TheBluesMuse wrote:
What can he say?
Here's a few ideas:
He could have spoken about our 1st and 2nd year kids, and how something is building. Urging them to get this proud club back to where it belongs on the fields.
He could have talked about what the B&F means to players - he won a few - and how much pride you get striving to get the best out of yourself every week and often sacrificing your own game for the good of the team.
He could have spoken about the benefits of hard work, and the huge improvements that you can make as a player in the space of 1 year. Fev 2005 vs Fev 2006, Heath Scotland 2005 v Heath Scotland 2006. Walker, Kade and so on. Emphasize to the players that things can change very quickly in football.
He could have talked about the journey from 1991 - 1995, and how 95 meant so much because we were at one of our lowest ebbs in the early 90s.
But he chose not to.
He chose to get personal with the journos because they wrote nasty things about him and the crap process.
What do the players get out of that? The young blokes that have played < 20 games?
"Our team is going to get no favours in the press, people think we're a rabble, why is our VP centring an entire speech - which should be about the B&F and the whole season - on one weeks worth of journo bashings?"
Nothing but negativity came from that. We need the young blokes especially to get instilled in them that THEY will bring this club back to greatness. They own the place, and the next few years are their time. If a great man like Sticks says that, you're going to take notice.
But instead he had to score points. Which he failed to do.
Such a shame.