Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 1:36 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1219 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 61  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:19 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
Jarusa wrote:
CarltonClem wrote:
Look at how many teams in the top 8 would like a dependable key defender. Imagine him playing alongside a decent side and with a decent midfield giving support....

Don't sell him short. I bet you'd trade him for a 3rd round pick :roll:


He was also a bit like the Australian batsmen this year as well.

They don't have to face the best bowlers in the world.

Thornton doesn't have to play on the best FF in the league anymore. :wink:


:roll:

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:39 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 3768
Jarusa wrote:
Effes wrote:
How many tackles did he have in 2006?


18 in 22 games, you should check how many defenders have such a low tackle count. :wink:


Ranked 30th at the club out of 31 players who played 5 or more games. Only Saddington had less. And Fisher was 29th as one of 3 who average less than one tackle per game.

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tr-c ... t=TA&st=TA


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17937
BlueWorld wrote:
Jarusa wrote:
Effes wrote:
How many tackles did he have in 2006?


18 in 22 games, you should check how many defenders have such a low tackle count. :wink:


Ranked 30th at the club out of 31 players who played 5 or more games. Only Saddington had less. And Fisher was 29th as one of 3 who average less than one tackle per game.

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tr-c ... t=TA&st=TA


17th in the AFL for 1%ers.
The only Carlton player in the top 50.
But I suppose you and Jars didnt want to mention that one, hey? :wink:

http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/pla ... t=LT&fc=E9

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:53 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Thornton was hardly beaten this year and would be a more than handy addition to any side. He's one of the best backmen in the comp.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 7:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Yep....our defence is Thornton and........................................?

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:11 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2147
Location: East Melbourne
keogh wrote:
malleefowl wrote:
keogh wrote:
I rate Fisher highly.He is just about the best overhead mark in the comp.Name me 5 guys better than him in this area.

OK I will play. How about Brett Burton, Luke McPharlin, Adam Hunter, Leo Barry and Matthew Richardson? Or if you don't like those there is Daniel Bradshaw, Nathan Thompson, Nick Riewoldt, Josh Fraser or Brad Johnson. That is 10. What do I win? ;)

Fish is equal of all of them except Fraser .You had credibility until you named him. And Fish is equal to Riewoldt in the kicking stakes. There is nobody equal to him except the one guy you missed. Johnathon Brown. So you lose.

Yes. You are right. I missed Jonathon Brown. That makes 11.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2147
Location: East Melbourne
verbs wrote:
NO! No more lengthy contracts.

As for Fisher he kicked 34.14 (71%) pre knee reconstruction and has kicked 20.19 (51%) post knee reconstruction.

What about the ones that went out of bounds on the full or the ones from 35m out that never made the distance? Add them in and his reliability in front of goal comes back to about 30%.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:13 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Blue Vain wrote:
BlueWorld wrote:
Jarusa wrote:
Effes wrote:
How many tackles did he have in 2006?


18 in 22 games, you should check how many defenders have such a low tackle count. :wink:


Ranked 30th at the club out of 31 players who played 5 or more games. Only Saddington had less. And Fisher was 29th as one of 3 who average less than one tackle per game.

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tr-c ... t=TA&st=TA


17th in the AFL for 1%ers.
The only Carlton player in the top 50.
But I suppose you and Jars didnt want to mention that one, hey? :wink:

http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/pla ... t=LT&fc=E9


Bit lower on averages though Blue Vain.

... and well behind Zac Dawson, bet you didn't want to mention that one, hey? :wink:

http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/pla ... t=LA&fc=E9

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:15 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2147
Location: East Melbourne
By the way I think that Fish should be signed on for another 2 years. It is just that at the moment he is a good-ordinary player... nothing more. Thornton should get 3 years. He is our most reliable defender, but not in the star class yet. We still have a way to go to get a team chock full of them.


Last edited by malbi on Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
malleefowl wrote:
verbs wrote:
NO! No more lengthy contracts.

As for Fisher he kicked 34.14 (71%) pre knee reconstruction and has kicked 20.19 (51%) post knee reconstruction.

What about the ones that went out of bounds on the full or the ones from 35m out that never made the distance? Add them in and his reliability in front of goal comes back to about 30%.


Before or after the reconstruction? :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:17 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:48 pm
Posts: 1392
Warby wrote:
Yep....our defence is Thornton and........................................?


Whitnall and Walker both played well in defence this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:18 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 10:44 am
Posts: 2147
Location: East Melbourne
verbs wrote:
malleefowl wrote:
verbs wrote:
NO! No more lengthy contracts.

As for Fisher he kicked 34.14 (71%) pre knee reconstruction and has kicked 20.19 (51%) post knee reconstruction.

What about the ones that went out of bounds on the full or the ones from 35m out that never made the distance? Add them in and his reliability in front of goal comes back to about 30%.


Before or after the reconstruction? :?

I suppose I am talking after reconstruction. That is the most relevant isn't it? Who cares what a guy did 3 or 4 years ago?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:19 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6316
malleefowl wrote:
keogh wrote:
malleefowl wrote:
keogh wrote:
I rate Fisher highly.He is just about the best overhead mark in the comp.Name me 5 guys better than him in this area.

OK I will play. How about Brett Burton, Luke McPharlin, Adam Hunter, Leo Barry and Matthew Richardson? Or if you don't like those there is Daniel Bradshaw, Nathan Thompson, Nick Riewoldt, Josh Fraser or Brad Johnson. That is 10. What do I win? ;)

Fish is equal of all of them except Fraser .You had credibility until you named him. And Fish is equal to Riewoldt in the kicking stakes. There is nobody equal to him except the one guy you missed. Johnathon Brown. So you lose.

Yes. You are right. I missed Jonathon Brown. That makes 11.


Burton I reckon is a freak of a mark but the rest take the majority of thei marks on leads because they are the go 2 guys. For judgement on where to put mits Fisher is superb.He has the rare gift of judging the ball in the air. What makes you think Josh Fraser is such a good mark. Most of his are of the cheap and easy variety.Bottom line Mallee we have to keep Fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
malleefowl wrote:
verbs wrote:
malleefowl wrote:
verbs wrote:
NO! No more lengthy contracts.

As for Fisher he kicked 34.14 (71%) pre knee reconstruction and has kicked 20.19 (51%) post knee reconstruction.

What about the ones that went out of bounds on the full or the ones from 35m out that never made the distance? Add them in and his reliability in front of goal comes back to about 30%.


Before or after the reconstruction? :?

I suppose I am talking after reconstruction. That is the most relevant isn't it? Who cares what a guy did 3 or 4 years ago?


It's important to chart history in order to project into the future, which is what is done when drafting a contract that will span several years.

No more lengthy contracts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17937
Jarusa wrote:
Bit lower on averages though Blue Vain.

... and well behind Zac Dawson, bet you didn't want to mention that one, hey? :wink:

http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/pla ... t=LA&fc=E9


Yes. 22nd in the AFL Jar.
We shouldnt tolerate that, should we?
Being reigning premiers with the best list in the AFL and all!

Lets sack the lazy bastard!!!!

And dont mention that Judd bloke to me. He couldnt make the top 30. :roll:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:20 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6316
malleefowl wrote:
keogh wrote:
malleefowl wrote:
keogh wrote:
I rate Fisher highly.He is just about the best overhead mark in the comp.Name me 5 guys better than him in this area.

OK I will play. How about Brett Burton, Luke McPharlin, Adam Hunter, Leo Barry and Matthew Richardson? Or if you don't like those there is Daniel Bradshaw, Nathan Thompson, Nick Riewoldt, Josh Fraser or Brad Johnson. That is 10. What do I win? ;)

Fish is equal of all of them except Fraser .You had credibility until you named him. And Fish is equal to Riewoldt in the kicking stakes. There is nobody equal to him except the one guy you missed. Johnathon Brown. So you lose.

Yes. You are right. I missed Jonathon Brown. That makes 11.


Burton I reckon is a freak of a mark but the rest take the majority of their marks on leads because they are the go 2 guys. For judgement on where to put the mits Fisher is superb.He has the rare gift of judging the ball in the air. What makes you think Josh Fraser is such a good mark. Most of his are of the cheap and easy variety.Bottom line Mallee we have to keep Fish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:25 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Blue Vain wrote:
Jarusa wrote:
Bit lower on averages though Blue Vain.

... and well behind Zac Dawson, bet you didn't want to mention that one, hey? :wink:

http://www.pro-stats.com.au/psw/web/pla ... t=LA&fc=E9


Yes. 22nd in the AFL Jar.
We shouldnt tolerate that, should we?
Being reigning premiers with the best list in the AFL and all!

Lets sack the lazy bastard!!!!

And dont mention that Judd bloke to me. He couldnt make the top 30. :roll:


You're welcome to think Thornton is a superstar.

I just think he is a good player, that is all. I take offence at him (and others) taking their contract negotiations to the media.

If you are happy with that then fine.

If you are happy that he has one of the lowest tackle counts for any defender in the comp then more power to you. Just let him go, no need to work on that at all.

If Thornton is still playing KPP in 3 years for Carlton we will still be on the bottom of the ladder.

_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:27 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8183
mjonc wrote:
keogh wrote:
italian_styles wrote:
Fish to be honest i couldn't give a toss if he walks, T-Bird on the other hand we need signed.

I rate Fisher highly.He is just about the best overhead mark in the comp.Name me 5 guys better than him in this area.He is young and has scope to improve.He also has had no luck with injury.Having met him he seems like a quality bloke as well.Yep he is a shit kick for goal and will never be a big kick.You get no argument from me on that score. So why hasnt he been tryed on a back flank where from what i have seen he could excel. W4e must sign him as well. I believe we have played him in the wrong possie.An actually he isnt a shit kick just a small one.


No one doubts his marking ability, but marking is pointless if you can't kick goals from 30 metres dead in front regularly or kick fullstop from anywhere with accuracy and penetration.

I think Fish may start to struggle for a game as young Edwards and Raso start to come through.


The marking aspect, especially up forward, is like gold. Makes a pr1ck of a match-up for a stretched opposition defence finding someone to mind the 3rd marking option (ala Brad Pearce). Imagine how he would be with a good, hard running midfield in front of him. Like Stewie Loewe, he can be taught to kick. The initial key is to get the damn thing first. No good being able to kick it if you can't get it. As Jack Dyer said.........."no good being where the ball aint". At 22 you wouldn't be trading him, or anyone else of that age or younger decent, for a pick. Be like starting 4 years of work all over again waiting for the new player to develop, and then hope he got to Fish's standard. Couldn't imagine a 3rd rounder marking it as well as he does. We could only lose.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
rhys87 wrote:
Warby wrote:
Yep....our defence is Thornton and........................................?


Whitnall and Walker both played well in defence this year.


Yeah but......the opposition wouldn't be shitting themselves planning against our defence.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 3:48 pm
Posts: 1392
I hate how the article reads that their is a better offer out their for him, stupid comment. Alot of AFL players would get more at different clubs because they know you have to pay over the odds to get players at times.
Eg. Nick Stevens.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1219 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 61  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group