet your bottom dollar there will be people alligning and re alligning.. but when it comes to the crunch what we need is Smorgon Malouf and the impotents out (Marcus Rose Simon Wilson etc.. and hopefully Sticks and Gleeson for being useless) and a dynamic alternative in....

Then im sure they will sort things out themselves.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:16 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:11 pm
Posts: 1959
Location: Elwood
Synbad wrote:
Smorgon has done his absolute best to knock things over and make things very complicated.

But come
March the new people will streamline everything .

So it doesnt matter...

Just vote for a ticket when its presented.. and you can bet your bottom dollar there will be people alligning and re alligning.. but when it comes to the crunch what we need is Smorgon Malouf and the impotents out (Marcus Rose Simon Wilson etc.. and hopefully Sticks and Gleeson for being useless) and a dynamic alternative in....

Then im sure they will sort things out themselves.



Is there or would there be hope of Retaining both Sticks and Gleeson ?

Sticks for appearances and show ( no important jobs as i think you've mentioned or someone mentioned it.)

And Gleeson because he may actually offer something in the right enviroment.

Maybe ??

_________________
I know a little secret. And i'm not sharing.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:24 pm
Posts: 29
Yeah Yeah Synbad but who is the dynamic alternative


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Sal wrote:
Yeah Yeah Synbad but who is the dynamic alternative


Wait till after New Years...

In the meantime go out enjoy yourself and know its all about to get better... and the club has begun to take its first steps towards being back to where it should be...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:48 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:21 am
Posts: 2345
Location: sitting at my computer...
mjonc wrote:
So from what i hear Smorgon doesn't rate supporter internet forums. So why would you bother sending lackeys to plant his seeds?


Because he realises that we are the type of supporters that may actually exercise our right to vote as members, and the sentiments towards the current board on here are not exactly glowing...

17th Premiership wrote:
Here's a thought, Sal: Why don't you come up with what you think is good plan?


17th Premiership... who the hell you you?! :? :P

Andain wrote:
Rhys26 wrote:
Sal wrote:
With most calling for a few if not all changes at Board level, can some of you at least offer alternative solutions based on the general chit chat

Hey Sal,
What are some of the plans or ideas that Smorgan has come up with during his time on the board?
Except of course running to the AFL for handouts and wanting to play home games interstate.
Have you seen the Watts report Sal?? You're one of Smorgos puppets surely you would have come across it.


What about the redevelopment of Optus Oval into an elite training centre? Not a bad effort considering we're so badly in debt that we can barely pay our players.


Oh Andain, don't worry about that - it's all sorted out... the AFL will take care of it, hinging on us agreeing to a plethora of terms and conditions as stated by the AFL to, in effect, give them more control over us... Smorgo will be cool with it...

Sal, to answer your question - I have no idea... I carry no handbook to the 'who's who of power brokers of the business world', and myself do not have the business acumen to nominate who I think would be suitable *otherwise I'd be on the board :wink: * - but I do know this - Smorgon is NOT the man to lead Carlton out of the mire, I do not respect any head of an organisation that relies on PR people to attempt to put rose-coloured glasses on our heads, I don't agree with Smorgo's stacking the board with those faithful to him 8)

That said, yes I'll happily shitcan the board *correction, the MAJORITY of the board* until the cows come home - but if you rad my previous posts you'll find I'll stacked with optimism and positivity and nothing else...

And with that, I'm positive that Smorgon has to go... :-D

The rival ticket that is being touted will have the financial backing of some very powerful people I hope *and by that I don't mean NAB or the AFL, who are backdoor, I mean backing the current board :) *... if that is the case, my vote goes to them...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 81 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group