Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 09, 2025 3:48 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Luck Ladder 2006
PostPosted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 10:51 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
Well I have done the Luck Ladder for 2006 and just a warning, it is not pretty viewing for Blues fans.

For those that don't know the luck ladder is pretty simple every round each team gets points allocated to them according to the ladder position of their opponent that week. If you play the 14th team on the ladder you get 14 points.

That mean 21 weeks are counted (only have a ladder after round 1).

What it indicates is how often particular teams encounter 'in form' or 'out of form' teams over the season. Sometimes you find that a couple of teams have a dream run and play lots of bottom teams and other have a hard run, playing lots of team in the top 4.

Well the sad news for Carlton is that in 2006 Carlton was equal top with respect to 'luck' throughout the season.

What this means is despite being in the bottom four for much of the season, we still managed to play more teams in the lower half of the ladder than all other teams.

Image
The second and third columns indicate how many games during the season each team played a top 4 or a bottom 4 side.

This mean that despite having a great run of 'luck' during the season we still managed to finish bottom.

It was the same story in 2005.

Image

Lots of luck but a bottom finish.

You can see that this table can be a good indicator if a team has finished lower than perhaps they should have. When collingwood finished 15th in 2005 they had the toughest run of any team. Yet in 2006, they have the 5th easiest run during the year. This might explain such a big rise on the ladder in one year.

In fact if you add up the last three years the Blues have had the easiest time in terms of playing bottom teams.

Image

So what does this mean?

Well, our luck has to turn around sooner or later.

If we have an unlucky year next year it could get really nasty.

This really indicates to me that we have by far the worst list in the competition and we are at least 2 or 3 years away from any sort of joy. :cry:

I know others will interpret it differently but that is the beauty of footy. :-D



_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:32 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 2194
Location: Melbourne
So we were lucky to win the spoon? :lol:

Nice work Jarusa. :-D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:39 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:59 am
Posts: 547
Location: Urban Wasteland
Zippy wrote:
So we were lucky to win the spoon? :lol:

Nice work Jarusa. :-D


That's definitely one way to look at it....we're damned lucky we couldn't fall any farther :(

God I hope you're wrong Jarusa (RE: "Really Nasty") :cry: I'm not sure just how much more this great club of ours can take.

_________________
The great are great to us only because we are on our knees. Let us arise.
--Robert Collier


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:46 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 7:56 pm
Posts: 174
I think the AFL usually keeps ladder positions in mind when doing next year's Fixture ie. giving the lower teams relatively easier runs to even up the competition? That might explain why we've been top the last 3 years after wooden spoon/lower finishes?

Just what i thought anyway....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 12:48 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Pffft!

This just means that if Collingwood and Essendon* have bad luck through injury, a draw like we get or their geriatrics fall over, they're [REDACTED]!

When is that bad news?

Do these tables take into account coaching?

Add a full season from Kennedy, Murphy, Walker and Stevens without injury and Russell, Bower, Edwards, etc. into the mix and we'll have a year like Hawthorn did this year.

Not forgetting Gibbs!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:18 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:00 am
Posts: 23123
JuzzCarlton wrote:
Pffft!

This just means that if Collingwood and Essendon* have bad luck through injury, a draw like we get or their geriatrics fall over, they're F@%&#!!

When is that bad news?

Do these tables take into account coaching?

Add a full season from Kennedy, Murphy, Walker and Stevens without injury and Russell, Bower, Edwards, etc. into the mix and we'll have a year like Hawthorn did this year.

Not forgetting Gibbs!


I'm hoping for a Hawthorn 2005. 8)


_________________
|♥♥♥♥♥♥| http://www.blueseum.org |♥♥♥♥♥♥|


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Braithy, ByteDanceSpider, keogh and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group