Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 5:41 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1219 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 ... 61  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:24 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:23 am
Posts: 284
Location: HOBART
Mighty Blues wrote:
Spider mate word is that we (Dennis and Co) went in there and within the 30 seconds we met with the Hawks we said we are not dealing with you vis a vis T-Bird and that was it....

If the Hawks want him bad enough they need to come up with a suitable offer or else next highest bidder. It seems clear Bret doesn't want to be at the blues next year.


Well what do you expect when the hawks recruiting wanker virtually saying they will give us nothing for him pick maybe 100 or something ( thats what it sounded like ) before the trade period. We are saying, right you arrogant pricks if this is your tact fk you. We will not deal with you and the next step is come back to us with something realistic or do no waste our time and play games. And as i said before he puts a price on his head we match it and we have pick 1 in the PSD Let him rot in the Bullants 2nds. IT would be worth the money. I would even donate to his contract.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:26 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
Ok, putting myself up to be shot down here...

I know we're all very emotional about all this, but for the life of me, what has Hawthorn done wrong in all this?

They talked with a player coming out of contract to see if he was interesting in coming to play for them, just as all clubs have an obligation to do, and JUST AS WE WOULD EXPECT CARLTON TO DO WITH ANY OTHER PLAYERS COMING OUT OF CONTRACT THAT WE ARE INTERESTED IN.

They got some great deals in the past, good luck to them. Not their fault that North were idiots. WE ALL WISH CARLTON COULD HAVE ENGINEERED DEALS LIKE THAT.

They have offered Thornton $300k a year...if that's what they want to pay, and can afford to, good luck to them.

They have said that pick 6 is not on the table, as they should have said as a starting negotiating point, and JUST AS WE WOULD ALL WANT CARLTON TO DO.

We don't even know what they have offered as yet, or if they have even put a deal on the table, so we can't be critical of that.

Hawthorn have done nothing other than what they are obliged to do for the club and its members, nothing more, nothing less.

Thornton has chosen to leave, for whatever reasons... that's his choice. I don't see why Hawthorn is being vilified in all this. They will make an offer...Carlton will accept it or reject it, simple.

Righto...take aim :wink:

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17892
I dont think Sheedy orLaidley would let him get to the Dawks in the PSD. So if T-Dick wants to go to hawks and they want him, they will have to deal.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:30 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10373
Location: Coburg
cos they have shit colours
a stupid song
ex players as flower in the media
and a prick as president!


but they did give Geelong and Adelaide Gary Ayers 8)

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:32 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:23 am
Posts: 284
Location: HOBART
Siegfried wrote:
Ok, putting myself up to be shot down here...

I know we're all very emotional about all this, but for the life of me, what has Hawthorn done wrong in all this?

They talked with a player coming out of contract to see if he was interesting in coming to play for them, just as all clubs have an obligation to do, and JUST AS WE WOULD EXPECT CARLTON TO DO WITH ANY OTHER PLAYERS COMING OUT OF CONTRACT THAT WE ARE INTERESTED IN.

They got some great deals in the past, good luck to them. Not their fault that North were idiots. WE ALL WISH CARLTON COULD HAVE ENGINEERED DEALS LIKE THAT.

They have offered Thornton $300k a year...if that's what they want to pay, and can afford to, good luck to them.

They have said that pick 6 is not on the table, as they should have said as a starting negotiating point, and JUST AS WE WOULD ALL WANT CARLTON TO DO.

We don't even know what they have offered as yet, or if they have even put a deal on the table, so we can't be critical of that.

Hawthorn have done nothing other than what they are obliged to do for the club and its members, nothing more, nothing less.

Thornton has chosen to leave, for whatever reasons... that's his choice. I don't see why Hawthorn is being vilified in all this. They will make an offer...Carlton will accept it or reject it, simple.

Righto...take aim :wink:


Carlton have rejected it, simple


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:33 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Did i not read McConnel state in the newspaper the other day that the offers were the same between Hawthorn and Carlton? Pretty sure I did as it filled up the first 50+ pages on this thread.

So why the is McConnel telling the world on SEN that our offers were way below expectations tonight?

I told you its all about the money. Money hungry fools, good luck paying over board for Thornton Hawks.

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:35 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
spider wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
Ok, putting myself up to be shot down here...

I know we're all very emotional about all this, but for the life of me, what has Hawthorn done wrong in all this?

They talked with a player coming out of contract to see if he was interesting in coming to play for them, just as all clubs have an obligation to do, and JUST AS WE WOULD EXPECT CARLTON TO DO WITH ANY OTHER PLAYERS COMING OUT OF CONTRACT THAT WE ARE INTERESTED IN.

They got some great deals in the past, good luck to them. Not their fault that North were idiots. WE ALL WISH CARLTON COULD HAVE ENGINEERED DEALS LIKE THAT.

They have offered Thornton $300k a year...if that's what they want to pay, and can afford to, good luck to them.

They have said that pick 6 is not on the table, as they should have said as a starting negotiating point, and JUST AS WE WOULD ALL WANT CARLTON TO DO.

We don't even know what they have offered as yet, or if they have even put a deal on the table, so we can't be critical of that.

Hawthorn have done nothing other than what they are obliged to do for the club and its members, nothing more, nothing less.

Thornton has chosen to leave, for whatever reasons... that's his choice. I don't see why Hawthorn is being vilified in all this. They will make an offer...Carlton will accept it or reject it, simple.

Righto...take aim :wink:


Carlton have rejected it, simple


Yes, I know that. Doesn't answer my question though.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:40 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
mjonc wrote:
Did i not read McConnel state in the newspaper the other day that the offers were the same between Hawthorn and Carlton? Pretty sure I did as it filled up the first 50+ pages on this thread.

So why the is McConnel telling the world on SEN that our offers were way below expectations tonight?

I told you its all about the money. Money hungry fools, good luck paying over board for Thornton Hawks.


The impression that I get Mjonc is that Carlton's initial offer was insulting. I had a discussion with Teddy a few days ago, saying that I didn't think it was good business to offer a player something low for a contract in the hope that you get away with paying less than they're worth. You put people off side that way. I think that you need to treat players with respect all the way through, while still being appropriately business-savvy.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
Why so much hatred now for the Hawks. I saw it coming some 65 pages ago! Hawthorn - very arrogant, self indulgent love me do's who believe that the rest of the footy teams exist solely to accomodate their youth policy. F### them. Pay the piper!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:44 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:23 am
Posts: 284
Location: HOBART
Siegfried wrote:
spider wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
Ok, putting myself up to be shot down here...

I know we're all very emotional about all this, but for the life of me, what has Hawthorn done wrong in all this?

They talked with a player coming out of contract to see if he was interesting in coming to play for them, just as all clubs have an obligation to do, and JUST AS WE WOULD EXPECT CARLTON TO DO WITH ANY OTHER PLAYERS COMING OUT OF CONTRACT THAT WE ARE INTERESTED IN.

They got some great deals in the past, good luck to them. Not their fault that North were idiots. WE ALL WISH CARLTON COULD HAVE ENGINEERED DEALS LIKE THAT.

They have offered Thornton $300k a year...if that's what they want to pay, and can afford to, good luck to them.

They have said that pick 6 is not on the table, as they should have said as a starting negotiating point, and JUST AS WE WOULD ALL WANT CARLTON TO DO.

We don't even know what they have offered as yet, or if they have even put a deal on the table, so we can't be critical of that.

Hawthorn have done nothing other than what they are obliged to do for the club and its members, nothing more, nothing less.

Thornton has chosen to leave, for whatever reasons... that's his choice. I don't see why Hawthorn is being vilified in all this. They will make an offer...Carlton will accept it or reject it, simple.

Righto...take aim :wink:


Carlton have rejected it, simple


Yes, I know that. Doesn't answer my question though.


Give us a short question and we will give you an answer. Keep it simple please.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:49 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
spider wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
spider wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
Ok, putting myself up to be shot down here...

I know we're all very emotional about all this, but for the life of me, what has Hawthorn done wrong in all this?

They talked with a player coming out of contract to see if he was interesting in coming to play for them, just as all clubs have an obligation to do, and JUST AS WE WOULD EXPECT CARLTON TO DO WITH ANY OTHER PLAYERS COMING OUT OF CONTRACT THAT WE ARE INTERESTED IN.

They got some great deals in the past, good luck to them. Not their fault that North were idiots. WE ALL WISH CARLTON COULD HAVE ENGINEERED DEALS LIKE THAT.

They have offered Thornton $300k a year...if that's what they want to pay, and can afford to, good luck to them.

They have said that pick 6 is not on the table, as they should have said as a starting negotiating point, and JUST AS WE WOULD ALL WANT CARLTON TO DO.

We don't even know what they have offered as yet, or if they have even put a deal on the table, so we can't be critical of that.

Hawthorn have done nothing other than what they are obliged to do for the club and its members, nothing more, nothing less.

Thornton has chosen to leave, for whatever reasons... that's his choice. I don't see why Hawthorn is being vilified in all this. They will make an offer...Carlton will accept it or reject it, simple.

Righto...take aim :wink:


Carlton have rejected it, simple


Yes, I know that. Doesn't answer my question though.


Give us a short question and we will give you an answer. Keep it simple please.


Apologies if I have been convoluted, was simply trying to explain my thinking. Ok, simple question, what has Hawthorn done, that we at Carlton wouldn't expect our own club to do, that makes so many on here vilify them so ruthlessly? I just don't understand why people are so pissed off at Hawthorn. I would be delighted if Carlton was approaching things in the way Hawthorn is, and has been for the last few years.

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:54 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
I don't have a problem with how Hawthorn do their business but seeing as they are trying to screw us over they can get f#$%ed.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:56 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 12:30 pm
Posts: 2862
TheGame wrote:
I don't have a problem with how Hawthorn do their business but seeing as they are trying to screw us over they can get f#$%ed.


Do you know what they have offered us?

_________________
Mens sana in corpore sano.

Bring back the laurel wreath logo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 5:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
phoenix johnson wrote:
Ok, does this deal seem feasible?

Everitt > Swans
Pick 15 > Hawks

TBird + 4th rounder > Hawks
Pick 15 + Pick 24 > Carlton

Let's say each club has a "trade-o-meter" for this sort of thing that gauges their interest.

Carlton: 8/10
Hawthorn: 6/10
Sydney: 3/10

Sydney should start talking to Essendon* or the Kangas about their 2nd rounder... I'm sure there's a few guys who might be interested in going to seek a few more games.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:00 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
Just said on Ch. 10 news that Hawthorn will FRONTLOAD his contract to get him PSD.

For example:

Thornton nominates PSD demanding 1 year contract of 450k, then they'll sign him up at end 2007 for 2 years at less (eg. 200-250k).

That means to re-pick him we'll have to pay through the roof then lose him again.

We're gonna get screwed over here.

I don;t care if Pagan is more brutal than Gengis Khan, Thornton is screwing us over. He has been shown to lack character in this episode. Very frustrating.

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
Posts: 1291
Location: Sydney
Update on the afl site:

http://carltonfc.com.au/default.asp?pg= ... eid=302497

_________________
When Dick became President, it was as if everyone at Carlton came out of the hailstorm and into the sunshine - Stephen Kernahan

YARRAN!!





.


Last edited by Bluebernz on Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:02 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:34 am
Posts: 8888
Location: 8888
Siegfried wrote:
TheGame wrote:
I don't have a problem with how Hawthorn do their business but seeing as they are trying to screw us over they can get f#$%ed.


Do you know what they have offered us?


Not pick 6 :-D

_________________
Mjonc signing off at 8888


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:03 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
LOL

If he's on a one-year contract someone the Hawks will probably try to re-sign him on a crappy deal and he'll ask to be traded to a club willing to pay more money.....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17892
Wont happen.
That would be a players dream. Sign a one year contract for 450., have a good season then tell te Dawks "If you want me to sign, more I need 350-400." No club would be that stupid. Its a threat by the Dawks to pressure Calron.
Means to me that they are keen to deal. A good sign in my eyes

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 6:04 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 10:23 am
Posts: 284
Location: HOBART
Siegfried wrote:
spider wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
spider wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
Ok, putting myself up to be shot down here...

I know we're all very emotional about all this, but for the life of me, what has Hawthorn done wrong in all this?

They talked with a player coming out of contract to see if he was interesting in coming to play for them, just as all clubs have an obligation to do, and JUST AS WE WOULD EXPECT CARLTON TO DO WITH ANY OTHER PLAYERS COMING OUT OF CONTRACT THAT WE ARE INTERESTED IN.

They got some great deals in the past, good luck to them. Not their fault that North were idiots. WE ALL WISH CARLTON COULD HAVE ENGINEERED DEALS LIKE THAT.

They have offered Thornton $300k a year...if that's what they want to pay, and can afford to, good luck to them.

They have said that pick 6 is not on the table, as they should have said as a starting negotiating point, and JUST AS WE WOULD ALL WANT CARLTON TO DO.

We don't even know what they have offered as yet, or if they have even put a deal on the table, so we can't be critical of that.

Hawthorn have done nothing other than what they are obliged to do for the club and its members, nothing more, nothing less.

Thornton has chosen to leave, for whatever reasons... that's his choice. I don't see why Hawthorn is being vilified in all this. They will make an offer...Carlton will accept it or reject it, simple.

Righto...take aim :wink:


Carlton have rejected it, simple


Yes, I know that. Doesn't answer my question though.


Give us a short question and we will give you an answer. Keep it simple please.


Apologies if I have been convoluted, was simply trying to explain my thinking. Ok, simple question, what has Hawthorn done, that we at Carlton wouldn't expect our own club to do, that makes so many on here vilify them so ruthlessly? I just don't understand why people are so pissed off at Hawthorn. I would be delighted if Carlton was approaching things in the way Hawthorn is, and has been for the last few years.


Because we bleed Navy Blue and take it as an insult an so we should.Whether right or wrong. I do not think you hurt enough. Tell us all how we should react. Oh no Hawthorn want our player we will let them have him for nicks, hang on we will just check with the AFL if we can lay down for the hawks as we have for them.

We spend 3/4 of our time in this site vilifying our own club and some of us get upset if we pick on anyone else. Oh how sad we are.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1219 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57 ... 61  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 64 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group