Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:43 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 146 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:44 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:55 pm
Posts: 776
Location: UK
jim wrote:
Mordan wrote:
I don't see how you've come to the conclusions that Pagan is the only experience coach "available". There are some big assumptions behind Pagan being available, and possibly even bigger assumptions behind no one else being available.

How you can then come to a "common sense judgement" that it "really does say something about him" if st kilda don't want him as a coach is beyond me. It may say many things, but saying that st kilda not targeting him as coach means anything more than just that is adding your own spin.


Of course there may be a little bit of personal interpretation there (we all have our own interpretation of things) but either way, why would they rule him out if they're after an experienced coach as reported? For the reason's I mentioned above, no-one really wants him at Carlton, that's pretty factual now, and St.Kilda really offers something. As I said , if a new Board gets in later in the year, he's gonat Pagan is e. Common sense would tell you to try to take another opportunity, especially one such as St.Kilda that offers so much opporunity, or possibly be left with nothing. At worst be stuck at a place where no-one wants hims. What other reason may there be? Surely you'd jump at it. I'm thinking the only way I'm wrong here is if the article's wrong and the Saints are interested. Surely that's not too hard to understand. Can't believe the above explanation is beyong you. It's not hard to understand. It may not be the only interpretation of it, could be a few of them, but it's a compelling one.


You're saying that Pagan must be terrible because he's the only experienced option available to St Kilda and the article says they're not interested. Nothing above explains how you come to Pagan being the only option.

I just think you're making a lot of assumptions, like the one above, to get from St Kilda not wanting Pagan, to the outcome you want in Pagan being crap. I'm just not so sure of St Kildas reasons for not wanting Pagan, and so I find it hard to use that to criticise Pagan. There are plenty of others reasons I'd have a go at him before a newspaper report that St Kilda doesn't want him.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:46 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10582
phoenix johnson wrote:
Malthouse will get the job.

You heard it here first.


Heard a similar thing PJ. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:55 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
George Harris wrote:
Thomas didn't quit.

They gave him the flick.

But thanks for the new thread anyway...


How can Buttcheeks then say that the club did not have to pay him out if he was sacked GH?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:57 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
TruBlueBrad wrote:
phoenix johnson wrote:
Malthouse will get the job.

You heard it here first.


Big call.

Will you be attaching a guarentee to this claim?


It's the off season, so why not?

I'll tell you what has happened and what is meant to happen...

At the end of 2005, St.Kilda asked Grant Thomas if he would step aside if they secured another coach. Apparently Thomas was happy to do so.
So, St.Kilda went and approached a current AFL coach. That coach being Mick Malthouse. He spoke to the board and appropriate staff of St.Kilda and he agreed to come to St.Kilda.

However, before he actually signed on the paper, his wife intervened and convinced him not to citing that "he had unfinished business at the Pies and still had a point to prove."

This rumour could be backed up by the claim that Malthouse is now under consideration for the Saints job.

It'll be an interesting next few weeks for the Saints and, Mick Malthouse, if this comes true.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:58 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
By the sounds of it Thomas had a performance/expectation clause in his contract which he didn't meet. You have to be an idiot to sign a performance based contract as a coach when player injuries are out of your control.

Denis has 2 years left in his contract with about 1.2Mill with NO OUT clause. Denis would be too smart to sign something like that.

Carlton wants Denis to quit so Carlton do not have to pay him out.
Denis wants Carlton to pay him out if they want him to go.

Outcome, nobody is going anywhere - yet..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 12:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
One rumour used as substantiation of another.

:roll:

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:01 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
We'll see what happens first, GH.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:02 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:30 am
Posts: 43
Apparently he had a top 4 clause - I think I heard that from 3AW


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:08 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
I wouldn't be surprised if he ends up there.

They'd like someone with premiership experience, he used to play for them, and he may be over Collingwood - so right fit.

Just don't think the scenario you indicated is how it did and then will play out.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:09 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
And yet wasn't there rumblings last year that there was a chance Thomas would have been sacked at the end of the year?

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:13 pm 
Offline
Herald Sun columnist
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:26 pm
Posts: 10018
Location: Visy Park
ranibear wrote:
Apparently he had a top 4 clause - I think I heard that from 3AW


So he did not deliver on his perfromance based contract and therefore was sacked and as such the club did not have to pay him out - is that how I read it?

_________________
“It is a state of mind, a system of belief, a way of seeing the world, a deep faith that, because you are Carlton, you belong to something great.” - Mike Fitzpatrick articulating what Out of the Blue means.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
That's correct.

Pagan has a performance based contract as well.

He's completely safe as long as he doesn't finish lower than 17th two years in a row.

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:20 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 1:27 pm
Posts: 597
Title change - Delete

_________________
Patrick Smith - Just another reason to HATE Essendon*!


Last edited by Knackers on Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:52 am
Posts: 1588
Location: My social club stand, Princes Park
Quote:
phoenix johnson:
And yet wasn't there rumblings last year that there was a chance Thomas would have been sacked at the end of the year?



The Thomas rumblings have been around since the day he took over.

2 + 2 = 5

_________________

************************************************************
NOW YOU'RE JUST SOME CLUB THAT I USED TO KNOW.


Last edited by George Harris on Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:38 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
George Harris wrote:
And if Mitchell gets his marching orders at the end of this year, who will we have to take over from Pagan when that happens?


Whoever's assistant at Carlton. I wonder why SOS and Ratts were so keen...

if Cresswell or Longmire don't get the St Kilda job, then the next best post is AC at Carlton because they kmow that if Pagan doesn't deliver within about 8 weeks, he's gone.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 1:44 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
Exactly, Clem.

If you didn't want/get the job at the Saints, your next port of call would be an assistant coaching job at Carlton.

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 4:08 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8206
Mordan wrote:
jim wrote:
Mordan wrote:
I don't see how you've come to the conclusions that Pagan is the only experience coach "available". There are some big assumptions behind Pagan being available, and possibly even bigger assumptions behind no one else being available.

How you can then come to a "common sense judgement" that it "really does say something about him" if st kilda don't want him as a coach is beyond me. It may say many things, but saying that st kilda not targeting him as coach means anything more than just that is adding your own spin.


Of course there may be a little bit of personal interpretation there (we all have our own interpretation of things) but either way, why would they rule him out if they're after an experienced coach as reported? For the reason's I mentioned above, no-one really wants him at Carlton, that's pretty factual now, and St.Kilda really offers something. As I said , if a new Board gets in later in the year, he's gonat Pagan is e. Common sense would tell you to try to take another opportunity, especially one such as St.Kilda that offers so much opporunity, or possibly be left with nothing. At worst be stuck at a place where no-one wants hims. What other reason may there be? Surely you'd jump at it. I'm thinking the only way I'm wrong here is if the article's wrong and the Saints are interested. Surely that's not too hard to understand. Can't believe the above explanation is beyong you. It's not hard to understand. It may not be the only interpretation of it, could be a few of them, but it's a compelling one.


You're saying that Pagan must be terrible because he's the only experienced option available to St Kilda and the article says they're not interested. Nothing above explains how you come to Pagan being the only option.

I just think you're making a lot of assumptions, like the one above, to get from St Kilda not wanting Pagan, to the outcome you want in Pagan being crap. I'm just not so sure of St Kildas reasons for not wanting Pagan, and so I find it hard to use that to criticise Pagan. There are plenty of others reasons I'd have a go at him before a newspaper report that St Kilda doesn't want him.


We all know he's crap. The only assumptio I'm making is that the article's right (meaning both the accuracy of the argument and wanting an experienced coach as compared to an untried coach), which is a big call talking the media. If they're after anexperienced coach, why have they ruled him out? I'd be surprised if he's ruled himslef out given his circumstances here. On face value, what does that tell from it? The Saints say themselves they want someone experienced why would they rule him out. The name's they had in the H-Suh are contracted, embraced by their clubs and going no-where. Why look at them and not Pagan? Pagan's contracted too but I'm sure we'd be happy to let him walk. saving us the payout. There's always Ayres too I suppose, but his man-magement skills aren't the greatest and he can't get the best out of teams either. There may be a few reasons as to why they rule him out but this is the one that stands out to me. I don't see the reason why they'd rule him out otherwise, unless he or the club's ruled it out, unless they don't think he'll fit the bill. Then you have to ask why.

It's YOU making the assumption that I'm after the outcome I want. Of course you can go think what you like. I'd be happy to be wrong here and St.Kilda take him off our hands. That would be a dream. I'm hoping the article's inaccurate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 12:09 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:34 pm
Posts: 2
Longmire to Carlton


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:36 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
David Schwatrz stated that Denis Pagan will be meeting with StKilda officials tomorrow.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:57 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
woof wrote:
David Schwatrz stated that Denis Pagan will be meeting with StKilda officials tomorrow.


Quick, someone nip round to Denis's house and get his power suit dry cleaned.

And we'd better arrange some wheat grass juice and a massage for him in the morning so he's energised and relaxed for his interview.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 146 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group