Showbag, I understand your "two things of quality to get one" arguement but it is not quite as simple as that.

You look at the makeup of each draft and which picks will give you the chance of getting the most value. For instance, I would rate pick 4 and 54 in this draft ahead of 17 and 19. This is because I believe that, on top of the value of pick 5, pick 54 will give us a much better chance of getting a 'project' player of value than pick 70+.

Matthew Leuenberger


Ruck

East Perth
203cms and 91kgs

etc.etc.etc.

Verdict : First round pick

You may pick him up at 17, but I doubt it going on Mojo's assessment. I don't car where Cox came from or what he was like as a teenager - I want to know that we can get a ruckmen equal to, or better than Cox. If that means giving up 17 and a excess player then so be it.

You should be very careful about posting someone else's work without permission, or at least clearly attributing it to them. The quote function on this site is an easy way to do it, and shows respect to the original author, while also helping to reduce confusion.